Total Evidence Or Taxonomic Congruence: Cladistics Or Consensus Classification

Cladistics

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 151-158

  Kluge, Arnold G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000590136     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00328.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barrett M., Donoghue M. J., Sober E. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:1991;486-493.
2. Bremer K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics. 10:1994;295-304.
3. Bull J. J., Huelsenbeck J. P., Cunningham C. W., Swofford D. L., Waddell P. J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;384-397.
4. Chippindale P. T., Wiens J. J. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;278-287.
5. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species. 1859;1964 facsimile reprint of first edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
6. De Queiroz A., Donoghue M. J., Kim J. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:1995;657-681.
7. De Queiroz K., Donoghue M. J. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics. 4:1988;317-338.
8. Dixon M. T., Hillis D. M. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: Compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;256-267.
9. Donoghue M. J. A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist. 88:1985;172-181.
10. Donoghue M. J., Sanderson M. J. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. Molecular Systematics of Plants. 1992;Chapman and Hall, New York. p. 340-368.
11. Donoghue M. J., Sanderson M. J. Complexity and homology in plants. Hall B. Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. 1994;393-421 Academic Press, San Diego.
12. Doyle J. J. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:1992;144-163.
13. Eernisse D., Kluge A. G. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;1170-1195.
14. Farris J. S. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Platnick N. I., Funk V. A. Advances in Cladistics. 1983;7-36 Vol. 2, Columbia University Press.
15. Farris J. S. Conjectures and refutations. Cladistics. 11:1995;105-118.
16. Farris J. S., Kluge A. G. A botanical clique. Syst. Zool. 28:1979;400-411.
17. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39:1985;783-791.
18. Frost D. R., Kluge A. G. A consideration of epistemology in systematic biology, with special reference to species. Cladistics. 10:1994;259-294.
19. Goodman M., Czelusniak J., Moore G. W., Romero-Herrera A. E., Matsuda G. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage: A parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool. 28:1979;132-168.
20. Hennig W. Phylogenetic Systematics. 1966;University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
21. Hillis D. M. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:1987;23-42.
22. Hillis D. M. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;3-16.
23. Hillis D. M., Bull J. J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:1993;182-192.
24. Hillis D. M., Allard M. W., Miyamoto M. M. Analysis of DNA sequence data: Phylogenetic inference. Methods Enzymol. 224:1993;456-487.
25. Huelsenbeck J. P., Bull J. J., Cunningham C. W. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;152-158.
26. Jones T. R., Kluge A. G., Wolf A. J. When theories and methodologies clash: A phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Syst. Biol. 42:1993;92-102.
27. Kluge A. G. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships amongEpicrates. Syst. Zool. 38:1989;7-25.
28. Kluge A. G. Moving targets and shell games. Cladistics. 10:1994;403-413.
29. Kluge A. G. Parsimony. Herpetol. Rev. 26:1995;76-77.
30. Kluge A. G. Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics. 13:1997;81-96.
31. Kluge A. G. Sophisticated falsification and research cycles: Consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics. Zool. Scripta. (in press):1998.
32. Kluge A. G., Wolf A. J. Cladistics: What's in a word. Cladistics. 9:1993;183-199.
33. Lanyon S. M. Phylogenetic frameworks: Towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 49:1993;45-61.
34. McKitrick M. C. Monophyly of the Tyrannidae (Aves): Comparison of morphology and DNA. Syst. Zool. 34:1985;35-45.
35. Meacham C. A. Phylogeny of the Berberidaceae with an evaluation of classifications. Syst. Bot. 5:1980;149-172.
36. Mindell D., Thacker C. Rates of molecular evolution: Phylogenetic issues and applications. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:1996;279-303.
37. Miyamoto M. M. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics. 1:1985;186-189.
38. Miyamoto M. M., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic inference, DNA sequence analysis, and the future of molecular systematics. Miyamoto M. M., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;3-17 Oxford University Press, New York.
39. Miyamoto M. M., Fitch W. M. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;64-76.
40. Miyamoto M. M., Allard M. W., Adkins R. M., Janecek L. L., Honeycutt R. L. A congruence test of reliability using linked mitochondrial DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;236-249.
41. Moore W. S. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution. 49:1995;718-726.
42. Pamillo P., Nei M. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:1988;568-583.
43. Patterson C., Williams D. M., Humphries C. J. Congruence between molecular and morphological phylogenies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:1993;153-188.
44. Popper K. R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 1968;Harper and Row, New York.
45. Popper K. R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. 1972a;Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
46. Popper K. R. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. 1972b;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. Popper K. R. Realism and the Aim of Science. 1992;Routledge, London.
48. Prager E. M., Wilson A. C. Construction of phylogenetic trees for proteins and nucleic acids: Empirical evaluation of alternative matrix methods. J. Mol. Evol. 11:1978;129-142.
49. Sanderson M. J., Donoghue M. J. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution. 43:1989;1781-1795.
50. Shaffer H. B. Utility of quantitative genetic parameters in character weighting. Syst. Zool. 35:1986;124-134.
51. Sheldon F. H., Bledsoe A. H. Avian molecular systematics, 1970s to 1990s. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:1993;243-278.
52. Swofford D. L. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? Miyamoto M. M., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;295-333 Oxford University Press, New York.
53. Turner H., Zandee R. The behaviour of Goloboff's tree fitness measure f. Cladistics. 11:1995;57-72.
54. Wheeler W. C., Honeycutt R. L. Paired sequence differences in ribosomal RNAs: Evolution and phylogenetic implications. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:1988;90-96.