New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome

Nature

Volumn 568, Issue 7753, 2019, Pages 505-510

  Nayfach, Stephen ^a,b   Shi, Zhou Jason ^c,d   Seshadri, Rekha ^a,b   Pollard, Katherine S ^c,d,e,f   Kyrpides, Nikos C ^a,b  

^a DOE JOINT GENOME INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c GLADSTONE INSTITUTES   (United States)

^d CHAN ZUCKERBERG BIOHUB   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BACTERIUM; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; GENOME; META-ANALYSIS; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MICROORGANISM; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENETICS; SPECIES RICHNESS;

ARTICLE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; INTESTINE FLORA; METAGENOME; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES RICHNESS; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIAL GENOME; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; BACTERIUM; BIOSYNTHESIS; CLASSIFICATION; DISEASES; FECES; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RURAL POPULATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); OTUS; PROKARYOTA;

BACTERIA; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAYS; DISEASE; FECES; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; GENOME, BACTERIAL; GENOMICS; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; HUMANS; METAGENOME; PHYLOGENY; RURAL POPULATION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85063615414     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1058-x     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Lynch, S. V. & Pedersen, O. The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2369–2379 (2016).
2. Kyrpides, N. C. et al. Genomic encyclopedia of bacteria and archaea: sequencing a myriad of type strains. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001920 (2014).
3. Sunagawa, S. et al. Metagenomic species profiling using universal phylogenetic marker genes. Nat. Methods 10, 1196–1199 (2013).
4. Nayfach, S., Rodriguez-Mueller, B., Garud, N. & Pollard, K. S. An integrated metagenomics pipeline for strain profiling reveals novel patterns of bacterial transmission and biogeography. Genome Res. 26, 1612–1625 (2016).
5. Nelson, K. E. et al. A catalog of reference genomes from the human microbiome. Science 328, 994–999 (2010).
6. Browne, H. P. et al. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature 533, 543–546 (2016).
7. Lagier, J. C. et al. Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16203 (2016).
8. Fodor, A. A. et al. The “most wanted” taxa from the human microbiome for whole genome sequencing. PLoS ONE 7, e41294 (2012).
9. Brito, I. L. et al. Mobile genes in the human microbiome are structured from global to individual scales. Nature 535, 435–439 (2016).
10. Alneberg, J. et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat. Methods 11, 1144–1146 (2014).
11. Parks, D. H. et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533–1542 (2017).
12. Stewart, R. D. et al. Assembly of 913 microbial genomes from metagenomic sequencing of the cow rumen. Nat. Commun. 9, 870 (2018).
13. Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
14. Bowers, R. M. et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 725–731 (2017).
15. Sczyrba, A. et al. Critical assessment of metagenome interpretation—a benchmark of metagenomics software. Nat. Methods 14, 1063–1071 (2017).
16. Tyson, G. W. et al. Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature 428, 37–43 (2004).
17. Tully, B. J., Graham, E. D. & Heidelberg, J. F. The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans. Sci. Data 5, 170203 (2018).
18. Anantharaman, K. et al. Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat. Commun. 7, 13219 (2016).
19. Brown, C. T. et al. Unusual biology across a group comprising more than 15% of domain Bacteria. Nature 523, 208–211 (2015).
20. Nielsen, H. B. et al. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 822–828 (2014).
21. Qin, J. et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 55–60 (2012).
22. Yuan, C., Lei, J., Cole, J. & Sun, Y. Reconstructing 16S rRNA genes in metagenomic data. Bioinformatics 31, i35–i43 (2015).
23. Luo, C., Tsementzi, D., Kyrpides, N. C. & Konstantinidis, K. T. Individual genome assembly from complex community short-read metagenomic datasets. ISME J. 6, 898–901 (2012).
24. Rosselló-Mora, R. & Amann, R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 25, 39–67 (2001).
25. Richter, M. & Rosselló-Móra, R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19126–19131 (2009).
26. Parks, D. H. et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 996–1004 (2018).
27. Truong, D. T. et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat. Methods 12, 902–903 (2015).
28. Brown, C. T., Olm, M. R., Thomas, B. C. & Banfield, J. F. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1256–1263 (2016).
29. Podar, M. et al. Targeted access to the genomes of low-abundance organisms in complex microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 3205–3214 (2007).
30. Di Rienzi, S. C. et al. The human gut and groundwater harbor non-photosynthetic bacteria belonging to a new candidate phylum sibling to Cyanobacteria. eLife 2, e01102 (2013).
31. Cronan, J. E. A new pathway of exogenous fatty acid incorporation proceeds by a classical phosphoryl transfer reaction. Mol. Microbiol. 92, 217–221 (2014).
32. Almeida, A. et al. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature 10.1038/s41586-019-0965-1 (2019).
33. Pasolli, E. et al. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell 176, 649–662 (2019).
34. Forster, S. C. et al. A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 186–192 (2019).
35. Zou, Y. et al. 1,520 reference genomes from cultivated human gut bacteria enable functional microbiome analyses. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 179–185 (2019).
36. Fenn, K. et al. Quinones are growth factors for the human gut microbiota. Microbiome 5, 161 (2017).
