Visualizing thought

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 499-535

  Tversky, Barbara ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Analogy; Diagrams; Gesture; Metaphor; Spatial cognition; Visual communication

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; THINKING; VISION;

COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; THINKING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960283283     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x     Document Type: Article

References (180)

1. Agrawala, M., & Stolte, C. (2001). Rendering effective route maps: Improving usability through generalization. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001 (pp. 241-250). New York: ACM.
2. Ainsworth, S. (2008a). How do animations influence learning? In D. H. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 37-67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
3. Ainsworth, S. (2008b). How should we evaluate multimedia learning environments?. In J.-F. Rouet, R. Lowe, & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Understanding multimedia comprehension. New York: Springer.
4. Alperson-Afil, N., Sharon, G., Kislev, M., Melamed, Y., Zohar, I., Ashkenazi, S., Rabinovich, R., Biton, R., Werker, E., Hartman, G., Feibel, C., & Goren-Inbar, N. (2009). Spatial organization of hominin activities at Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel. Science, 326, 1677-1680.
5. Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication. London: Routledge.
6. Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Arnheim, R. (1977). The dynamics of architectural form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. Arnheim, R. (1988). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Barker, R. G. (1963). The stream of behavior as an empirical problem. In R. G. Barker (Ed.), The stream of behavior (pp. 1-22). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
10. Barker, R. G., & Wright, H. F. (1954). Midwest and its children: The psychological ecology of an American town. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.
11. Bendix, F., Kosara, R., & Hauser, H. (2006). Parallel sets: Interactive exploration and visual analysis of categorical data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12, 558-568.
12. Bertin, J. (1981). Graphics and graphic-information-processing. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
13. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
14. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1-22.
15. Brown, L. (1979). The story of maps. New York: Dover.
16. Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
17. Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980). Development of face recognition-A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257-269.
18. Carpenter, P. A., & Shah, P. (1998). A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75-100.
19. Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351-367.
20. Chatterjee, A. (2001). Language and space: Some interactions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 55-61.
21. Chatterjee, A. (2002). Portrait profiles and the notion of agency. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 20, 33-41.
22. Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (2000). Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 45-49.
23. Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (2002). The influence of handedness on profile and line drawing directionality in children, young, and older normal adults. Brain, Cognition, and Emotion, 48, 333-336.
24. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27-63). New York: Academic Press.
25. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Committee on Support for Thinking Spatially. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
27. Cooper, W. E., & Ross, J. R. (1975). World order. In R. E. Grossman, L. J. San, & T. J. Vance (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on functionalism (pp. 63-111). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
28. Corter, J. E., Rho, Y.-J., Zahner, D., Nickerson, J. V., & Tversky, B. (2009). Bugs and biases: Diagnosing misconceptions in the understanding of diagrams. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ.
29. De Loache, J. S. (2004). Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 66-70.
30. Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. State College, PA: Learning Services.
33. Elkin, J. (1999). The domain of images. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34. Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Journal of Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 157-180.
35. Engle, R. A. (1998). Not channels but composite signals: Speech, gesture, diagrams and object demonstrations are integrated in multimodal explanations. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Fontana, D. (2005). Meditating with mandalas. London: Duncan Baird Publishers.
37. Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108, 819-824.
38. Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63-76.
39. Gattis, M. (2002). Structure mapping in spatial reasoning. Cognitive Development, 17, 1157-1183.
40. Gattis, M. (2004). Mapping relational structure in spatial reasoning. Cognitive Science, 28 (4), 589-610.
41. Gattis, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1-9.
42. Gelb, I. (1963). A study of writing, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, R. (1986). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
44. Gobert, J. D. (1999). Expertise in the comprehension of architectural plans. In J. Gero & B. Tversky (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design (pp. 185-205). Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
45. Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Gombrich, E. (1961). Art and illusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48. Gombrich, E. (1979). The sense of order: A study in the psychology of decorative art. Oxford, England: Phaidon.
49. Goodman, N. (1978). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. New York: Bobbs-Merrill
50. Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words. Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496-499.
51. Hartshorne, C., & Weiss, P. (Eds.) (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1084-1102.
53. Hegarty, M. (in press). Components of spatial intelligence. In B. H. Ross (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego: Academic Press.
54. Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations inunderstanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Insruction, 2, 325-360.
55. Hegarty, P., Lemieux, A. F., & McQueen, G. (in press). Graphing the order of the sexes: Constructing, recalling, interpreting, and putting the self in gender difference graphs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
56. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2006). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of visuospatial thinking. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57. Heiser, J., & Tversky, B. (2006). Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams. Cognitive Science, 30, 581-592.
58. Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1962). Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: A study of one child's performance. American Journal of Psychology, 75, 624-628.
59. Hochberg, J., & Galper, R. E. (1967). Recognition of faces: I. An exploratory study. Psychonomic Science, 6, 156-163.
60. Horn, R. E. (1998). Visual language. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVu, Inc.
61. Howard, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley.
62. Hughes, M. (1986). Children and number: Difficulties in learning mathematics. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
63. Inselberg, A., & Dimsdale, B. (1990). Parallel coordinates: A tool for visualizing multi-dimensional geometry, Visualization '90. Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Visualizations, 23-26, 361-378.
64. Ittelson, W. H. (1996). Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 171-187.
65. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). Micro-and macro-developmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science, 3, 91-118.
66. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraints on representational change: Evidence from children's drawing. Cognition, 34, 1-27.
67. Kellogg, R. (1969). Analyzing children's art. Palo Alto, CA: National Press.
68. Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
69. Kessell, A. M., & Tversky, B. (2006). Using gestures and diagrams to think and talk about insight problems. Proceedings of the Meetings of the Cognitive Science Society.
70. Kessell, A. M., & Tversky, B. (2008). Cognitive methods for visualizing space, time, and agents. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
71. Kessell, A. M., & Tversky, B. (2009). Thinking about cycles: Producing sequences but preferring circles.
72. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 73, 31-68.
73. Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Understanding charts and graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 185-223.
74. Kosslyn, S. M. (2006). Graph design for the eye and the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
75. Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33, 710-726.
76. Kulvicki, J. (2006). Pictorial representation. Philosophy Compass, 10, 1-12.
77. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
78. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from. New York: Basic Books.
79. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007a). Formal notations are diagrams: Evidence from a production task. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2033-2040.
80. Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2007b). How abstract is symbolic thought? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 720-733.
81. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
82. Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). The development of external symbol systems: The child as a notator. In R. Gelman & T. Kit Fong Au (Eds.), Perceptual and cognitive develoment (pp. 185-211). San Diego: Academic Press.
83. Lee, P. U., & Tversky, B. (2005). Interplay between visual and spatial: The effects of landmark descriptions on comprehension of route/survey descriptions. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5 (2 & 3), 163-185.
84. Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
85. Maass, A., Pagani, D., & Berta, E. (2007). How beautiful is the goal and how violent is the fistfight? Spatial bias in the interpretation of human behavior Social Cognition, 25, 833-852.
86. Maass, A., & Russo, A. (2003). Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture? Psychological Science, 14, 296-301.
87. Mallery, G. (18931972). Picture writing of the American Indians. (Originally published by Government Printing Office). New York: Dover.
88. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
89. Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S. Y., & Campbell, J. (2005). When passive media promote active learning: Static diagrams versus animation in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 256-265.
90. McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding comics. New York: Harper Collins.
91. McManus, I. C., & Humphrey, N. (1973). Turning the left cheek. Nature, 243, 271-272.
92. McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
93. McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
94. Morikawa, K., & McBeath, M. (1992). Lateral motion bias associated with reading direction. Vision Research, 32, 1137-1141.
95. Murch, W. (2001). In the blink of an eye. Beverly Hills, CA: Silman-James Press.
96. Nachshon, I. (1985). Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. International Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 161-174.
97. Nachshon, I., Argaman, E., & Luria, A. (1999). Effects of directional habits and handedness on aesthetic preference for left and right profiles. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 30, 106-114.
98. Netz, R. (1999). Linguistic formulae as cognitive tools. Pragmatics and Cognition, 7, 147-176.
99. Neurath, O. (1936). International picture language: The first rules of isotype. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.
100. Nickerson, J. V., Corter, J. E., Tversky, B., Zahner, D., & Rho, Y.-J. (2008). The spatial nature of thought: Understanding information systems design through diagrams. In R. Boland, M. Limayem, & B. Pentland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems.
101. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
102. Novick, L. R. (2001) Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought. In D. L. Medin (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 40. (pp. 279-325). New York: Academic Press.
103. Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. (2007). Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a Gestalt perceptual principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 197-223.
104. Novick, L. R., & Hurley, S. M. (2001). To matrix, network, or hierarchy, that is the question. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 158-216.
105. Novick, L. R., Hurley, S. M., & Francis, M. (1999). Evidence for abstract, schematic knowledge of three spatial diagram representations. Memory and Cognition, 27, 288-308.
106. Novick, L. R., Shade, C. K., & Catley, K. M. (in press). Linear versus branching depictions of evolutionary history: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science.
107. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York: Oxford.
108. Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing (pp. 73-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
109. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
110. Sakhuja, T., Gupta, G. C., Singh, M., & Vaid, J. (1996). Reading habits affect asymmetries in facial affect judgements: A replication. Brain and Cognition, 32, 162-165.
111. Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 512-516.
112. Santiago, J., Román, A., Ouellet, M., Rodríguez, N., & Pérez-Azor, P. (2008). In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research. DOI.
113. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185-213.
114. Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1992). Before writing, Volume 1: From counting to cuneiform. Austin: University of Texas Press.
115. Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. K. (2007). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research and design implications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
116. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Harper Collins.
117. Schwartz, D. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321-354.
118. Shah, P., & Carpenter, P. A. (1995). Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 43-61.
119. Shah, P., & Freedman, E. (2010). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes. Topics in Cognitive Science.
120. Shah, P., Freedman, E., & Vekiri, I. (2005). The comprehension of quantitative information in graphical displays. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 426-476). New York: Cambridge University Press.
121. Shah, P., Mayer, R. E., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Graphs as aids to knowledge construction: Signaling techniques for guiding the process of graph comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 690-702.
122. Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4-27.
123. Shephard, R. N., & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition, 18, 161-193.
124. Shephard, R. N., & Podgorny, P. (1978). Cognitive processes that resemble perceptual processes. In W. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, Vol. 5. (pp. 189-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schema. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 615-628.
126. Small, J. P. (1997). Wax tablets of the mind. New York: Routledge, Paul.
127. Smallman, H. S., St. John, M., Onck, H. M., & Cowen, M. (2001). "Symbicons": A hybrid symbology that combines the best elements of symbols and icons. Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society (pp. 110-114).
128. Smith, M. C., & Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373-392.
129. Stafford, B. (2007). Echo objects: The cognitive work of images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
130. Stasko, J., & Lawrence, A. (1998). Empirically assessing algorithm animations as learning aids. In J. Stasko, J. Domingue, M. H. Brown, & B. A. Price (Eds.), Software visualization (pp. 419-438). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
131. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97-140.
132. Suitner, C., & Maass, A. (2007). Positioning bias in portraits and self-portraits: Do female artists make different choices? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25, 71-95.
133. Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1996). What architects see in their sketches: Implications for design tools. In Human factors in computing systems: Conference companion (pp. 191-192). New York: ACM.
134. Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Constructive perception in design. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Computational and cognitive models of creative design V (pp. 227-239). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
135. Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (2003). Constructive perception: A skill for coordinating perception and conception. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society Meetings.
136. Suwa, M., Tversky, B., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2001). Seeing into sketches: Regrouping parts encourages new interpretations. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Purcell (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design (pp. 207-219). Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
137. Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick Jr & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225-282). New York: Plenum.
138. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vols 1 & 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
139. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992a). Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition, 20, 483-496.
140. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992b). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261-282.
141. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1997). Indexing events in memory: Evidence for index preferences. Memory, 5, 509-542.
142. Tolchinsky-Landsmann, L., & Levin, I. (1987). Writing in four- to six-year-olds: Representation of semantic and phonetic similarities and differences. Journal of Child Language, 14, 127-144.
143. Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
144. Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
145. Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
146. Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual explanations. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
147. Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407-433.
148. Tversky, B. (1995). Cognitive origins of graphic conventions. In F. T. Marchese (Ed.), Understanding images (pp. 29-53). New York: Springer-Verlag.
