A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota, Fungi): Identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1204-1223

  Sung, Gi Ho ^a   Sung, Jae Mo ^b   Hywel Jones, Nigel L ^c   Spatafora, Joseph W ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

^c NATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Bayesian; mtATP6; Parsimony; Partitioned Bremer support; RPB1; RPB2; Systematics

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PROTON TRANSPORTING ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA POLYMERASE II;

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENZYMOLOGY; FUNGAL GENE; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ASCOMYCOTA; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, FUNGAL; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTON-TRANSLOCATING ATPASES; PHYLOGENY; RNA POLYMERASE II; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ARTHROPODA; ASCOMYCOTA; BALANSIA; CLAVICEPS; CLAVICIPITACEAE; CORDYCEPS; EPICHLOE; FUNGI; HYPOCREACEAE; TORRUBIELLA; TUBER (TRUFFLE);

EID: 34347334174     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19 (1974) 716-723
2. Alfaro M.E., Zoller S., and Lutzoni F. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (2003) 255-266
3. Artjariyasripong S., Mitchell J.I., Hywel-Jones N.L., and Jones E.B.G. Relationships of the genus Cordyceps and related genera, based on parsimony and spectral analysis of partial 18S and 28S ribosomal gene sequences. Mycoscience 42 (2001) 503-517
4. Baker R.H., and DeSalle R. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46 (1997) 654-673
5. Baker R.H., Yu X., and DeSalle R. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9 (1998) 427-436
6. Barker F.K., and Lutzoni F. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 625-637
7. Barrett M., Donoghue M., and Sober E. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40 (1991) 486-493
8. Braum E.L., Jansen R.K., Oxelman B., Backlund M., Lantz H., and Kim K.-J. Examining basal avian divergences with mitochondrial sequences: model complexity, taxon sampling, and sequence length. Syst. Biol. 51 (1994) 614-625
9. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42 (1988) 795-803
10. Bremer K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10 (1994) 295-304
11. Bull J.J., Huelsenbeck J.P., Cunningham C.W., Swofford D.L., and Waddell P.J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 384-397
12. Castlebury L.A., Rossman A.Y., Sung G.-H., Hyten A.S., and Spatafora J.W. Multigene phylogeny reveals new lineage for Stachybotrys chartarum, the indoor air fungus. Mycol. Res. 108 (2004) 864-872
13. Chippindale P.T., and Wiens J.J. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43 (1994) 278-287
14. Cummings M.P., Handley S.A., Myers D.S., Reed D.L., Rokas A., and Winka K. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 477-487
15. Danforth B.N., Brady S.G., Sipes S.D., and Pearson A. Single-copy nuclear genes recover cretaceous-age divergences in bees. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 309-326
16. de Queiroz A. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 368-372
17. Diehl, W.W., 1950. Balansia and the Balansiae in America. Agricultural monograph No. 4. U. S. D. A. Washington.
18. Doaudy C.J., Delsuc F., Boucher Y., Doolittle W.F., and Douzery E.J.P. Comparison of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (2003) 248-254
19. Doaudy C.J., Dosay M., Shivji M.S., and Stanhope M.J. Molecular phylogenetic evidence refuting the hypothesis of Batoidea (rays and skates) as derived sharks. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26 (2003) 215-221
20. Dolphin K., Belshaw R., Orme D.L.C., and Quicke D.L.J. Noise and incongruence: interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17 (2000) 401-406
21. Dowton M., and Austin A.D. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy-The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 19-31
22. Engstrom T.N., Shaffer H.B., and McCord W.P. Multiple data sets, high homoplasy, and the phylogeny of softshell turtles (Trionychidae: Chitra). Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 693-710
23. Eriksson O. Outline of the ascomycetes-1982. Mycotaxon 15 (1982) 203-248
24. In: Erikkson O.E. (Ed). Outline of ascomycota-2006. Myconet 12 (2006) 1-82
25. Erixon P., Svennblad B., Britton T., and Oxelman B. Reliability of bayesian probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 665-673
26. Farris J.S., Källersjö M., Kluge A.G., and Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10 (1994) 315-319
27. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39 (1985) 783-791
