Large-scale genome-wide analysis links lactic acid bacteria from food with the gut microbiome

Nature Communications

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2020, Pages

  Pasolli, Edoardo ^a   De Filippis, Francesca ^a   Mauriello, Italia E ^a   Cumbo, Fabio ^b   Walsh, Aaron M ^c,d   Leech, John ^c,d   Cotter, Paul D ^c,d   Segata, Nicola ^b   Ercolini, Danilo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^c TEAGASC FOOD RESEARCH CENTRE   (Ireland)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; BIOTECHNOLOGY; FERMENTATION; FOOD QUALITY; GENOME; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; ORGANIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FECES; FERMENTED PRODUCT; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LACTIC ACID BACTERIUM; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; LIFESTYLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METAGENOME; MICROBIOME; MICROORGANISM; NONHUMAN; PREVALENCE; STREPTOCOCCUS THERMOPHILUS; ANIMAL; FOOD CONTROL; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; INTESTINE FLORA; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; LACTOBACILLALES; META ANALYSIS; MICROBIOLOGY; PRIMATE;

LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; STREPTOCOCCUS THERMOPHILUS;

PROBIOTIC AGENT;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, GENETIC; FERMENTED FOODS AND BEVERAGES; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; HUMANS; LACTOBACILLALES; LACTOCOCCUS LACTIS; LIFE STYLE; METAGENOME; PRIMATES; PROBIOTICS; STREPTOCOCCUS THERMOPHILUS;

