Rapid assimilation of external objects into the body schema

Psychological Science

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1000-1005

  Carlson, Thomas A ^a,b,c   Alvarez, George ^b   Wu, Daw an ^b   Verstraten, Frans A J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Body schema; Proprioception; Tool use; Vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77954822075     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797610371962     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aglioti, S., Smania, N., Manfredi, M., & Berlucchi, G. (1996). Disownership of left hand and objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage. NeuroReport, 8, 293-296.
2. Bisiach, E., Perani, D., Vallar, G., & Berti, A. (1986). Unilateral neglect: Personal and extra-personal. Neuropsychologia, 24, 759-767.
3. Braun, C., Heinz, U., Schweizer, R., Wiech, K., Birbaumer, N., & Topka, H. (2001). Dynamic organization of the somatosensory cortex induced by motor activity. Brain, 124, 2259-2267.
4. Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345-351.
5. Critchley, M. (1979). The divine banquet of the brain and other essays. New York: Raven Press.
6. Davies, P. (1973). Effects of movements upon the appearance and duration of a prolonged visual afterimage: 1. Changes arising from the movement of a portion of the body incorporated in the afterimaged scene. Perception, 2, 147-153.
7. Gregory, R.L., Wallace, J.G., & Campbell, F.W. (1959). Changes in size and shape of visual afterimages observed in complete darkness during changes of position in space. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 54-55.
8. Guariglia, C., & Antonucci, G. (1992). Personal and extrapersonal space: A case of neglect dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 30, 1001-1009.
9. Head, H., & Holmes, G. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34, 102-254.
10. Hogendoorn, H., Kammers, M.P., Carlson, T.A., & Verstraten, F.A.J. (2009). Being in the dark about your hand: Resolution of visuoproprioceptive conflict by disowning visible limbs. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2698-2703.
11. Holmes, N.P., Sanabria, D., Calvert, G.A., & Spence, C. (2007). Tool-use: Capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space? Cortex, 43, 469-489.
12. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport, 7, 2325-2330.
13. James, W. (1918). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt and Co.
14. Maravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 79-86.
15. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennetta, S., & Driver, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, B25-B34.
16. Nöe, A. (2009). Out of heads. New York: Hill and Wang.
17. Reed, C.L., & Farah, M.J. (1995). The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 334-343.
18. Wolpert, D., & Haggard, P. (2005). Disorders of body schema. In H.-J. Freund, M. Jeannerod, M. Hallett, & R. Leiguarda (Eds.), Higher-order motor disorders: From neuroanatomy and neuro-biology to clinical neurology (Vol. 1, pp. 261-272). New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Yamamoto, S., & Kitazawa, S. (2001). Sensation at the tips of invisible tools. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 979-980.