Ubiquitin and SUMO systems in the regulation of mitotic checkpoints

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 324-332

  Gutierrez, Gustavo J ^a   Ronai, Ze'ev ^a  

^a BURNHAM INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; CULLIN 1; F BOX PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN SKP1; SUMO PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL REGENERATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; METAPHASE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANAPHASE; ANIMALS; CELL DIVISION; HUMANS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 33745156511     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.04.001     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Doree M., and Hunt T. From Cdc2 to Cdk1: when did the cell cycle kinase join its cyclin partner?. J. Cell Sci. 115 (2002) 2461-2464
2. Gadde S., and Heald R. Mechanisms and molecules of the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) R797-R805
3. Malumbres M., and Barbacid M. Mammalian cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30 (2005) 630-641
4. Boutros R., et al. The when and wheres of CDC25 phosphatases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18 (2006) 185-191
5. 2/M events by Cdc25A through phosphorylation-dependent modulation of its stability. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 5911-5920
6. Donzelli M., et al. Dual mode of degradation of Cdc25 A phosphatase. EMBO J. 21 (2002) 4875-4884
7. Busino L., et al. Degradation of Cdc25A by βTrCP during S phase and in response to DNA damage. Nature 426 (2003) 87-91
8. βTRCP links Chk1 signaling to degradation of the Cdc25A protein phosphatase. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 3062-3074
9. Bartek J., et al. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5 (2004) 792-804
10. Busino L., et al. Cdc25A phosphatase: combinatorial phosphorylation, ubiquitylation and proteolysis. Oncogene 23 (2004) 2050-2056
11. Chen F., et al. Arsenite-induced Cdc25C degradation is through the KEN-box and ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 (2002) 1990-1995
12. Kanemori Y., et al. β-TrCP recognizes a previously undescribed nonphosphorylated destruction motif in Cdc25A and Cdc25B phosphatases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 6279-6284
13. Kellogg D.R. Wee1-dependent mechanisms required for coordination of cell growth and cell division. J. Cell Sci. 116 (2003) 4883-4890
14. Michael W.M., and Newport J. Coupling of mitosis to the completion of S phase through Cdc34-mediated degradation of Wee1. Science 282 (1998) 1886-1889
15. Boddy M.N., et al. Replication checkpoint enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1. Science 280 (1998) 909-912
16. 2 DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 (2001) 1499-1508
17. Lee K.S., et al. Monitoring the cell cycle by multi-kinase-dependent regulation of Swe1/Wee1 in budding yeast. Cell Cycle 4 (2005) 1346-1349
18. Ayad N.G., et al. Tome-1, a trigger of mitotic entry, is degraded during G1 via the APC. Cell 113 (2003) 101-113
19. βTrCP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 4419-4424
20. Watanabe N., et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation destabilizes somatic Wee1 via multiple pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 11663-11668
21. Smits V.A., et al. Polo-like kinase-1 is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. Nat. Cell Biol. 2 (2000) 672-676
22. van Vugt M.A., et al. Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery from a G2 DNA damage-induced arrest in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 15 (2004) 799-811
23. Lee J., et al. Positive regulation of Wee1 by Chk1 and 14-3-3 proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 12 (2001) 551-563
24. Stanford J.S., and Ruderman J.V. Changes in regulatory phosphorylation of Cdc25C Ser287 and Wee1 Ser549 during normal cell cycle progression and checkpoint arrests. Mol. Biol. Cell 16 (2005) 5749-5760
25. Sanchez Y., et al. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286 (1999) 1166-1171
26. Scolnick D.M., and Halazonetis T.D. Chfr defines a mitotic stress checkpoint that delays entry into metaphase. Nature 406 (2000) 430-435
