Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes

Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 315-320

  Simons, Daniel J ^a   Wang, Ranxiao Frances ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141826543     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00062     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berthoz, A., Israel, I., Francois, P.G., Grasso, R., & Tsuzuku, T. (1995). Spatial memory of body linear displacement: What is being stored? Science, 269, 95-98.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. Christou, C., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1997). View-direction specificity in scene recognition after active and passive learning (Technical Report No. 53). Tübingen, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Biologische Kybernetik.
5. Cooper, E.E., Biederman, I., & Hummel, J.E. (1992). Metric invariance in object recognition: A review and further evidence. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 191-214.
6. Corballis, M.C., Zbrodoff, N.J., Shetzer, L.I., & Butler, P.B. (1978). Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Memory and Cognition, 6, 98-107.
7. Diwadkar, V.A., & McNamara, T.P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
8. Easton, R.D., & Sholl, M.J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483-500.
9. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400
10. Hummel, J.E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
11. Huttenlocher, J., & Presson, C.C. (1973). Mental rotation and the perspective problem Cognitive Psychology, 4, 277-299.
12. Huttenlocher, J., & Presson, C.C. (1979). The coding and transformation of spatial information. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 375-394.
13. Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Golledge, R.G., Cicinelli, J.G., Pellegrino, J.W., & Fry, P.A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 73-91.
14. Presson, C.C. (1982). Strategies in spatial reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 243-251.
15. Rieser, J.J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
16. Rieser, J.J., Ganng, A.E., & Young, M.F. (1994). Imagery, action, and young children's spatial onentation: It's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind Child Development, 65, 1262-1278.
17. Sholl, M.J. (1989). The relation between horizontally and rod-and-frame and vestibular navigational performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 110-125.
18. Simons, D.J. (1996). Accurate visual detection of layout changes requires a stable observer position. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37, s519.
19. Tarr, M.J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
20. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition Cognition, 32, 193-254.