28. Gams W., O'Donnell K., Schroers H.-J., and Christensen M. Generic classification of some more hyphomycetes with solitary conidia borne on phialides. Can. J. Bot. 76 (1998) 1570-1583
29. Gatesy J., O'Grady P., and Baker R.H. Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: Hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher-level artiodactyl taxa. Cladistics 15 (1999) 271-313
30. Gäumann, E., 1926. Vergleichende morphologie der pilze. 626 pp., illus, Jena.
31. Gernandt D.S., and Stone J.K. Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ribosomal DNA places the nematode parasite, Drechmeria coniospora, in Clavicipitaceae. Mycologia 91 (1999) 993-1000
32. Glenn A.E., Bacon C.W., Price R., and Hanlin R.T. Molecular phylogeny of Acremonium and its taxonomic implications. Mycologia 88 (1996) 369-383
33. Gontcharov A.A., Marin B., and Melkonian M. Are combined analyses better than single gene phylogenies? A case study using SSU rDNA and rbcL sequence comparisons in the Zygnematophyceae (Streptophyta). Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 (2004) 612-624
34. Graybeal A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem. Syst. Biol. 47 (1998) 9-17
35. Hibbett D.S., and Donoghue M. Analysis of character correlations among wood decay mechanisms, mating systems, and substrate ranges in homobasidiomycetes. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 215-242
36. Hillis D.M., and Bull J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 182-192
37. Hipp A., Hall J., and Systsma K. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 81-89
38. Hodge K.T. Clavicipitaceous anamorphs. In: White Jr. J.F., Bacon C.W., Hywel-Jones N.L., and Spatafora J.W. (Eds). Clavicipitalean fungi: Evolutionary biology, Chemistry, Biocontrol and Cultural impacts (2003), Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 75-123
39. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Bull J.J. A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45 (1996) 92-98
40. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Rannala B. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276 (1997) 227-232
41. Huelsenbeck J.P., and Ronquist F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17 (2001) 754-755
42. Hywel-Jones N.L. Multiples of eight in Cordyceps ascospores. Mycol. Res. 106 (2002) 2-3
43. Kauff F., and Lutzoni F. Phylogeny of the Gyalectales and Ostropales (Ascomycota, Fungi): among and within order relationships based on nuclear ribosomal RNA small and large subunits. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25 (2002) 138-156
44. Kluge A.G. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidea, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38 (1989) 7-25
45. Kluge A.G., and Wolf A.J. Cladistics: What's in a word?. Cladistics 9 (1993) 183-199
46. Kluge A.G. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics 14 (1998) 151-158
47. Kobayasi Y. Keys to the taxa of the genera Cordyceps and Torrubiella. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Jpn. 23 (1982) 329-364
48. Koepfli K.P., and Wayne R.K. Type I STS markers are more informative than cytochrome b in phylogenetic reconstruction of the Mustelidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 571-593
49. Kolaczkowski B., and Thorton J.W. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431 (2004) 980-984
50. McNeill, J.F., Barrie, F., Burdet, H.M., Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D.L., Marhold, K., Nicolson, D.H., Prado, J., Silva, P.C., Skog, J.E., Wiersema, J., Turland, N.J., 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code). Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.
51. Landvik S., Eriksson O.E., and Berbee M.L. Neolecta-a fungal dinosaur? Evidence from ß-tubulin amino acid sequences. Mycologia 93 (2001) 1151-1163
52. Larget B., and Simon D.L. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 (1999) 750-759
53. Lemmon A.R., and Moriarty E.C. The importance of proper model assumption in Bayesian pylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 265-277
54. Levasseur C., and Lapointe F.-J. War and peace in phylogenetics: a rejoinder on total evidence and consensus. Syst Biol 50 (2001) 881-891
55. Lockhart P.J., Stell M.A., Hendy M.D., and Penny D. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11 (1994) 605-612
56. Luttrel E.S. The ascostromatic ascomycetes. Mycologia 47 (1955) 511-532
57. Lutzoni F., Kauff F., Cox C.J., McLaughlin D., Celio G., Dentinger B., Padamsee M., Hibbett D., James T.Y., Baloch E., Grube M., Reeb V., Hofstetter V., Schoch C., Arnold A.E., Miadlikowska J., Spatafora J., Johnson D., Hambleton S., Crockett M., Shoemaker R., Sung G.-H., Lucking R., Lumbsch T., O'Donnell K., Binder M., Diederich P., Ertz D., Gueidan C., Hansen K., Harris R.C., Hosaka K., Lim Y.-W., Matheny B., Nishida H., Pfister D., Rogers J., Rossman A., Schmitt I., Sipman H., Stone J., Sugiyama J., Yahr R., and Vilgalys R. Assembling the fungal tree of life: progress, classification, and evolution of subcellular traits. Am. J. Bot. 91 (2004) 1446-1480