27. Kang D., et al. The checkpoint protein Chfr is a ligase that ubiquitinates Plk1 and inhibits Cdc2 at the G2 to M transition. J. Cell Biol. 156 (2002) 249-259
28. Bothos J., et al. The Chfr mitotic checkpoint protein functions with Ubc13-Mms2 to form Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Oncogene 22 (2003) 7101-7107
29. Andersen P.L., et al. Distinct regulation of Ubc13 functions by the two ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variants Mms2 and Uev1A. J. Cell Biol. 170 (2005) 745-755
30. Summers M.K., et al. The CHFR mitotic checkpoint protein delays cell cycle progression by excluding Cyclin B1 from the nucleus. Oncogene 24 (2005) 2589-2598
31. Matsusaka T., and Pines J. Chfr acts with the p38 stress kinases to block entry to mitosis in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 166 (2004) 507-516
32. Yu X., et al. Chfr is required for tumor suppression and Aurora A regulation. Nat. Genet. 37 (2005) 401-406
33. Castro A., et al. The D-Box-activating domain (DAD) is a new proteolysis signal that stimulates the silent D-Box sequence of Aurora-A. EMBO Rep. 3 (2002) 1209-1214
34. Littlepage L.E., and Ruderman J.V. Identification of a new APC/C recognition domain, the A box, which is required for the Cdh1-dependent destruction of the kinase Aurora-A during mitotic exit. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 2274-2285
35. Lindon C., and Pines J. Ordered proteolysis in anaphase inactivates Plk1 to contribute to proper mitotic exit in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 164 (2004) 233-241
36. Shtivelman E. Promotion of mitosis by activated protein kinase B after DNA damage involves polo-like kinase 1 and checkpoint protein CHFR. Mol. Cancer Res. 1 (2003) 959-969
37. Marumoto T., et al. Roles of aurora-A kinase in mitotic entry and G2 checkpoint in mammalian cells. Genes Cells 7 (2002) 1173-1182
38. Sudo T., et al. Activation of Cdh1-dependent APC is required for G1 cell cycle arrest and DNA damage-induced G2 checkpoint in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 20 (2001) 6499-6508
39. Pinsky B.A., et al. The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 8 (2006) 78-83
40. Kops G.J., et al. On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5 (2005) 773-785
41. Nasmyth K. How do so few control so many?. Cell 120 (2005) 739-746
42. Lens S.M., and Medema R.H. The survivin/Aurora B complex: its role in coordinating tension and attachment. Cell Cycle 2 (2003) 507-510
43. Vagnarelli P., and Earnshaw W.C. Chromosomal passengers: the four-dimensional regulation of mitotic events. Chromosoma 113 (2004) 211-222
44. Vong Q.P., et al. Chromosome alignment and segregation regulated by ubiquitination of survivin. Science 310 (2005) 1499-1504
45. Hoppe T. Multiubiquitylation by E4 enzymes: 'one size' doesn't fit all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30 (2005) 183-187
46. Nijman S.M., et al. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell 123 (2005) 773-786
47. Ambrosini G., et al. Induction of apoptosis and inhibition of cell proliferation by survivin gene targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 11177-11182
48. Yonesaka K., et al. Small interfering RNA targeting survivin sensitizes lung cancer cell with mutant p53 to adriamycin. Int. J. Cancer 118 (2006) 812-820
49. Vaziri S.A., et al. Sensitization of DNA damage-induced apoptosis by the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 is p53 dependent and involves target proteins 14-3-3σ and survivin. Mol. Cancer Ther. 4 (2005) 1880-1890
50. Pines, J. (2005) Mitosis: a matter of getting rid of the right protein at the right time. Trends Cell Biol
51. Nguyen H.G., et al. Mechanism of Aurora-B degradation and its dependency on intact KEN and A-boxes: identification of an aneuploidy-promoting property. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 4977-4992
52. Monaco L., et al. Inhibition of Aurora-B kinase activity by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 14244-14248
53. Stewart S., and Fang G. Destruction box-dependent degradation of aurora B is mediated by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and Cdh1. Cancer Res. 65 (2005) 8730-8735
