A comprehensive dynamic systems theory of language development

Language Development Over the Lifespan

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 60-104

  Van Geert, Paul ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861371394     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880937     Document Type: Chapter

References (154)

1. Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 91(2), 169-188.
2. Auer, P. (2007). On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences, in press, corrected proof.
3. Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Ball, P. (2005). Critical mass: How one thing leads to another. London: Arrow Books/Random House.
5. Bankes, S., & Lempert, R. (2004). Robust reasoning with agent-based modeling. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8(2), 259-277.
6. Barsalou, L., Breazeal, C., & Smith, L. (2007). Cognition as coordinated noncognition. Cognitive Processing, 8(2), 79-91.
7. Bassano, D., & van Geert, P. (2007). Modeling continuity and discontinuity in utterance length: A quantitative approach to changes, transitions and intra-individual variability in early grammatical development. Developmental Science, 10(5), 588-612.
8. Berthouze, L., Metta, G., & Sun, R. (2005). Editorial: Epigenetic robotics: Modelling cognitive development in robotic systems. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(3), 189-192.
9. Bickhard, M. (2007). Language as an interaction system. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(2), 171-187.
10. Bigelow, A., MacLean, K., & Proctor, J. (2004, November). The role of joint attention in the development of infants' play with objects. Developmental Science, 7(5), 518-526.
11. Bjorne, P., & Balkenius, C. (2005). A model of attentional impairments in autism:First steps toward a computational theory. Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 193-204.
12. Borenstein, E., & Ruppin, E. (2005). The evolution of imitation and mirror neurons in adaptive agents. Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 229-242.
13. Breazeal, C. (2003). Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1), 119-155.
14. Breazeal, C., & Brooks, R. (2005). Robot emotion: A functional perspective. In J.-M. Fellous & M. A. Arbib (Eds.), Who needs emotions? The brain meets the robot (pp. 271-310). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Breazeal, C., & Scassellati, B. (2002). Robots that imitate humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 481-487.
16. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. London: Allen & Unwin.
17. Butler, C. S. (2008). Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences, 30, 1-30.
18. Call, J., & Carpenter, M. (2002). Three sources of information in social learning. In K. Dautenhahn & C. L. Nehaniv (Eds.), Imitation in animals and artifacts (pp. 211-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Callaghan, T. C., Rochat, P., & MacGillivray, T. (2004). Modeling referential actions in 6- to 18-month-old infants: A precursor to symbolic understanding. Child Development, 75, 11733-11744.
20. Cañamero, L., & Gaussier, P. (2005). Emotion understanding: Robots as tools and models. In J. Nadel & D. Muir (Eds.), Emotional development: Recent research advances (pp. 235-258). New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Cangelosi, A. (2006). The grounding and sharing of symbols. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14, 275-285.
22. Cangelosi, A. (2007). Adaptive agent modeling of distributed language: Investigations on the effects of cultural variation and internal action representations. Language Sciences, 29(5), 633-649.
23. Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Twelve- and 18-month-olds copy actions in terms of goals. Developmental Science, 8, 13-20.
24. Carr, P. (2007). Internalism, externalism and coding, Language Sciences, 29, 672-689.
25. Case, P., Tuller, B., Mingzhou, D., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Evaluation of a dynamical model of speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 977-988.
26. Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181-195.
27. Chemero, A., & Turvey, M. (2007). Gibsonian affordances for roboticists. Adaptive Behavior, 15(4), 473-480.
28. Christiansen, M. H., & Kirby, S. (2003). Language evolution: Consensus and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 300-307.
29. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 370-374.
31. Cleveland, A., Schug, M., & Striano, T. (2007, May). Joint attention and object learning in 5- and 7-month-old infants. Infant and Child Development, 16(3), 295-306.
32. Cowley, S. J. (2006). Language and biosemiosis: A necessary unity? Semiotica, 162(1/4), 417-444.
33. Cowley, S. J. (2007). The cognitive dynamics of distributed language. Language Sciences, 29, 575-583.
34. Cowley, S. J., Moodley, S., & Fiori-Cowley, A. (2004). Grounding signs of culture:Primary intersubjectivity in social semiosis. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(2), 109-132.
35. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21.
36. de Weerth, C., & van Geert, P. (2002). Changing patterns of infant behavior and mother-infant interaction: Intra- and interindividual variability. Infant Behavior and Development, 24(4): 347-371.
37. Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. London: Penguin Books.
38. Demiris, Y., & Johnson, M. (2003). Distributed, predictive perception of actions: A biologically inspired robotics architecture for imitation and learning. Connection Science, 15(4), 231-243.
39. Dessing, J., Daffertshofer, A., Peper, C., & Beek, P. (2007). Pattern stability and error correction during in-phase and antiphase four-ball juggling. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39(5), 433-446.
40. Diessel, H. (2007, August). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 108-127.
41. Dominey, P. (2007). Towards a construction-based framework for development of language, event perception and social cognition: Insights from grounded robotics and simulation. Neurocomputing: An International Journal, 70, 2288-2302.
42. Dominey, P., & Boucher, J. (2005). Developmental stages of perception and language acquisition in a perceptually grounded robot. Cognitive Systems Research, 6, 243-259.
43. Eilan, N., Hoerl, C., McCormack, T., & Roessler, J. (2005). Joint attention: Communication and other minds: Issues in philosophy and psychology. New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
44. Elliott, E., & Kiel, L. (2004). Agent-based modeling in the social and behavioral sciences. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8, 121-130.
45. Erlhagen, W., & Schöner, G. (2002). Dynamic field theory of movement preparation. Psychological Review, 109, 545-572.
46. Estes, K., Evans, J., Alibali, M., & Saffran, J. (2007). Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning. Psychological Science, 18, 254-260.
47. Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Theoretical models of human development. Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 313-399). New York:John Wiley.
48. Fischer, K. W., & Rose, S. P. (1999). Rulers, models, and nonlinear dynamics: Measurement and method in developmental research. In G. Savelsbergh, H. van der Maas, & P. van Geert (Eds.), Nonlinear developmental processes (pp. 197-212). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
49. Gergely, G. (2003). What should a robot learn from an infant? Mechanisms of action interpretation and observational learning in infancy. Connection Science, 15, 191-209.
50. Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 287-292.
51. Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.
52. Goldberg, A., Casenhiser, D., & White, T. (2007). Constructions as categories of language. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(2), 70-86.
53. Greenspan, S., & Shanker, S. (2007). The developmental pathways leading to pattern recognition, joint attention, language and cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 128-142.
54. Haken, H. (2006, May). Synergetics of brain function. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60(2), 110-124.
55. Hauser, M., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
56. Hawkins, J. (2007). Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(2), 87-107.
57. Hodges, B. (2007a). Values define fields: The intentional dynamics of driving, carrying, leading, negotiating, and conversing. Ecological Psychology, 19(2), 153-178.
58. Hodges, B. (2007b). Good prospects: ecological and social perspectives on conforming, creating, and caring in conversation. Language Sciences, 29, 584-604.
59. Huys, R., Daffertshofer, A., & Beek, P. (2004). Multiple time scales and subsystem embedding in the learning of juggling. Human Movement Science, 23(3), 315-336.
60. Jones, S. S. J., & Smith, L. B. (2002). How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Developmental Science, 5, 219-232.
61. Kaplan, F., & Hafner, V. (2006). The challenges of joint attention. Interaction Studies, 7(2), 135-169.
62. Kello, C. T. (2004). Characterizing the evolutionary dynamics of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 392-394.
63. Kersten, A. W., & Smith, L. B. (2002). Attention to novel objects during verb learning. Child Development, 73, 93-109.
64. Király, I., Jovanovic, B., Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., & Gergely, G. (2003). The early origins of goal attribution in infancy. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 12, 752-769.
65. Kirby, S. (2002). Natural language from artificial life. Artificial Life, 8, 185-215.
66. Kirby, S., & Hurford, J. R. (2002). The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. In A. Cangelosi & D. Parisi (Eds.), Simulating the evolution of language (pp. 121-148). London: Springer.
