Evaluation of protein docking predictions using Hex 3.1 in CAPRI rounds 1 and 2

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 98-106

  Ritchie, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blind docking trial; Fast Fourier transform; Fourier correlation; OPLS potentials; Protein shape; Shape complementarity; Spherical harmonics

Indexed keywords

DOCKING PROTEIN; LIGAND; RECEPTOR;

ALGORITHM; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; EXPERIMENT; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

ALGORITHMS; ANTIBODIES; ANTIGENS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; EXOTOXINS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHOSPHOENOLPYRUVATE SUGAR PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE SYSTEM; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTEINS; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL, ALPHA-BETA;

BOVINAE; BOVINE ROTAVIRUS; LACTOBACILLUS; ROTAVIRUS;

EID: 0037683565     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10379     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Wodak SJ, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1978;124:323-342.
2. 1 subunit interface. Biopolymers 1986;25:1229-1247.
3. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: an overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002;47:409-443.
4. Janin J. Welcome to CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2002;47:257.
5. Fleury D, Daniels RS, Skehel JJ, Knossow M, Bizebard T. Structural evidence for recognition of a single epitope by two distinct antibodies. Proteins 2000;40:572-578.
6. Dixon JS. Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:198-204.
7. Vakser I. Evaluation of GRAMM low-resolution docking methodology on the hemagglutinin-antibody complex. Proteins 1997;Suppl. 1:226-230.
8. Ritchie DW, Kemp GJL. Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 2000;39:178-194.
9. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
10. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
11. Chen R, Weng Z. Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 2002;47:281-294.
12. Guéziec A, Hummel R. Exploiting triangulated surface extraction using tetrahedral decomposition. IEEE Trans Vis Comp Graph 1995;1:328-342.
13. Grant JA; Pickup BT. A Gaussian description of molecular shape. J Phys Chem 1995;99:3503-3510.
14. Fieulaine S, Morera S, Poncet S, Monedero V, Gueguen-Chaignon V, Galinier A, Janin J, Deutscher J, Nessler S. X-ray structure of HPr kinase: a bacterial protein kinase with a P-loop nucleotide-binding domain. EMBO J 2001;20:3917-3927.
15. Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Computer Graphics 1987;21:163-169.
16. Ritchie DW, Kemp GJL. Fast computation, rotation and comparison of low resolution spherical harmonic molecular surfaces. J Comp Chem 1999;20:383-395.
17. Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS potential functions for proteins: energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc 1988;110:1657-1671.
18. Pickersgill RW. A rapid method of calculating charge-charge interaction energies in proteins. Protein Eng 1988;2:247-248.
19. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial constraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779-815.
20. Liao DI, Herzberg O. Refined structures of the active Ser83→Cys and impaired Ser46→Asp histidine-containing phosphocarrier proteins. Structure 1994;2:1203-1216.
21. Herzberg O, Reddy P, Sutrina S, Saier MH, Reizer J, Kapadia G. Structure of the histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein HPr from bacillus subtilis at 2.0-Å resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2499-2503.
22. Fieulaine S, Morera S, Poncet S, Mijakovic I, Galinier A, Janin J, Deutscher J, Nessler S. X-ray structure of a bifunctional protein kinase in complex with its protein substrate HPr. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:13437-13441.
23. Papageorgiou AC, Collins CM, Gutman DM, Kline JB, O'Brien SM, Tranter HS, Acharya KR. Structural basis for the recognition of superantigen streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A (SpeA1) by MHC class II molecules and T-cell receptors. EMBO J 1995;18:9-21.
24. Fields BA, Malchiodi EL, Li H, Ysern X, Stauffacher CV, Schlievert PM, Karjalainen K, Mariuzza RA. Crystal structure of a T-cell receptor β-chain complexed with a superantigen. Nature 1996;384:188-192.
25. Bentley GA, Boulot G, Karjalainen K, Mariuzza RA. Crystal structure of the beta chain of a T cell antigen receptor. Science 1995;267:1984-1987.
26. Sundberg EJ, Li H, Liera AS, McCormick JK, Torma J, Schlievert PM, Karjalainen K, Mariuzza RA. Structures of two streptococcal superantigens bound to TCR β chains reveal diversity in the architecture of T cell signaling complexes. Structure 2002;10:687-699.
27. Desmyter A, Spinelli S, Payan F, Lauwereys M, Wyns L, Muyldermans S, Cambillau C. Three camelid VHH domains in complex with porcine pancreatic α-amylase. J Biol Chem 2002;277:23645-23650.
28. Machius M, Vértesy L, Huber R, Wiegand G. Carbohydrate and protein-based inhibitors of porcine pancreatic α-amylase; structure analysis and comparison of their binding characteristics. J Mol Biol 1996;260:409-421.
29. Mathieu M, Petitpas I, Nayaza J, Lepault J, Kohli E, Pothier P, Venkataram Prasad BV, Cohen J, Rey FA. Atomic structure of the major capsid protein of rotavirus: implications for the architecture of the virion. EMBO J 2001;20:1485-1497.
30. Sauter NK, Hanson JE, Glick GD, Brown JH, Crowthers RL, Park SJ, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Binding of influenza virus hemagglutinin to analogs of its cell-surface receptor, sialic acid: analysis by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Biochemistry 1992;31:9609-9621.
31. Harris LJ, Larson SB, Hasel KW, Day J, Greenwood A, McPherson A. The three-dimensional structure of an intact monoclonal antibody for canine lymphoma. Nature 1992;360:369-372.
32. Barbey-Martin C, Gigant B, Bizebard T, Calder LJ, Wharton SA, Skehel JJ, Knossow M. An antibody that prevents the hemagglutinin low pH fusogenic transition. Virology 2002;294:70-74.