Identifying the basal angiosperm node in chloroplast genome phylogenies: Sampling one's way out of the Felsenstein zone

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1948-1963

  Leebens Mack, Jim ^a   Raubeson, Linda A ^b   Cui, Liying ^a   Kuehl, Jennifer V ^c   Fourcade, Matthew H ^c   Chumley, Timothy W ^d   Boore, Jeffrey L ^c,e   Jansen, Robert K ^d   DePamphilis, Claude W ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiosperm phylogeny; Parametric bootstrap; Phylogenomics

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ACORUS; ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; CHLOROPLAST; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC CODE; GENOMICS; GINKGO BILOBA; GRASS; LILY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; NUPHAR; NYMPHAEA; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE; RANUNCULACEAE; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE; YUCCA;

ANGIOSPERMS; CHLOROPLASTS; CODON; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, PLANT; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE DELETION;

ACORUS; AMBORELLA; EMBRYOPHYTA; GINKGO BILOBA; GYMNOSPERMAE; LILIOPSIDA; LILIUM; MAGNOLIIDS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NUPHAR; NYMPHAEA; NYMPHAEACEAE; NYMPHAEALES; POACEAE; RANUNCULACEAE; TYPHA;

EID: 24744449757     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi191     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Ané, C., J. G. Burleigh, M. M. McMahon, and M. J. Sanderson. 2005. Covarion structure in plastid genome evolution: a new statistical test. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:914-924.
2. Asano, T., T. Tsudzuki, S. Takahashi, H. Shimada, and K. Kadowaki. 2004. Complete nucleotide sequence of the sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) chloroplast genome: a comparative analysis of four monocot chloroplast genomes. DNA Res. 11:93-99.
3. Barkman, T. J., G. Chenery, J. R. McNeal, J. Lyons-Weiler, W. J. Ellisens, G. Moore, A. D. Wolfe, and C. W. dePamphilis. 2000. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13166-13171.
4. Becker, A., and G. Theissen. 2003. The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29:464-489.
5. Borsch, T., K. W. Hilu, D. Quandt, V. Wilde, C. Neinhuis, and W. Barthlott. 2003. Noncoding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms. J. Evol. Biol. 16:558-576.
6. Chase, M. W. 2004. Monocot relationships: an overview. Am. J. Bot. 91:1645-1655.
7. Chaw, S. M., C. C. Chang, H. L. Chen, and W. H. Li. 2004. Dating the monocot-dicot divergence and the origin of core eudicots using whole chloroplast genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 58:424-441.
8. Cosner, M. E., L. A. Raubeson, and R. K. Jansen. 2004. Chloroplast DNA rearrangements in Campanulaceae: phylogenetic utility of highly rearranged genomes. BMC Evol. Biol. 4:27.
9. Crane, P. R., E. M. Friis, and K. R. Pederson. 1995. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374:27-33.
10. Darwin, C. 1903. Letter to J. D. Hooker. In F. Darwin and A.C. Seward, eds. More letters of Charles Darwin, Vol. 2. John Murray, London.
11. Davies, T. J., T. G. Barraclough, M. W. Chase, P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and V. Savolainen. 2004. Darwin's abominable mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:1904-1909.
12. Ewing, B., and P. Green. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8:186-194.
13. Ewing, B., L. Hillier, M. C. Wendl, and P. Green. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8:175-185.
14. Eyre-Walker, A., and B. S. Gaut. 1997. Correlated rates of synonymous site evolution across plant genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:455-460.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
16. _. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
17. _. 2004. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package). Version 3.6. Distributed by the author, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
18. Gordon, D., C. Abajian, and P. Green. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8:195-202.
19. Goremykin, V., V. Bobrova, J. Pahnke, A. Troitsky, A. Antonov, and W. Martin. 1996. Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support gnetalean affinities of angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:383-396.