67. Kirby, S., Smith, K., & Brighton, H. (2004). From UG to universals: Linguistic adaptation through iterated learning. Studies in Language, 28, 587-607.
68. Kravchenko, A. V. (2007). Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences, 29, 650-671.
69. Lavoie, A. (2008, 14 February). Hauser presents theory of "humaniqueness". Retrieved 6 January, 2009 from http://harvardscience.harvard.edu/foundations/articles/hauser-presents-theory-humaniqueness.
70. Leslie, A., & Chen, M. (2007). Individuation of pairs of objects in infancy. Developmental Science, 10(4), 423-430.
71. Lewis, M. (2005). Self-organizing individual differences in brain development. Developmental Review, 25, 252-277.
72. Lewis, M., & Todd, R. (2007). The self-regulating brain: Cortical-subcortical feedback and the development of intelligent action. Cognitive Development, 22(4), 406-430.
73. Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., van Geert, P., Kunnen, S., & Bosma, H. (2008). Time and identity: A framework for research and theory formation. Developmental Review, 28, in press.
74. Lindblom, J., & Ziemke, T. (2006). The social body in motion: Cognitive development in infants and androids. Connection Science, 18(4), 333-346.
75. Linell, P. (2007). Dialogicality in languages, minds and brains: Is there a convergence between dialogism and neurobiology? Language Sciences, 29, 605-620.
76. Lopes, L., & Chauhan, A. (2007). How many words can my robot learn? An approach and experiments with one-class learning. Interaction Studies, 8(1), 53-81.
77. Love, N. (2007) Are languages digital codes? Language sciences. Cognitive Dynamics in Language, 29, 690-709.
78. Meltzoff, A. N. (1988). Infant imitation and memory: Nine-month-olds in immediate and deferred tests. Child Development, 59, 217-225.
79. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838-850.
80. Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1983). Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development, 54, 702-709.
81. Metta, G., & Berthouze, L. (2006). Epigenetic robotics: Modelling cognitive development in robotic systems. Interaction Studies, 7(2), 129-134.
82. Metta, G., Sandini, G., Natale, L., Craighero, L., & Fadiga, L. (2006). Understanding mirror neurons: A bio-robotic approach. Interaction Studies, 7(2), 197-232.
83. Morton, J. (1986). Developmental contingency modelling: A framework for discussing the processes of change and the consequences of deficiency. In P. L. C. van Geert (Ed.), Theory building in developmental psychology (pp. 141-165). New York: Elsevier.
84. Mundy, P., Block, J., Delgado, C., Pomares, Y., van Hecke, A., & Parlade, M. (2007, May). Individual differences and the development of joint attention in infancy. Child Development, 78(3), 938-954.
85. Nagai, Y., Hosoda, K., Morita, A., & Asada, M. (2003). A constructive model for the development of joint attention. Connection Science, 15(4), 211-229.
86. Newell, K., Liu, Y., & Mayer-Kress, G. (2003). A dynamical systems interpretation of epigenetic landscapes for infant motor development. Infant Behavior & Development, 26, 449-472.
87. Petitot, J. (1979). Hypothèse localiste et théorie des catastrophes. Note sur le débat. In M. Piatelli Palmerini (Ed.), Théories linguistiques et théorie de l'apprentissage: Le débat entre Jean Piaget et Noam Chomsky. Paris: Editions du Seuil (pp. 516-24).
88. Petitot, J. (1985). Morphogenèse du sens. Paris: PUF.
89. Port, R. (2007). How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 143-170.
90. Porter, R., & Hogue, D. (1998). Nonlinear dynamical systems in speech perception and production. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2(2), 95-131.
91. Raczaszek, J., Tuller, B., Shapiro, L., Case, P., & Kelso, S. (1999). Categorization of ambiguous sentences as a function of a changing prosodic parameter: A dynamical approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 367-393.
92. Raczaszek-Leonardi, J., Shapiro, L., Tuller, B., & Kelso, J. (2008). Activating basic category exemplars in sentence contexts: A dynamical account. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 87-113.
