The place of Amborella within the radiation of angiosperms

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 201-202

  Lockhart, Peter J ^a   Penny, David ^a  

^a Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology & Evolution   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; LETTER; NYMPHAEA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT ROOT;

ANGIOSPERMS; EVOLUTION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NYMPHAEA; PLANT ROOTS;

AMBORELLA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 18144425198     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.03.006     Document Type: Letter

References (22)

1. D.E. Soltis, and P.E. Soltis Amborella not a basal angiosperm? Not so fast Am. J. Bot. 91 2004 997 1001
2. D.E. Soltis Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and 'ending incongruence': a cautionary tale in phylogenetics Trends Plant Sci. 9 2004 477 483
3. S. Stefanović Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? BMC Evol. Biol. 4 2004 35
4. V.V. Goremykin Analysis of Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 2003 1499 1505
5. V.V. Goremykin The chloroplast genome of Nymphaea alba: whole-genome analyses and the problem of identifying the most basal angiosperm Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 2004 1445 1454
6. P.J. Lockhart Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: the problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93 1996 1930 1934
7. W.J. Bruno, and A.L. Halpern Topological bias and inconsistency of maximum likelihood using wrong models Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 1999 564 566
8. D.L. Swofford Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods Syst. Biol. 50 2001 525 539
9. S. Poe, and D.L. Swofford Taxon sampling revisited Nature 398 1999 299 300
10. M.D. Hendy, and D. Penny A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees Syst. Zool. 38 1989 297 309
11. B. Kolaczkowski, and J.W. Thornton Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous Nature 431 2004 980 984
12. D. Posada, and K.A. Crandall Simple (wrong) models for complex trees: a case from retroviridae Mol. Biol. Evol. 18 2001 271 275
13. C. Ané Covarion structure in plastid genome evolution: a new statistical test Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004 10.1093/molbev/msi076 (http://mbe.oupjournals.org/)
14. D. Penny Mathematical elegance with biochemical realism: the covarion model of molecular evolution J. Mol. Evol. 53 2001 711 723
15. S.W. Graham, and R.G. Olmstead Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of basal angiosperms Am. J. Bot. 87 2000 1712 1730
16. S. Mathews, and M. Donoghue The root of angiosperm phylogeny inferred from duplicate phytochrome genes Science 286 1999 947 949
17. C. Loehne, and T. Borsch Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the petD group II intron: a case study in basal angiosperms Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 2005 317 332
18. Martin, W. et al. Chloroplast genome phylogenetics: why we need independent approaches to plant molecular evolution. Trends Plant Sci. (in press)
19. L. Jermiin The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated Syst. Biol. 53 2004 638 643
20. B.R. Holland Outgroup misplacement and phylogenetic inaccuracy under a molecular clock-a simulation study Syst. Biol. 52 2003 229 238
21. M.J. Phillips, and D. Penny The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28 2003 171 185
22. B.R. Holland Using consensus networks to visualize contradictory evidence for species phylogeny Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 2004 1459 1461