Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian Drosophilids

Systematic Biology

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 654-673

  Baker, Richard H ^a,b   Desalle, Rob ^a  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hawaiian Drosophila; Partitioned Bremer support; Process partitions; Simultaneous analysis

Indexed keywords

ANTOPOCERUS; DROSOPHILIDAE; HAWAIIA;

DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CODON; DROSOPHILA; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CODON; DNA; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DROSOPHILA; HAWAII; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0031371067     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/46.4.654     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. ARNASON, U., AND A. GULLBERG. 1994. Relationship of baleen whales established by cytochrome b gene sequence comparison. Nature 367:726-728.
2. BARRETT, M., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND E. SOBER. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
3. BEVERLEY, S. M., AND A. C. WILSON. 1985. Ancient origin for Hawaiian Drosophilinae inferred from protein comparisons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 4753-4757.
4. BREMER, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
5. BREMER, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
6. BROWER, A. V. Z. 1994. Phylogeny of Heliconius butterflies inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:159-174.
7. BROWER, A. V. Z., AND R. DESALLE. 1994. Practical and theoretical considerations for choice of a DNA sequence region in insect molecular systematics, with a short review of published studies using nuclear gene regions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:702-716.
8. BROWER, A. V. Z., R. DESALLE, AND A. VOGLER. 1996. Gene trees, species trees, and systematics: A cladistic perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:423-450.
9. BROWER, A. V. Z., AND V. SCHAWAROCH. 1996. Three steps of homology assessment. Cladistics 12:265-272.
10. BROWN, J. M., O. PELLMYR, J. N. THOMPSON, AND R. G. HARRISON. 1994. Phylogeny of Greya (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae), based on nucleotide sequence variation in mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and II: Congruence with morphological data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:128-141.
11. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
12. CARSON, H. L. 1970. Chromosome tracers of the origin of species. Science 168:1414-1418.
13. CARSON, H. L. 1982. Evolution of Drosophila on the newer Hawaiian volcanoes. Heredity 48:3-25.
14. CARSON, H. L. 1987. Tracing ancestry with chromosomal sequences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:203-207.
15. CHIPPINDALE, P. T., AND J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
16. CRACRAFT, J., AND D. P. MINDELL. 1989. The early history of modern birds: A comparison of molecular and morphological evidence. Pages 389-403 in The hierarchy of life. Molecules and morphology in phylogenetic analysis (B. Fernhom, K. Bremer, and H. Jörnvall, eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
17. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
18. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
19. DESALLE, R. 1992. The origin and possible time of divergence of the Hawaiian Drosophilidae: Evidence from DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:905-916.
20. DESALLE, R. 1995. Molecular approaches to biogeographic analysis of Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Pages 72-89 in Hawaiian biogeography: Evolution of a hot spot archipelago (W. L. Wagner and V. A. Funk, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
21. DESALLE, R., T. FREEDMAN, E. M. PRAGER, AND A. C. WILSON. 1987. Tempo and mode of sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 26:157-164.
22. DESALLE, R., AND L. V. GIDDINGS. 1986. Discordance of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies in Hawaiian Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 6902-6906.
23. DESALLE, R., A. K. WILLIAMS, AND M. GEORGE. 1993. Isolation and characterization of animal mitochondrial DNA. Methods Enzymol. 224:176-204.
24. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144-163.
25. EERNISSE, D. J., AND A. G. KLUGE. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1170-1195.
26. FARRIS, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Pages 7-36 in Advances in cladistics, Volume 2 (N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk, eds.). Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
27. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1994. Testing significance of congruence. Cladistics 10:315-320.
28. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
29. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
