Visuospatial Thinking

The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Hegarty, Mary ^a   Stull, Andrew T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive maps; Diagrams; Graphs; Imagery; Navigation; Spatial metaphors; Spatial updating

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066586276     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0031     Document Type: Chapter

References (235)

1. Avraamides, M., Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., & Golledge, R. G. (2004). Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: Evidence from allocentric judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 801-814.
2. Azevedo, F. S. (2000). Designing representations of terrain: A study in meta-representational competence. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 443-480.
3. Bacon, A. M., Handley, S. J., & Newstead, S. E. (2003). Individual differences in strategies for syllogistic reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 133-168.
4. Baddeley, A. D., & Lieberman, K. (1980). Spatial working memory. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance (pp. 521-539). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bauer, M. I., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Science, 4 (6), 372-378.
6. Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415-420.
7. Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps (W. Berg, Trans.). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Bethell-Fox, C. E., & Shepard, R. N. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 14, 12-23.
9. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
10. Bisiach, E., & Luzatti, C. (1978). Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex, 14, 129-133.
11. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
12. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1-22.
13. Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185-189.
14. Byrne, P., Becker, S., & Burgess, N. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: A neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychological Review, 114 (2), 340-375.
15. Canham, M., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20, 155-166.
16. Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Schneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
17. Carlson, T. A., Alvarez, G., Wu, D., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2010). Rapid assimilation of external objects into the body schema. Psychological Science, 21, 1000-1005.
18. Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75-100.
19. Casasanto, D. (2008). Who's afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58, 63-79.
20. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351-367.
21. Chambers, D. (1997). Are images vivid pictures in the mind? PsycCRITIQUES, 42, 613-614.
22. Chambers, D., & Reisberg, D. (1985). Can mental images be ambiguous? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 317-328.
23. Chambers, D., & Reisberg, D. (1992). What an image depicts depends on what an image means. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 145-174.
24. Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rats spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149-178.
25. Cheng, K., & Newcombe, N. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial reorientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 12, 1-23.
26. Cheng, K., Shettleworth, S. J., Huttenlocher, J., & Rieser, J. J. (2007). Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 625-637.
27. Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387-404.
28. Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1986). An experiment in graphical perception. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 491-500.
29. Conson, M., Sarà, M., Pistoia, F., & Trojano, L. (2009). Action observation improves motor imagery: Specific interactions between simulative processes. Experimental Brain Research, 199, 71-81.
30. Cooper, L A. (1976). Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 296-302.
31. Cooper, L. A., & Podgorny, R. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 503-514.
32. Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1984). Turning something over in one's mind. Scientific American, 251, 106-114.
33. Cheng, K., Shettleworth, S. J., Huttenlocher, J., & Rieser, J. J. (2007). Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 625-637.
34. Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387-404.
35. Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1986). An experiment in graphical perception. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 491-500.
36. Conson, M., Sarà, M., Pistoia, F., & Trojano, L. (2009). Action observation improves motor imagery: Specific interactions between simulative processes. Experimental Brain Research, 199, 71-81.
37. Cooper, L A. (1976). Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 296-302.
38. Cooper, L. A., & Podgorny, R. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 503-514.
39. Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1984). Turning something over in one's mind. Scientific American, 251, 106-114.
40. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
41. De Soto, C. B., London, M., & Handel, S. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 513-520.
42. di Sessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 293-331.
43. Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8 (4), 302-307.
44. Doeller, C. F., King, J. A., & Burgess, N. (2008). Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 5915-5920.
45. Duyck, W., Vandierendonck, A., & De Vooght, G. (2003). Conditional reasoning with spatial content requies visuo-spatial working memory. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 267-287.
46. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483-500.
47. Egan, D. E., & Grimes-Farrow, D. D. (1982). Differences in mental representations spontaneously adopted for reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 10, 297-307.
48. Emery, N. J., & Clayton, N. S. (2004). The mentality of crows: Convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science, 306, 1903-1907.