93. Ripa, J., & Ives, A. R. (2003). Food web dynamics in correlated and autocorrelated environments. Theoretical Population Biology, 64, 369-384.
94. Roberts, L. D., & Lee, C. (2002). Problems about young children's knowledge of the theory of mind and of intentionality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32, 295-310.
95. Robinson, B. F., & Mervis, C. B. (1998). Disentangling early language development:Modeling lexical and acquisition using and extension of case-study methodology. Developmental Psychology, 34, 363-375.
96. Rose, S. P., & Fischer, K. W. (1998). Models and rulers in dynamical development. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 123-131.
97. Ruhland, R., & van Geert, P. (1998). Jumping into syntax. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 65-95.
98. Ruhland, R., Wijnen, F., & van Geert, P. (1995). An exploration into the application of dynamic systems modelling to language acquisition. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Approaches to parameter setting (Amsterdam Series in Child Language Acquisition 4) (pp. 107-134). Institute for General Linguistics, Amsterdam.
99. Sandhofer, C. M., Smith, L. B., & Luo, J. (2000). Counting nouns and verbs in the input: Differential frequencies, different kinds of learning? Journal of Child Language, 27(33), 561-585.
100. Schlesinger, M. (2003). A lesson from robotics: Modeling infants as autonomous agents. Adaptive Behavior, 11(2), 97-107.
101. Schlesinger, M., & Casey, P. (2003). Where infants look when impossible things happen: Simulating and testing a gaze-direction model. Connection Science, 15, 271-280.
102. Schlesinger, M., & Parisi, D. (2001). The agent-based approach: A new direction for computational models of development. Developmental Review, 21, 121-146.
103. Schöner G., & Dineva, E. (2007). Dynamic instabilities as mechanisms for emergence. Developmental Science, 10, 169.
104. Schöner, G., & Thelen, E. (2006). Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. Psychological Review, 113(2), 273-299.
105. Schutte, A. R., & Spencer, J. P. (2002). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: Three-year-olds' delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. Child Development, 73, 377-404.
106. Schutte, A. R., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2003). Testing the dynamic field theory: Working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. Child Development, 74, 1393-1417.
107. Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2004, September). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305(5691), 1779-1782.
108. Shaw, R. (2001). Processes, acts, and experiences: Three stances on the problem of intentionality. Ecological Psychology, 13(4), 275-314.
109. Smith, E., & Conrey, F. (2007). Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 1-18.
110. Smith, K., Kirby, S., & Brighton, H. (2003). Iterated learning: A framework for the emergence of language. Artificial Life, 9, 371-386.
111. Smith, L. B. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: Principles from embodiment. Developmental Review, 25, 278-298.
112. Smith, L. B., Thelen, E., Titzer, R., & McLin, D. (1999). Knowing in the context of acting: The task dynamics of the A-not-B error. Psychological Review, 106, 235-260.
113. Steenbeek, H., & van Geert, P. (2007a). "Do you still like to play with him?" Variability and the dynamic nature of children's sociometric ratings. Netherlands Journal of Psychology, 63, 86-101.
114. Steenbeek. H., & van Geert, P. (2007b). The empirical validation of a dynamic systems model of interaction: Do children of different sociometric statuses differ in their dyadic play interactions? Developmental Science, 11, 253-281.
115. Steenbeek. H., & van Geert, P. (2008). A dynamic systems approach to dyadic interaction in children: Emotional expression, action, dyadic play, and sociometric status. Developmental Review, 27, 1-40.
116. Striano, T., Chen, X., Cleveland, A., & Bradshaw, S. (2006). Joint attention social cues influence infant learning. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(3), 289-299.
117. Striano, T., Henning, A., & Stahl, D. (2006). Sensitivity to interpersonal timing at 3 and 6 months of age. Interaction Studies, 7(2), 251-271.
118. Striano, T., Henning, A., & Vaish, A. (2006). Selective looking by 12-month-olds to a temporally contingent partner. Interaction Studies, 7(2), 233-250.
