Modeling Structurally Variable Regions in Homologous Proteins with Rosetta

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 656-677

  Rohl, Carol A ^a   Strauss, Charlie E M ^b   Chivian, Dylan ^c   Baker, David ^c  

^a University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Comparative protein structure modeling; Fragment assembly; Homology modeling; Loop modeling; Structurally variable region

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE MODELING METHOD; CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE 4 METHOD; CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE 5 METHOD; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; ROSETTA MODEL; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STRUCTURALLY VARIABLE REGION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

INSERTION SEQUENCES; STAPHYLOCOCCUS PHAGE 3A;

EID: 2442449534     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10629     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Martí-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29:291-325.
2. Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, Sander C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2001;8:559-566.
3. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox B, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;35:82-95.
4. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
5. Tramontano A, Leplae R, Morea V. Analysis and assessment of comparative modeling predictions in CASP4 Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:22-38.
6. Sippl MJ, Lackner P, Dominguez FS, Prlíc A, Malik R, Andreeva A, Wiederstein M. Assessment of the CASP4 fold recognition category. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:55-67.
7. Jones TA, Thirup S. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J 1986;5:819-822.
8. Martin ACR, Thornton JM. Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modeling and application to antibodies. J Mol Biol 1996;263:800-815.
9. Oliva B, Bates PA, Querol E, Avilés FX, Sternberg MJE. An automated classification of the structure of protein loops. J Mol Biol 1997;266:814-830.
10. Rufino SD, Donate LE, Canard LHJ, Blundell TL. Predicting the conformation class of short and medium size loops connecting regular secondary structures: application to comparative modeling. J Mol Biol 1997;267:352-367.
11. Van Vlijmen WWT, Karplus M. PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. J Mol Biol 1997;257:975-1001.
12. Wojcik J, Mornon J-P, Chomilier J. New efficient statistical sequence-dependent structure prediction of short to medium-sized protein loops based on an exhaustive loop classification. J Mol Biol 1999;289:1469-1490.
13. Deane CM, Blundell TL. CODA: a combined algorithm for predicting the structurally variable regions of protein models. Protein Sci 2001;10:599-612.
14. Burke DF, Deane CM. Improved protein loop prediction from sequence alone. Protein Eng 2001;7:473-478.
15. Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M. Conformational sampling using high-temperature molecular dynamics. Biopolymers 1990;29:1847-1862.
16. Hornak V, Simmerling C. Generation of accurate protein loop conformations through low-barrier molecular dynamics. Proteins 2003;51:577-590.
17. Fiser A, Do RKG, Sali A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 2001;9:1753-1773.
18. Rapp CS, Friesner RA. Prediction of loop geometries using a generalized Born model of solvation effects. Proteins 1999;35:173-183.
19. Moult J, James MN. An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins by systematic search. Proteins 1986;1:146-163.
20. Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M. Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments in proteins by systematic search. Biopolymers 1987;26:137-168.
21. Deane CM, Blundell TL. A novel exhaustive search algorithm for predicting the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins. Proteins 2000;40:135-144.
22. Galaktionov S, Nikiforovich GV, Marshall GR. Ab initio modeling of small medium and large loops in proteins. Biopolymers 2001;60: 153-168.
23. DePristo MA, de Bakker, PIW, Lovell SC, Blundell TL. Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: efficient generation of accurate, representative ensembles. Proteins 2003;51:41-55.
24. Shenkin PS, Yarmush DL, Fine RM, Wang HJ, Levinthal C. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformation. I. Ensembles of random conformations for ringlike structures. Biopolymers 1987;26:2053-2085.
25. Xiang Z, Soto CS, Honig B. Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:7432-7437.
26. Go N, Scheraga HA. Ring closure and local conformation deformations of chain molecules. Macromolecules 1970;3:178-187.
27. Wedemeyer W, Scheraga HA. Exact analytical loop closure in proteins using polynomial equations. J Comp Chem 1999;20:819-844.
28. de Bakker PIW, DePristo MA, Burke DF, Blundell TL. Ab initio construction of polypeptide fragments: accuracy of loop decoy discrimination by an all-atom statistical potential ant the AMBER force field with the Generalized Born solvation model. Proteins 2003;51:21-40.
29. Mas MT, Smith KC, Yarmush DL, Aisaka K, Fine RM. Modeling the anti-cea antibody combining site by homology and conformational search. Proteins 1992;14:483-498.
30. Martin AC, Cheetham JC, Rees AR. Modeling antibody hypervariable loops: combined algorithm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86: 9268-9272.
31. Sudarsanam S, DuBose RF, March CJ, Srinivasan S. Modeling protein loops using a Φ I + 1, Ψ i dimer database. J Mol Biol 1995; 206:759-777.
32. Bonneau R, Tsai J, Ruczinski I, Chivian D, Rohl C, Strauss CEM, Baker D. Rosetta in CASP4: Progress in ab initio protein structure prediction. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:119-126.
33. Bradley P, Chivian D, Meiler J, Misura KMS, Rohl CA, Schief WR, Wedemeyer WJ, Schueler-Furman O, Murphy P, Schonbrun J, Strauss CEM, Baker D. Rosetta predictions in CASP5: successes, failures and prospects for complete automation. Proteins 2003. Forthcoming.
34. Li Z, Scheraga HA. Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:6611-6615.
35. Press WH, Teukolski SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in Fortran 77: the art of scientific computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
36. Dunbrack RL, Cohen FE. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci 1997;6:1661-1681.
37. Kuhlman B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97: 10383-10388.
38. Bowers PM, Strauss CEM, Baker D. De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data. J Biomol NMR 2000;18: 311-318.
39. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
40. Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J Mol Biol 2003;326: 1239-1259.
41. Lazaridis T, Karplus M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 1999;35:133-152.
42. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 3389-3402.
43. Holm L, Sander C. Mapping the protein universe. Science 1996;273: 595-602.
44. Chivian D, Kim DE, Malmstrom L, Bradley P, Robertson T, Murphy P, Strauss CEM, Bonneau R, Rohl CA, Baker D. Automated prediction of CASP-5 structures using the ROBETTA server. Proteins 2003. Forthcoming.
45. http://PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/CASP4.
46. Zemla A. LGA program: a method for finding 3-D similarities in protein structures. 2000; accessed at http://PredictionCenterllnl-gov/local/lga
47. Fidelis K, Stern PS, Bacon D, Moult J. Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure. Protein Eng 1994;7:953-960.
48. Shortle D, Simons KT, Baker D. Clustering of low energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998;95:11158-11162.
49. Koradi R, Billeter M, Wüthrich K. MOMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J Mol Graphics 1996; 14:51-55.
50. Kraulis P. MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1991;24: 946-950.