Linking tumor suppression, DNA damage and the anaphase-promoting complex

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 331-334

  Jackson, Peter K ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; CYCLIN A; CYCLIN D1; EARLY MITOTIC INHIBITOR 1 PROTEIN; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; PROTEIN MAD2; RAS ASSOCIATION DOMAIN FAMILY PROTEIN 1A; RAS PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ANAPHASE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOME 3P; DNA DAMAGE; GENE CLUSTER; METHYLATION; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS INHIBITION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; ONCOGENE RAS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; REVIEW; RNA INTERFERENCE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE; UBIQUITINATION;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 3042756223     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2004.05.005     Document Type: Short Survey

References (25)

1. Murray A.W., et al. Recycling the cell cycle: cyclins revisited. Cell. 116:2004;221-234
2. Nasmyth K. Segregating sister genomes: the molecular biology of chromosome separation. Science. 297:2002;559-565
3. Harper J.W., et al. The anaphase-promoting complex: it's not just for mitosis any more. Genes Dev. 16:2002;2179-2206
4. Reimann J.D., et al. Emi1 regulates the anaphase-promoting complex by a different mechanism than Mad2 proteins. Genes Dev. 15:2001;3278-3285
5. Reimann J.D., et al. Emi1 is a mitotic regulator that interacts with Cdc20 and inhibits the anaphase promoting complex. Cell. 105:2001;645-655
6. Hsu J.Y., et al. E2F-dependent accumulation of hEmi1 regulates S phase entry by inhibiting APC(Cdh1). Nat. Cell Biol. 4:2002;358-366
7. Margottin-Goguet F., et al. Prophase destruction of Emi1 by the SCF(βTrCP/Slimb) ubiquitin ligase activates the anaphase promoting complex to allow progression beyond prometaphase. Dev. Cell. 4:2003;813-826
8. Yu, H. (2002) Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 706-714.
9. Song M.S., et al. The tumour suppressor RASSF1A regulates mitosis by inhibiting the APC-Cdc20 complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:2004;129-137
10. Dammann R., et al. Epigenetic inactivation of a RAS association domain family protein from the lung tumour suppressor locus 3p21.3. Nat. Genet. 25:2000;315-319
11. Vos M.D., et al. Ras uses the novel tumor suppressor RASSF1 as an effector to mediate apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2000;35669-35672
12. Yoon J.H., et al. Hypermethylation of the CpG island of the RASSF1A gene in ovarian and renal cell carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer. 94:2001;212-217
13. Burbee D.G., et al. Epigenetic inactivation of RASSF1A in lung and breast cancers and malignant phenotype suppression. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 93:2001;691-699
14. Ortiz-Vega S., et al. The putative tumor suppressor RASSF1A homodimerizes and heterodimerizes with the Ras-GTP binding protein Nore1. Oncogene. 21:2002;1381-1390
15. Tommasi S., et al. RASSF3 and NORE1: identification and cloning of two human homologues of the putative tumor suppressor gene RASSF1. Oncogene. 21:2002;2713-2720
16. Shivakumar L., et al. The RASSF1A tumor suppressor blocks cell cycle progression and inhibits cyclin D1 accumulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:2002;4309-4318
17. Liu L., et al. Control of microtubule stability by the RASSF1A tumor suppressor. Oncogene. 22:2003;8125-8136
18. Guardavaccaro D., et al. Control of meiotic and mitotic progression by the F box protein β-Trcp1 in vivo. Dev. Cell. 4:2003;799-812
19. Michel L.S., et al. MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature. 409:2001;355-359
20. Searle J.S., et al. The DNA damage checkpoint and PKA pathways converge on APC substrates and Cdc20 to regulate mitotic progression. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:2004;138-145
21. Sanchez Y., et al. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science. 286:1999;1166-1171
22. Agarwal R., et al. Two distinct pathways for inhibiting pds1 ubiquitination in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2003;45027-45033
23. Hu F., et al. Regulation of the Bub2-Bfa1 GAP complex by Cdc5 and cell cycle checkpoints. Cell. 107:2001;655-665
24. Kotani S., et al. PKA and MPF-activated polo-like kinase regulate anaphase-promoting complex activity and mitosis progression. Mol. Cell. 1:1998;371-380
25. Rieder C.L., et al. Entry into mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells is guarded by a chromosome damage checkpoint that reverses the cell cycle when triggered during early but not late prophase. J. Cell Biol. 142:1998;1013-1022