Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 274-310

  Shelton, Amy L ^a   McNamara, Timothy P ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECALL;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; SPACE PERCEPTION; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0035657040     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0758     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Acredolo, L. P. (1978). Development of spatial orientation in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 14, 224-234.
2. Acredolo, L. P. (1979). Laboratory versus home: The effect of environment on the nine-month-old infant's choice of spatial reference system. Developmental Psychology, 15, 666-667.
3. Acredolo, L. P., & Evans, D. (1980). Developmental changes in the effects of landmarks on infant spatial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 16, 312-318.
4. Attneave, F., & Reid, K. W. (1968). Voluntary control of frame of reference and slope equivalence under head rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 153-159.
5. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
6. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1993). Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition, 46, 223-244.
7. Cutzu, F., & Edelman, S. (1994). Canonical views in object representation and recognition. Vision Research, 34, 3037-3056.
8. Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
9. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483-500.
10. Friedman, A., & Hall, D. L. (1996). The importance of being upright: Use of environmental and viewer-centered reference frames in shape discriminations of novel three-dimensional objects. Memory & Cognition, 24, 285-295.
11. Goldmeier, E. (1937). über ähnlichkeit bei gesehenen Figuren. Psychologische Forschung, 21, 146-209. [Translation (by Goldmeier): Similarity in visually perceived forms. Psychological Issues, 8, 1-135.]
12. Goldmeier, E. (1937). über ähnlichkeit bei gesehenen Figuren. Psychologische Forschung, 21, 146-209. [Translation (by Goldmeier): Similarity in visually perceived forms. Psychological Issues, 8, 1-135.]
13. Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. S. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370, 57-59.
14. Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195-232.
15. Hinton, G. (1979). Some demonstrations of the effects of structural descriptions in mental imagery. Cognitive Science, 3, 231-250.
16. Hintzman, D. L., O'Dell, C. S., & Arndt, D. R. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 149-206.
17. Köhler, W. (1940). Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liveright.
18. Learmonth, A. E., Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (1998, November). Disoriented children use landmarks as well as geometry to reorient. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas, TX.
19. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Logan, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174.
21. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
22. McMullen, P. A., &, Jolicoeur, P. (1990). The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections. Memory & Cognition, 18, 99-115.
23. Palmer, S. E. (1989). Reference frames in the perception of shape and orientation. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 121-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Pani, J. R., & Dupree, D. (1994). Spatial reference systems in the comprehension of rotational motion. Perception, 23, 929-946.
25. Pani, J. R., Williams, C. T., & Shippey, G. T. (1995). Determinants of the perception of rotational motion: Orientation of the motion to the object and to the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1441-1456.
26. Presson, C. C., DeLange, N., & Hazelrigg, M. D. (1987). Orientation-specificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: The role of multiple orientations. Memory & Cognition, 15, 225-229.
27. Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1447-1455.
28. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157-1165.
29. Rieser, J. J., Guth, D. A., & Hill, E. W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15, 173-188.
30. Rock, I. (1956). The orientation of forms on the retina and in the environment. American Journal of Psychology, 69, 513-528.
31. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
32. Rock, I. (1992). Comment on Asch and Witkin's "Studies in Space Orientation II." Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 4, 404-406.
33. Rock, I., & Heimer, W. (1957). The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form. American Journal of Psychology, 70, 493-511.
34. Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., McNamara, T. P., Shelton, A. L., & Carr, W. S. (1998). Mental representations of large and small spatial layouts are orientation dependent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 215-226.
35. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997a). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 102-106.
36. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997b). Representing space: reference frames and multiple views. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Convention of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1048). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Sholl, M. J., & Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1494-1507.
38. Talmy, L. (1983). How language structures space. In H. L. Pick, Jr. & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research, and application (pp. 225-282). New York: Plenum Press.
39. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
40. Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407-433.
41. Vetter, T., Poggio, T., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1994). The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition. Current Biology, 4, 18-23.