Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) and exploring data congruence using a partition addition bootstrap alteration (PABA) approach

Systematic Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-20

  Struck, Torsten ^a,b   Purschke, Günter ^b   Halanych, Kenneth ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

COI; Conflicting data; Fossil record; ILD; Jaw Evolution; Molecular phylogeny; rDNA; SH test

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RIBOSOME DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; JAW; PHYLOGENY; POLYCHAETA;

ANIMALS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION; JAW; PHYLOGENY; POLYCHAETA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

ANNELIDA; EUNICIDA; EUNICIDAE; LOPHOTROCHOZOA;

EID: 33644585312     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150500354910     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Barker, F. K., and F. Lutzoni. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51:625-637.
2. Barrett, M., M. J. Donoghue, and E. Sober. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
3. Bull, J. J., J. P. Huelsenbeck, C. W. Cunningham, D. L. Swofford, and P. J. Waddell. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
4. Campoy, A., and G. San Martin. 1980. Pettiboneia urciensis sp.n.: Un nouveau Dorvilleidae (Polychètes: Errantes) de la Mé diterranée. Cahiers Biol. Marine 21:201-207.
5. Carrera-Parra, L. F. 2003. Redescription of Hartmaniella tulearensis n. comb. (Amoureux, 1978) with comments on Hartmaniella sp. and affinities of the family (Polychaeta: Hartmaniellidae). J. Nat. Hist. 37:49-55.
6. Chippindale, P. T., and J. J. Wiens. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
7. Cohen, B. L., A. Gawthrop, and T. Cavaliersmith. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of brachiopods and phoronids based on nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lon. B Biol. Sci. 353:2039-2061.
8. Colbath, G. K. 1986. Jaw mineralogy in eunicean polychaetes. Micropaleaontology 32:186-189.
9. Cunningham, C. 1997a. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:733-740.
10. Cunningham, C. W. 1997b. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing and iterative procedure for chosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46:464-478.
11. Dahlgren, T. G., B. Åkesson, C. Schander, K. M. Halanych, and P. Sundberg. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the model annelid Ophryotrocha. Biol. Bull. 201:193-203.
12. Darlu, P., and G. Lecointre. 2002. When does the incongruence length difference test fail? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:432-437.
13. Dolphin, K., R. Belshaw, C. D. L. Orme, and D. L. J. Quicke. 2000. Noise and incongruence: Interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17:401-406.
14. Dowton, M., and A. D. Austin. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy - The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51:19-31.
15. Edgar, D. R. 1984. Polychaetes of the lower and middle Paleozoic: A multi-element analysis abd phylogenetic outline. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 43:255-284.
16. Ehlers, E. 1864. Die Borstenwürmer (Annelida Chaetopoda) nach systematischen und anatomischen Untersuchungen dargestellt. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
17. Ehlers, E. 1868. Die Borstenwürmer (Annelida Chaetopoda) nach systematischen und anatomischen Untersuchungen dargestellt. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
18. Eibye-Jacobsen, D., and R. M. Kristensen. 1994. A new genus and species of Dorvilleidae (Annelida, Polychaeta) from Bermuda, with a phylogenetic analysis of Dorvilleidae, Iphitimidae and Dinophilidae. Zool. Scripta 23:107-131.
19. Eriksson, M. E., C. F. Bergman, and L. Jeppsson. 2004. Silurian scolecodonts. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 131:269-300.
20. Farris, J. S., M. Kallersjo, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
21. Folmer, O., M. Black, W. Hoeh, R. Lutz, and R. Vrijenhoek. 1994. DNA primers for amplication of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse meatazoan invertebrates. Mol. Marine Biol. Biotechnol. 3:294-299.
22. Goldman, N., J. P. Anderson, and A. G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
23. Halanych, K. M. 1998. Considerations for reconstructing metazoan history: Signal, resolution, and hypothesis testing. Am. Zool. 38:929-941.
