Efficiently resolving the basal clades of a phylogenetic tree using Bayesian and parsimony approaches: A case study using mitogenomic data from 100 higher teleost fishes

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 351-362

  Simmons, Mark P ^a   Miya, Masaki ^b  

^a Immunology and Pathology   (United States)

^b NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM AND INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Basal clades; Branch support; Character sampling; Jackknife support; Phylogenetic analysis; Taxon sampling

Indexed keywords

PISCES; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 1642546638     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.08.004     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Akaike, H., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 19, 716-723.
2. Albach, D.C., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Olmstead, R.G., 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of Asterids based on sequences of four genes. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 88, 163-212.
3. Alfaro, M.E., Zoller, S., Lutzoni, F., 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 255-266.
4. Baker, R.H., Wilkinson, G.S., DeSalle, R., 2001. Phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst. Biol. 50, 87-105.
5. Björklund, M., 1999. Are third positions really that bad? A test using vertebrate cytochrome b. Cladistics 15, 191-197.
6. Braun, E.L., Kimball, R.T., 2002. Examining basal avian divergences with mitochondrial sequences: model complexity, taxon sampling, and sequence length. Syst. Biol. 51, 614-625.
7. Bremer, B., Jansen, R.K., Oxelman, B., Backlund, M., Lantz, H., Kim, K.-J., 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny -case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 48, 413-435.
8. Bremer, K., 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42, 795-803.
9. Cameron, K.M., Chase, M.W., Whitten, W.M., Kores, P.J., Jarrell, D.C., Albert, V.A., Yukawa, T., Hills, H.G., Goldman, D.H., 1999. A phylogenetic analysis of the Orchidaceae: evidence from rbcL nucleotide sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 86, 208-224.
10. Cummings, M.P., Otto, S.P., Wakeley, J., 1995. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 814-822.
11. Davis, J.I., Simmons, M.P., Stevenson, D.W., Wendel, J.F., 1998. Data decisiveness, data quality, and incongruence in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the monocotyledons using mitochondrial atp A sequences. Syst. Biol. 47, 282-310.
12. Douady, C.J., Delsuc, F., Boucher, Y., Doolittle, W.F., Douzery, E.J.P., 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 248-254.
13. Efron, B., Halloran, E., Holmes, S., 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13429-13434.
14. Faith, D.P., Ballard, J.W.O., 1994. Length differences and topology-dependent tests: a response to Källersjö et al. Cladistics 10, 57-64.
15. Farris, J.S., 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5, 417-419.
16. Farris, J.S., Albert, V.A., Källersjö, M., Lipscomb, D., Kluge, A.G., 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12, 99-124.
17. Felsenstein, J., 1973. Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Syst. Zool. 22, 240-249.
18. Felsenstein, J., 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27, 401-410.
19. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
20. Gatesy, J., 2000. Linked branch support and tree stability. Syst. Biol. 49, 800-807.
21. Gaut, B.S., Lewis, P.O., 1995. Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 152-162.
22. Giribet, G., Wheeler, W.C., 1999. On gaps. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13, 132-143.
23. Goloboff, P.A. 1993. NONA (NO NAME). Published by the author, Tucumán, Argentina.
24. Graur, D., Durent, L., Gouy, M., 1996. Phylogenetic position of the order Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares and allies). Nature 379, 333-335.
25. Graybeal, A., 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47, 9-17.
26. Hendy, M.D., Penny, D., 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38, 297-309.
27. Hillis, D.M., 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383, 130-131.
28. Hillis, D.M., 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst. Biol. 47, 3-8.
29. Hillis, D.M., 1999. Phylogenetics and the study of HIV. In: Crandall, K.A. (Ed.), The Evolution of HIV. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 105-121.
30. Hillis, D.M., Bull, J.J., 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 42, 182-192.
31. Hillis, D.M., Bull, J.J., White, M.E., Badgett, M.R., Molineux, I.J., 1992. Experimental phylogenetics: generation of a known phylogeny. Science 255, 589-592.
32. Hillis, D.M., Huselsenbeck, J.P., Cunningham, C.W., 1994. Application and accuracy of molecular phylogenies. Science 264, 671-677.
33. Hillis, D.M., Pollock, D.D., McGuire, J.A., Zwickl, D.J., 2003. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Syst. Biol. 52, 124-126.
34. Huelsenbeck, J.P., 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44, 17-48.
35. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Crandall, K.A., 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 437-466.
36. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Ronquist, F., 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755.
37. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Larget, B., Miller, R.E., Ronquist, F., 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51, 673-688.
38. Inoue, J.G., Miya, M., Tsukamoto, K., Nishida, M., 2001. A mitogenomic perspective on the basal teleostean phylogeny: resolving higher-level relationships with longer DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20, 275-282.
39. Johnson, K.P., 2001. Taxon sampling and the phylogenetic position of Passeriformes: evidence from 916 avian cytochrome b sequences. Syst. Biol. 50, 128-136.
40. Källersjö, M., Farris, J.S., Chase, M.W., Bremer, B., Fay, M.F., Humphries, C.J., Petersen, G., Seberg, O., Bremer, K., 1998. Simultaneous parsimony jackknife analysis of 2538 rbc L DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants, and flowering plants. Plant Syst. Evol. 213, 259-287.
41. Källersjö, M., Albert, V.A., Farris, J.S., 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15, 91-93.
42. Kim, J., 1996. General inconsistency conditions for maximum parsimony: effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Syst. Biol. 45, 363-374.
43. Kluge, A.G., 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis for relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38, 7-25.
44. Kluge, A.G., Farris, J.S., 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of Anurans. Syst. Zool. 18, 1-32.
45. Larget, B., Simon, D.L., 1999. Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 750-759.
46. Leaché, A.D., Reeder, T.W., 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard Sceloporus undulatus: a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51, 44-68.
47. Lecointre, G., Philippe, H., Van Le, H.L., Le Guyader, H., 1993. Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2, 205-224.
48. Lecointre, G., Philippe, H., Lê, H.L.V., Le Guyader, H., 1994. How many nucleotides are required to resolve a phylogenetic problem? The use of a new statistical method applicable to available sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3, 292-309.
49. Lewis, L.A., Mishler, B.D., Vilgalys, R., 1997. Phylogenetic relationships of the liverworts (Hepaticeae), a basal embryophyte lineage, inferred from nucleotide sequence data of the chloroplast gene rbcL. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7, 377-393.
50. Mathews, S., Donoghue, M.J., 2000. Basal angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochromes A and C. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161, S41-S55.
51. Mau, B., Newton, M.A., Larget, B., 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55, 1-12.
52. Miller, J.A., 2003. Assessing progress in systematics with continuous jackknife function analysis. Syst. Biol. 52, 55-65.
53. Mitchell, A., Mitter, C., Regier, J.C., 2000. More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Syst. Biol. 49, 202-224.
54. Miya, M., Nishida, M., 2000. Use of mitogenomic information in teleostean molecular phylogenetics: a tree-based exploration under the maximum-parsimony optimality criterion. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17, 437-455.
55. Miya, M., Kawaguchi, A., Nishida, M., 2001. Mitogenomic exploration of higher teleostean phylogenies: a case study for moderate-scale evolutionary genomics with 38 newly determined complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 1993-2009.
56. Miya, M., Takeshima, H., Endo, H., Ishiguro, N.B., Inoue, J.G., Mukai, T., Satoh, T.P., Yamaguchi, M., Kawaguchi, A., Mabuchi, K., Shirai, S.M., Nishida, M., 2003. Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26, 121-138.
57. Nandi, O.I., Chase, M.W., Endress, P.K., 1998. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular data sets. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 85, 137-212.
58. Nei, N., Kumar, S., Takahashi, T., 1998. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12390-12397.
59. Nixon, K.C. 2002. Winclada. Ithaca, Published by the author, New York.
60. Nixon, K.C., Carpenter, J.M., 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12, 221-242.
61. Penny, D., Hendy, M.D., Steel, M.A., 1992. Progress with methods for constructing evolutionary trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7, 73-79.
62. Poe, S., 1998. Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxonomic sampling. Syst. Biol. 47, 18-31.
63. Poe, S., Swofford, D.L., 1999. Taxon sampling revisited. Nature 398, 299-300.
64. Pollock, D.D., Bruno, W.J., 2000. Assessing an unknown evolutionary process: effect of increasing site-specific knowledge through taxon addition. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1854-1858.
65. Pollock, D.D., Zwickl, D.J., McGuire, J.A., Hillis, D.M., 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 51, 664-671.
66. Posada, D., Crandall, K.A., 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818.
67. Posada, D., Crandall, K.A., 2001. Selecting models of nucleotide substitution: an application to human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 897-906.
68. Rannala, B., Yang, Z., 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43, 304-311.
69. Rannala, B., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Yang, Z., Nielsen, R., 1998. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of large phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 47, 702-710.
