Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1758-1776

  Hilu, Khidir W ^a   Borsch, Thomas ^b   Müller, Kai ^b   Soltis, Douglas E ^c   Soltis, Pamela S ^d   Savolainen, Vincent ^e   Chase, Mark W ^e   Powell, Martyn P ^e   Alice, Lawrence A ^f   Evans, Rodger ^g   Sauquet, Hervé ^h   Neinhuis, Christoph ⁱ   Slotta, Tracey A B ^a   Rohwer, Jens G ^j   Campbell, Christopher S ^k   Chatrou, Lars W ^l  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^e ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^f WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g ACADIA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^h MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

ⁱ DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^l UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

more..

Author keywords

Angiosperms; Bayesian inference; matK; Phylogeny; Systematics

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS;

AEXTOXICACEAE; AMBORELLA; ASTERIDS; AUSTROBAILEYALES; BERBERIDOPSIDACEAE; CARYOPHYLLALES; CERATOPHYLLUM; CHLORANTHALES; CORE EUDICOTS; EMBRYOPHYTA; GYMNOSPERMAE; LILIOPSIDA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NYMPHAEACEAE; SANTALALES;

EID: 0347723872     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.12.1758     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. ALBACH, D. C., P. S. SOLTIS, D. E. SOLTIS, AND R. G. OLMSTEAD, 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of asterids based on sequences of four genes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88: 163-212.
2. ANDERBERG, A. A., C. RYDIN, AND M. KÄLLERSJÖ. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l.: analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. American Journal of Botany 89: 677-687.
3. APG (ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP). 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531-553.
4. APG II. 2003. An update of APG classification for the orders and families of flowering plants. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
5. BARKMAN, T. J., G. CHENERY, J. R. MCNEAL, J. LYONS-WEILER, W. ELLISENS, G. MOORE, A. D. WOLFE, AND C. W. DEPAMPHILIS. 2000. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 13 166-13 171.
6. BARTHLOTT, W., I. THEISEN, T. BORSCH, AND C. NEINHUIS. 2003. Epicuticular waxes and vascular plant systematics: integrating micromorphological and chemical data. In T. F. Stuessy, V. Mayer, and E. Hörandl [eds.], Deep morphology: toward a renaissance of morphology in plant systematics, 189-206. Regnum Vegetabile 141. Ganter Verlag, Rugell, Liechtenstein.
7. BORSCH, T., K. W. HILU, D. QUANDT, V. WILDE, C. NEINHUIS, AND W. BARTHLOTT. 2003. Non-coding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well supported phylogeny of basal angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 558-576.
8. BOWE, L. M., G. COAT, AND C. W. DEPAMPHILIS. 2000. Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales closest relatives are conifers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 4092-4097.
9. BREMER, B., K. BREMER, N. HEIDARI, P. ERIXON, R. G. OLMSTEAD, A. A. ANDERBERG, M. KALLERSJO, AND E. P. BARKHORDARIAN. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxoninc levels. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution 24: 274-301.
10. BREMER, B., R. K. JANSEN, B. OXELMAN, M. BACKLUND, H. LANTZ, AND K.-J. KIM. 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny - case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Systematic Biology 48: 413-435.
11. CHASE, M. W., M. R. DUVALL, H. G. HILLS, J. G. CONRAN, A. V. COX, L. E. EGUIARTE, J. HARTWELL, M. F. FAY, L. R. CADDICK, K. M. CAMERON, AND S. HOOT. 1995. Molecular phylogenetics of Lilianae. In P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries [eds.], Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. 109-137. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
12. CHASE, M. W., D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, P. J. RUDALL, M. F. FAY, W. H. HAHN, S. SULLIVAN, J. JOSEPH, T. GIVNISH, K. J. SYTSMA, AND C. PIRES. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In K. K. L. Wilson and D. Morrison [eds.], Proceedings of monocots II: the second international symposium on the comparative biology of the monocotyledons. 3-16. CSIRO Press, Sydney, Australia.
13. CHASE, M. W., ET AL. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
14. CHIBA, T., T. HARADA, S. GOTO, R. ISHIKAWA, AND M. NIIZEKI. 1996. Transcription of tRNA genes from large-scale plastid DNA deletion clearly reveals the action of nuclear-encoded RNA polymerase in the plastid. Journal of Plant Physiology 148: 652-656.
15. CORNER, E. J. H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons, vols. 1, 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
16. COSNER, M. E., R. K. JANSEN, AND T. G. LAMMERS, 1994. Phylogenetic relationship in the Campanulales based on rbcL sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 190: 79-95.
17. CRONQUIST, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants, 2nd ed. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA.
