What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations

Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 31-55

  Mannix, Elizabeth ^a   Neale, Margaret A ^b  

^a The Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32444440843     PISSN: 15291006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x     Document Type: Review

References (228)

1. Affirmative Action: A strong prejudice. (1995, June 17). The Economist, 335, 69-70.
2. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1992). Demography & design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341.
4. Applebaum, E., & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workplace. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
5. Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D.H, & Naquin, C. (2000). Group learning in organizations. In M.E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Asch, S.E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Ashby, W.R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
8. Bantel, K., & Jackson, S. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
9. Barsade, S., Ward, A., Turner, J., & Sonnenfeld, J. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802-836.
10. Berger, J., Fisek, M., Norman, R., & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.
11. Berscheid, E. (1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 413-484). New York: Random House.
12. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1978). Interpersonal attraction (2nd ed). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
13. Blalock, H.M. (1957). Percent non-white and discrimination in the south. American Sociological Review, 22, 677-682.
14. Blalock, H.M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley.
15. Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
16. Bowers, C., Pharmer, J., & Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 31, 305-327.
17. Brewer, M. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
18. Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
19. Brewer, M. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in workteams (pp. 131-159). Washington, DC: APA Books.
20. Brickson, S. (2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Academy of Management Review, 25, 82-101.
21. Bridges, W. (1994). Jobshift: How to prosper in a workplace without jobs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Brown, S., & Eisenhardt, K, (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
23. Bunderson, J.S., & Sutcliffe, K. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 875-893.
24. Burt, R. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10, 5-46.
25. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
26. Byrne, D., Clore, G., Worchel, P. (1966). The effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity as determinants of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 220-224.
27. Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (1988). Organizational paradox and transformation. In R. Quinn & K. Cameron (Eds.), Paradox and transformation (pp. 1-18). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
28. Carley, K. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56, 331-354.
29. Carpenter, M. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275-284.
30. Carroll, G., & Harrison, J. (1998). Organizational demography and culture: Insights from a formal model and simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 637-667.
31. Catalyst (2005). Home page. Retrieved October 19, 2005, from http://www.catalystwomen.org
32. Chatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484.
33. Chatman, J., Polzer, J., Barsade, S., & Neale, M. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749-780.
34. Chatman, J. & Spataro, S. (2005). Using self-categorization theory to understand relational demography-based variations in people's responsiveness to organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 321-331.
35. Chen, Y., Mannix, E., & Okumura, T. (2003). The importance of who you meet: The effects of self- versus other-concerns among negotiators in the United States, the People's Republic of China, and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 1-15.
36. Clark, R.D., & Maass, A. (1988). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 347-364.
37. Clement, D., & Schiereck, J. (1973). Sex composition and group performance in a signal detection task. Memory and cognition, 1, 251-255.
38. Cox, T., Lobel, S., & McLeod, P. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827-847.
39. Cross, E., Katz, J., Miller, F., & Seashore, E. (1994). The promise of diversity. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
40. Cummings, J. (2004). Workgroups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 352-364.
41. Damon, W. (1991). Problems of direction in socially shared cognition. In L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, & S.D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: APA Books.
42. Dietch, E., Butz, R., & Brief, A. (2003). Out of the closet and out of a job? The nature, import, and causes of sexual orientation discrimination in the workplace. In R. Griffin and A. O'Leary-Kelly (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 187-231). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43. Dreachslin, J., Hunt, P., & Sprainer, E. (2000). Workforce diversity: Implications for the effectiveness of healthcare delivery teams. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1403-1414.
44. Eagly, A., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306-315.
45. Earley, C. & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of international team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26-49.
46. Ely, R. & Thomas, D. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229-273.
47. Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., & Uzzi, B. (2000). Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
48. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456.
49. Festinger (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
50. Friedman, J., & DiTomaso, N. (1996). Myths about diversity: What managers need to know about changes in the U.S. labor force. California Management Review, 38, 54-77.