20. Goremykin, V. V., K. I. Hirsch-Ernst, S. Wolfl, and F. H. Hellwig. 2003. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1499-1505.
21. _. 2004. The chloroplast genome of Nymphaea alba: whole-genome analyses and the problem of identifying the most basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1445-1454.
22. Graham, S. W., and R. G. Olmstead. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 87:1712-1730.
23. Graham, S. W., P. A. Reeves, A. C. E. Burns, and R. G. Olmstead. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161:S83-S96.
24. Graur, D., and W. Martin. 2004. Reading the entrails of chickens: molecular timescales of evolution and the illusion of precision. Trends Genet. 20:80-86.
25. Graybeal, A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47:9-17.
26. Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-704.
27. Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino, and T. Yano. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
28. Hendy, M. D., and D. Penny. 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38:297-309.
29. Hillis, D. M., D. D. Pollock, J. A. McGuire, and D. J. Zwickl. 2003. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Syst. Biol. 52:124-126.
30. Hilu, K. W., T. Borsch, K. Muller et al. (16 co-authors). 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information. Am. J. Bot. 90:1758-1776.
31. Hiratsuka, J., H. Shimada, R. Whittier et al. (16 co-authors). 1989. The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa) chloroplast genome: intermolecular recombination between distinct tRNA genes accounts for a major plastid DNA inversion during the evolution of the cereals. Mol. Gen. Genet. 217:185-194.
32. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2002. Testing a covariotide model of DNA substitution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:698-707.
33. Hupfer, H., M. Swiatek, S. Hornung, R. G. Herrmann, R. M. Maier, W. L. Chiu, and B. Sears. 2000. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Oenothera elata plastid chromosome, representing plastome I of the five distinguishable euoenothera plastomes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:581-585.
34. Jansen, R. K., L. A. Raubeson, J. L. Boore et al. (15 co-authors). 2005. Methods for obtaining and analyzing whole chloroplast genome sequences. Methods Enzymol. 395:348-384.
35. Jones, D. T., W. R. Taylor, and J. M. Thornton. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:275-282.
36. Judd, W. S., and R. G. Olmstead. 2004. A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships. Am. J. Bot. 91:1627-1644.
37. Kato, T., T. Kaneko, S. Sato, Y. Nakamura, and S. Tabata. 2000. Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of a legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 7:323-330.
38. Kellogg, E. 2000. Evolutionary history of the grasses. Plant Physiol. 125:1198-1205.
39. Kim, K.-J., and H.-L. Lee. 2004. Complete chloroplast genome sequence from korea ginseng (Panax schinseng Nees) and comparative analysis of sequence evolution among 17 vascular plants. DNA Res. 11:247-261.
40. Kim, S., M.-J. Yoo, V. A. Albert, J. S. Farris, P. S. Soltis, and D. E. Soltis. 2004. Phylogeny and diversification of B-function MADS-box genes in angiosperms: evolutionary and functional implications of a 260-million-year-old duplication. Am. J. Bot. 91:2102-2118.
41. Kolaczkowski, B., and J. W. Thornton. 2004. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431:980-984.
42. Kramer, E. M., M. A. Jaramillo, and V. S. Di Stilio. 2004. Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiosperms. Genetics 166:1011-1023.
43. Kugita, M., A. Kaneko, Y. Yamamoto, Y. Takeya, T. Matsumoto, and K. Yoshinaga. 2003a. The complete nucleotide sequence of the hornwort (Anthoceros formosae) chloroplast genome: insight into the earliest land plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:716-721.
44. Kugita, M., Y. Yamamoto, T. Fujikawa, T. Matsumoto, and K. Yoshinaga. 2003b. RNA editing in hornwort chloroplasts makes more than half the genes functional. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2417-2423.
45. Lake, J. A. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1455-1459.
46. Litt, A., and V. F. Irish. 2003. Duplication and diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL floral homeotic gene lineage: implications for the evolution of floral development. Genetics 165:821-833.