30. FRIEDLANDER, T. P., J. C. REGIER, AND C. MITTER. 1994. Phylogenetic information content of five nuclear gene sequences in animals: Initial assessment of character sets from concordance and divergence studies. Syst. Biol. 43:511-525.
31. GATESY, J., R. DESALLE, AND W. C. WHEELER. 1994. Alignment-ambiguous nucleotide sites and the exclusion of data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:152-157.
32. GRAYBEAL, A. 1994. Evaluating the phylogenetic utility of genes: A search for genes informative about deep divergences among vertebrates. Syst. Biol. 43: 174-193.
33. GRIMALDI, D. A. 1990. A phylogenetic, revised classification of genera in the Drosophilidae (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 197:1-39.
34. HEED, W. B. 1971. Host plant specificity and speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila. Taxon 20:115-121.
35. HILLIS, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 23-42.
36. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND J. J. BULL. 1996. A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45:92-98.
37. HUELSENBECK, J. P., J. J. BULL, AND C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:152-158.
38. HUNT, J. A., AND H. L. CARSON. 1983. Evolutionary relationships of four species of Hawaiian Drosophila as measured by DNA reassociation. Genetics 104: 353-364.
39. KAMBYSELLIS, M. P., K.-F. HO, E. M. CRADDOCK, F. PIANO, M. PARISI, AND J. COHEN. 1995. Pattern of ecological shifts in the diversification of Hawaiian Drosophila inferred from a molecular phylogeny. Curr. Biol. 5:1129-1139.
40. KANESHIRO, K. Y., AND C. R. B. BOAKE. 1987. Sexual selection and speciation: Issues raised by Hawaiian Drosophila. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:207-212.
41. KLUGE, A. J. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
42. KLUGE, A. G., AND A. J. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9:183-199.
43. LANYON, S. M. 1993. Phylogenetic frameworks: Towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49:45-61.
44. LARA, M. C., J. L. PATTON, AND M. N. F. DA SILVA. 1996. The simultaneous diversification of South American echimyid rodents (Hystricognathi) based on complete cytochrome b sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:403-413.
45. LARSON, A. 1994. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic sytematics. Pages 371-390 in Molecular ecology and evolution: Approaches and applications (B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds.). Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
46. MASON-GAMER, R. J., AND E. A. KELLOGG. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45: 524-545.
47. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30:351-370.
48. MIYAMOTO, M. M. 1985. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1:186-189.
49. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76.
50. NIXON, K. C., AND J. M. CARPENTER. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12:221-241.
51. NORMARK, B. B., A. R. MCCUNE, AND R. G. HARRISON. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships of neopterygian fishes, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8:819-834.
52. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solenaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:467-481.
53. POE, S. 1996. Data set incongruence and the phylogeny of crocodilians. Syst. Biol. 45:393-114.
54. RUSSO, C. A. M., N. TAKEZARI, AND M. NEI. 1996. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:525-536.
55. SIDDALL, M. E. 1995. ARNIE.EXE. Random Cladistics software package. Software available via ftp:// zoo.toronto.edu/pub.
56. SIMON, C., F. FRATI, A. BECKENBACH, B. CRESPI, H. LIU, AND P. FLOOK. 1994. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:651-701.
57. SPIETH, H. T. 1966 Courtship behavior of endemic Hawaiian Drosophila. Univ. Tex. Publ. 6615:245-313.
58. STALKER, H. D. 1972. Intergroup phytogenies in Drosophila as determined by comparison of salivary banding patterns. Genetics 82:323-344.
59. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? Pages 295-333 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
60. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
61. TAKADA, H. 1966. Male genitalia of some Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Univ. Tex. Publ. 6615:315-333.
62. THOMAS, R. H., AND J. A. HUNT. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships in Drosophila: A conflict between molecular and morphological data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 362-374.
63. THROCKMORTON, L. H. 1966. The relationships of the endemic Hawaiian Drosophilidae. Univ. Tex. Publ. 6615:335-396.
64. VOGLER, A. P., R. DESALLE, T. ASSMANN, C. B. KNISLEY, AND T. D. SCHULTZ. 1993. Molecular population genetics of the endangered tiger beetle, Cicindela dorsalis (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86:142-152.
65. WHEELER, W. C., AND D. S. GLADSTEIN. 1994. MALIGN: A multiple sequence alignment program. J. Hered. 85:417-418.