A New Method to localize and test the significance of incongruence: Detecting domain shuffling in the nuclear receptor superfamily

Systematic Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 183-201

  Thornton, Joseph W ^a   DeSalle, Rob ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Character partitions; Exon shuffling; Gene family evolution; Incongruence; Molecular evolution; Nuclear receptors

Indexed keywords

METAZOA;

CELL RECEPTOR; DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANIMALS; DNA; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0034350428     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.183     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. AGARWAL, M. K. 1993. Receptors for mammalian steroid hormones in microbes and plants. FEBS Lett. 322:207-10.
2. AMERO, S. A., R. H. KRETSINGER, N. D. MONCRIEF, K. R. YAMAMOTO, AND W. R. PEARSON. 1992. The origin of nuclear receptor proteins: A single precursor distinct from other transcription factors. Mol. Endocrinol. 6:3-7.
3. BAKER, R. H., AND R. DESALLE. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosopholids. Syst. Biol. 46:654-673.
4. BEATO, M., P. HERRLICH, AND G. SCHUTZ. 1995. Steroid hormone receptors: Many actors in search of a plot. Cell 83:851-857.
5. BREMER, K. 1995. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
6. BRUNT, S. A., R. RIEHL, AND J. C. SILVER. 1990. Steroid hormone regulation of the Achyla ambisexualis 85-kD heat shock protein, a component of the achyla steroid receptor complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:273-281.
7. CANNATTELLA, D. C., D. M. HILLIS, P. T. CHIPPINDALE, L. WEIGT, A. S. RAND, AND M. J. RYAN. 1998. Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group with an examination of data incongruence. Syst. Biol. 37:311-335.
8. DELWICHE, C. F., AND J. D. PALMER. 1996. Rampant horizontal transfer and duplication of RUBISCO genes in eubacteria and plastids. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 873-882.
9. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
10. DESALLE, R., AND A. V. Z. BROWER. 1997. Process partitions, congruence and the independence of characters: Inferring relationships among closely related Hawaiian Drosophila from multiple gene regions. Syst. Biol. 46:751-764.
11. DETERA-WADLEIGH S. D., AND T. G. FANNING. 1994. Phylogeny of the steroid receptor superfamily. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:192-205.
12. EERNISSE, D. J., AND A. G. KLUGE. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote morphology inferred from fossils, molecules and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:11170-1195.
13. ERIKSSON, T. 1996. Auto-Decay. Software and documentation, version 2.9.5. Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
14. ESCRIVA, H., R. SAFI, C. HANNI, M. C. LANGLOIS, P. SAUMITOU-LAPRADE, D. STEHELIN, A. CAPRON, R. PIERCE, AND V. LAUDET. 1997. Ligand binding was acquired during evolution of nuclear receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:6803-6808.
15. EVANS, R. M. 1988. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 240:889-895.
16. FARRIS, J. S., M. KALLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
17. GOLDING, G. B., AND A. M. DEAN. 1998. The structural basis of molecular adaptation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:355-369.
18. GRONEMEYER, H., AND V. LAUDET. 1995. Transcription factors 3: Nuclear receptors. Protein Profiles 2:1173-1351.
19. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND J. J. BULL. 1996. A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45:92-98.
20. KLUGE, A. G. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae: Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25.
21. KLUGE, A. G. 1998. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: Cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics 14:151-158.
22. KLUGE, A. G., AND A. J. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9:183-199.
23. LARSON, A. 1994. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. Pages 371-390 in:-Molecular ecology and evolution: Approaches and applications (B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds.). Birhauswer Verlag, Basil, Switzerland.
24. LAUDET, V. 1997. Evolution of the nuclear receptor superfamily: Early diversification from an ancestral orphan receptor. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 19:207-226.
25. LAUDET, V., C. HANNI, J. COLL, F. CATZEFLIS, AND D. STEHELIN. 1992. Evolution of the nuclear receptor gene superfamily. EMBO J. 11:1003-1013.
26. LI, W-H. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
27. MANGLESDORF, D. J., AND R. M. EVANS. 1995. The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell 83:841-850.
28. MANGLESDORF, D. J., C. S. THUMMEL, M. BEATO, P. HERRLICH, G. SCHUTZ, K. UMESONO, B. BLUMBERG, P. KASTNER, M. MARK, P. CHAMBON, AND R. M. EVANS. 1995. The nuclear receptor superfamily: The second decade. Cell 83:835-839.
29. MICKEVICH, M. F., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30:351-370.
30. MIYAMOTO, M. 1996. A congruence study of molecular and morphological data for eutherian mammals. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:373-390.
31. MOORE, D. D. 1990. Diversity and unity in the nuclear receptors: A terpenoid receptor superfamily. New Biol. 2:100-105.
32. NIXON, K. C., AND J. M. CARPENTER. 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12:221-241.
33. PETTIGREW, J. D. 1994. Flying DNA. Curr. Biol. 4:277-280.
34. POE, S. 1996. Data set incongruence and the phylogeny of crocodilians. Syst. Biol. 45:393-414.
35. RIESEBERG, L. H., AND N. C. ELLSTRAND. 1993. What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 12:213-241.
36. SWOFFORD, D. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), 4.0 beta version. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
37. THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS, AND T. J. GIBSON. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
38. THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS, AND T. J. GIBSON. 1997. CLUSTAL X multiple sequence alignment program version 1.63b. European Molecular Biology Organization, Hamburg, Germany.
39. THORNTON, J., AND R. DESALLE. 1997. Molecular systematics of the nuclear receptors. Proc. EMBO Workshop, Struct. Funct. Nucl. Recept 1:71 (Abstr.). Heidelberg: European Molecular Biology Organization.
40. THORNTON, J. W., AND D. B. KELLY. 1998. Evolution of the androgen receptor: Structure-function implications. Bioessays 20:860-869.
41. THUMMEL, C. S. 1995. From embryogenesis to metamorphosis: Regulation and function of Drosophila nuclear receptor superfamily members. Cell 83: 871-877.
42. WHEELER, W. C., J. GATESY, AND R. DESALLE. 1995. Elision: A method for accommodating multiple molecular sequence alignments with alignment-ambiguous sites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:1-9.
43. WILSON, T. E., R. E. PAULS, K. A. PADGETT, AND J. MILBRANDT. 1992. Participation of non-zinc finger residues in DNA binding by two nuclear orphan receptors. Science 256:107-110.
44. WURTZ, J. M., W. BOURGUET, J. P. RENAUD, V. VIVAT, P. CHAMBON, D. MORAS, AND H. GRONEMEYER. 1996. A canonical structure for the ligand-binding domain of nuclear receptors. Nature Struct. Biol. 3:87-94.
45. YAMAMOTO, K. R. 1985. Steroid receptor regulated transcription of specific genes and gene networks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 19:209-252.