Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition

Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 302-307

  Diwadkar, Vaibhav A ^b   McNamara, Timothy P ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347351067     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00442.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
4. Bülthoff, H.H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
5. Bülthoff, H.H., Edelman, S.Y., & Tarr, M.J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 5, 247-260.
6. Cohen, D., & Kubovy, M. (1993). Mental rotation, mental representation, and flat slopes. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 351-382.
7. Cohen, J.D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
8. Edelman, S., & Weinshall, D. (1991). A self-organizing multiple-view representation of 3D objects. Biological Cybernetics, 64, 209-219.
9. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
10. Levine, M., Jankovic, I.N., & Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 157-175.
11. Logothetis, N.K., & Pauls, J. (1995). Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Cerebral Cortex, 5, 270-288.
12. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
13. Poggio, T., & Girosi, F. (1990). Regularisation algorithms for learning that are equivalent to multilayer networks. Science, 247, 978-982.
14. Presson, C.C., DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M.D. (1989). Orientation specificity in spatial memory: What makes a path different from a map of the path? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 887-897.
15. Rieser, J.J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
16. Rock, I., & DiVita, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 280-293.
17. Shelton, A.L., & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
18. Shepard, R.N., & Cooper, L.A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Srinivas, K. (1995). Representation of rotated objects in explicit and implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1019-1036.
20. Tarr, M.J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
21. Tarr, M.J., & Bulthoff, H.H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
22. Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
23. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
24. Vetter, T., Poggio, T., & Bulthoff, H.H. (1994). The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition. Current Biology, 4, 18-23.