24. Hall, K. A., P. A. Hutchings, and D. J. Colgan. 2004. Further phylogenetic studies of the Polychaeta using 18S rDNA sequence data. J. Marine Biol. Assoc. UK 84:949-960.
25. Hartman, O. 1944. Polychaetous Annelids. Part V. Eunicea. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions 10:1-237.
26. Hilbig, B. 1995. Family Oenonidae Kinberg, 1865. Pages 315-339 in Taxonomic atlas of the Benthic Fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel, Volume 5: The Annelida. Part 2. Polychaeta: Phyllodocida (Syllidae and Scale-bearing families), Amphinomida and Eunicida. (J. A. Blake, B. Hilbig, and P. H. Scott, eds.). Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California.
27. Hillis, D. M., and M. T. Dixon. 1991. Ribosomal DNA: Molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q. Rev. Biol. 66:411-453.
28. Hints, O., M. E. Eriksson, A. E. S. Högström, P. Kraft, and O. Lehnert. 2004. Chapter 23. Worms, worm-like and sclerite-bearing taxa. Pages 223-230 in The Great Ordovician bio-diversification event (B. D. Webby, F. Paris, M. L. Droser, and I. G. Percival, eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.
29. Hipp, A., J. Hall, and K. Sytsma. 2004. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: Revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 53:81-89.
30. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46:69-74.
31. Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. J. Bull, and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
32. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, R. Miller, and F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:673-688.
33. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
34. Jördens, J., T. H. Struck, and G. Purschke. 2004. Phylogenetic inference of Parergodrilidae and Hrabeiella periglandulata (" Polychaeta", Annelida) based on sequences of the CO I, 18S- and 28S-rDNA. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 42:270-280.
35. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1966. Polychaete jaw apparatus from the Ordovician and Silurian of Poland and a comparison with modern forms. Acta Palaeontol. Polon. 16:1-152.
36. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
37. Kluge, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
38. Kojima, S., R. Segawa, J. Hashimoto, and S. Ohta. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of vestimentiferans collected around Japan, revealed by the nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial DNA. Marine Biol. 127:507-513.
39. Kozur, H. 1970. Zur Klassifikation und phylogenetischen Entwicklung der fossilen Phyllodocida und Eunicida (Polychaeta). Freiburger Forschungshefte Serie C 260:35-81.
40. Lu, H., and K. Fauchald. 2000. Ophryotrochae lipscombae, a new species and a possible connection between ctenognath and labidognath-prionognath eunicean worms (Polychaeta). Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington 113:486-492.
41. Mallatt, J., and C. J. Winchell. 2002. Testing the new animal phylogeny: First use of combined large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene sequences to classify the protostomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:289-301.
42. Mason-Gamer, R. J., and E. Kellogg. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the Tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45:524-545.
43. McHugh, D. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the Annelida. Can. J. Zool. 78:1873-1884.
44. Miyamoto, M. M., and W. M. Fitch. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
45. Nelson, K., and C. R. Fisher. 2000. Speciation of the bacterial symbionts of deep-sea vestimentiferan tube worms. Symbiosis 28:1-15
46. Nicholas, K. B., and H. B. J. Nicholas. 1997. GeneDoc: A tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Distributed by the authors.
47. Nygren, A., and P. Sundberg. 2003. Phylogeny and evolution of reproductive modes in Autolytinae (Syllidae, Annelida). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29:235-249.
48. Nylander, J. A. A. 2002. MrModelTest., version 1.1. http://morphbank.ebc. uu.se/MR.BAYES.
49. Olmstead, R. G., and J. A. Sweere. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:467-481.
