CHILDREN’S FIRST LANGUAGE ACQUISITION FROM A USAGE-BASED PERSPECTIVE1

Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 168-196

  Lieven, Elena ^a   Tomasello, Michael ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903991869     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203938560-16     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Abbot-Smith, K. & Behrens, H. (2006). How known constructions influence the acquisition of new constructions: the German periphrastic passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science, 30, 995-1026.
2. Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2001). What pre-school children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders. Cognitive Development, 16, 679-692.
3. Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Training two-year-olds to produce the transitive: the role of frequency, semantic similarity and shared syntactic distribution. Developmental Science, 7, 1, 48-55.
4. Aguado-Orea, J. (2005). The acquisition of morpho-syntax in Spanish: implications for current theories of development. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.
5. Akhtar, N. (1999). Acquiring basic word order: evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26, 339-356.
6. Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Young, C. R. (in press). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralisation errors. Cognition.
7. Ambridge, B., Theakston, A., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract grammatical construction. Cognitive Development, 21, 174-193.
8. Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.) Mechanisms of language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 157-193).
9. Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.) The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (pp. 3-76).
10. Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devoscovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of children’s comprehension strategies. Child Development, 55, 341-354.
11. Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.) (2003) Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Bowerman, M. (1988). The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid constructing an over-general grammar? In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Braine, M. (1987). What is learned in acquiring word classes-a step towards an acquisition theory. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Brooks, P. & Tomasello, M. (1999). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75, 4, 720-738.
15. Brooks, P., Tomasello, M., Lewis, L., & Dodson, K. (1999). Children’s overgeneralization of fixed transitivity verbs: The entrenchment hypothesis. Child Development, 70, 1,325-1,337.
16. Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455.
17. Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (Eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Bybee, J. L. & Scheibmann, J. (1999). The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, 37, 575-596.
19. Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science, 27, 843-873.
20. Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven E., & Theakston, A. (2007). What part of no do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword negation. Journal of Child Language, 34: 251-282.
21. Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention and communicative competence from 9-15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 255.
22. Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, J. K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113 (2), 234-272.
23. Chater, N., & Manning, C. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10 (7), 335-344.
24. Childers, J. B. & Tomasello, M. (2001). The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology, 37, 739-748.
25. Clark, E. (1996). Early verbs, event types and inflections. In C. E. Johnson & J. H. V. Gilbert (Eds.), Children’s Language, Vol. 9. Mahwah: New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 61-73).
26. Correa, L. (1995). An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 183-203.
27. Culicover, P. (1999). Syntactic nuts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Dąbrowska, E. (2004a). Language, mind and brain. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29. Dąbrowska, E. (2004b). Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19 (2), 225-271.
30. Dąbrowska, E. & Lieven, E. (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 3, 437-474.
31. de Villiers, J. (1985). Learning how to use verbs: Lexical coding and the influence of input. Journal of Child Language, 12, 587-596.
32. Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2000). The development of relative constructions in early child speech. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 131-152.
33. Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2001). The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: a usage-based approach to the development of grammatical constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 97-141.
34. Diessel, H. & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81, 4, 882-906.
35. Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (in press). Comprehension of case-marking and word-order cues by German preschoolers. Child Development.
36. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: a review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 143-188.
37. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, (1), 1-24.
38. Fernald, A., Pinto, J., Swingley, D., Weinberg, A., & McRoberts, G. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the second year. Psychological Science, 9, 228-231.
39. Fisher, C. (2002). The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: a reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition, 82, 259-278.
40. Freudenthal, D., Pine, J., Aguado-Orea, J., & Gobet, F. (2007). Modelling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German and Spanish using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science, 31, 311-341.
41. Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17 (8), 684-691.
42. Gomez, R. L. & Gerken, L. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70, 109-135.
43. Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45 (3), 337-374.
44. Indefrey, P. (2003). Variabilität in Erwerb und Repräsentation der schwachen Substantivdeklination des Deutschen. Paper presented at the 25th annual meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, February 2003, München.
45. Jackendoff, R. (1996). The architecture of the language faculty. Bradford: MIT Press.
46. Jusczyk, P. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Kempe, V. & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 543-587.
48. Kidd, E., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Examining the role of lexical frequency in children’s acquisition and processing of sentential complements. Cognitive Development, 21, 93-107.
49. Lewis, J. D. and Elman, J. (2001). A connectionist investigation of linguistic arguments from poverty of the stimulus: learning the unlearnable. In J. D. Moore and K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-third annual conference of the cognitive science society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
51. Lieven, E., Behrens, H., Speares, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30, 333-370.
52. Mandler, J. (2000). Perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 3-36.
53. Maslen, R., Theakston, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2004). A dense corpus study of past tense and plural overregularization in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 1,319-1,333.
54. Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20, 121-136.
55. Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2007). French children’s use and correction of weird word orders: A constructivist account. Journal of Child Language, 34 (2): 381-409.
56. McClure, K., Pine, J. & Lieven, E. (2006). Investigating the abstractness of children’s early knowledge of argument structure. Journal of Child Language, 33, 693-720.
57. Mintz, T. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90, 91-117.
58. Morris, W., Cottrell, G., & Elman, J. (2000). A connectionist simulation of the empirical acquisition of grammatical relations. In S. Wermter & R. Sun (Eds.), Hybrid neural systems. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
59. Naigles, L., & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before others? Journal of Child Language, 25, 95-120.
60. Peters, A. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Peters, A. (1997). Language typology, prosody and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 5. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum (pp. 135-197).
62. Pine, J., Lieven, E., & Rowland, C. (1998). Comparing different models of the development of the verb category. Linguistics, 36, 4-40.
63. Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C. (1992). The acquisition of Italian morphology: implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language, 19, 491-557.
64. Rowland, C. (2007). Explaining errors in children’s questions. Cognition, 104, 106-134.
65. Rowland, C. & Pine, J. (2000). Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition. Journal of Child Language, 27, 1, 157-181.
66. Rubino, R. B. & Pine, J. M. (1998). Subject-verb agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: what low error rates hide. Journal of Child Language, 25, 35-59.
67. Shanks, D. R. (1995). The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston (pp. 175-208).
69. Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (pp. 1,157-1,256).
70. Theakston, A. L. (2004). The role of entrenchment in children’s and adults’ performance on grammaticality-judgement tasks. Cognitive Development, 19 (1) 15-34.
71. Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2002). Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb “Go”. Journal of Child Language, 29, 783-811.
72. Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2004). Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax. Journal of Child Language, 31, 61-99.
73. Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M., & Rowland, C. F. (2005). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: BE and HAVE. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 247-277.
74. Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of the input in the acquisition of third singular verbs in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 863-877.
75. Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: a case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74, 209-253.
77. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Tomasello, M. & Abbot-Smith, K. (2002). A tale of two theories: response to Fisher. Cognition, 83, 207-214.
79. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 675-735.
80. Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23-79.
81. Wilson, S. (2003). Lexically-specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English. Journal of Child Language, 30, 75-115.
82. Wittek, A. & Tomasello, T. (2005). German-speaking children’s productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: local cues act locally. First Language, 25, 103-125.