Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1455-1458

  Phillips, Matthew J ^a,b   Delsuc, Frédéric ^a,c   Penny, David ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

Genome scale phylogeny; RY coding; Saccharomyces; Systematic error

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE; PURINE DERIVATIVE; PYRIMIDINE DERIVATIVE;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CODING; EVOLUTION; GENOME; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; SACCHAROMYCES; SAMPLING; STOCHASTIC MODEL; YEAST;

GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; RESEARCH DESIGN; YEASTS;

SACCHAROMYCES;

EID: 3042550872     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh137     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Amrine-Madsen, H., K. P. Koepfli, R. K. Wayne, and M. S. Springer. 2003. A new phylogenetic marker, apolipoprotein B, provides compelling evidence for eutherian relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28:225-240.
2. Brinkmann, H., and H. Philippe. 1999. Archaea sister group of Bacteria? Indications from tree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:817-825.
3. Cavender, J. A., and J. Felsenstein. 1987. Invariants of phylogenies in a simple case with discrete states. J. Classif. 4: 57-71.
4. Delsuc, F., M. J. Phillips, and D. Penny. 2003. Comment on "Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?" Science 301:1482d.
5. Delsuc, F., M. Scally, O. Madsen, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. de Jong, F. M. Catzeflis, M. S. Springer, and E. J. P. Douzery. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of living xenarthrans and the impact of character and taxon sampling on the placental tree rooting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1656-1671.
6. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
7. Harrison, G. L., P. A. McLenachan, M. J. Phillips, K. E. Slack, A. Cooper, and D. Penny. 2004. Four new avian mitochondrial genomes help get to basic evolutionary questions in the late Cretaceous. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: (in press).
8. Hendy, M. D., and M. A. Charleston 1993. Hadamard conjugation-a versatile tool for modelling nucleotide-sequence evolution. N. Z. J. Bot. 31:231-237.
9. Hillis, D. M. 1995. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 44:3-16.
10. Huber, K. T., M. Langton, D. Penny, V. Moulton, and M. D. Hendy. 2002. Spectronet: a package for computing spectra and median networks. Appl. Bioinf. 1:159-161.
11. Lockhart, P. J., M. Steel, M. D. Hendy, and D. Penny. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
12. Lopez, P., D. Casane, and H. Philippe. 2002. Heterotachy, an important process in protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 1-7.
13. Penny, D., and M. D. Hendy. 1986. Estimating the reliability of evolutionary trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:403-417.
14. Penny, D., M. D. Hendy, and M. Steel. 1992. Progress with methods for constructing evolutionary trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:73-79.
15. Phillips, M. J., Y.-H. Lin, G. L. Harrison, and D. Penny. 2001. Mitochondrial genomes of a bandicoot and a brushtail possum confirm the monophyly of australidelphian marsupials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268:1533-1538.
16. Phillips, M. J., and D. Penny. 2003. The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28:171-185.
17. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
18. Pryer, K. M., H. Schneider, A. R. Smith, R. Cranfill, P. G. Wolf, J. S. Hunt, and S. D. Sipes. 2001. Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature 409:618-622.
19. Rokas, A., B. L. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804.
20. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
21. Springer, M. S., H. M. Amrine, A. Burk, and M. J. Stanhope. 1999. Additional support for Afrotheria and Paenungulata, the performance of mitochondrial versus nuclear genes, and the impact of data partitions with heterogeneous base composition. Syst. Biol. 48:65-75.
22. Steel, M., D. Huson, and P. J. Lockhart. 2000. Invariable sites models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 49:225-232.
23. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Mass.
24. Templeton, A. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37:221-244.
25. Woese, C. R., L. Achenbach, P. Rouviere, and L. Mandelco. 1991. Archaeal phylogeny: reexamination of the phylogenetic position of Archaeoglobus fulgidus in light of certain composition-induced artifacts. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 14:364-371.
26. Yang, Z. 1994. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:105-111.