Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 725-731

  Bowers, Robert M ^a   Kyrpides, Nikos C ^a   Stepanauskas, Ramunas ^b   Harmon Smith, Miranda ^a   Doud, Devin ^a   Reddy, T B K ^a   Schulz, Frederik ^a   Jarett, Jessica ^a   Rivers, Adam R ^a,c   Eloe Fadrosh, Emiley A ^a   Tringe, Susannah G ^a,d   Ivanova, Natalia N ^a   Copeland, Alex ^a   Clum, Alicia ^a   Becraft, Eric D ^b   Malmstrom, Rex R ^a   Birren, Bruce ^e   Podar, Mircea ^f   Bork, Peer ^g   Weinstock, George M ^h   Garrity, George M ⁱ   Dodsworth, Jeremy A ^j   Yooseph, Shibu ^k   Sutton, Granger ^k   Glöckner, Frank O ^l   Gilbert, Jack A ^m,n   Nelson, William C ^o   Hallam, Steven J ^p   Jungbluth, Sean P ^a,q   Ettema, Thijs J G ^r   Tighe, Scott ^s   Konstantinidis, Konstantinos T ^t   Liu, Wen Tso ^u   Baker, Brett J ^v   Rattei, Thomas ^w   Eisen, Jonathan A ^x   Hedlund, Brian ^y   McMahon, Katherine D ^z   Fierer, Noah ^aa   Knight, Rob ^ab   Finn, Rob ^ac   Cochrane, Guy ^ac   Karsch Mizrachi, Ilene ^ad   Tyson, Gene W ^ae   Rinke, Christian ^ae   Lapidus, Alla ^af   Meyer, Folker ^m   Yilmaz, Pelin ^l   Parks, Donovan H ^ae   Eren, A M ^ag   Schriml, Lynn ^ah   Banfield, Jillian F ^ai   Hugenholtz, Philip ^ae   Woyke, Tanja ^a,d   more..

^a DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCEAN SCIENCES   (United States)

^c CENTER FOR MEDICAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e BROAD INSTITUTE OF MIT AND HARVARD   (United States)

^f OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^g EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^h JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

ⁱ Michigan State University ^*  (United States)

^j CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k J CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^l MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MARINE MICROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^m ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^o PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^q UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^r UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^s UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^t Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^u University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^v UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^w UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^x UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^y UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^z UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^aa UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^ab UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^ac EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^ad NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^ae UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^af ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^ag Sections of Critical Care Knapp Center for Biomedical Discovery   (United States)

^ah NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^ai UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

ARCHAEA; ARCHAEAL; ASSEMBLY QUALITY; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC; GENOME SEQUENCES; MARKER GENES; METAGENOMES; MINIMUM INFORMATION;

GENES;

ARCHAEAL DNA; ARCHAEAL RNA; BACTERIAL DNA; BACTERIAL RNA; CONTIG; RIBOSOME RNA; TRANSFER RNA;

ARCHAEAL CELL; ARCHAEAL GENOME; BACTERIAL CELL; BACTERIAL GENOME; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME ANALYSIS; MARKER GENE; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEQUENCE DATABASE; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