58. Maddison, D.R., Maddison, W.P., 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
59. Mitchell A., Mitter C., and Regier J.C. More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear-protein encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 202-224
60. Miyamoto M.M., and Fitch W.M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44 (1995) 64-76
61. Nygren A., and Sundberg P. Phylogeny and evolution of reproductive modes in Autolytinae (Syllidae, Annelida). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29 (2003) 235-249
62. Passamaneck Y.J., Schander C., and Halanych K.M. Investigation of molluscan phylogeny using large-subunit and small-subunit nuclear rRNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32 (2004) 25-38
63. Posada D., and Crandall K.A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14 (1998) 817-818
64. Reeb V., Lutzoni F., and Roux C. Contribution of RPB2 to multilocus phylogenetic studies of the euascomycetes (Pezizomycota, Fungi) with special emphasis on the lichen-forming Acarosporaceae and evolution of polyspory. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32 (2004) 1036-1060
65. Rehner S.A., and Samuels G.J. Molecular systematics of the Hypocreales: a teleomorph gene phylogeny and the status of their anamorphs. Can. J. Bot. 73 Suppl. 1 (1995) S816-S823
66. Rodrigo A.G., Kelly-Borges M., Bergquist P.R., and Bergquist P.L. A randomization test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. N. Z. J. Bot. 31 (1993) 257-268
67. Rogerson C.T. The hypocrealean fungi (Ascomycetes, Hypocreales). Mycologia 62 (1970) 865-910
68. Rokas A., and Carroll S.B. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (2005) 1337-1344
69. Rosenberg M.S., and Kumar S. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. PNAS 98 (2001) 10751-10756
70. Rossman A.Y., Samuels G.J., Rogers J.S., and Lowen R. Genera of Bionectriaceae, Nectriaceae and Hypocreaceae (Hypocreales, Ascomycetes). Stud. Mycol. 42 (1999) 1-238
71. Shimodaira H., and Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 (1999) 1114-1116
72. Sorenson, M.D., 1998. TreeRot, version 2. Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor.
73. Spatafora J.W., and Blackwell M. Molecular systematics of unitunicate perithecial ascomycetes: the Clavicipitales-Hypocreales connection. Mycologia 85 (1993) 912-922
74. Spatafora J.W., Volkmann-Kohlmeyer B., and Kohlmeyer J. Independent terrestrial origins of the Halosphaeriales (marine Ascomycota). Am. J. Bot. 85 (1998) 1569-1580
75. Struck T.H., Purschke G., and Halanych K.M. Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) and exploring data congruence using a partition addition bootstrap alteration (PABA) approach. Syst. Biol. 55 (2006) 1-20
76. Sullivan J. Combining data with different distributions of among-site variation. Syst. Biol. 45 (1996) 375-380
77. Sung G.-H., Spatafora J.W., Zare R., Hodge K.T., and Gams W. A revision of Verticillium sect. Prostrata. II. Phylogenetic analyses of SSU and LSU nuclear rDNA sequences from anamorphs and teleomorphs of the Clavicipitaceae. Nova Hedwigia 72 (2001) 311-328
78. Suzuki Y., Glazko G.V., and Nei M. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. PNAS 99 (2002) 16138-16143
79. Swofford, D.L., 2004. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.
80. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., and Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22 (1994) 4673-4680
81. Thornton J.W., and DeSalle R. A new method to localize and test the significance of incongruence: detecting domain shuffling in the nuclear receptor superfamily. Syst. Biol. 49 (2000) 183-201
82. Whittingham L.A., Slikas B., Winkler D.W., and Sheldon F.H. Phylogeny of the tree swallow genus, Tachycineta (Aves: Hirundinidae), by Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22 (2002) 430-441
83. Wiens J.J. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst. Biol. 47 (1998) 568-581
84. Wiens J.J. Incomplete taxa, incomplete characters, and phylogenetic accuracy: is there a missing data problem?. J. Vert. Paleontol. 23 (2003) 297-310
85. Wiens J.J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52 (2003) 528-538
86. Yoder A.D., Irwin J.A., and Payseur B.A. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50 (2001) 408-424
87. Zwickl D.J., and Hillis D.M. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51 (2002) 588-598