51. George, J. (1990). Personality, affect and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
52. Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.
53. Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 959-974.
54. Goins, S., & Mannix, E. (1999). Self-selection and its impact on team diversity and performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 12, 127-147.
55. Graen, G., & Scandura, T. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
56. Gruenfeld, D.H, Mannix, E.A., Williams, K.Y., & Neale, M.A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1-15.
57. Guillon, M., & Personnaz, B. (1983). Dynamics of representation of minority and majority conflicts. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 3, 65-87.
58. Guzzo, R., & Dickson, M. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
59. Halpern, D. (1986). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Halpern, D. (1989). The disappearance of cognitive gender differences: What you see depends on where you look. American Psychologist, 44, 1156-1157.
61. Hambrick, D., Cho, T. & Chen, M. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659-684.
62. Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelon: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review. 9, 193-206.
63. Hamilton, B., Nickerson, J., & Owan, H. (2003). Team incentives and worker heterogeneity: An empirical analysis of the impact of teams on productivity and participation. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 465-497.
64. Harrison, D., Price, K., & Bell, M. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
65. Harrison, D., Price, K., Gavin, J., & Florey, A. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.
66. He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-494.
67. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
68. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
69. Hinsz, V., Tindale, S., & Vollrath, D. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-94.
70. Hoffman, E. (1985). The effect of race-ration composition on the frequency of organizational communication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 17-26.
71. Hoffman, L. (1959). Homogeneity and member personality and its effect on group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 27-32.
72. Hoffman, L., Harburg, E., & Maier, N. (1962). Differences and disagreement as factors in creative group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 206-214.
73. Hoffman, L., & Maier, N. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401-407.
74. Hogg, M., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification. London: Routledge.
75. Huo, Y. (2003). Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: Does subgroup identification undermine relationship-based governance? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 336-348.
76. Huo, Y., Smith, H., Tyler, T., & Lind, A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; is assimilation the answer? Psychological Science, 7, 40-45.
77. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
78. Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56-87.
79. Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 673-703.
80. Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an alternate route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 91-102.
81. Ilgen, D. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications. American Psychologist, 54, 129-139.
82. Jackson, S. (1992). Team composition in organizations. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 138-173). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
83. Jackson, S., Brett, J., Sessa, V., Cooper, D., Julin, J., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
84. Jackson, S., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
85. Jackson, S., May, E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. Guzzo and E. Salas, Associates (Eds.), Team decision making effectiveness in organizations (pp. 204-261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
86. Jackson, S., & Ruderman, M. (1995). Diversity in workteams. Washington, DC: APA Books.
87. Jackson, S., Stone, V., & Alvarez, E. (1992). Socialization amidst diversity: The impact of demographics on work team oldtimers and newcomers. Research in Organizational Behavior, 15, 45-109.
88. Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
89. Jehn, K., & Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
90. Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
91. Johnston, W.B., & Packer, A.H. (1987). Workforce 2000. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
92. Kanter, R. (1977a). Men and women of the organization. New York: Basic Books.
93. Kanter, R. (1977b). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965-990.
94. Kim, P. (1997). Strategic timing in group negotiations: The implications of forced entry and forced exit for negotiators with unequal power. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 263-286.
95. Kirchler, E., & Davis, J. (1986). The influence of member status differences and task type on group consensus and member position change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 83-91.
96. Kirchmeyer, C. (1993). Multicultural task groups: An account of the low contribution level of minorities. Small group research, 24, 127-148.
97. Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D., & Thomas, D. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42, 3-21.
98. Konrad, A., Winter, S., & Gutek, B. (1992). Diversity in work group sex composition. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 10, 115-140.
99. Kramer, R. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. In B. Staw and 1,. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 191-228). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
100. Kramer, R. (1993). Cooperation and organizational identification. In J.K. Murnighan (Ed.), The social psychology of organizations Advances in theory and research (pp. 244-268). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
101. Larson, J., Christensen, C., Abbott, A., & Franz, T. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330.
102. Larson, J., Sargis, E., & Bauman, C, (2004). Shared knowledge and subgroup influence during decision-making discussions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 245-262.
