Corroboration among data sets in simultaneous analysis: Hidden support for phylogenetic relationships among higher level artiodactyl taxa

Cladistics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 271-313

  Gatesy, John ^a   O'Grady, Patrick ^a   Baker, Richard H ^b  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIODACTYLA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0032805771     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/clad.1999.0111     Document Type: Editorial

References (91)

1. Allard M., Carpenter J. On weighting and congruence. Cladistics. 12:1996;183-198.
2. Baker R., DeSalle R. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;654-673.
3. Baker R., Yu X., DeSalle R. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:1998;427-436.
4. Barrett M., Donoghue M., Sober E. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:1991;486-493.
5. Bremer K. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angio-sperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution. 42:1988;795-803.
6. Bremer K. Combinable component consensus. Cladistics. 6:1990;369-372.
7. Bremer K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics. 10:1994;295-304.
8. Brower A., DeSalle R., Vogler A. Gene trees, species trees, and systematics: A cladistic perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:1996;423-450.
9. Bull J., Huelsenbeck J., Cunningham C., Swofford D., Waddell P. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;384-397.
10. Cannatella D., Hillis D., Chippindale P., Weigt L., Rand A., Ryan M. Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;311-335.
11. Chippindale P., Wiens J. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;278-287.
12. Clark J., Maddison W., Kidwell M. Phylogenetic analysis supports horizontal transfer of P transposable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;40-50.
13. Collins T., Wimberger P., Naylor G. Compositional bias, character-state bias, and character-state reconstruction using parsimony. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;482-496.
14. Cunningham C. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;733-740.
15. Davis J. Character removal as a means for assessing stability of clades. Cladistics. 9:1993;201-210.
16. Davis J., Simmons M., Stevenson D., Wendel J. Data decisiveness, data quality, and incongruence in phylogenetic analysis: An example from the monocotyledons using mitochondrial atp A sequences. Syst. Biol. 47:1998;282-310.
17. deQueiroz A., Donoghue M., Kim J. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:1995;657-681.
18. DeSalle R., Brower A. Process partitions, congruence, and the independence of characters: Inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;751-764.
19. Eernisse D., Kluge A. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;1170-1195.
20. Farris J. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics. 5:1989;417-419.
21. Farris J. Combinability vs. congruence - abstract. Cladistics. 13:1997;170.
22. Farris J., Källersjö M., Kluge A., Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10:1994a;315-319.
23. Farris J., Källersjö M., Kluge A., Bult C. Permutations. Cladistics. 10:1994b;65-76.
24. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:1978;401-410.
25. Gatesy J. More support for a Cetacea/Hippopotamidae clade: The blood-clotting protein gene γ-fibrinogen. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;537-543.
26. Gatesy J. Molecular evidence for the phylogenetic affinities of Cetacea. Thewissen J. Advances in Vertebrate Paleobiology. 1998;63-111 Plenum, New York.
27. Gatesy, J, and, O'Grady, P. (in prep.), Character congruence and incongruence at the base of Artiodactyla: An analysis of ten data sets.
28. Gatesy J., Hayashi C., Cronin M., Arctander P. Evidence from milk casein genes that cetaceans are close relatives of hippopotamid artiodactyls. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;954-963.
29. Geisler J., O'Leary M. A phylogeny of Cetacea, Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla, and archaic ungulates: The morphological evidence. J. Vert. Paleo. Abstracts. 17:1997;48A.
30. Gentry A., Hooker J. The phylogeny of the Artiodactyla. Benton M. The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. 2:1988;235-272 Clarendon Press, Oxford.
31. Gilbert D. SeqApp. 1992;Indiana University, Bloomington.
32. Goloboff P. Homoplasy and the choice among cladograms. 1991. Cladistics. 7:1991;215-232.
33. Goloboff P. NONA. 1993a;American Museum of Natural History, New York.
34. Goloboff P. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics. 9:1993b;83-91.
35. Goodman M., Czelusniak J., Moore G., Romero A., Matsuda G. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool. 28:1979;132-163.
36. Graur D., Higgins D. Molecular evidence for the inclusion of cetaceans within the order Artiodactyla. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;357-364.
37. Irwin D., Arnason U. Cytochrome b gene of marine mammals: Phylogeny and evolution. J. Mammal. Evol. 2:1994;37-55.
38. Kluge A. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:1989;7-25.
39. Kluge A. Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics. 13:1997;81-96.
40. Kluge A., Farris J. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18:1969;1-32.
41. Kluge A., Wolf A. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics. 9:1993;183-199.
42. Larson A. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. Schierwater B., Streit B., Wagner G., DeSalle R. Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. 1994;371-390 Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.
43. Maddison D. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40:1991;315-328.
44. Maddison W., Maddison D. MacClade 3.03. 1992;Sinauer, Sunderland.
45. Margush T., McMorris F. Consensus n-trees. Bull. Math. Biosci. 43:1981;239-244.
46. Mickevich M., Farris J. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30:1981;351-370.
47. Milinkovitch M., Orti G., Meyer A. Revised phylogeny of whales suggested by mt ribosomal DNA sequences. Nature. 361:1993;346-348.
48. Milinkovitch M., Meyer A., Powell J. Phylogeny of all major groups of cetaceans based on DNA sequences from three mt genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;939-948.
49. Milinkovitch M., Orti G., Meyer A. Novel phylogeny of whales revisited but not revised. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;518-520.
