How to sections

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 29, Issue , 2011, Pages 129-207

  Verspoor, Marjolijn ^a   Lowie, Wander ^a   van Geert, Paul ^a   van Dijk, Marijn ^a   Schmid, Monika S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126851279     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lllt.29.08ver     Document Type: Chapter

References (133)

1. Adolph, K.E. (1997). Learning in the development of infant locomotion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 62 [3, Serial No. 251].
2. Atkinson, D. (2002). Towards a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 86, 525-545.
3. Bassano D., & van Geert, P. (2007). Modeling continuity and discontinuity in utterance length: A quantitative approach to changes, transitions and intraindividual variability in early grammatical development. Developmental Science 10(5), 588-612.
4. Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M., Croft, W., Ellis, N., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59 (suppl.1), 1-26.
5. Beer, R. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 91-99.
6. Behrens, H. (2002). Learning multiple regularities: Evidence from overgeneralisation errors in the German plural. In A. Do, L. Dominguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 72-83). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
7. Behrens, H. (2009). First language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In K. de Bot & R. Schrauf (Eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 40-59). London: Routledge.
8. Bertenthal, B. (1999). Variation and selection in the development of perception and action. In G. Savelsbergh, H. van der Maas, & P. van Geert (Eds.), Non-linear developmental processes (pp. 105-121). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
9. Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216-236). London: Routledge.
10. Byrne, D. (2002). Interpreting quantitative data. London: Sage.
11. Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1978). The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In E.M. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings. (pp. 207-230). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
12. Caspi, T., & Lowie, W.M. (2010). A dynamic perspective on (Academic English) L2 lexical development. In R.Chácon-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, M. Torreblanca-López, & M. López-Jiménez (Eds.), Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
13. Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
14. Clark, E. (2009). First language acquisition. (2nd Ed.) Cambridge: CUP.
15. Cowan, N. (2003). Comparisons of development modeling frameworks and levels of analysis in cognition: Connectionist and dynamic systems theories deserve attention, but don't yet explain attention. Developmental Science, 6, 440-447.
16. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-238.
17. Coyle, T.R., & Bjorklund, D.F. (1997). Age differences in, and consequences of, multiple- and variable-strategy use on a multiple sort-recall task. Developmental Psychology, 33, 372-380.
18. de Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 166-178.
19. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2005). Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
20. de Bot, K., & Makoni, S. (2005). Language and aging in multilingual societies: A dynamic approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
21. de Bot, K., Verspoor, M., & Lowie, W. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 10, 7-21.
22. Dowker, A., Flood, A., Griffiths, H., Harriss, L., & Hook, L. (1996). Estimation strategies of four groups. Mathematical Cognitions, 2, 113-135.
23. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.
24. Dromi, E. (1986). The one-word period as a stage in language development: Quantitative and qualitative accounts. In I. Levin (Ed.), Stage and structure: Reopening the debate (pp. 220-245). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
26. Ellis, N. (1998). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631-664.
27. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
28. Ellis, N. (2008). The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 92, 232-249.
29. Ellis, N., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27, 558-589.
30. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.
31. Elman, J. (1995). Language as a dynamical system. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion (pp. 195-225). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32. Evans, N., & Levinson, S. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429-492.
33. Eykhoff, P. (1974). System identification: Parameter and state estimation. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
34. Feldman, H.M., Dollaghan, C.A., Campbell, T.F., Kurs-Lasky, M., Janosky J.E., & Paradise, J.L. (2000). Measurement properties of the MacArthur communicative development inventories at ages one and two years. Child Development, 71, 310-322.
35. Fenson, L., Bates, E., Goodman, J., Reznick, J.S., & Thal, D.J. (2000). Measuring variability in early child language: Don't shoot the messenger. Child Development, 71, 323-328.
36. Furrow, D., Nelson, K., & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers' speech to children and syntactic development: Some simple relationships. Journal of Child Language, 6, 423-442.
37. Gaddis, J.L. (2002). The landscape of history. Oxford: OUP.
38. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (1994). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Goldberg, A. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 219-224.
40. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M.W. (2002). Looking at the hands through time: A microgenetic perspective on learning and instruction. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 80-105). Cambridge: CUP.
41. Good, P.I. (1999). Resampling methods: A practical guide to data analysis. Boston, MA: Birkhauser.
42. Grant, L., & Ginther, A. (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 123-145.
43. Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
44. Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
45. Hernandez, A., Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 220-225.
46. Hood, G. (2009). Poptools [Computer software]. Canberra, Australia: Pest Animal Control Co-operative research Center (CSIRO).
47. Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 155-175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Jahn-Samilo, J., Goodman, J., Bates, E., Appelbaum, M., & Sweet, M. (2000). Vocabulary learning in children from 8 to 30 months of age: A comparison of parental reports and laboratory measures. San Diego, CA: University of California.
49. Jarvis, S. (2006). Examining the properties of lexical diversity through quantitative and qualitative means. Paper presented at the 16th Sociolinguistics Symposium, Limerick, Ireland.
50. Jessner, U. (2008). A DST model of multilingualism and the role of metalinguistic awareness. Modern Language Journal, 92, 270-283.
51. Jordan, G. (2004). Theory construction in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Klima, E. & Bellugi, U. (1966). Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In J. Lyons & R. J. Wales (Eds.), Psycholinguistic Papers: The proceedings of the 1966 Edinburgh Conference (pp. 183-207). Edinburgh: EUP.
53. Köpcke, K. (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: Schemata vs. rules. Journal of Child Language, 25, 293-319.
54. Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 66-88). London: Routledge.
55. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning, 26, 125-135.
56. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141-165.
57. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 33-46). London: Continuum.
58. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2005). Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end and there is no state. In Z. Han & T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (pp. 189-200). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
59. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590-616.
60. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). On the complementarity of complexity theory and dynamic systems theory in understanding the second language acquisition process. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 10, 35-37.
61. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). The dynamic co-adaption of cognitive and social views: A complexity theory perspective. R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning.
62. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008a). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
63. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008b). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92, 200-213.
64. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
65. Laufer, B. (1998). The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different. Applied Linguistics, 19, 255-271.
66. Laufer, B., Elder, C., Hill, K., & Congdon, P. (2004). Size and strength: Do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing, 21, 202-226.
67. Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436.
68. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307-322.
69. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33-51.
70. Laufer, B., & Paribakht, T.S. (1998). The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context. Language Learning, 48, 365-391.
71. Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2002). Macro- and microdevelopmental research assumptions, research strategies, constraints and utilities. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 243-265). Cambridge: CUP.
72. Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30, 341-371.
73. Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children's first language learning from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168-196). London: Routledge.
74. Long, M. (1993). Assessment strategies for second language acquisition theories. Applied Linguistics, 14, 225-249.
75. Lorenz, E.N. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130-141.
76. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analysing talk. (3rd. Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. MacWhinney, B. (2008). A unified model. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 341-371). London: Routledge.
78. May, R.M. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261, 459.
79. McKee, G., Malvern, D., & Richards, B.J. (2000). Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 15, 323-383.
80. Meara, P. (2004). Modeling vocabulary loss. Applied Linguistics, 25, 137-155.
81. Melka, F. (1997). Receptive versus productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & N. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 84-102). Cambridge: CUP.
82. Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: OUP.
83. Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (1998[2004]). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.
84. Nortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Arnold.
85. Paulson, E. (2005). Viewing eye movements during reading through the lens of chaos theory: How reading is like the weather. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 338-358.
86. Peters, A. (2009). Cracking the language code: Processing strategies in first language acquisition. In S. Foster-Cohen (Ed.), Advances in language acquisition. Quoting. (pp. 40-61). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
87. Pierrehumbert, J. (2003). Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In R. Bod, J. Hay, & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp. 177-228). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
88. Plaza Pust, C. (2008). Dynamic systems theory and universal grammar: Holding up a turbulent mirror to development in grammars. Modern Language Journal, 92, 250-269.