103. Lau, D., & Murnighan, J.K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325-340.
104. Lawrence, B. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1-22.
105. Leavitt, B., & March, J. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
106. Lefkowitz, J. (1994). Race as a factor in job placement: Serendipitous findings of "ethnic drift." Personnel Psychology, 47, 497-513.
107. Levine, J., & Resnick, L. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
108. Lewis, M. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760-776.
109. Lincoln, J., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181-199.
110. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1993). The teamnetfactor: Bringing the power of boundary crossing into the heart of your business. Essex Junction, VT: Oliver Wight Publishers.
111. Lovaglia, M., Mannix, E., Samuelson, C., Sell, J., & Wilson, R. (2004). Conflict, power and status in groups. In M.S. Poole & A. Hollingshead (Eds.), Theories of small groups: An interdisciplinary perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
112. Maass, A., & Clark, R.D. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
113. Mackie, D., Gastardo-Conaco, M.C., & Skelly, J.J. (1992). Knowledge of the advocated position and the processing of in-group and out group persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 145-151.
114. Mackie, D.M., & Smith, E.R. (1998). Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105, 499-529.
115. Mannix, E., & Jehn, K. (2004). Let's storm and norm but not right now: Integrating models of group development and performance. In E. Mannix, M. Neale, and S. Blount (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Temporal issues (Vol. 6, pp. 11-38). New York: Elsevier.
116. Mannix. E., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. (1989). Small group negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 508-517.
117. March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Science, 2, 71-87.
118. Markus, H., & Cross, S. (1990). The interpersonal self. In L. Pervin (Ed), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 576-608). New York: Guilford.
119. McCain, B., O'Reilly, C., & Pfeffer, J. (1984). The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 626-641.
120. McGrath, J., Berdahl, J., & Arrow, H. (1995). Traits, expectations, culture, and clout. In S. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in workteams (pp. 47-68). Washington, DC: APA Books.
121. McGuire, W.J., & McGuire, C.V. (1988). Content and process in experience of self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 97-143). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
122. Merton, R. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 9-47.
123. Meyerson, D., & Fletcher, J. (2000, January). A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review, 78, 1-11.
124. Milliken, F., & Martins, L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
125. Mohrman, S., Cohen, S., & Mohrman, A. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
126. Mollica, K., Gray, B., & Trevino, L. (2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers' social networks. Organization Science, 74, 123-136.
127. Morrison, A. (1992). The new leaders, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
128. Morrison, A., & Von Glinow, M. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 45, 200-208.
129. Moscovici, S. (1985a). Innovation and minority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 9-52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
130. Moscovici, S. (1985b). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
131. Moscovici, S., & Neve, P. (1971). Studies in social influence 1. Those absent are in right: Convergence and polarization of answers in course of a social interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 201-213.
132. Mowday, R., & Sutton, R. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual review of psychology, 44, 195-229.
133. Mueller, P. (2004, October 18). "You call yourselves a demographic?" (Cartoon). The New Yorker. Retrieved November 8, 2005, from www.cartoonbank.com (ID# 119541).
134. Mugny, G., Kaiser, C., & Papastamou, S. (1983). Intergroup relations, identification, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 317-322.
135. Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1980). Minority influence and psychosocial identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 379-394.
136. Neale, M., & Bazerman, M. (1991). Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation. New York: Free Press.
137. Nelson, L., & Klutas, K. (2000). The distinctiveness effect in social interaction: Creation of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 126-135.
138. Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93, 23-32.
139. Nemeth, C.J., & Kwan, J.L. (1985). Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 277-282.
140. Nemeth, C.J., & Kwan, J.L. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 788-799.
141. Nemeth, C., Mosier, K., & Chiles, C. (1992). When convergent thought improves performance: Majority vs. minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 81, 139-144.