47. Lockhart, P. J., C. J. Howe, A. C. Barbrook, A. W. D. Larkum, and D. Penny. 1999. Spectral analysis, systematic bias, and the evolution of chloroplasts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:573-576.
48. Lockhart, P. J., and D. Penny. 2005. The place of Amborella within the radiation of angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci. 10:201-202.
49. Lockhart, P. J., M. A. Steel, A. C. Barbrook, D. H. Huson, M. A. Charleston, and C. J. Howe. 1998. A covariotide model explains apparent phylogenetic structure of oxygenic photosynthetic lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1183-1188.
50. Lockhart, P. J., M. A. Steel, M. D. Hendy, and D. Penny. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
51. Lopez, P., D. Casane, and H. Philippe. 2002. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1-7.
52. Lyons-Weiler, J., G. A. Hoelzer, and R. J. Tausch. 1996. Relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA). I: the statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:749-757.
53. Maier, R. M., K. Neckermann, G. L. Igloi, and H. Kossel. 1995. Complete sequence of the maize chloroplast genome: gene content, hotspots of divergence and fine tuning of genetic information by transcript editing. J. Mol. Biol. 251:614-628.
54. Martin, W., O. Deusch, N. Stawski, N. Grunheit, and V. Goremykin. 2005. Chloroplast genome phylogenetics: why we need independent approaches to plant molecular evolution. Trends Plant Sci. 10:203-209.
55. Mathews, S., and M. J. Donoghue. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286:947-950.
56. _. 2000. Basal angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochromes A and C. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161:S41-S41.
57. Ogihara, Y., K. Isono, T. Kojimal et al. (18 co-authors). 2000. Chinese spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) chloroplast genome: complete sequence and contig clones. Plant Molec. Biol. Rep. 18:243-253.
58. Ohyama, K., H. Fukuzawa, T. Kohchi et al. 1988. Structure and organization of Marchantia polymorpha chloroplast genome. I. Cloning and gene identification. J. Mol. Biol. 203:281-298.
59. Parkinson, C. L., K. L. Adams, and J. D. Palmer. 1999. Multigene analyses identify the three earliest lineages of extant flowering plants. Curr. Biol. 9:1485-1488.
60. Philippe, H., N. Lartillot, and H. Brinkmann. 2005. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa and Protostomia. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1246-1253.
61. Philippe, H., and J. Laurent. 1998. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8:616-623.
62. Phillips, M. J., F. Delsuc, and D. Penny. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1455-1458.
63. Pollock, D. D., D. J. Zwickl, J. A. McGuire, and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 51:664-671.
64. Qiu, Y. L., J. Lee, F. Bernasconi-Quadroni, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, M. Zanis, E. A. Zimmer, Z. Chen, V. Savolainen, and M. W. Chase. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402:404-407.
65. _. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161:S3-S27.
66. Rambaut, A., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
67. Rokas, A., and P. W. Holland. 2000 Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:454-459.
68. Sanderson, M. J. 2003. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19:301-302.
69. Sanderson, M. J., J. L. Thorne, N. Wikstrom, and K. Bremer. 2004. Molecular evidence on plant divergence times. Am. J. Bot. 91:1656-1665.
70. Sanderson, M. J., M. F. Wojciechowski, J. M. Hu, T. S. Khan, and S. G. Brady. 2000. Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:782-797.
71. Sato, S., Y. Nakamura, T. Kaneko, E. Asamizu, and S. Tabata. 1999. Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res. 6:283-290.
72. Schmitz-Linneweber, C., R. M. Maier, J. P. Alcaraz, A. Cottet, R. G. Herrmann, and R. Mache. 2001. The plastid chromosome of spinach (Spinacia oleracea): complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization. Plant Mol. Biol. 45:307-315.