89. Port, R., & van Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
90. Redington, M., Chater, N., & Finch, S. (1998). Distributional information: A powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cognitive Science, 22, 425-469.
91. Reinking, D., & Watkins, J. (2000). A formative experiment investigating the use of multimedia book reviews to increase elementary students' independent reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 384-419.
92. Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of first language in foreign language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
93. Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. (2008). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
94. Robinson, P., & Mervis, C.B. (1998). Disentangling early language development: Modeling lexical and grammatical acquisition using an extension of case-study methodology. Developmental Psychology, 34, 363-375.
95. Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1987). Learning the past tense of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel processing? In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 195-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
96. Saffran, J. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110-114.
97. Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 17-36.
98. Shatz, M. (2009). On the development of the field of language development. In E. Hoff & M. Shatz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 1-15). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
99. Shrager, J., & Siegler, R. S. (1998). SCADS: A model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychological Science, 9, 405-410.
100. Siegler, R.S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464-510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
101. Siegler, R.S. (2007). Cognitive variability. Developmental Science, 10, 104-109.
102. Siegler, R.S., & Svetina, M. (2002). A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change. Child Development, 73, 793-809.
103. Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. Oxford: OUP.
104. Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish Applied Linguistics, 31, 532-553.
105. Steinkrauss, R. (2009). Frequency and function: A usage-based case study of German L1 acquisition. Groningen Dissertation in Linguistics 75.
106. Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
107. Thelen, E., & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56(1, Serial No. 223).
108. Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209-253.
109. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based account of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
110. van der Slik, F., Driessen, G., & de Bot, K. (2006). Ethnic and socioeconomic class composition and language proficiency: A longitudinal multilevel examination in Dutch elementary schools. European Sociological Review, 22, 293-308.
111. van Dijk, M. (2003). Child language cuts capers. Variability and ambiguity in early child development. Groningen: University of Groningen.
112. van Dijk, M., & van Geert, P. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340-375.
113. van Dijk, M., & van Geert, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development, 16, 7-33. Published online in Wiley InterScience DOI: 10.1002/icd.506.
114. van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems theory model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3-53.
115. van Geert, P. (1993). A dynamic systems model of cognitive growth: Competition and support under limited resource conditions. In L.B. Smith & E. Thelen (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications (pp. 265-332). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
116. van Geert, P. (1994a). Vygotskian dynamics of development. Human Development, 37, 346-365.
117. van Geert, P. (1994b). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. New York, NY: Harvester.
118. van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond. Psychological Review, 5, 634-677.
119. van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K.J. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640-672). London: Sage.
120. van Geert, P. (2008). The dynamic systems approach in the study of L1 and L2 acquisition: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 92, 179-199.
121. van Geert, P. (2009). A comprehensive dynamic systems theory of language development. In K. de Bot & R. Schrauf (Eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 60-104). London: Routledge.
122. van Geert, P., Savelsbergh, G., & van der Maas, H. (1997). Transitions and non-linear dynamics in developmental psychology. In G. Savelsbergh, H. van der Maas, & P. van Geert (Eds.), Non-linear developmental processes (pp. XI-XX). Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen.
123. van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining 'after' by 'before': Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25, 408-442.
124. van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, R. (2008). A complexity and dynamic systems approach to development assessment, modeling and research. In A. Battro, K. Fischer, & P. Léna (Eds.), The educated brain (pp. 71-94). Cambridge: CUP.
125. van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340-375.
126. Verhulst, P.F. (1838). Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans sonaccroissement. Correspondance Mathématique et Physique, publicée par A. Quetelet 10, 113.
127. Vermeer, A. (2000). Coming to grips with lexical richness in spontaneous speech data. Language Testing, 17, 65-83.
128. Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (2008). Input and second language development from a dynamic perspective. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters (pp. 62-81). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
129. Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 214-231.
130. Verspoor, M. & Sauter K. (2000). English sentence analysis: An introductory course. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
131. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaií, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
132. Xue, G., & Nation, I.S.P. (1984). A university word list. Language Learning and Communication, 3, 215-229.
133. Young, R. (1988). Variation and the interlanguage hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 281-302.