142. Nemeth, C., & Staw, B. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation within groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 175-210). New York: Academic Press.
143. Nemeth, C., & Wachtler, J. (1974). Creating the perceptions of consistency and confidence: A necessary condition for minority influence. Sociometry, 37, 529-540.
144. Nemeth, C.J., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs. minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45-55.
145. Newcomb, T.M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
146. Newcomb, T.M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
147. Nkomo, S. (1992). The Emperor has no clothes: Rewriting race in organizations, Academy of Management Review, 17, 487-513.
148. Offerman, L., & Cowing, M. (1990). Organizations of the future: Changes and challenges. American Psychologist, 45, 95-108.
149. O'Reilly, C., Caldwell, D., & Barnett, W. (1989). Work group demography, social integration and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37.
150. O'Reilly, C.A., & Flatt, S. (1989). Executive team demography, organizational innovation, and firm performance. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
151. Pelled, L. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615-631.
152. Pelled, L., Eisenhardt, K., & Xin, K. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of workgroup diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
153. Pelz, D. (1956). Some social factors related to performance in a research organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1, 310-325.
154. Perret-Clemont, A., Perret, J.F., & Bell, N. (1991). The social construction of meaning and cognitive activity in elementary school children. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially-shared cognition (pp. 41-62). Washington, DC: APA Books.
155. Peterson, R., & Mannix, E. (2003). Understanding people in the dynamic organization. New York: Erlbaum.
156. Pettigrew, T. (1982). Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
157. Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 299-357), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
158. Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. (1987). Hospital demography and turnover among nurses. Industrial relations, 26, 158-173.
159. Phillips, K.W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3-13.
160. Phillips, K., & Loyd, D. (2005). When surface- and deep-level diversity meet: The effects on dissenting group members. Unpublished manuscript.
161. Phillips, K., Mannix, E., Neale, M., & Gruenfeld, D. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effect of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497-510.
162. Phillips, K., Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (in press). Surface-level diversity and information sharing in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
163. Pitcher, P., & Smith, A. (2000). Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power and proxies. Organization Science, 12, 1-18.
164. Premack, S., & Wanous, J. (1985). A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 706-719.
165. Priem, R., Lyon, D., & Dess, G. (1999). Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. Journal of Management, 25, 935-953.
166. Randel, A. (2002). Identity salience: A moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 749-766.
167. Randel, A., & Jaussi, K. (2003). Functional background identity, diversity, and individual performance in cross-functional teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 763-774.
168. Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. (2001). Networks, diversity and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12, 502-517.
169. Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks versus demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 101-133.
170. Richard, O., & Shelor, R. (2002), Linking top management team age heterogeneity to firm performance: Juxtaposing two midrange theories. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 958-974.
171. Riordan, C., & Shore, L. (1997). Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: An empirical examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 342-358.
172. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21-31.
173. Rosenbaum, M.E. (1986). The repulsion hypothesis: On the non-development of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 729-736.
174. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
175. Schneider, S., & Northcraft, G. (1999). Three social dilemmas of workforce diversity in organizations: A social identity perspective. Human Relations, 52, 1445-1467.
176. Schopler, J., & Insko, C.A. (1992). The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: Generality and mediation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 121-151). New York: Wiley.
177. Seidel, M., Polzer, J., & Stewart, K. (2000). Friends in high places: The effects of social networks on discrimination in salary negotiations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 1-24.
178. Sinaceur, M., Thomas-Hunt, M., O'Neill, A., & Neale, M.A. (2004). Catalyzing individual accuracy in groups; How expert minorities affect private beliefs vs. public decisions. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University.
179. Smith, W., & Tushman, M. (in press). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management team model for simultaneously exploring and exploiting. Organization Science.
