A UNIFIED MODEL

Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 341-371

  MacWhinney, Brian ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85083688934     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203938560-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (137)

1. Anderson, J., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Asher, J. (1977). Children learning another language: A developmental hypothesis. Child Development, 48, 1,040-1,048.
3. Atkinson, R. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821-828.
4. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory: The interface between memory and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 281-288.
5. Bailey, D., Chang, N., Feldman, J., & Narayanan, S. (1998). Extending embodied lexical development. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 64-69.
6. Barry, R. (1975). Topic in Chinese: An overlap of meaning, grammar, and discourse function. In J. S. R. Grossman & T. Vance (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
7. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
8. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences conference on native and foreign language acquisition (pp. 190-214). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
9. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173-218). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Berk, L. E. (1994). Why children talk to themselves. Scientific American, November, 78-83.
11. Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Birdsong, D. (2005). Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. DeGroot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Blackwell, A., & Bates, E. (1995). Inducing agrammatic profiles in normals: Evidence for the selective vulnerability of morphology under cognitive resource limitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 228-257.
14. Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S., & Ioup, G. (1988). The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4, 1-32.
15. Booth, J. R., MacWhinney, B., Thulborn, K. R., Sacco, K., Voyvodic, J. T., & Feldman, H. M. (2001). Developmental and lesion effects during brain activation for sentence comprehension and mental rotation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 18, 139-169.
16. Bradlow, A., Akahni-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D., & Tokhura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese liseners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning perception and production. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 977-985.
17. Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Chase, W., & Simon, H. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive psychology, 4, 5-81.
19. Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of UG to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93-119.
20. Cleermans, A., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). Learning the structure of event sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 235-253.
21. Colomé, A. (2001). Lexical activation in bilinguals’ speech production: Language specific or language independent. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 721-736.
22. de Bot, K., & van Montfort, R. (1988). “Cue-validity” in het Nederlands als eerste en tweede taal. Interdisciplinair Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap, 8, 111-120.
23. De Houwer, A. (2005). Early bilingual acquisition: Focus on morphosyntax and the Separate Development Hypothesis. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533.
25. DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Dell, G., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17, 149-195.
27. Dell’Orletta, F., Lenci, A., Montemagni, S., & Pirelli, V. (2005). Climbing the path to grammar: A maximum entropy model of subject/object learning. In Proceedings of the second workshop on psychocomputational Models of Human Language Acquisition, pp. 72-81. Ann Arbour, MI: Association for Computational Linguistics.
28. Demuth, K. (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS), Amherst.
29. Devescovi, A., D’Amico, S., Smith, S., Mimica, I., & Bates, E. (1998). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian and Serbo-Croatian: Local versus distributed cues. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 31. Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 345-377). San Diego: Academic Press.
30. Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 496-518.
32. Dittenbach, M., Rauber, A., & Merkl, D. (2002). Uncovering the hierarchical structure in data using the growing hierarchical self-organizing map. Neurocomputing, 48, 199-216.
33. Döpke, S. (1998). Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Journal of Child Language, 25, 555-584.
34. Dussias, P. E. (2001). Bilingual sentence parsing. In J. L. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 159-176). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
35. É.-Kiss, K. (1981). Topic and focus: The basic operators of the Hungarian sentence. Folia Linguistica, 15, 305-330.
36. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis. Leipzig: Duncker.
37. Eckman, F. R. (1991). The structural conformity hypothesis and the acquisition of consonant clusters in the interlanguage of ESL learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 23-41.
38. Ellis, N. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91-126.
39. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
40. Ellis, N., & Sinclair, S. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 234-250.
41. Elman, J., Hare, M., & McRae, K. (2005). Cues, constraints, and competition in sentence processing. In M. Tomasello & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Beyond nature nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates, pp. 111-138. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Elman, J. L., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143-165.
43. Flege, J. E., & Davidian, R. (1984). Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 323-347.
44. Flege, J. E., Takagi, J., & Mann, V. (1995). Japanese adults can learn to produce English “r” and “l” accurately. Language Learning, 39, 23-32.
45. Flynn, S. (1996). A parameter-setting approach to second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 121-158). San Diego: Academic Press.