54. Weaver B.A., and Cleveland D.W. Decoding the links between mitosis, cancer, and chemotherapy: the mitotic checkpoint, adaptation, and cell death. Cancer Cell 8 (2005) 7-12
55. Giet R., et al. Aurora kinases, aneuploidy and cancer, a coincidence or a real link?. Trends Cell Biol. 15 (2005) 241-250
56. Agarwal R., et al. Two distinct pathways for inhibiting Pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 45027-45033
57. Nagao K., et al. Separase-mediated cleavage of cohesin at interphase is required for DNA repair. Nature 430 (2004) 1044-1048
58. βTrCP/Slimb ubiquitin ligase activates the anaphase promoting complex to allow progression beyond prometaphase. Dev. Cell 4 (2003) 813-826
59. Moshe Y., et al. Role of Polo-like kinase in the degradation of early mitotic inhibitor 1, a regulator of the anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 7937-7942
60. βTrCP-dependent destruction of the APC inhibitor Emi1. Mol. Biol. Cell 15 (2004) 5623-5634
61. Searle J.S., and Sanchez Y. Stopped for repairs: a new role for nutrient sensing pathways?. Cell Cycle 3 (2004) 865-868
62. Searle J.S., et al. The DNA damage checkpoint and PKA pathways converge on APC substrates and Cdc20 to regulate mitotic progression. Nat. Cell Biol. 6 (2004) 138-145
63. Ke P.Y., and Chang Z.F. Mitotic degradation of human thymidine kinase 1 is dependent on the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-CDH1-mediated pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24 (2004) 514-526
64. Ke P.Y., et al. Control of dTTP pool size by anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome is essential for the maintenance of genetic stability. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 1920-1933
65. Li S.J., and Hochstrasser M. The yeast ULP2 (SMT4) gene encodes a novel protease specific for the ubiquitin-like Smt3 protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 2367-2377
66. Xhemalce B., et al. Role of the fission yeast SUMO E3 ligase Pli1p in centromere and telomere maintenance. EMBO J. 23 (2004) 3844-3853
67. Dieckhoff P., et al. Smt3/SUMO and Ubc9 are required for efficient APC/C-mediated proteolysis in budding yeast. Mol. Microbiol. 51 (2004) 1375-1387
68. Nacerddine K., et al. The SUMO pathway is essential for nuclear integrity and chromosome segregation in mice. Dev. Cell 9 (2005) 769-779
69. Joseph J., et al. The RanGAP1-RanBP2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) 611-617
70. Stead K., et al. Pds5p regulates the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and is sumoylated to promote the dissolution of cohesion. J. Cell Biol. 163 (2003) 729-741
71. Azuma Y., et al. PIASy mediates SUMO-2 conjugation of Topoisomerase-II on mitotic chromosomes. EMBO J. 24 (2005) 2172-2182
72. Jacquiau H.R., et al. Defects in SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) conjugation and deconjugation alter cell sensitivity to DNA topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 23566-23575
73. Honda Y., et al. Cooperation of HECT-domain ubiquitin ligase hHYD and DNA topoisomerase II-binding protein for DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 277 (2002) 3599-3605
74. Jackson P.K. Linking tumor suppression, DNA damage and the anaphase-promoting complex. Trends Cell Biol. 14 (2004) 331-334
75. Castro A., et al. The anaphase-promoting complex: a key factor in the regulation of cell cycle. Oncogene 24 (2005) 314-325
76. Sorensen C.S., et al. Chk1 regulates the S phase checkpoint by coupling the physiological turnover and ionizing radiation-induced accelerated proteolysis of Cdc25A. Cancer Cell 3 (2003) 247-258
77. Donzelli M., et al. Hierarchical order of phosphorylation events commits Cdc25A to βTrCP-dependent degradation. Cell Cycle 3 (2004) 469-471
78. Suzuki H., et al. Homodimer of two F-box proteins βTrCP1 or βTrCP2 binds to IκBα for signal-dependent ubiquitination. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 2877-2884
79. Kim S.Y., et al. Multisite M-phase phosphorylation of Xenopus Wee1A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25 (2005) 10580-10590
80. Asano S., et al. Concerted mechanism of Swe1/Wee1 regulation by multiple kinases in budding yeast. EMBO J. 24 (2005) 2194-2204