Combining data with different distributions of among-site rate variation

Systematic Biology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 375-380

  Sullivan, Jack ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039466725     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/45.3.375     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. AVISE, J. C., M. H. SMITH, AND R. K. SELANDER. 1979. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. VII. Geographic variation in members of the truei and maniculatus species groups. J. Mammal. 60:177-192.
2. AVISE, J. C., M. H. SMITH, R. K. SELANDER, T. E. LAWLOR, AND P. R. KAMSEY. 1974. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. V. Insular and mainland species of the subgenus Haplomylomys. Syst. Zool. 23:226-238.
3. BARRETT, M., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND E. SOBER. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-493.
4. BULL, J. J., J. P. HUELSENBECK, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, D. L. SWOFFORD, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
5. CHIPPINDALE, P. T., AND J. J. WIENS. 1994. Weighting, partitioning and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-287.
6. DE QUEIROZ, A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-372.
7. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE, AND J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
8. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
9. HUELSENBECK, J. P., D. L. SWOFFORD, C. W. CUNNINGHAM, J. J. BULL, AND P. J. WADDELL. 1994. Is character weighting a panacea for the problem of data heterogeneity in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Biol. 43:288-291.
10. KOCHER, T. D., AND A. C. WILSON. 1991. Sequence evolution of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees: Control region and protein coding region. Pages 391-413 in Evolution of life: Fossils, molecules, and culture (S. Osawa and T. Honjo, eds.). Springer, Tokyo.
11. MIYAMOTO, M. M., M. W. ALLARD, R. M. ADKINS, L. L. JANACEK, AND R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1994. A congruence test of reliability using linked mitochondrial DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 43:236-249.
12. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND J. CRACRAFT. 1991. Phylogenetic inference, DNA sequence analysis, and the future of molecular systematics. Pages 3-17 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
13. SMITH, S. A. 1990. Cytosystematic evidence against monophyly of the Peromyscus boylii species group (Rodentia: Cricetidae). J. Mammal. 71:654-667.
14. STANGL, F. B., AND R. J. BAKER. 1984. Evolutionary relationships in Peromyscus: Congruence among chromosomal, genic, and classical data sets. J. Mammal. 65:643-654.
15. SULLIVAN, J., K. E. HOLSINGER, AND C. SIMON. 1995. Among-site rate variation and phylogenetic analysis of 12S rRNA in sigmodontine rodents. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:988-1001.
16. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1991. When are phytogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? Pages 295-333 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
17. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1996. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
18. UZZELL, T., AND K. W. CORBIN. 1971. Fitting discrete distributions to evolutionary events. Science 172: 1089-1096.
19. YANG, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39: 306-314.
20. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, AND A. FRIDAY. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:316-324.
21. YANG, Z., I. J. LAUDER, AND H. J. LIN. 1995. Molecular evolution of the hepatitus B virus genome. J. Mol. Evol. 41:587-596.