46. Frenck-Mestre, C. (2005). Second language sentence processing: Which theory best accounts for the processing of reduced relative clauses? In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Gass, S. (1987). The resolution of conflicts among competing systems: A bidirectional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 329-350.
48. Gerver, D. (1974). The effects of noise on the performance of simultaneous interpreters: Accuracy of performance. Acta Psychologica, 38, 159-167.
49. Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59, 23-59.
50. Gobet, F. (2005). Chunking models of expertise: Implications for education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 183-204.
51. Goldsmith, J., & O’Brien, J. (2006). Learning inflectional classes. Language Learning and Development, 2, 219-250.
52. Green, D. W. (1986). Control, activation, and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210-223.
53. Grosjean, F. (1997). Processing mixed languages: Issues, findings and models. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 225-254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54. Gupta, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal shortterm memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language, 59, 267-333.
55. Hancin-Bhatt, B. (1994). Segment transfer: a consequence of a dynamic system. Second Language Research, 10, 241-269.
56. Harm, M. (2002). Building large-scale distributed semantic feature sets with WordNet. CNBC Tech Report.
57. Harrington, M. (1987). Processing transfer: language-specific strategies as a source of interlanguage variation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 351-378.
58. Hernandez, A., Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 220-225.
59. Holmes, V., Stowe, L., & Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 668-689.
60. Hurford, J. (1991). The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition. Cognition, 40, 159-201.
61. Ijaz, H. (1986). Linguistic and cognitive determinants of lexical acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 36, 401-451.
62. Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201-258.
63. Kilborn, K. (1989). Sentence processing in a second language: The timing of transfer. Language and Speech, 32, 1-23.
64. Kilborn, K., & Cooreman, A. (1987). Sentence interpretation strategies in adult Dutch-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 415-431.
65. Kilborn, K., & Ito, T. (1989). Sentence processing in Japanese-English and Dutch-English bilinguals. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 257-291). New York: Cambridge University Press.
66. Kohonen, T. (1990). The self-organizing map. In Proceedings of the IEEE (Vol. 78, pp. 1,464-1,480).
67. Krashen, S. (1994). The Input Hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 45-78). San Diego: Academic.
68. Kroll, J., & Tokowicz, N. (2005). Bilingual lexical processing. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
69. Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
70. La Heij, W. (2005). Selection processes in monolingual and bilingual lexical access. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
71. Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
72. Li, P., Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (2001). The acquisition of word meaning through global lexical co-occurrences. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 221-244.
73. Li, P., & Farkas, I. (2002). A self-organizing connectionist model of bilingual processing. In R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Bilingual sentence processing (pp. 59-85). Amsterdam: North Holland Elsevier.
74. Li, P., Farkas, I., & MacWhinney, B. (2004). Early lexical development in a selforganizing neural network. Neural Networks, 17, 1, 345-1,362.
75. Li, P., & MacWhinney, B. (2002). PatPho: A Phonological Pattern Generator for Neural Networks. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 408-415.
76. Li, P., Zhao, X., & MacWhinney, B. (2007). Dynamic self-organization and early lexical development. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 581-607.
77. Liu, H., Bates, E., & Li, P. (1992). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 451-484.
78. Long, M. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 287-317.
79. Lotto, A., Kluender, K., & Holt, L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1,134-1,140.
80. MacDonald, M. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157-201.
81. MacDonald, M. C., & MacWhinney, B. (1990). Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 469-492.
82. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676-703.
83. MacWhinney, B. (1975). Pragmatic patterns in child syntax. Stanford Papers And Reports on Child Language Development, 10, 153-165.
84. MacWhinney, B. (1982). Basic syntactic processes. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language acquisition: Vol. 1. Syntax and semantics (pp. 73-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. MacWhinney, B. (1987a). The Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249-308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
86. MacWhinney, B. (1987b). Toward a psycholinguistically plausible parser. In S. Thomason (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
87. MacWhinney, B. (1999). The emergence of language from embodiment. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 213-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. MacWhinney, B. (2000). Lexicalist connectionism. In P. Broeder & J. Murre (Eds.), Models of language acquisition: Inductive and deductive approaches (pp. 9-32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. MacWhinney, B. (2005a). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49-67). New York: Oxford University Press.
90. MacWhinney, B. (2005b). Item-based constructions and the logical problem. Association of Computational Linguistics 2005, 46-54.