49. Epstein, R. (2008). Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 388-396.
50. Farah, M. J. (1988). Is visual imagery really visual? Overlooked evidence from neuropsychology. Psychological Review, 95, 307-317.
51. Farrell, M. J., & Robertson, I. (1998). Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 227-233.
52. Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850-855.
53. Finke, R. A. (1989). Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Finke, R. A., & Pinker, S. (1983). Directional scanning of remembered visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 398-410.
55. Finke, R. A., Pinker, S., & Farah, M. J. (1989). Reinterpreting visual patterns in mental imagery. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 51-78.
56. Folk, M. D., & Luce, R. D. (1987). Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 395-404.
57. Foo, P., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A., & Tarr, M. J. (2005). Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map-versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31, 195-215.
58. Foster, D. H., & Gilson, S. J. (2002). Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 1939-1947.
59. Friedman, A., Brown, N. R., & McGaffey, A. P. (2002). A basis for bias in geographical judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 151-159.
60. Friedman, A., Spetch, M. L., & Ferrey, A. (2005). Recognition by humans and pigeons of novel views of 3-D objects and their photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 149-162.
61. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.
63. Gardner, H. (2004). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
64. Gattis, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 231-239.
65. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Orientation priming of novel shapes in the context of viewpoint-dependent recognition. Perception, 26, 51-73.
66. Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 537-565.
67. Goel, V. (2007). Anatomy of deductive reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 435-441.
68. Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning. Neuropsychologica, 39, 901-909.
69. Goldstone, R. L., Landy, D., & Son, J. Y. (2010). The education of perception. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 265-284.
70. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15, 20-25.
71. Graf, M. (2006). Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 920-945.
72. Graf, M. (2010). Categorization and object shape. In B. M. Glatzeder, V. Goel, & A. von Müller (Eds.), Towards a theory of thinking: Building blocks for a conceptual framework (pp. 73-102). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
73. Graf, M., Kaping, D., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 214-221.
74. Green, S., Li, R., & Bavelier (2010). Perceptual learning during action video game playing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 202-216.
75. Grön, G., Wunderlich, A. P., Spitzer, M., Tomczak, R., & Riepe M. W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: Gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 404-408.
76. Halligan, P. W., Fink, G. R., Marshall, J. C., & Vallar, G. (2003). Spatial cognition: Evidence from visual neglect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 125-133.
77. Hayward, W. G. (2003). After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition? Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 425-427.
78. Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1084-1102.
79. Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 280-285.
80. Hegarty, M. (2010). Components of spatial intelligence. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 265-297). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
81. Hegarty, M., Canham, M., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2010). Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 37-53.
82. Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visuospatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684-689.
83. Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., Kriz, S., & Keehner, M. (2005). The role of gestures in mental animation. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5, 333-356.
84. Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006) Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34, 151-176.
85. Hegarty, M., Smallman, H., Stull, A. T., & Canham, M. (2009). Naïve cartography: How intuitions about display configuration can hurt performance. Cartographica, 44, 171-186.
86. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Intelligence, 32, 175-191.
87. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial ability. In P. Shah (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121-169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
88. Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. (1994). A geometric process for spatial representation in young children. Nature, 370, 57-59.
89. Hermer-Vasquez, L., Spelke, E., & Katsnelson, A. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3-36.
90. Hirtle, S. C., & Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition, 13, 208-217.
91. Hintzman, D. L., O'Dell, C. S., & Arndt, D. R. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 149-206.
92. Hölscher, C., Büchner, S. J., Meilinger, T., & Strube, G. (2009). Adaptivity of wayfinding strategies in a multi-building ensemble: The effects of spatial structure, task requirements and metric information. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 208-219.
93. Holyoak, K. J., & Mah, W. A. (1982). Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 328-352.
94. Hummel, J. E. (2003). The complementary properties of holistic and analytic representations of object shape. In M. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes (pp. 212-234). New York: Oxford University Press.
95. Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1984). Routes to object constancy: Implications from neurological impairments of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 37, 493-495.
96. Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 75, 550-560.