18. CUÉNOUD, P., V. SAVOLAINEN, L. W. CHATROU, M. W. POWELL, R. J. GRAYER, AND M. W. CHASE. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 132-144.
19. DAHLGREN, R. M. T. 1980. A revised classification of the angiosperm. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 91-124.
20. DONOGHUE, M. J., AND M. J. SANDERSON. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants, 340-368. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
21. DOYLE, J. J., AND J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf material. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
22. DOYLE, J. A., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161(Supplement): 121-153.
23. DRINNAN, A. N., N. R. CRANE, AND S. B. HOOT. 1994. Patterns of floral evolution in the early diversification of non-magnoliid dicotolydons (eudicots). Plant Systematics and Evolution (Supplement) 8: 93-122.
24. DU JARDIN, P., D. PORTETELLE, L. HARVENGT, M. DUMONT, AND B. WATHELET. 1994. Expression of intron-encoded maturase-like polypeptides in potato chloroplasts. Current Genetics 25: 158-163.
25. EMS, S. C., C. W. MORDEN, AND K. W. DIXON. 1995. Transcription, splicing, and editing of plastid RNAs in the nonphotosynthetic plant Epifagus virginiana. Plant Molecular Biology 29: 621-733.
26. ENDRESS, P. K., AND A. IGERSHEIM. 2000. Gynoecium structure and evolution in basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Supplement): 211-213.
27. FARRIS, J. S. 1977. Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's law. Systematic Zoology 26: 77-88.
28. FARRIS, S. J. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
29. FARRIS, J. S. 2002. RASA attributes highly significant structure to randomized data. Cladistics 18: 334-353.
30. FARRIS, J. S., V. A. ALBERT, M. KÄLLERSJÖ, D. LIPSCOMB, AND A. G. KLUGE. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99-124.
31. FAY, M. F., P. J. RUDALL, S. SULLIVAN, K. L. STOBART, A. Y. BRUIJN, G. REEVES, F. QAMARUZ-ZAMAN, W. P. HONG, J. JOSEPH, W. J. HAHN, J. G. CONRAN, AND M. W. CHASE. 2000. Phylogenetic studies of Asparagaies based on four plastid DNA regions. In K. K. L. Wilson and D. Morrison [eds.], Proceedings of monocots II: the second international symposium on the comparative biology of the monocotyledons, 347-359. CSIRO Press, Sydney, Australia.
32. FISHBEIN, M., C. HIBSCH-JETTER, D. E. SOLTIS, AND L. HUFFORD. 2001. Phylogeny of Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots): analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. Systematic Biology 50: 817-847.
33. GADEK, P. A., E. S. FERNANDO, C. J. QUINN, S. B. HOOT, T. TERRAZAS, M. C. SHEAHAN, AND M. W. CHASE. 1996. Sapindales: molecular delimitation and infraordinal groups. American Journal of Botany 83: 802-811.
34. GRAHAM, S. W., AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 87: 1712-1730.
35. GRAHAM, S. W., P. A. REEVES, A. C. E. BURNS, AND R. G. OLMSTEAD. 2000. Microstructural changes in noncoding chloroplast DNA: interpretation, evolution, and utility of indels and inversions in basal angiosperm phylogenetic inference. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161(Supplement): 83-96.
36. GRAYBEAL, A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Systematic Biology 47: 9-17.
37. HILLIS, D. M. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383: 130-131.
38. HILLIS, D. M. 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy and investigator bias. Systematic Biology 47: 3-8.
39. HILU, K. W., AND L. A. ALICE. 1999. Systematic and evolutionary implications of matK indels in Poaceae. American Journal of Botany 86: 1735-1741.
40. HILU, K. W., L. A. ALICE, AND H. LIANG. 1999. Phylogeny of Poaceae inferred from matK sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 835-851.
41. HILU, K. W., AND H. LIANG. 1997. The matK gene: sequence variation and application in plant systematics. American Journal of Botany 84: 830-839.
42. HOLMQUIST, R. 1983. Transitions and transversions in evolutionary descent: an approach to understanding. Journal of Molecular Evolution 19: 134-144.
43. HOOT, S. B., S. MAGALLÓN, AND P. R. CRANE. 1999. Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three molecular datasets: atpB, rbcL, and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 1-32.
44. HUELSENBECK, J. P, B. LARGET, R. E. MILLER, AND F. RONQUIST. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 673-688.
45. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes. Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
46. JOHNSON, L. A., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1994. matK DNA sequences and phylogenetic reconstruction in Saxifragaceae s. str. Systematic Botany 19: 143-156.
47. JOHNSON, L. A., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1995. Phylogenetic inference in Saxifragaceae sensu stricto and Gilia (Polemoniaceae) using matK sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 149-175.
48. JUDD, W. S., R. W. SAUNDERS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1994. Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Papers in Botany 5: 1-51.
49. 4 photosynthesis. International Journal of Plant Sciences.
50. KÄLLERSJÖ, M., V. A. ALBERT, AND J. S. FARRIS. 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15: 91-93.
