USAGE-BASED GRAMMAR AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 216-236

  Bybee, Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960519925     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203938560-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 568-591.
2. Bayley, R. (1994). Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: past tense marking in Chinese-English. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 157-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bayley, R. (1996). Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In R. Bayley, & D. R. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 97-120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). “If you look at . . ".: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25, 371-405.
5. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2002). What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 199-208.
7. Boas, H. C. (2003). A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI.
8. Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.) (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10. Bybee, J. L. (1991). Natural morphology: the organization of paradigms and language acquisition. In C. Ferguson, & T. Huebner (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 67-91). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Bybee, J. L. (1998). The emergent lexicon. Chicago Linguistic Society, 34, 421-35.
12. Bybee, J. L. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Bybee, J. L. (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14, 261-290.
14. Bybee, J. L. (2002a). Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In T. Givón & B. F. Malle (Eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp. 109-132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Bybee, J. L. (2003). Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602-623). Oxford: Blackwell.
16. Bybee, J. L. (2006). From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711-733.
17. Bybee, J. L., & Brewer, M. A. (1980). Explanation in morphophonemics: changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms. Lingua, 52, 201-242.
18. Bybee, J. L., & Eddington, D. (2006). A usage-based exemplar model approach to Spanish verbs of “becoming”. Language, 82, 323-355.
19. Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (Eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Bybee, J. L., & Moder, C. L. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59, 251-270.
21. Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Bybee, J. L., & Thompson, S.A. (1997). Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23, 378-388.
23. Casenhiser, D. & Goldberg, A. E. (2005). Fast mapping of a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8(6), 500-508.
24. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. De Saussure, F. (1915/1966). Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Eddington, D. (2000). Spanish stress assignment within the analogical model of language. Language, 76, 92-109.
28. Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91-126.
29. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: a review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143-188.
30. Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-24.
31. Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, overshadowing, blocking and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164-194.
32. Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20, 29-62.
33. Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64, 501-538.
34. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219-224.
36. Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289-316.
37. Guillaume, P. (1927/1973). The development of formal elements in the child’s speech. In C. A. Ferguson and D. I. Slobin (Eds.), Studies of Child Language Development (pp. 240-251). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
38. Hay, J., & Baayen, H. (2002). Parsing and productivity. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001 (pp. 203-235). Dordrecht: Klewer Academic.
39. Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kotovsky, L., and Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67, 2,797-2,822.
41. Krott, A., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2001). Analogy in morphology: modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics, 39, 51-93.
42. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
44. Langacker, R. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 1-63). Stanford: CSLI.
45. Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
46. Long, M. H. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 487-536). Oxford: Blackwell.
47. MacWhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, no. 174, Vol. 43.
48. Mańczak, W. (1980). Laws of analogy. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical morphology (pp. 283-288). Berlin: Mouton.
49. Meillet, A. (1912/1958). L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia 12, No. 26, 6. Reprinted in Meillet 1958, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion.
50. Moder, C. A. (1992). Productivity and categorization in morphological classes. Ph.D. diss., SUNY at Buffalo.
51. Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-226). Longman: London.
52. Richards, J. C. and T. S. Rodgers. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Schmitt, N. (Ed.) (2004). Formulaic sequences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
55. Simpson, R., & Ellis, N. (2005). An Academic Formulas List (AFL): extraction, validation, prioritization. Paper presented at the Phraseology, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
56. Simpson, R., & Mendis, D. (2003). A corpus-based study of idioms in academic speech. TESOL Quarterly, 3, 419-441.
57. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Skousen, R. (1989). Analogical modeling of language. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
59. Tottie, G. (1991). Lexical diffusion in syntactic change: frequency as a determinant of linguistic conservatism in the development of negation in English. In D. Kastovsky (Ed.), Historical English syntax (pp. 439-467). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
60. Traugott, E. C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65, 31-55.
61. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.