97. Ishikawa, T., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 93-129.
98. Johnson, M., & Lakoff, G. (2002). Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13, 245-263.
99. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
100. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 351-364.
101. Jolicoeur, P. (1992). Orientation congruency effects in visual search. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 280-305.
102. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480.
103. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92, 137-172.
104. Kail, R. (1986). The impact of extended practice on rate of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 378-391.
105. Keehner, M., Hegarty, M., Cohen, C. A., Khooshabeh, P., & Montello, D. R. (2008). Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: What matters is what you see, not whether you interact. Cognitive Science, 32, 1099-1132.
106. Kelly, J., McNamara, T. P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T. H., & Rieser, J. J. (2009). Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation: Cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 176-181.
107. Khooshabeh, P., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Inferring cross-sections: When internal visualizations are more important than properties of external visualizations. Human-Computer Interaction, 25, 119-147.
108. Kirsh, D. (1997). Interactivity and multimedia interfaces. Instructional Science, 25, 79-96.
109. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293-298.
110. Knauff, M., Fangmeier, T., Ruff, C. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2003). Reasoning, models and images: Behavioral measures of cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 559-573.
111. Knauff, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 10, 363-371.
112. Knauff, M., & May, E. (2006). Mental imagery, reasoning, and blindness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 161-177.
113. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
114. Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, N. M., Thompson, W. L., & Maljkovic, V. (1993). Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: PET investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 263-287.
115. Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reiser, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47-60.
116. Kosslyn, S. M., Brunn, J., Cave, K. R., & Wallach, R. W. (1984). Individual differences in mental imagery ability: A computational analysis. Cognition, 18, 195-243.
117. Kosslyn, S. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2003). When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 723-746.
118. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., & Ganis, G. (2006). The case for mental imagery. New York: Oxford University Press.
119. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Wraga, M., & Alpert, N. M. (2001). Imaging rotation by endogenous versus exogenous forces: Distinct neural mechanisms. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12, 2519-2525.
120. Kozhevnikov, M., Blazhenkova, O., & Becker, M. (2010). Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: Restriction in the development of visual-processing resources. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 29-35.
121. Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object-manipulation and perspective-taking spatial abilities. Memory and Cognition, 29, 745-756.
122. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 47-78.
123. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
124. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.
125. Larkin, J., & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
126. Lawson, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245.
127. Lawson, R., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). The effects of view in depth on the recognition of line drawings and silhouettes of familiar objects: Normality and pathology. Visual Cognition, 6, 165-195.
128. Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in wayfinding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765-779.
129. Levine, M., Marchon, I., & Hanley, G. L. (1984). The placement and misplacement of you-are-here maps. Environment and Behavior, 16, 139-157.
130. Liben, L. S., Myers, L. J., & Christensen, A. E. (2010). Identifying locations and directions on field and representational mapping tasks: Predictors of success. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 10, 105-134.
131. Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
132. Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 181-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
133. Lowe, R. K. (1993). Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram. Learning and Instruction, 3, 157-179.
134. Lowe, R. K. (1994). Selectivity in diagrams: Reading beyond the lines. Educational Psychology, 14, 467-491.
135. Lowe, R. K. (1996). Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 377-397.
136. Macaluso, E., & Maravita, A. (2010). The representation of space near the body through touch and vision. Neuropsychologia, 48, 782-795.
137. Makin, T. R., Wilf, M., Schwartz, I., & Zohary, E. (2009). Amputees "neglect" the space near their missing hand. Psychological Science, 21, 55-57.
138. Maravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 79-86.
139. Margolies, S. O., & Crawford, L. E. (2008). Event valence and spatial methaphors of time. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 1401-1414.
140. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 200, 269-294.
141. May, M. (1996). Cognitive and embodied modes of spatial imagery. Psychologische Beitrage, 38, 418-434.
142. Montello, D. R. (1993). Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In A. U. Frank & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS (pp. 312-321). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
143. Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 162-170.