37. Hazlewood, G. & Dawson, R. M. Characteristics of a lipolytic and fatty acid-requiring Butyrivibrio sp. isolated from the ovine rumen. J. Gen. Microbiol. 112, 15–27 (1979).
38. Morris, J. J., Lenski, R. E. & Zinser, E. R. The Black Queen hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive gene loss. mBio 3, e00036-12 (2012).
39. Leinonen, R., Sugawara, H. & Shumway, M. The Sequence Read Archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D19–D21 (2011).
40. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).
41. Li, J. et al. An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 834–841 (2014).
42. Zhang, X. et al. The oral and gut microbiomes are perturbed in rheumatoid arthritis and partly normalized after treatment. Nat. Med. 21, 895–905 (2015).
43. Feng, Q. et al. Gut microbiome development along the colorectal adenoma–carcinoma sequence. Nat. Commun. 6, 6528 (2015).
44. Karlsson, F. H. et al. Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature 498, 99–103 (2013).
45. Obregon-Tito, A. J. et al. Subsistence strategies in traditional societies distinguish gut microbiomes. Nat. Commun. 6, 6505 (2015).
46. Rampelli, S. et al. Metagenome sequencing of the Hadza hunter-gatherer gut microbiota. Curr. Biol. 25, 1682–1693 (2015).
47. Vatanen, T. et al. Variation in microbiome LPS immunogenicity contributes to autoimmunity in humans. Cell 165, 842–853 (2016).
48. Bäckhed, F. et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe 17, 690–703 (2015).
49. Liu, W. et al. Unique features of ethnic Mongolian gut microbiome revealed by metagenomic analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 34826 (2016).
50. Smits, S. A. et al. Seasonal cycling in the gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania. Science 357, 802–806 (2017).
51. Pehrsson, E. C. et al. Interconnected microbiomes and resistomes in low-income human habitats. Nature 533, 212–216 (2016).
52. Zhu, Y., Stephens, R. M., Meltzer, P. S. & Davis, S. R. SRAdb: query and use public next-generation sequencing data from within R. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 19 (2013).
53. Barrett, T. et al. BioProject and BioSample databases at NCBI: facilitating capture and organization of metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D57–D63 (2012).
54. Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T. W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
55. Wu, Y. W., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32, 605–607 (2016).
56. Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3, e1165 (2015).
57. Sieber, C. M. K. et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 836–843 (2018).
58. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
59. Ondov, B. D. et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 17, 132 (2016).
60. Wu, D., Jospin, G. & Eisen, J. A. Systematic identification of gene families for use as “markers” for phylogenetic and phylogeny-driven ecological studies of bacteria and archaea and their major subgroups. PLoS ONE 8, e77033 (2013).
61. Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).
62. Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964 (1997).
63. Seemann, T. Barrnap 0.8: Rapid Ribosomal RNA Prediction https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap (2013).
64. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
65. Chen, I. A. et al. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D666–D677 (2019).
66. Wattam, A. R. et al. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D581–D591 (2014).
67. Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B. & Banfield, J. F. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 11, 2864–2868 (2017).
68. Varghese, N. J. et al. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 6761–6771 (2015).
69. Loewenstein, Y., Portugaly, E., Fromer, M. & Linial, M. Efficient algorithms for accurate hierarchical clustering of huge datasets: tackling the entire protein space. Bioinformatics 24, i41–i49 (2008).
70. Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).
71. Deorowicz, S., Debudaj-Grabysz, A. & Gudyś, A. FAMSA: fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment of huge protein families. Sci. Rep. 6, 33964 (2016).
72. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. A. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
73. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W242–W245 (2016).
74. Chen, Y., Ye, W., Zhang, Y. & Xu, Y. High speed BLASTN: an accelerated MegaBLAST search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 7762–7768 (2015).
75. Bedarf, J. R. et al. Functional implications of microbial and viral gut metagenome changes in early stage L-DOPA-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients. Genome Med. 9, 39 (2017).
76. Jie, Z. et al. The gut microbiome in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat. Commun. 8, 845 (2017).
77. Wen, C. et al. Quantitative metagenomics reveals unique gut microbiome biomarkers in ankylosing spondylitis. Genome Biol. 18, 142 (2017).
78. Loomba, R. et al. Gut microbiome-based metagenomic signature for non-invasive detection of advanced fibrosis in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. 25, 1054–1062 (2017).
79. Qin, N. et al. Alterations of the human gut microbiome in liver cirrhosis. Nature 513, 59–64 (2014).
80. Le Chatelier, E. et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500, 541–546 (2013).
81. Pedregosa, F. V. G. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
82. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
83. Kiełbasa, S. M., Wan, R., Sato, K., Horton, P. & Frith, M. C. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res. 21, 487–493 (2011).
84. Ho, L. s. T. & Ané, C. A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst. Biol. 63, 397–408 (2014).
85. Bradley, P. H., Nayfach, S. & Pollard, K. S. Phylogeny-corrected identification of microbial gene families relevant to human gut colonization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006242 (2018).
86. Haft, D. H. et al. TIGRFAMs and Genome Properties in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D387–D395 (2013).