73. Schmitz-Linneweber, C., R. Regel, T. G. Du, H. Hupfer, R. G. Herrmann, and R. M. Maier. 2002. The plastid chromosome of Atropa belladonna and its comparison with that of Nicotiana tabacum: the role of RNA editing in generating divergence in the process of plant speciation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1602-1612.
74. Schneider, H., E. Schuettpelz, K. M. Pryer, R. Cranfill, S. Magallon, and R. Lupia. 2004. Ferns diversified in the shadow of angiosperms. Nature 428:553-557.
75. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
76. Shinozaki, K., M. Ohme, M. Tanaka et al. (23 co-authors). 1986. The complete nucleotide sequence of tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J. 5:2043-2049.
77. Simmons, M. P., and M. Miya. 2004. Efficiently resolving the basal clades of a phylogenetic tree using Bayesian and parsimony approaches: a case study using mitogenomic data from 100 higher teleost fishes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:351-362.
78. Soltis, D. E., V. A. Albert, S. Kim et al. (11 co-authors). 2004a. Evolution of the flower. In R. Henry, ed. Diversity and evolution of plants. CABI, Wallingford, Oxfordshire.
79. Soltis, D. E., V. A. Albert, V. Savolainen et al. (11 co-authors). 2004b. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends Plant Sci. 9:477-483.
80. Soltis, D. E., and P. S. Soltis. 2004. Amborella not a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast. Am. J. Bot. 91:997-1001.
81. Soltis, P. S., and D. E. Soltis. 2004. The origin and diversification of angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 91:1614-1626.
82. Soltis, P. S., D. E. Soltis, and M. W. Chase. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402:402-404.
83. Spencer, M., E. Susko, and A. J. Roger. 2005. Likelihood, parsimony, and heterogeneous evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1161-1164.
84. Steel, M. A. 1994. Recovering a tree from the leaf colorations it generates under a Markov model. Appl. Math. Lett. 7:19-23.
85. Stefanović, S., D. W. Rice, and J. D. Palmer. 2004. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? BMC Evol. Biol. 4:35.
86. Stellari, G. M., M. A. Jaramillo, and E. M. Kramer. 2004. Evolution of the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA lineages of MADS-box-containing genes in the basal angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:506-519.
87. Sugiura, C., Y. Kobayashi, S. Aoki, C. Sugita, and M. Sugita. 2003. Complete chloroplast DNA sequence of the moss Physcomitrella patens: evidence for the loss and relocation of rpoA from the chloroplast to the nucleus. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:5324-5331.
88. Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
89. Thollesson, M. 2004. LDDist: a Perl module for calculating LogDet pair-wise distances for protein and nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 20:416-418.
90. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
91. Wakasuki, T., A. Nishikawa, K. Yamada and M. Sugiura. 1998. A complete nucleotide sequence of the plastid genome from a fern, Psilotum nudum. Endocyt. Cell Res., 13 (Suppl.):147.
92. Wakasugi, T., J. Tsudzuki, S. Ito, K. Nakashima, T. Tsudzuki, and M. Sugiura. 1994. Loss of all ndh genes as determined by sequencing the entire chloroplast genome of the black pine Pinus thunbergii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:9794-9798.
93. Williams, J. H., and W. E. Friedman. 2002. Identification of diploid endosperm in an early angiosperm lineage. Nature 415:522-526.
94. Wolf, P. G., C. A. Rowe, R. B. Sinclair, and M. Hasebe. 2003. Complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast genome from a leptosporangiate fern, Adiantum capillus-veneris L. DNA Res. 10:59-65.
95. Wyman, S. K., R. K. Jansen, and J. L. Boore. 2004. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20:3252-3255.
96. Yang, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
97. Zanis, M. J., D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, S. Mathews, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:6848-6853.
98. Zanis, M. J., P. S. Soltis, Y.-L. Qiu, E. Zimmer, and D. E. Soltis. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses and perianth evolution in basal angiosperms. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 90:129-129.
99. Zwickl, D. J., and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51:588-598.