50. Orensanz, J. M. 1990. The eunicemorph polychaete annelids from Antarctic and Subantarctic seas. With addenda to the Eunicemorpha of Argentina, Chile, New Zealand, Australia, and the southern Indian Ocean. Biol. Antarctic Seas 21:1-183.
51. Palumbi, S., A. Martin, S. Romano, W. O. McMillan, L. Stice, and G. Grabowski. 1991. The simple fools guide to PCR, version II. University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
52. Passamaneck, Y. J., C. Schander, and K. M. Halanych. 2004. Investigation of molluscan phylogeny using large-subunit and small-subunit nuclear rRNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenet. Evol. 32:25-38.
53. Paxton, H. 1986. Generic revision and relationships of the family Onuphidae (Annelida: Polychaeta). Records Aust. Mus. 38:1-74.
54. Paxton, H. 2004. Jaw growth and replacement in Ophryotrocha labronica (Polychaeta, Dorvilleidae). Zoomorphology 123:147-154.
55. Peterson, K. J., and D. J. Eernisse. 2001. Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: Inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences. Evol. Dev. 3:170-205.
56. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. ModelTest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
57. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Syst. Biol. 50:580-601.
58. Purschke, G. 2002. On the ground pattern of Annelida. Organ., Divers. Evol. 2:181-196.
59. Purschke, G., and A. B. Tzetlin. 1996. Dorsolateral ciliary folds in the polychaete foregut: Structure, prevalence and phylogenetic significance. Acta Zool. 77:33-49.
60. Rambaut, A., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. Seq-Gen: An application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
61. Raup, D. M., and J. J. Sepkoski. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science 215:1501-1503.
62. Rohde, R. A., and R. A. Muller. 2005. Cycles in fossil diversity. Nature 434:208-210.
63. Rouse, G. W. 2001. A cladistic analysis of Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914 (Polychaeta, Annelida): Formerly the phyla Pogonophora and Vestimentifera. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 132:55-80.
64. Rouse, G. W., and K. Fauchald. 1997. Cladistics and polychaetes. Zool. Scripta 26:139-204.
65. Rouse, G. W., and F. Pleijel. 2001. Polychaetes. University Press, Oxford.
66. Shimodaira, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51:492-508.
67. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
68. Strimmer, K., and A. Rambaut. 2002. Inferring confidence sets of possibly misspecified gene trees. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. B Biol. 269:137-142.
69. Struck, T. H., R. Hessling, and G. Purschke. 2002a. The phylogenetic position of the Aeolosomatidae and Parergodrilidae, two enigmatic oligochaete-like taxa of the "Polychaeta," based on molecular data from 18SrDNA sequences. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 40:155-163.
70. Struck, T. H., W. Westheide, and G. Purschke. 2002b. Progenesis in Eunicida ("Polychaeta," Annelida) - Separate evolutionary events? Evidence from molecular data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25:190-199.
71. Suzuki, Y., G. V. Glazko, and M. Nei. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16138-16143.
72. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
73. Szaniawski, H. 1996. Chapter 12. Scolecodonts. Pages 337-354 in Palynology: Principles and apllications (J. Jansonius and D. C. McGregor, eds.). American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Salt Lake City, Utah.
74. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
75. Tzetlin, A. B. 1980. Ophryotrocha schubravyi sp.n. and the problem of the evolution of the jaw apparatuses of Eunicemorpha (Polychaeta). (Translated from Russian). Zoologiceskij Zhurnal 54:665-676.
76. Underhay, N. K., and H. S. Williams. 1995. Lower Ordovician scolecodonts from the Cow Head Group, western Newfoundland. Can. J. Earth Sci. 32:895-901.
77. Westheide, W. 1965. Parapodrilus psammophilus nov. gen. nov. spec., eine neue Polychaeten-Gattung aus dem Mesopsammal der Nordsee. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 12:207-213.
78. Westheide, W., and N. W. Riser. 1983. Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the neotenic interstitial polychaete Apodotrocha progenerans n.gen.,n.sp. (Annelida). Zoomorphology 103:67-87.
79. Yoder, A. D., J. A. Irwin, and B. A. Payseur. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50:408-424.