GENOME, ARCHAEAL; GENOME, BACTERIAL; GENOMICS; METAGENOMICS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 85027264358     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3893     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Amann, R.I., Ludwig, W. & Schleifer, K.H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59, 143-169 (1995).
2. Rappé, M.S. & Giovannoni, S.J. The uncultured microbial majority. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57, 369-394 (2003).
3. Tyson, G.W. et al. Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 428, 37-43 (2004).
4. Venter, J.C. et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304, 66-74 (2004).
5. Lasken, R.S. Single-cell sequencing in its prime. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 211-212 (2013).
6. Stepanauskas, R. Single cell genomics: an individual look at microbes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15, 613-620 (2012).
7. Turnbaugh, P.J. et al. The human microbiome project. Nature 449, 804-810 (2007).
8. Gilbert, J.A., Jansson, J.K. & Knight, R. The Earth Microbiome project: successes and aspirations. BMC Biol. 12, 69 (2014).
9. Wu, D. et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 462, 1056-1060 (2009).
10. Anantharaman, K. et al. Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat. Commun. 7, 13219 (2016).
11. Brown, C.T. et al. Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria. Nature 523, 208-211 (2015).
12. Eloe-Fadrosh, E.A. et al. Global metagenomic survey reveals a new bacterial candidate phylum in geothermal springs. Nat. Commun. 7, 10476 (2016).
13. Rinke, C. et al. Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499, 431-437 (2013).
14. Reddy, T.B.K. et al. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v.5: a metadata management system based on a four level (meta)genome project classification. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1099-D1106 (2015).
15. Field, D. et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 541-547 (2008).
16. Chain, P.S.G. et al. Genomics. Genome project standards in a new era of sequencing. Science 326, 236-237 (2009).
17. Yilmaz, P. et al. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 415-420 (2011).
18. Medema, M.H. et al. Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 625-631 (2015).
19. Glass, E.M. et al. MIxS-BE: a MIxS extension defining a minimum information standard for sequence data from the built environment. ISME J. 8, 1-3 (2014).
20. Rinke, C. et al. Obtaining genomes from uncultivated environmental microorganisms using FACS-based single-cell genomics. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1038-1048 (2014).
21. Albertsen, M. et al. Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 533-538 (2013).
22. Dick, G.J. et al. Community-wide analysis of microbial genome sequence signatures. Genome Biol. 10, R85 (2009).
23. Sharon, I. & Banfield, J.F. Microbiology. Genomes from metagenomics. Science 342, 1057-1058 (2013).
24. Nielsen, H.B. et al. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 822-828 (2014).
25. Stepanauskas, R. & Sieracki, M.E. Matching phylogeny and metabolism in the uncultured marine bacteria, one cell at a time. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9052-9057 (2007).
26. Swan, B.K. et al. Prevalent genome streamlining and latitudinal divergence of planktonic bacteria in the surface ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11463-11468 (2013).
27. Blainey, P.C. The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 407-427 (2013).
28. Hutchison, C.A. III & Venter, J.C. Single-cell genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 657-658 (2006).
29. Dean, F.B. et al. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5261-5266 (2002).
30. Lasken, R.S. Single-cell genomic sequencing using Multiple Displacement Amplification. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 10, 510-516 (2007).
31. de Bourcy, C.F. et al. A quantitative comparison of single-cell whole genome amplification methods. PLoS One 9, e105585 (2014).
32. Yilmaz, S., Allgaier, M. & Hugenholtz, P. Multiple displacement amplification compromises quantitative analysis of metagenomes. Nat. Methods 7, 943-944 (2010).
33. Lasken, R.S. & Stockwell, T.B. Mechanism of chimera formation during the Multiple Displacement Amplification reaction. BMC Biotechnol. 7, 19 (2007).
34. Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455-477 (2012).
35. Peng, Y., Leung, H.C.M., Yiu, S.M. & Chin, F.Y.L. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28, 1420-1428 (2012).
36. Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets. PLoS One 6, e17288 (2011).
37. Woyke, T. et al. One bacterial cell, one complete genome. PLoS One 5, e10314 (2010).
38. Woyke, T. et al. Decontamination of MDA reagents for single cell whole genome amplification. PLoS One 6, e26161 (2011).
39. Clingenpeel, S., Clum, A., Schwientek, P., Rinke, C. & Woyke, T. Reconstructing each cell's genome within complex microbial communities-dream or reality? Front. Microbiol. 5, 771 (2015).
40. Eren, A.M. et al. Anvi'o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for 'omics data. PeerJ 3, e1319 (2015).
41. Parks, D.H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C.T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G.W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. PeerJ PrePrints 3, e554v2 (2015).
42. Tennessen, K. et al. ProDeGe: a computational protocol for fully automated decontamination of genomes. ISME J. 10, 269-272 (2016).
43. Lux, M. et al. acdc - Automated Contamination Detection and Confidence estimation for single-cell genome data. BMC Bioinformatics 17, 543 (2016).
44. Woyke, T. et al. Symbiosis insights through metagenomic analysis of a microbial consortium. Nature 443, 950-955 (2006).
45. Baker, B.J. et al. Lineages of acidophilic archaea revealed by community genomic analysis. Science 314, 1933-1935 (2006).
46. Wrighton, K.C. et al. Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla. Science 337, 1661-1665 (2012).
47. Boisvert, S., Raymond, F., Godzaridis, E., Laviolette, F. & Corbeil, J. Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling. Genome Biol. 13, R122 (2012).
48. Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674-1676 (2015).
49. Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P.A. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 27, 824-834 (2017).
50. Hess, M. et al. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science 331, 463-467 (2011).
51. Mande, S.S., Mohammed, M.H. & Ghosh, T.S. Classification of metagenomic sequences: methods and challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 13, 669-681 (2012).
52. Nelson, W.C., Maezato, Y., Wu, Y.-W., Romine, M.F. & Lindemann, S.R. Identification and resolution of microdiversity through Metagenomic Sequencing of Parallel Consortia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 255-267 (2016).
53. Sharon, I. et al. Time series community genomics analysis reveals rapid shifts in bacterial species, strains, and phage during infant gut colonization. Genome Res. 23, 111-120 (2013).
54. Imelfort, M. et al. GroopM: an automated tool for the recovery of population genomes from related metagenomes. PeerJ 2, e603 (2014).
55. Wu, Y.-W., Tang, Y.-H., Tringe, S.G., Simmons, B.A. & Singer, S.W. MaxBin: an automated binning method to recover individual genomes from metagenomes using an expectation-maximization algorithm. Microbiome 2, 26 (2014).
56. Kang, D.D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. A robust statistical framework for reconstructing genomes from metagenomic data. Preprint at bioRxiv http://dx.doi.org//10.1101/011460 (2014).
57. Alneberg, J. et al. CONCOCT: Clustering cONtigs on COverage and ComposiTion. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.4038v1 (2013).
58. Strous, M., Kraft, B., Bisdorf, R. & Tegetmeyer, H.E. The binning of metagenomic contigs for microbial physiology of mixed cultures. Front. Microbiol. 3, 410 (2012).
59. Bennett, G.M., McCutcheon, J.P., MacDonald, B.R., Romanovicz, D. & Moran, N.A. Differential genome evolution between companion symbionts in an insect-bacterial symbiosis. MBio 5, e01697-e14 (2014).
60. Nakabachi, A. et al. The 160-kilobase genome of the bacterial endosymbiont Carsonella. Science 314, 267 (2006).
61. Venton, D. Highlight: tiniest of the tiny-a new low for genome size. Genome Biol. Evol. 5, 1702-1703 (2013).
62. Lasken, R.S. Genomic sequencing of uncultured microorganisms from single cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 631-640 (2012).
63. Woyke, T. et al. Assembling the marine metagenome, one cell at a time. PLoS One 4, e5299 (2009).
64. Vanwonterghem, I. et al. Methylotrophic methanogenesis discovered in the archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16170 (2016).
65. Allen, E.E. & Banfield, J.F. Community genomics in microbial ecology and evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 489-498 (2005).
66. Konstantinidis, K.T., Ramette, A. & Tiedje, J.M. The bacterial species definition in the genomic era. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 361, 1929-1940 (2006).
67. Zengler, K. Central role of the cell in microbial ecology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 712-729 (2009).
68. Darling, A.E. et al. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ 2, e243 (2014).
69. Wu, M. & Scott, A.J. Phylogenomic analysis of bacterial and archaeal sequences with AMPHORA2. Bioinformatics 28, 1033-1034 (2012).
70. Mende, D.R., Sunagawa, S., Zeller, G. & Bork, P. Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat. Methods 10, 881-884 (2013).
71. Simão, F.A., Waterhouse, R.M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E.V. & Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210-3212 (2015).
72. Campbell, J.H. et al. UGA is an additional glycine codon in uncultured SR1 bacteria from the human microbiota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5540-5545 (2013).
73. Wu, M. & Eisen, J.A. A simple, fast, and accurate method of phylogenomic inference. Genome Biol. 9, R151 (2008).
74. Sunagawa, S. et al. Metagenomic species profiling using universal phylogenetic marker genes. Nat. Methods 10, 1196-1199 (2013).
75. Klappenbach, J.A., Saxman, P.R., Cole, J.R. & Schmidt, T.M. rrndb: the Ribosomal RNA Operon Copy Number Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 181-184 (2001).
76. Sekiguchi, Y. et al. First genomic insights into members of a candidate bacterial phylum responsible for wastewater bulking. PeerJ 3, e740 (2015).
77. Soo, R.M. et al. An expanded genomic representation of the phylum cyanobacteria. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 1031-1045 (2014).
78. Delmont, T.O. & Eren, A.M. Identifying contamination with advanced visualization and analysis practices: metagenomic approaches for eukaryotic genome assemblies. PeerJ 4, e1839 (2016).
79. Chivian, D. et al. Environmental genomics reveals a single-species ecosystem deep within Earth. Science 322, 275-278 (2008).
80. Di Rienzi, S.C. et al. The human gut and groundwater harbor non-photosynthetic bacteria belonging to a new candidate phylum sibling to Cyanobacteria. eLife 2, e01102 (2013).
81. Castelle, C.J. et al. Extraordinary phylogenetic diversity and metabolic versatility in aquifer sediment. Nat. Commun. 4, 2120 (2013).
82. Wrighton, K.C. et al. RubisCO of a nucleoside pathway known from Archaea is found in diverse uncultivated phyla in bacteria. ISME J. 10, 2702-2714 (2016).
83. Martinson, V.G., Magoc, T., Koch, H., Salzberg, S.L. & Moran, N.A. Genomic features of a bumble bee symbiont reflect its host environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3793-3803 (2014).
84. Schulz, F. et al. A Rickettsiales symbiont of amoebae with ancient features. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2326-2342 (2016).
85. Shendure, J. et al. Accurate multiplex polony sequencing of an evolved bacterial genome. Science 309, 1728-1732 (2005).
86. Margulies, M. et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437, 376-380 (2005).
87. Raghunathan, A. et al. Genomic DNA amplification from a single bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 3342-3347 (2005).
88. Marcy, Y. et al. Dissecting biological "dark matter" with single-cell genetic analysis of rare and uncultivated TM7 microbes from the human mouth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11889-11894 (2007).
89. Bentley, D.R. et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456, 53-59 (2008).
90. Harris, T.D. et al. Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome. Science 320, 106-109 (2008).