Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 782-797

  Sanderson, M J ^a   Wojciechowski, M F ^a,b   Hu, J M ^a   Khan, T Sher ^a   Brady, S G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Maximum likelihood; Parsimony; Statistical consistency

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; CODON; ERROR; GENE SEQUENCE; GYMNOSPERM; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; REVIEW; TREE;

EID: 0034069504     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026357     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. ADACHI, J., and M. HASEGAWA. 1996. MOLPHY. Computer program published by the authors. Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo.
2. ADKINS, R. M., and R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1994. Evolution of primate cytochrome c oxidase subunit II gene. J. Mol. Evol. 38:215-231.
3. ALBERT, V. A., A. BACKLUND, K. BREMER, M. W. CHASE, J. R. MANHART, B. D. MISHLER, and K. C. NIXON. 1994. Functional constraints and rbcL evidence for land plant phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81:534-567.
4. BAKKE, E., and A. VON HAESELER. 1999. Distance measures in terms of substitution process. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55:166-175.
5. BJÖRKLAND, M. 1999. Are third positions really that bad? A test using vertebrate cytochrome b. Cladistics 15:191-197.
6. BOUSQUET, J., S. H. STRAUSS, A. H. DOERKSEN, and R. A. PRICE. 1992. Extensive variation in evolutionary rate of rbcL gene sequences among seed plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:7844-7848.
7. BOWE, L. M., G. COAT, and C. W. DEPAMPHILIS. 2000. Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three plant genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales are derived conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (in press).
8. CARLQUIST, S. 1996. Wood, bark, and stem anatomy of Gnetales: a summary. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157(Suppl.):S58-S76.
9. CARMEAN, D., and B. CRESPI. 1995. Do long branches attract flies? Nature 373:666.
10. CHANG, J. T. 1996. Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters. Math. Biosci. 134:189-215.
11. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD et al. (39 coauthors). 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:528-580.
12. CHAW, S.-M., C. L. PARKINSON, Y. CHENG, T. M. VINCENT, and J. D. PALMER. 2000. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (in press).
13. CHAW, S.-M., A. ZHARKIKH, H.-M. SUNG, T.-C. LAU, and W.-H. LI. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of extant gymnosperms and seed plant evolution: analysis of nuclear 18S rRNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:56-68.
14. CRANE, P. R. 1985. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:716-793.
15. DAYHOFF, M. O., R. M. SCHWARTZ, and B. C. ORCUTT. 1978. A model of evolutionary change in proteins. Pp. 345-352 in M. O. DAYHOFF, ed. Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Vol. 5, Suppl. 3. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.
16. DOYLE, J. A. 1996. Seed plant phylogeny and the relationships of Gnetales. Int. J. Plant Sci. 157(Suppl. 6):S3-S39.
17. DOYLE, J. A., and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Bot. Rev. 52:321-431.
18. _. 1992. Fossils and seed plant phylogeny reanalyzed. Brittonia 44:89-106.
19. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, and C. BULT. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:570-572.
20. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 16:183-196.
21. _. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
22. FROHLICH, M. W., and D. S. PARKER. 1999. Seed plant phylogeny: evidence from Floricaula/Leafy. XVIth International Botanical Congress [abstract].
23. GAUT, B. 1998. Molecular clocks and nucleotide substitution rates in higher plants. Pp. 93-120 in M. K. HECHT, ed. Evolutionary biology. Vol. 30. Plenum Press, New York.
24. GILLESPIE, J. H. 1999. The role of population size in molecular evolution. Theor. Popl. Biol. 55:145-156.
25. GOREMYKIN, V., V. BOBROVA, J. PAHNKE, A. TROITSKY, A. ANTONOV, and W. MARTIN. 1996. Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support gnetalean affinities of angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:383-396.
26. GRAHAM, S. W., and R. G. OLMSTEAD. 1999. A phylogeny of basal angiosperms inferred from 17 chloroplast genes. XVIth International Botanical Congress [abstract].
27. HANSEN, A., S. HANSMANN, T. SAMIGULLIN, A. ANTONOV, and W. MARTIN. 1999. Gnetum and the angiosperms: molecular evidence that their shared morphological characters are convergent rather than homologous. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1006-1009.
28. HASEBE, M., R. KOFUJI, M. ITO, M. KATO, K. IWATSUKI, and K. UEDA. 1992. Phylogeny of gymnosperms inferred from rbcL gene sequences. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 105:673-679.
29. HENDY, M. D., and D. PENNY. 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38:297-309.
30. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1995. The robustness of two phylogenetic methods: four-taxon simulations reveal a slight superiority of maximum likelihood over neighbor-joining. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:843-849.
31. _. 1997. Is the Felsenstein Zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46:69-74.
32. _. 1998. Systematic bias in phylogenetic analysis: is the Strepsiptera problem solved? Syst. Biol. 47:519-537.
33. HUELSENBECK, J. P., D. M. HILLIS, and R. JONES. 1996. Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance. Pp. 19-45 in J. D. FERRARIS and S. R. PALUMBI, eds. Molecular zoology: advances, strategies and protocols. Wiley-Liss, New York.
34. KÄLLERSJÖ, M., V. A. ALBERT, and J. S. FARRIS. 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15:91-93.
35. KIM, J. 1998. Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance of phylogenetic estimators. Syst. Biol. 47:43-60.
36. LEHMANN, E. L. 1983. Theory of point estimation. Wiley, New York.
37. LI, W.-H. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
38. LOCKHART, P. J., M. A. STEEL, M. D. HENDY, and D. PENNY. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
39. LOCONTE, H., and D. W. STEVENSON. 1990. Cladistics of the Spermatophyta. Brittonia 42:197-211.
40. LYONS-WEILER, J., and G. A. HOELZER. 1997. Escaping from the Felsenstein Zone by detecting long branches in phylogenetic data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:375-384.
41. MADDISON, D. R., M. D. BAKER, and K. A. OBER. 1999. Phylogeny of carabid beetles inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Syst. Entomol. 24:103-138.
42. MANLY, B. F. J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
43. MEYER, A. 1994. Shortcomings of the cytochrome b gene as a molecular marker. TREE 9:278-280.
44. NIXON, K. C., W. L. CREPET, D. STEVENSON, and E. M. FRIIS. 1994. A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 81:484-533.
45. ORT, D. R., and C. F. YOCUM. 1996. Oxygenic photosynthesis: the light reactions. Kluwer, Boston.
46. PELLMYR, O., and J. LEEBENS-MACK. 1999. Forty million years of mutualism: evidence for Eocene origin of the yucca-yucca moth association. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9178-9183.
47. RAMBAUT, A., and N. C. GRASSLY. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the monte-carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
48. RAUBESON, L. A., and R. K. JANSEN 1992. A rare chloroplast DNA structural mutation is shared by all conifers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 20:17-24.
49. ROSS, V. A., M. J. ZANIS, P. S. SOLTIS, and D. SOLTIS. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among extant seed plant lineages inferred from 26S rDNA sequences. XVIth International Botanical Congress [abstract].
50. ROTHWELL, G. R., and R. SERBET. 1994. Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes: a numerical cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. 19:443-482.
51. SIDDALL, M. E. 1998. Success of parsimony in the four-taxon case: long branch repulsion by likelihood in the Farris zone. Cladistics 14:209-220.
52. SOLTIS, P. S., D. E. SOLTIS, P. G. WOLF, D. L. NICKRENT, S.-M. CHAW, and R. L. CHAPMAN. 1999. The phylogeny of land plants inferred from 18s rDNA sequences: pushing the limits of rDNA signal? Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1774-1784.
53. STANGER-HALL, K., and C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 1998. Support for a monophyletic lemuriformes: overcoming incongruence between data partitions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1572-1577.
54. STEWART, W. N., and G. W. ROTHWELL. 1993 Paleobotany and the evolution of plants. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.
55. SWOFFORD, D. S. 1999. PAUP* 4.0. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4b2. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
56. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. K. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, and D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogeny reconstruction. Pp. 407-514 in D. M. HILLIS, C. MORITZ, and B. K. MABLE, eds. Molecular systematics. 2nd edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
57. WINTER, K.-U., A. BECKER, T. MUNSTER, J. T. KIM, H. SAEDLER, and G. THEISSEN. 1999. MADS-box genes reveal that gnetophytes are more closely related to conifers than to flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:7342-7347.
58. YANG, Z. 1998. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 47:125-133.
59. YODER, A. D., R. VILGALYS, and M. RUVOLO. 1996. Molecular evolutionary dynamics of cytochrome beta in strepsirrhine primates: the phylogenetic significance of third-position transversions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1339-1350.
60. ZHARKIKH, A. 1994. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 39:315-329.