50. Milinkovitch M., LeDuc R., Adachi J., Farnir F., Georges M., Hasegawa M. Effects of character weighting and species sampling on phylogeny reconstruction: A case study based on DNA sequence data in cetaceans. Genetics. 144:1996;1817-1833.
51. Milinkovitch M., Bérubé M., Palsbøll P. Cetaceans are highly derived artiodactyls. Thewissen J. Advances in Vertebrate Paleobiology. 1998;113-131 Plenum, New York.
52. Miyamoto M. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics. 1:1985;186-189.
53. Miyamoto M. A congruence study of molecular and morphological data for eutherian mammals. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:1996;373-390.
54. Miyamoto M., Goodman M. Biomolecular systematics of eutherian mammals: Phylogenetic patterns and classification. Syst. Zool. 35:1986;230-240.
55. Miyamoto M., Fitch W. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;64-76.
56. Montgelard C., Catzeflis F., Douzery E. Phylogenetic relationships of artiodactyls and cetaceans as deduced from the comparison of cytochrome b and 12S rRNA mt sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1997;550-559.
57. Nelson G. Cladistic analysis and synthesis: Principles and definitions, with a historical note on Adanson's Familles des Plantes (1763-1764). Syst. Zool. 28:1979;1-21.
58. Nixon K., Carpenter J. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics. 12:1996;221-241.
59. Novacek M. Higher mammal phylogeny: The morphological-molecular synthesis. Fernholm B., Bremer K., Jornvall H. The Hierarchy of Life. 1989;421-435 Elsevier Science Publishers.
60. Novacek M. Mammalian phylogeny: Shaking the tree. Nature. 356:1992;121-125.
61. Olmstead R., Sweere J. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: An empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;467-481.
62. Pamilo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:1988;568-583.
63. Philippe H., Douzery E. The pitfalls of molecular phylogeny based on four species, as illustrated by the Cetacea/Artiodactyla relationships. J. Mammal. Evol. 2:1994;133-152.
64. Pickford M. On the origins of Hippopotamidae together with descriptions of two new species, a new genus, and a new subfamily from the Miocene of Kenya. Geobios. 16:1983;193-217.
65. Prager E., Wilson A. Ancient origin of lactalbumin from lysozyme: Analysis of DNA and amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 27:1988;326-335.
66. Prothero D. Ungulate phylogeny: Molecular versus morphological evidence. Szalay F., Novacek M., McKenna M. Mammal Phylogeny. II:1993;173-181 Springer-Verlag, New York.
67. Prothero D., Manning E., Fischer M. The phylogeny of the ungulates. Benton M. The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods. 2:1988;201-234 Clarendon, Press, Oxford.
68. Rozas J., Aguade M. Gene conversion is involved in the transfer of genetic information between naturally occurring inversions of Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;11517-11521.
69. Sarich V. Mammalian systematics: Twenty-five years among their albumins and transferrins. Szalay F., Novacek M., McKenna M. Mammal Phylogeny. II:1993;103-114 Springer-Verlag, New York.
70. Schuh R., Polhemus J. Analysis of taxonomic congruence among morphological, ecological, and biogeographic data sets for the Leptopodomorpha (Hemiptera). Syst. Zool. 30:1980;309-325.
71. Shaffer H., Meylan P., McKnight M. Tests of turtle phylogeny: Molecular, morphological, and paleontological approaches. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;235-268.
72. Shimamura M., Yasue H., Ohahima K., Abe H., Kato H., Kishiro T., Goto M., Munechika I., Okada N. Molecular evidence from retroposons that whales form a clade within even-toed ungulates. Nature. 388:1997;666-670.
73. Shoshani J. Mammalian phylogeny: Comparison of morphological and molecular results. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:1986;222-242.
74. Siddall M. Prior agreement: Arbitration or arbitrary. Syst Biol. 46:1997;765-769.
75. Siddall M., Kluge A. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics. 13:1997;313-336.
76. Stanhope M., Smith M., Waddell V., Porter C., Shivji M., Goodman M. Mammalian evolution and the interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP) gene: Convincing evidence for several superordinal clades. J. Mol. Evol. 43:1996;83-92.
77. Stewart C., Schilling J., Wilson A. Adaptive evolution in the stomach lysozymes of foregut fermenters. Nature. 330:1987;401-404.
78. Sullivan J. Combining data with different distributions of among-site rate variation. Syst. Biol. 45:1996;375-380.
79. Swofford D. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony. 1993;Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
80. Swofford, D. (in prep.). "PAUP*."
81. Templeton A. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution. 37:1983;221-244.
82. Theodor J. Postcranial evolution in early non-ruminant artiodactyls. J. Vert. Paleo. Abstracts. 16:1996;15A.
83. Theodor J. Why do molecules and morphology conflict? Examination of the artiodactyl-cetacean relationship. J. Vert. Paleo. Abstracts. 17:1997;80A.
84. Thewissen J. Phylogenetic aspects of cetacean origins: A morphological perspective. J. Mammal. Evol. 2:1994;157-184.
85. Webb S., Taylor B. The phylogeny of the hornless ruminants and a description of the cranium of Archaeomeryx. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat Hist. 167:1980;117-158.
86. Wheeler W. Extinction, sampling, and molecular data. Novacek M., Wheeler Q. Extinction and Phylogeny. 1992;205-215 Columbian University Press, New York.
87. Wheeler W., Gladstein D. MALIGN. 1994;American Museum of Natural History, New York.
88. Wheeler W., Cartwright P., Hayashi C. Arthropod phylogeny: A combined approach. Cladistics. 9:1993;1-39.
89. Whiting M., Carpenter J., Wheeler Q., Wheeler W. The Strepsiptera problem: Phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;1-68.
90. Xu X., Janke A., Arnason U. The complete mt DNA sequence of the greater Indian rhinoceros, Rhinoceros unicornis, and the phylogenetic relationship among Carnivora, Perissodactyla, and Artiodactyla (+ Cetacea). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;1167-1173.
91. Zardoya R., Meyer A. Phylogenetic performance of mt protein-coding genes in resolving relationships among vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;933-942.