51. KELCHNER, S. A. 2000. The evolution of noncoding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482-498.
52. KIM, J. 1998. Large-scale phylogenies and measuring the performance of phylogenetic estimators. Systematic Biology 47: 43-60.
53. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. Journal of Molecular Evolution 29: 170-179.
54. KLUGE, A. G., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18: 1-32.
55. KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA, I. B. JAKOBSEN, AND M. NEI. 2001. MEGA 2. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
56. LIERE, K., AND G. LINK. 1995. RNA-binding activity of the matK protein encoded by the chloroplast trnK intron from mustard (Sinapis alba L.). Nucleic Acids Research 23: 917-921.
57. LYONS-WEILER, J., G. A. HOELZER, AND R. J. TAUSCH. 1996. Relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA) I: the statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 749-757.
58. MATHEWS, S., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1999. The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes. Science 286: 947-950.
59. MATHEWS, S., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2000. Basal angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochromes A and C. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161(Supplement): 41-55.
60. METCALFE, C. R., AND L. CHALK. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Leaves, stem, and wood in relation to taxonomy with notes on economic uses, 1st ed., vols. 1-2, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
61. MOHR, G., P. S. PERLMAN, AND A. M. LAMBOWITZ. 1993. Evolutionary relationships among group II intron-encoded proteins and identification of a conserved domain that may be related to maturase function. Nucleic Acids Research 21: 4991-4997.
62. MÜLLER, K. 2002. PRAT: computer program for phylogenetic analyses of large data sets. Program distributed by the author, Botanical Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany, http://www.botanik.uni-bonn.de/ system/download/PRAT
63. MÜLLER, K. 2003. QuickAlign: a new alignment editor. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 21: 5.
64. MÜLLER, K., T. BORSCH, L. LEGENDRE, S. POREMBSKI, I. THEISEN, AND W. BARTHLOTT. In press. Evolution of carnivory in Lamiales and Lentibulariaceae. Plant Biology.
65. NANDI, O. I., M. W. CHASE, AND P. L. ENDRESS. 1998. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular data sets. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 137-212.
66. NEUHAUS, H., AND G. LINK. 1987. The chloroplast tRNALys (UUU) gene from mustard (Sinapsis alba) contains a class II intron potentially coding for a maturase related polypeptide. Current Genetics 11: 251-257.
67. NIXON, K. 1999. The parsimony ratchet: a rapid means for analyzing large data sets. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
68. OLMSTEAD, R. G., B. BREMER, K. SCOTT, AND J. D. PALMER. 1993. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 700-722.
69. OLMSTEAD, R., G. C. W. DEPAMPHILIS, A. D. WOLFE, N. D. YOUNG, W. J. ELISONS, AND P. A. REEVES. 2001. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. American Journal of Botany 88: 348-361.
70. OLMSTEAD, R. G., R. K. JANSEN, K. J. KIM, AND S. J. WAGSTAFF. 2000. The phylogeny of the Asteridae s.l. based on chloroplast ndhF sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 96-112.
71. OLMSTEAD, R. G., H. J. MICHAELS, K. M. SCOTT, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 249-265.
72. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. D. PALMER. 1994. Chloroplast DNA systematics: a review of methods and data analysis. American Journal of Botany 81: 1205-1224.
73. OLMSTEAD, R. G., P. A. REEVES, AND A. C. YEN. 1998. Patterns of sequence evolution and implications for parsimony analysis of chloroplast DNA. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants II, 164-187. Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
74. OLMSTEAD, R. G., AND J. A. SWEERE. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular datasets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
75. PARKINSON, C. L., K. L. ADAMS, AND J. D. PALMER. 1999. Multigene analyses identify the three earliest lineages of extant flowering plants. Current Biology 9: 1485-1488.
76. POLLOCK, D. D., D. J. ZWICKL, J. M. MCGUIRE, AND D. M. HILLIS. 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Systematic Biology 51: 664-671.
77. QIU, Y-L., M, W. CHASE, S. B. HOOT, E. CONTI, P. R. CRANE, K. J. SYTSMA, AND C. R. PARKS. 1998. Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. International Journal of Plant Science 159: 891-905.
78. QIU, Y-L., J. LEE, F. BERNASCONI-QUADRONI, D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, M. ZANIS, E. A. ZIMMER, Z. CHEN, V. SAVOLAINEN, AND M. W. CHASE. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404-407.
79. QIU, Y-L., J. LEE, F. BERNASCONI-QUADRONI, D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, M. ZANIS, E. A. ZIMMER, Z. CHEN, V. SAVOLAINEN, AND M. W. CHASE. 2000. Phylogeny of basal angiosperms: analyses of five genes from three genomes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: S3-S27.