119. Striedter, G. (1998). Stepping into the same river twice: Homologues as recurring attractors in epigenetic landscapes. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 52(4), 218-231.
120. Thagard, R. (1996) Mind: Introduction to cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
121. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
122. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. Handbook of child psychology:Volume 1: Theorectical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 563-634). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
123. Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment:A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1-86.
124. Thom, R. (1972). Stabilité structurelle et morphogenèse. New York: Benjamin (also Paris: Intereditions, 1977).
125. Thompson, D. E., & Russell, J. (2004). The ghost condition: Imitation versus emulation in young children's observational learning. Developmental Psychology, 40, 882-889.
126. Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In C. Moore & P. J. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 103-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
127. Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language, 18, 121-147.
128. Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007). Intentionality in non-equilibrium systems? The functional aspects of self-organized pattern formation. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(1), 1-15.
129. Tuller, B., Jantzen, G., & Jirsa, V. K. (2008). A dynamical approach to speech categorization:Two routes to learning. New Ideas in Psychology. In press, corrected proof.
130. Turvey, M. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4, 173-187.
131. van Dijk, M., & van Geert, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development, 16(1), 7-33.
132. van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3-53.
133. van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development. Change between complexity and chaos. New York: Harvester.
134. van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms:Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond. Psychological Review, 105 (5, 4), 634-677.
135. van Geert, P. (2000). The dynamics of general developmental mechanisms: From Piaget and Vygotsky to dynamic systems models. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(2), 64-68.
136. van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K. J. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 640-672). London: Sage.
137. van Geert, P., & Fischer, K. W. (2008; in press). Dynamic systems and the quest for individual-based models of change and development. In J. P. Spencer, M. S. C. Thomas, & J. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a new grand theory of development? Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
138. van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before. Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25(3-4), 408-442.
139. van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intraindividual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 340-374.
140. Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 214-231.
141. Visetti, Y.-M. (2004). Language, space and the theory of semantic forms. In A. Carsetti (Ed.), Seeing, thinking and knowing (pp. 245-275). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
142. Vogt, P., & Divina, F. (2007). Social symbol grounding and language evolution. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 8(1), 31-52.
143. Wildgen W. (1981). Archetypal dynamics in word semantics: An application of catastrophe theory. In H. J. Eikemeyer & H. Raiser (Eds.), Words, worlds and contexts (pp. 234-296). New York: de Gruyter.
144. Wildgen W. (1982). Catastrophe theoretic semantics. An elaboration and application of René Thom's theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
145. Wildgen, W. (2002). Natural ontologies and semantic roles in sentences. Axiomathes, 12, 171-193.
146. Wildgen, W. (2006). Emergence of semantic and syntactic complexity in language. Paper presented at the Language Culture and Mind Conference: Integrating Perspectives and Methodologies in the Study of Language, Paris, July 17-20, 2006.
147. Woodward, A. L. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69, 1-34.
148. Woodward, A. L. (1999). Infants' ability to distinguish between purposeful and nonpurposeful behaviors. Infant Behavior and Development, 22, 145-160.
149. Woodward, A. L. (2005). Infants' understanding of the actions involved in joint attention. In N. Eilan, C. Hoerl, T. McCormack, & J. Roessler (Eds.), Joint attention:Communication and other minds: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 110-128). New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
150. Woodward, A. L., Sommerville, J. A., & Guajardo, J. J. (2001). How infants make sense of intentional action. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 149-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
151. Yavuz, H. (2007). An integrated approach to the conceptual design and development of an intelligent autonomous mobile robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 55(6), 498-512.
152. Yoshikawa, Y., Asada, M., Hosoda, K., & Koga, J. (2003). A constructivist approach to infants' vowel acquisition through mother-infant interaction. Connection Science, 15, 245-258.
153. Yu, C., & Ballard, D. H. (2007). A unified model of early word learning: Integrating statistical and social cues. Neurocomputing, 70(13-15), 2149-2165.
154. Zeeman, E. C. (1976). Catastrophe theory. Scientific American, 236(4), 65-83.