149. Tversky, B. (2000). Some ways that maps and graphs communicate. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognitiion II: Integrating abstract theories, empirical studies, formal methods, and practical applications (pp. 72-79). New York: Springer.
150. Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79-111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
151. Tversky, B. (2003). Navigating by mind and by body. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial reasoning (pp. 1-10). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
152. Tversky, B. (2004). Semantics, syntax, and pragmatics of graphics. In K. Holmqvist & Y. Ericsson (Eds.), Language and visualisation (pp. 141-158). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.
153. Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of higher-level visuospatial thinking (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
154. Tversky, B., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Lee, P. U., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Stolte, C., & Daniele, M.-P. (2007). Cognitive design principles for generating visualizations. In G. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology (pp. 53-73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
155. Tversky, B., Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Zahner, D., & Rho, Y. J. (2008a). Transforming descriptions and diagrams to sketches in information system design. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
156. Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lee, P., & Daniel, M.-P. (2009). Explanations in gesture, diagram, and word. In K. R. Coventry, T. Tenbrink, & J. A. Bateman (Eds.), Spatial language and dialogue (pp. 119-131). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
157. Tversky, B., Heiser, J., Lozano, S., MacKenzie, R., & Morrison, J. (2007). Enriching animations. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
158. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515-557.
159. Tversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1998). How space structures language. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge (pp. 157-175). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
160. Tversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1999). Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In C. Freksa & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science (pp. 51-64). Berlin: Springer.
161. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
162. Tversky, B., & Suwa, M. (2009). Thinking with sketches. In A. Markman (Ed.), Tools for innovation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
163. Tversky, B., Suwa, M., Agrawala, M., Heiser, J., Stolte, C., Hanrahan, P., Phan, D., Klingner, J., Daniel, M.-P., Lee, P., & Haymaker, J. (2003). Sketches for design and design of sketches. In U. Lindemann (Ed.), Human behavior in design: Individuals, teams, tools (pp. 79-86). Berlin: Springer.
164. Tversky, B., Zacks, J. M., & Hard, B. M. (2008). The structure of experience. In T. Shipley & J. M. Zacks (Eds.), Understanding events. (pp. 436-464). Oxford, England: Oxford University.
165. Tversky, B., Zacks, J., Lee, P. U., & Heiser, J. (2000). Lines, blobs, crosses, and arrows: Diagrammatic communication with schematic figures. In M. Anderson, P. Cheng, & V. Haarslev (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams (pp. 221-230). Berlin: Springer.
166. Vaid, J., & Singh, M. (1989). Asymmetries in the perception of facial effects: Is there an influence of reading habits? Neuropsychologia, 27, 1277-1286.
167. Vaid, J., Singh, M., Sakhuja, T., & Gupta, G. C. (2002). Stroke direction asymmetry in figure drawing: Influence of handedness and reading/writing habits. Brain and Cognition, 48, 597-602.
168. Wainer, H. (1992). Understanding graphs and tables. Educational Researcher, 21, 14-23.
169. Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
170. Ware, C. (2008). Visual thinking for design. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufman.
171. Westendorp, P., & van der Waarde, K. (20002001). Icons: Support or substitute? Information Design Journal, 10, 91-94.
172. Wiesner, D. (2001). The three pigs. New York: Clarion.
173. Wilkins, D. P. (1997). Alternative representations of space: Arrernte narratives in sand and sign. In M. Biermans & J.v.d. Weijer (Eds.), Proceedings of the CLS opening academic year 1997-1998 (pp. 133-162). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Nijmegen/Tilburg Center for Language Studies.
174. Winn, W. D. (1987). Charts, graphs and diagrams in educational materials. In D. M. Willows & H. A. Haughton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration. New York: Springer-Verlag.
175. Woodward, D., & Lewis, G. M. (1998). History of cartography. Vol. 2. Book 3: Cartography in the traditional Africa, America, Arctic, Australian, and Pacific societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
176. Zacks, J., Levy, E., Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. J. (1998). Reading bar graphs: Effects of depth cues and graphical context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 119-138.
177. Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (1999). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1073-1079.
178. Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21.
179. Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 29-58.
180. Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number, concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: The SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 5, 165-190.