80. RANNALA, B., J. P. HUELSENBECK, Z. YANG, AND R. NIELSEN. 1998. Taxon sampling and the accuracy of large phylogenies. Systematic Biology 47: 702-710.
81. RENNER, S. S. 1999. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Laurales: evidence from molecular and morphological data. American Journal of Botany 86: 1301-1315.
82. RENNER, S. S., AND A. S. CHANDERBALI. 2000. What is the relationship among Hernandiaceae, Lauraceae, and Monimiaceae, and why is this question so difficult to answer? International Journal of Plant Sciences 161(Supplement): S109-S119.
83. SAUQUET, H., J. A. DOYLE, T. SCHARASCHKIN, T. BORSCH, K. W. HILU, L. W. CHATROU, AND A. LE THOMAS. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in the Magnoliales and Myristicaceae: a multi-level approach based on morphology and molecules. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 125-186.
84. SAVOLAINEN, V., M. W. CHASE, S. B. HOOT, C. M. MORTON, D. E. SOLTIS, C. BAYER, M. F. FAY, A. Y. DE BRUIJN, S. SULLIVAN, AND Y-L. QIU. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306-362.
85. SAVOLAINEN, V., ET AL. 2000b. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis of the rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bulletin 55: 257-309.
86. SHEAHAN, M. C., AND M. W. CHASE. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within Zygophyllaceae based on DNA sequences of three plastid regions, with special emphasis on Zygophylloideae. Systematic Botany 25: 371-384.
87. SIMMONS, M. P., C. P. RANDLE, J. V. FREUDENSTEIN, AND J. W. WENZEL. 2002. Limitations of relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA) for measuring phylogenetic signal. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 14-23.
88. SOLTIS, D. E., A. E. SENTERS, M. J. ZANIS, S. KIM, J. D. THOMPSON, P. S. SOLTIS, L. R. DE CRAENE, P. K. ENDRESS, AND J. S. FARRIS. 2003. Gunnerales are sister to other core eudicots: implications for the evolution of pentamery. American Journal of Botany 90: 461-470.
89. SOLTIS, D. E., AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among Saxifragaceae sensu lato: a comparison of topologies based on 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 84: 504-522.
90. SOLTIS, D. E., AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1998. Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis. In P. S. Soltis, D. E. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle [eds.], Molecular systematics of plants, vol. II, 1-42. Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
91. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, D. R. MORGAN, S. M. SWENSEN, B. C. MULLIN, J. M. DOWD, AND P. G. MARTIN. 1995. Chloroplast gene sequence data suggest a single origin of the predisposition for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in angiosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 92: 2647-2651.
92. SOLTIS, D. E., ET AL. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 1-49.
93. SOLTIS, P. S., D. E. SOLTIS, AND M. W. CHASE. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402-404.
94. SOLTIS, P. S., ET AL. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381-461.
95. SUZUKI, Y., G. V. GLAZKO, AND M. NEI. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenetics obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 16 138-16 143.
96. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2001. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, ver. 4.0b6. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
97. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable [eds.], Molecular systematics, 2nd ed., 407-514. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
98. TAKAHASHI, M. 1994. Exine development in Illicium religiosum Sieb. et Zucc. (Illiciaceae). Grana 33: 309-312.
99. TAKHTAJAN, A. 1987. System of Magnoliophyta. Academy of Sciences, USSR, Leningrad, Russia.
100. THOMPSON, J. D., T. J. GIBSON, F. PLEWNIAK, F. JEANMOUGIN, AND D. G. HIGGINS. 1997. The CLUSTAL-X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25; 4876-4882.
101. THORNE, R. F. 1992. An updated classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365-389.
102. VOGEL, J., T. HÜBSCHMANN, T. BÖRNER, AND W. R. HESS. 1997. Splicing and intron-internal RNA editing of trnK-matK transcripts in barley plastids: support for matK as an essential splice factor. Journal of Molecular Biology 270: 179-187.
103. WOLFE, A. D., C. W. MORDEN, AND J. D. PALMER. 1992. Function and evolution of a minimal plastid genome from a nonphotosynthetic parasitic plant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 89: 10648-10652.
104. XIANG, Q.-Y., D. E. SOLTIS, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of Cornaceae and close relatives inferred from matK and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 85: 285-297.
105. ZANIS, M., D. E. SOLTIS, P. S. SOLTIS, S. MATHEWS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2002. The root of angiosperms revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 99: 6848-6853.
106. ZWICKL, D. J., AND D. M. HILLIS. 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Systematic Biology 51: 588-598.