91. MacWhinney, B. (2005c). The emergence of grammar from perspective. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 198-223). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
92. MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127-150.
93. MacWhinney, B., Feldman, H. M., Sacco, K., & Valdes-Perez, R. (2000). Online measures of basic language skills in children with early focal brain lesions. Brain and Language, 71, 400-431.
94. MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 29, 121-157.
95. MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255-277.
96. MacWhinney, B., & Pléh, C. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29, 95-141.
97. Major, R. (2001). Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
98. McCandliss, B. D., Fiez, J. A., Protopapas, A., Conway, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2002). Success and failure in teaching the /r/-/l/contrast to Japanese adults: Test of a Hebbian model of plasticity and stabilization in spoken language perception. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 89-108.
99. McDonald, J. L. (1987a). Assigning linguistic roles: The influence of conflicting cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 100-117.
100. McDonald, J. L. (1987b). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379-414.
101. McDonald, J. L., & Heilenman, K. (1991). Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 313-348.
102. McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Maximum likelihood models for sentence processing research. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 397-421). New York: Cambridge University Press.
103. McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. J. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 543-566.
104. McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Tanenhaus, M. (1998). Modeling the effects of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 283-312.
105. Mehler, J., & Christophe, A. (1994). Language in the infant’s mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 346, 13-20.
106. Miyake, A., Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671-717.
107. Moro, A. (2006). Copular sentences. In M. Eveart & H. Van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volume II, pp. 1-23. Oxford: Blackwell.
108. Nelson, K. (1998). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
109. Newell, A. (1990). A unified theory of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
110. O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
111. Paget, R. (1930). Human speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.
112. Pavlik, P. (in press). Timing is an order: Modeling order effects in the learning of information. In F. E. Ritter, J. Nerb, T. O’Shea & E. Lehtinen (Eds.), In order to learn: How the sequences of topics affect learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
113. Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. (Eds.) (2005). Grounding cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
114. Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Håkansson, G. (2005). Processing constraints on L1 transfer. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 128-153). New York: Oxford University Press.
115. Pimsleur, P. (1967). A memory schedule. Modern Language Journal, 51, 73-75.
116. Pirelli, V., & Herreros, I. (2006). Learning morphology by itself. Linguistica Computazionale, 22, 14-19.
117. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3-34.
118. Regier, T. (2006). The emergence of words: Attentional learning in form and meaning. Cognitive Science, 29, 819-865.
119. Sagae, K., MacWhinney, B., & Lavie, A. (2004). Automatic parsing of parent-child interactions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 113-126.
120. Sebastián-Galles, N., & Bosch, L. (2005). Phonology and bilingualism. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
121. Seleskovitch, D. (1976). Interpretation: A psychological approach to translating. In R. W. Brislin (Ed.), Translation: Application and Research. New York: Gardner.
122. Service, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (1993). Differences between young and older adults in learning a foreign vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 608-623.
123. Snow, C. E. (1999). Social perspectives on the emergence of language. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 257-276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
124. Sokolov, J. L. (1988). Cue validity in Hebrew sentence comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 15, 129-156.
125. Sokolov, J. L. (1989). The development of role assignment in Hebrew. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 158-184). New York: Cambridge.
126. Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381-382.
127. Stockwell, R., Bowen, J., & Martin, J. (1965). The grammatical structures of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
128. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: a case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
129. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a first language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
130. Trueswell, J., & Tanenhaus, M. (1994). Toward a constraint-based lexicalist approach to syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing, pp. 155-179. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
131. Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Garvey, S. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
132. Trueswell, J., Tanenhaus, M., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
133. Vygotsky, L. (1934). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
134. Waddington, C. H. (1957). The strategy of the genes. New York: MacMillan.
135. Werker, J. F. (1995). Exploring developmental changes in cross-language speech perception. In L. Gleitman & M. Liberman (Eds.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Language: Vol. 1 (pp. 87-106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
136. Wittenberg, G., Sullivan, M., & Tsien, J. (2002). Synaptic reentry reinforcement based network model for long-term memory consolidation. Hippocampus, 12, 637-647.
137. Yamamoto, K., Hoffman, D. S., & Strick, P. (2006). Rapid and long lasting plasticity of input/output mapping. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 2797-2798.