180. South, S., Bonjean, C., Markham, W., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 47, 587-599.
181. Spangler, E., Gordon, M., & Pipkin, R. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 160-170.
182. Spataro, S. (2000). Not all differences are the same: The role of status in predicting reactions to demographic diversity in organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
183. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). The discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups. Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
184. Stasser, G., Stewart, D., & Wittenbaum, G. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 244-265.
185. Stasser, G., Taylor, L.A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussion of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
186. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
187. Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
188. Stroessner, S. (1996). Social categorization by race or sex: Effects of perceived non-normalcy on response times. Social cognition, 14, 274-276.
189. Tajfel, H. (1978). The psychological nature of intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
190. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
191. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations (pp. 7-24), Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
192. Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101-113.
193. Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.
194. Thatcher, S., Jehn, K., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12, 217-241.
195. Thomas, D., & Ely, R. (1996, September-October). Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review, 74, 79-90.
196. Thomas-Hunt, M., Ogden, T., & Neale, M. (2003). Who's really sharing: Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Science, 49, 464-477.
197. Thompson, L., Mannix, E., & Bazerman, M. (1988). Negotiation in small groups: Effects of decision rule, agendas, aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 86-95.
198. Tolbert, P., Andrews, A., & Simons, T. (1995). The effects of group proportions on group dynamics, In S. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in workteams (pp. 131-159). Washington, DC: APA Books.
199. Townsend, A., & Scott, K. (2001). Team racial composition, member attitudes, and performance: A field study. Industrial relations, 40, 317-337.
200. Triandis, H. (1959). Cognitive similarity and interpersonal communication in industry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 321-326.
201. Triandis, H. (1960). Cognitive similarity and communication in a dyad. Human Relations, 13, 279-287.
202. Triandis, H., Hall, E., & Ewen, R. (1965). Member heterogeneity and dyadic creativity. Human Relations, 18, 33-55.
203. Triandis, H., Kurowski, L, & Gelfand, M. (1993). Workplace diversity. In H. Triandis, M. Dunnette, & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 769-827). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
204. Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119-142.
205. Tsui, A., Egan, T., & O'Reilly, C. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
206. Tsui, A., & O'Reilly, C. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
207. Tsui, A.S., Xin, K., & Egan, T.D. (1995). Relational demography: The missing link in vertical dyad linkage. In S. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Productivity and interpersonal relations in work teams characterized by diversity (pp. 97-130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
208. Turner, J. (1982). Toward a cognitive definition of the group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
209. Turner, J. (1985). Social categorization and the self concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-121). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
210. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., & Reicher, S.D. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
211. Tushman, M.L., & O'Reilly, C.A. (1997). Winning through innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
212. Tushman, M., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 171-222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
213. Van der Vegt, G., & Bunderson, S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532-547.
214. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C., & Homan, A. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
215. Wagner, W., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74-92.
216. Watson, W., Johnson, L., & Merritt, D. (1998). Team orientation, self-orientation and diversity in task groups. Group and Organization Management, 23, 161-188.
217. Watson, W., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.
218. Webber, S., & Donahue, L. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141-162.
219. Wharton, A., & Baron, J. (1987). So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work. American Sociological Review, 52, 574-587.
220. Wharton, A., & Baron, J. (1991). Satisfaction? The psychological impact of gender segregation on women at work. Sociology Quarterly, 32, 365-387.
221. Wiersema, M., & Bantel, K. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91-121.
222. Williams, K., & O'Reilly, C. (1998). The complexity of diversity: A review of forty years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
223. Winquist, J., & Larson, J. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377.
224. Wittenbaum, G. (1998). Information sampling in decision-making groups: The impact of members' task-relevant status. Small Group Research, 29, 57-84.
225. Wittenbaum, G., Hubbell, A., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-978.
226. Wittenbaum, G., & Stasser, G, (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. Nye & A. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
227. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J.A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
228. Zenger, T., & Lawrence, B. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communications. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 353-376.