144. Muller, M., & Wehner, R. (1988). Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 85, 5287-5290.
145. Nardini, M., Jones, P., Bedford, R., & Braddick, O. (2008). Development of cue integration in human navigation. Current Biology, 18, 689-693.
146. National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: National Research Council Press.
147. Novick, L. R. (2001). Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 279-325). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
148. Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2007). Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a Gestalt perceptual principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 197-223.
149. Novick, L. R., & Hurley, S. M. (2001). To matrix, network, or hierarchy: That is the question. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 158-216.
150. Pani, J. R. (1993). Limits on the comprehension of rotational motion: Mental imagery of rotations with oblique components. Perception, 22, 785-808
151. Pani, J. R., William, C. T., & Shippey, G. T. (1995). Determinants of the perception of rotational motion: Orientation of the motion to the object and to the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1441-1456.
152. Panis, S., Vangeneugden, J., & Wagemans, J. (2008). Similarity, typicality, and category-level matching of morphed outlines of everyday objects. Perception, 37, 1822-1849.
153. Parsons, L. M. (1987a). Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 178-241.
154. Parsons, L. M. (1987b). Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 172-191.
155. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 709-730.
156. Peebles, D., & Cheng, P. C-H. (2003). Modeling the effect of task and graphical representation on response latency in a graph-reading task. Human Factors, 45, 28-46.
157. Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing (pp. 73-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
158. Presson, C. C. (1987). The development of spatial cognition: Secondary uses of spatial information. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.) Contemporary topics in developmental psychology (pp. 77-112). New York: Wiley.
159. Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1447-1455.
160. Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 123-164.
161. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003). Seeing and visualizing: It's not what you think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
162. Ratwani, R. M., & Trafton, J. G. (2008). Shedding light on the graph schema: Perceptual features versus invariant structure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 757-762.
163. Reed, C. L., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J., Jr. (2009). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 236-245.
164. Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 166-177.
165. Reed, S. K. (1974). Structural descriptions and the limitations of mental images. Memory and Cognition, 2, 319-336.
166. Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M., & Stampe, D. M. (2001). Visual span in expert chess players: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Science, 12, 48-55.
167. Richardson, A. E., Montello, D., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps, and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory and Cognition, 27, 741-750.
168. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157-1165
169. Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
170. Sack, A. T., Lindner, M., & Linden, D. E. J. (2007). Object- and direction-specific interference between manual and mental rotation. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 1435-1449.
171. Sadalla, E. K., Burroughs, W. J., & Staplin, L. J. (1980). Reference points in spatial cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 516-528.
172. Sandstrom, N. J., Kaufman, J., & Huettel, S. A. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 351-360.
173. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
174. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 457-497.
175. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, T. (1999). Inferences through imagined actions: Knowing by simulated doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 116-136.
176. Schwartz, D. L., & Holton, D. L. (2000). Tool use and the effect of action on the imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1655-1665.
177. Sekiyama, K. (1982). Kinesthetic aspects of mental representations in the identification of left and right hands. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 89-95.
178. Shah, P., & Carpenter, P. (1995). Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 337-370.
179. Shah P., & Friedman, E. G. (2011). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes. TopiCS in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 560-578.
180. Shah, P., Friedman, E. G., & Vekiri, I (2005). The comprehension of quantitative information in graphical displays. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 426-476). New York: Cambridge University Press.
181. Shah, P., Mayer, R. E., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 690-702.
182. Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4-27.
183. Shaver, P., Pierson, L., & Lang, S. (1975). Converging evidence for the functional significance of imagery in problem solving. Cognition, 3, 359-375.
184. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 102-106.
185. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274-310.
186. Shepard, R. M., & Metzler, L. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 191, 952-954.
187. Sherrin, B. (2000). How students invent representations of motion. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 399-441.
188. Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol 10, pp. 9-55). New York: Academic Press.
189. Simkin, D. K., & Hastie, R. (1986). An information-processing analysis of graph perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 454-465.
190. Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
191. Sims, V. K., & Hegarty, M. (1997). Mental animation in the visuospatial sketchpad: Evidence from dual-task studies. Memory and Cognition, 25, 321-332.
192. Smallman, H. S., & Cook, M. B. (2011). Naïve realism: Folk fallacies in the design and use of visual displays. TopiCS in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 579-608.
193. Smallman, H. S., & St. John, M. (2005). Naïve realism: Misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design, 13, 14-19.
194. Smallman, H. S., St. John, M., Oonk, H. M., & Cowen, M. B. (2001). 'SYMBICONS': A hybrid symbology that combines the best elements of SYMBols and ICONS. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society(pp. 110-114). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
195. Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89-96.
196. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97-140.
197. Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Representation and process in linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 119-159.
198. Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422-437.
199. Stieff, M. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction, 17, 219-234.
200. Stieff, M., Hegarty, M., & Dixon B. L. (2010). Alternative strategies for spatial reasoning with diagrams. In A. Goel, M. Jamnik, & N. H. Narayanan (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (Proceedings of Diagrams 2010). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
201. Stieff, M., & Raje, S. (2010). Expert algorithmic and imagistic problem solving strategies in advanced chemistry. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 10, 53-81.
202. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
203. Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 996-1013.
204. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
205. Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
206. Trickett, S. B., & Trafton, J. G. (2006). Toward a comprehensive model of graph comprehension: Making the case for spatial cognition. In D. Barker-Plummer, R. Cox, & N. Swaboda (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 286-300). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
207. Tversky, B. T. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407-433.
208. Tversky, B. (2005). Visuospatial reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 209-240). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
209. Tversky B. (2011). Visualizing thought. TopiCS in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 499-535.
210. Tversky, B., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Lee, P. U., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., et al. (2007). Cognitive design principles for generating visualizations. In G. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology (pp. 53-73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
211. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515-577.
212. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
213. Twyman, A. D., & Newcombe, N. S. (2010). Five reasons to doubt the existence of a geometric module. Cognitive Science, 34, 1315-1356.
214. Ullman, S. (1984). Visual routines. Cognition, 18, 97-159.
215. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
216. Vandierendonck, A., & De Vooght, G. (1997). Working memory constraints on linear reasoning with spatial and temporal contents. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 50, 803-820.
217. Vanrie, J., Willems, B., & Wagemans, J. (2001). Multiple routes to object matching from different viewpoints: Mental rotation versus invariant features. Perception, 30, 1047-1056.
218. Wainer, H. (2005). Graphic discovery: A trout in the milk and other visual adventures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
219. Waller, D., & Hodgson, E. (2006). Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 867-882.
220. Waller, D., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1051-1063.
221. Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191-210.
222. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77, 215-250.
223. Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Berthoz, A. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68, 77-94.
224. Wickens, C. D., & Carswell, M. (1995). The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors, 37, 473-494.
225. Wiener, J. M., Büchner, S. J, & Hölscher, C. (2009). Taxonomy of human wayfinding tasks: A knowledge-based approach. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 9, 152-165.
226. Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 721-731.
227. Wohlschläger, A. (2001). Mental object rotation and the planning of hand movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 709-718.
228. Wohlschläger, A., & Wohlschläger, A. (1998). Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 397-412.
229. Wolbers, T., & Hegarty, M. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 138-146.
230. Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalizad spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 763-771.
231. Xiao, C., Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2009). Use of self-to-object and object-to-object spatial relations in locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1137-1147.
232. Yeh, M., & Wickens, C. D. (2001). Attentional filtering in the design of electronic map displays: A comparison of color coding, intensity coding, and decluttering techniques. Human Factors, 43, 543-562.
233. Yuille, J. C., & Steiger, J. H. (1982). Nonholistic processing in mental rotation: Some suggestive evidence. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 201-209.
234. Zacks, J. M. (2008). Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: A meta-analysis and review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1-19.
235. Zacks., J. M., Levy, E., Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. J. (1998). Reading bar graphs: Effects of extraneous depth cues and graphical context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 119-138.