70. Rodrigo, A.G., 1993. Calibrating the bootstrap test of monophyly. Int. J. Parasitol. 23, 507-514.
71. Rosenberg, M.S., Kumar, S., 2001. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10751-10756.
72. Rosenberg, M.S., Kumar, S., 2003. Taxon sampling, bioinformatics, and phylogenomics. Syst. Biol. 52, 119-124.
73. Rydin, C., Källersjö, M., 2002. Taxon sampling and seed plant phylogeny. Cladistics 18, 485-513.
74. Sanderson, M.J., 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: a critique. Syst. Biol. 44, 299-320.
75. Sanderson, M.J., Kim, J., 2000. Parametric phylogenetics? Syst. Biol. 49, 817-829.
76. Sanderson, M.J., Wojciechowski, M.F., 2000. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (Leguminosae). Syst. Biol. 49, 671-685.
77. Savolainen, V., Chase, M.W., Hoot, S.B., Morton, C.M., Soltis, D.E., Bayer, C., Fay, M.F., De Brujin, A., Sullivan, S., Qiu, Y.-L., 2001. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49, 306-362.
78. Shevchuk, N.A., Allard, M.W., 2001. Sources of incongruence among mammalian mitochondrial sequences: COII, COIII and ND6 genes are main contributors. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21, 43-54.
79. Siddall, M.E., 1998. Success of parsimony in the four-taxon case: long-branch repulsion by likelihood in the Farris Zone. Cladistics 14, 209-220.
80. Simmons, M.P., Freudenstein, J.V., 2003. The effects of increasing genetic distance on alignment of, and tree construction from, rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol..
81. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369-381.
82. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., Carr, T.G., 2001. Incorporation, relative homoplasy, and effect of gap characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 50, 454-462.
83. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., Freudenstein, J.V., 2002a. Amino acid vs. nucleotide characters: challenging preconceived notions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 24, 78-90.
84. Simmons, M.P., Ochoterena, H., Freudenstein, J.V., 2002b. Conflict between amino acid and nucleotide characters. Cladistics 18, 200-206.
85. Smith, D.B., Basaras, M., Frost, S., Haydon, D., Cuceanu, N., Prescott, L., Kamenka, C., Millband, D., Sathar, M.A., Simmonds, P., 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of GBV-C/hepatitis G virus. J. Gen. Virol. 81, 769-780.
86. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Nickrent, D.L., Johnson, L.A., Hahn, W.J., Hoot, S.B., Sweere, J.A., Kuzoff, R.K., Kron, K.A., Chase, M.W., Swensen, S.M., Zimmer, E.A., Chaw, S.M., Gillespie, L.J., Kress, W.J., Sytsma, K.J., 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 84, 1-49.
87. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Mort, M.E., Chase, M.W., Savolainen, V., Hoot, S.B., Morton, C.M., 1998. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47, 32-42.
88. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Chase, M.W., Mort, M.E., Albach, D.C., Zanis, M., Savolainen, V., Hahn, W.H., Hoot, S.B., Fay, M.F., Axtell, M., Swensen, S.M., Nixon, K.C., Farris, J.S., 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from a combined data set of 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133, 381-461.
89. Sullivan, J., 1996. Combining data with different distributions of among-site variation. Syst. Biol. 45, 375-380.
90. Suzuki, Y., Glazko, G.V., Nei, M., 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16138-16143.
91. Swofford, D.L. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
92. Vrati, S., Giri, R.K., Razdan, A., Malik, P., 1999. Complete nucleotide sequence of an Indian strain of Japanese Encephalitis Virus: sequence comparison with other strains and phylogenetic analysis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 61, 677-680.
93. Wheeler, W.C., 1992. Extinction, sampling, and molecular phylogenetics. In: Novacek, M.J., Wheeler, Q.D. (Eds.), Extinction and Phylogeny. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 205-215.
94. Whittingham, L.A., Slikas, B., Winkler, D.W., Sheldon, F.H., 2002. Phylogeny of the tree swallow genus, Tachycineta (Aves: Hirundinidae), by Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22, 430-441.
95. Wilcox, T.P., Zwickl, D.J., Heath, T.A., Hillis, D.M., 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25, 361-371.
96. Wolfe, K.H., Li, W.-H., Sharp, P.M., 1987. Rates of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 9054-9058.
97. Yang, Z., 1993. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 1396-1401.
98. Yang, Z., 1998. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47, 125-133.
99. Yang, Z., Rannala, B., 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 717-724.
100. Yoder, A.D., Irwin, J.A., 1999. Phylogeny of the Lemuridae: effects of character and taxon sampling on resolution of species relationships within Eulemur. Cladistics 15, 351-361.
101. Zharkikh, A., Li, W.-H., 1992. Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences. I. Four taxa with a molecular clock. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 1119-1147.
102. Zwickl, D.J., Hillis, D.M., 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51, 588-598.