EID: 85085304133     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16438-8     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Cordain, L. et al. Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st century. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 81, 341–354 (2005).
2. Marco, M. L. et al. Health benefits of fermented foods: microbiota and beyond. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 44, 94–102 (2017).
3. Stefanovic, E., Fitzgerald, G. & McAuliffe, O. Advances in the genomics and metabolomics of dairy lactobacilli: a review. Food Microbiol. 61, 33–49 (2017).
4. Wu, C., Huang, J. & Zhou, R. Genomics of lactic acid bacteria: Current status and potential applications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 43, 393–404 (2017).
5. Douillard, F. P. & de Vos, W. M. Biotechnology of health-promoting bacteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 37, 107369 (2019).
6. Hill, C. et al. Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11, 506–514 (2014).
7. Derrien, M. & van Hylckama Vlieg, J. E. T. Fate, activity, and impact of ingested bacteria within the human gut microbiota. Trends Microbiol. 23, 354–366 (2015).
8. Bertuzzi, A. S. et al. Omics-based insights into flavor development and microbial succession within surface-ripened cheese. mSystems 3, e00211-17 (2018).
9. Escobar-Zepeda, A., Sanchez-Flores, A. & Quirasco Baruch, M. Metagenomic analysis of a Mexican ripened cheese reveals a unique complex microbiota. Food Microbiol. 57, 116–127 (2016).
10. Milani, C. et al. Colonization of the human gut by bovine bacteria present in Parmesan cheese. Nat. Commun. 10, 1286 (2019).
11. Quigley, L. et al. Thermus and the pink discoloration defect in cheese. mSystems 1, e00023-16 (2016).
12. Walsh, A. M. et al. Microbial succession and flavor production in the fermented dairy beverage kefir. mSystems 1, e00052-16 (2016).
13. Walsh, A. M. et al. Strain-level metagenomic analysis of the fermented dairy beverage nunu highlights potential food safety risks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e01144-17 (2017).
14. Wolfe, B. E., Button, J. E., Santarelli, M. & Dutton, R. J. Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity. Cell 158, 422–433 (2014).
15. Pasolli, E. et al. Accessible, curated metagenomic data through ExperimentHub. Nat. Methods 14, 1023–1024 (2017).
16. Pasolli, E. et al. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell 176, 649–662.e20 (2019).
17. Truong, D. T. et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat. Methods 12, 902–903 (2015).
18. Redondo-Useros, N. et al. Associations of probiotic fermented milk (PFM) and yogurt consumption with Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus components of the gut microbiota in healthy adults. Nutrients 11, 651 (2019).
19. Vatanen, T. et al. Variation in microbiome LPS immunogenicity contributes to autoimmunity in humans. Cell 165, 1551 (2016).
20. Soto, A. et al. Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in human breast milk: influence of antibiotherapy and other host and clinical factors. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 59, 78–88 (2014).
21. Murphy, K. et al. The Composition of human milk and infant faecal microbiota over the first three months of life: a pilot study. Sci. Rep. 7, 40597 (2017).
22. Ferretti, P. et al. Mother-to-infant microbial transmission from different body sites shapes the developing infant gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 24, 133–145.e5 (2018).
23. Di Cagno, R., Coda, R., De Angelis, M. & Gobbetti, M. Exploitation of vegetables and fruits through lactic acid fermentation. Food Microbiol. 33, 1–10 (2013).
24. Broussard, J. L. & Devkota, S. The changing microbial landscape of Western society: Diet, dwellings and discordance. Mol. Metab. 5, 737–742 (2016).
25. Schnorr, S. L. et al. Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat. Commun. 5, 3654 (2014).
26. Crittenden, A. N. & Schnorr, S. L. Current views on hunter-gatherer nutrition and the evolution of the human diet. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 162, 84–109 (2017).
27. Zhu, K. et al. Anti-obesity effects of Lactobacillus fermentum CQPC05 isolated from Sichuan pickle in high-fat diet-induced obese mice through PPAR-α signaling pathway. Microorganisms 7, 194 (2019).
28. Manara, S. et al. Microbial genomes from non-human primate gut metagenomes expand the primate-associated bacterial tree of life with over 1000 novel species. Genome Biology 20, 299 (2019).
29. Bowers, R. M. et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 725 (2017).
30. Roos, S., Karner, F., Axelsson, L. & Jonsson, H. Lactobacillus mucosae sp. nov., a new species with in vitro mucus-binding activity isolated from pig intestine. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50(Pt 1), 251–258 (2000).
31. Heredia, N. & García, S. Animals as sources of food-borne pathogens: a review. Anim. Nutr. 4, 250–255 (2018).
32. Martin, N. H., Trmčić, A., Hsieh, T.-H., Boor, K. J. & Wiedmann, M. The evolving role of coliforms as indicators of unhygienic processing conditions in dairy foods. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1549 (2016).
33. Zanine, A. M. et al. Effects of Streptococcus bovis Isolated from bovine rumen on the fermentation characteristics and nutritive value of Tanzania grass silage. Sci. World J. 2016, 8517698 (2016).
34. Beck, M., Frodl, R. & Funke, G. Comprehensive study of strains previously designated Streptococcus bovis consecutively isolated from human blood cultures and emended description of Streptococcus gallolyticus and Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 2966–2972 (2008).
35. Godon, J. J., Delorme, C., Ehrlich, S. D. & Renault, P. Divergence of genomic sequences between Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 4045–4047 (1992).
36. Almeida, A. et al. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature 568, 499–504 (2019).
37. Nayfach, S., Shi, Z. J., Seshadri, R., Pollard, K. S. & Kyrpides, N. C. New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome. Nature 568, 505–510 (2019).
38. Segers, M. E. & Lebeer, S. Towards a better understanding of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG–host interactions. Microb. Cell Fact. 13(Suppl 1), S7 (2014).
39. Wuyts, S. et al. Large-scale phylogenomics of the Lactobacillus casei group highlights taxonomic inconsistencies and reveals novel clade-associated features. mSystems 2, e00061–17 (2017).
40. Li, X. et al. Establishment of a Macaca fascicularis gut microbiome gene catalog and comparison with the human, pig, and mouse gut microbiomes. Gigascience 7, giy100 (2018).
41. Zheng, J. et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 (2020).
42. Uriot, O. et al. Streptococcus thermophilus: from yogurt starter to a new promising probiotic candidate? J. Funct. Foods 37, 74–89 (2017).
43. Zhernakova, A. et al. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science 352, 565–569 (2016).
44. Song, A. A.-L., In, L. L. A., Lim, S. H. E. & Rahim, R. A. A review on Lactococcus lactis: from food to factory. Microb. Cell Fact. 16, 55 (2017).
45. Nakamura, S., Morimoto, Y. V. & Kudo, S. A lactose fermentation product produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, acetate, inhibits the motility of flagellated pathogenic bacteria. Microbiology 161, 701–707 (2015).
46. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. New Food Balances. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS. Accessed: 1st February 2020.
47. Taylor, B. C. et al. Consumption of fermented foods is associated with systematic differences in the gut microbiome and metabolome. mSystems 5, e00901–19 (2020).
48. Jung, J. Y. et al. Metagenomic analysis of kimchi, a traditional Korean fermented food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2264–2274 (2011).
49. Tamang, J. P., Watanabe, K. & Holzapfel, W. H. Review: Diversity of microorganisms in global fermented foods and beverages. Front. Microbiol. 7, 377 (2016).
50. Prentice, A. M. Dairy products in global public health. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 99, 1212S–1216SS (2014).
51. Thomas, A. M. & Segata, N. Multiple levels of the unknown in microbiome research. BMC Biol. 17, 48 (2019).
52. Hemarajata, P. & Versalovic, J. Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: mechanisms of intestinal immunomodulation and neuromodulation. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 6, 39–51 (2013).
53. Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. A. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824–834 (2017).
54. Peng, Y., Leung, H. C. M., Yiu, S. M. & Chin, F. Y. L. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28, 1420–1428 (2012).
55. Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).
56. Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
57. Ondov, B. D. et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 17, 132 (2016).
58. Asnicar, F. et al. Precise phylogenetic analysis of microbial isolates and genomes from metagenomes using PhyloPhlAn 3.0. Nat. Commun. (in the press).
59. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
60. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
61. Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).
62. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
63. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
64. Asnicar, F., Weingart, G., Tickle, T. L., Huttenhower, C. & Segata, N. Compact graphical representation of phylogenetic data and metadata with GraPhlAn. PeerJ 3, e1029 (2015).
65. Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T. & Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9, 5114 (2018).
66. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
67. Page, A. J. et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31, 3691–3693 (2015).