Active and passive scene recognition across views

Cognition

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 191-210

  Frances Wang, Ranxiao ^a   Simons, Daniel J ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Rotation; Scene recognition; Viewer centered representation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; ROTATION;

ADULT; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0345161503     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00012-8     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Acredolo C., Adams A., Goodwyn S.W. The role of self-produced movement and visual tracking in infant spatial orientation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 38:1984;312-327.
2. Amorim M.A., Glasauer S., Corpinot K., Berthoz A. Updating an object's orientation and location during nonvisual navigation: a comparison between two processing modes. Perception and Psychophysics. 59:1997;404-418.
3. Amorim M.A., Stucchi N. Viewer- and object-centered mental explorations of an imagined environment are not equivalent. Cognitive Brain Research. 5:1997;229-239.
4. Bartram D.J. Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks. Memory and Cognition. 4:1976;593-602.
5. Benson J.B., Uzgiris I.C. Effect of self-initiated locomotion on infant search activity. Developmental Psychology. 21:1985;923-931.
6. Berthoz A., Israel I., Francois P.G., Grasso R., Tsuzuku T. Spatial memory of body linear displacement: what is being stored? Science. 269:1995;95-98.
7. Biederman I., Cooper E.E. Object recognition and laterality null effects. Neuropsychologia. 29:1991;685-694.
8. Biederman I., Cooper E.E. Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 18:1992;121-133.
9. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P.C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;1162-1182.
10. Bridgeman B., Graziano J.A. Effect of context and efference copy on visual straight ahead. Vision Research. 29:1989;1729-1736.
11. Bridgeman B., Stark L. Ocular proprioception and efference copy in registering visual direction. Vision Research. 31:1991;1903-1913.
12. Bridgeman B. Multiple sources of outflow in processing spatial information. Acta-Psychologica. 63:1986;35-48.
13. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 89:1992;60-64.
14. Christou, C.G., Bülthoff, H.H., 1997. View-Direction Specificity in Scene Recognition After Active and Passive Learning. (Technical Report No. 53). Max Planck Institut für Biologische Kybernetik, Tübingen, Germany.
15. Cooper E.E., Biederman I., Hummel J.E. Metric invariance in object recognition: a review and further evidence. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 46:1992;191-214.
16. Diwadkar V.A., McNamara T.P. Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science. 8:1997;302-307.
17. Ellis R., Allport D.A., Humphreys G.W., Collis J. Varieties of object constancy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 41A:1989;775-796.
18. Farrell M.J., Robertson I.H. Mental rotation and the automatic updating of body-centered spatial relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 24:1998;227-233.
19. Frier H.J., Edwards E., Smith C., Neale S., Collett T.S. Magnetic compass cues and visual pattern learning in honeybees. Journal of Experimental Biology. 199:1996;1353-1361.
20. Gale N., Golledge R.G., Pellegrino J.W., Doherty S. Acquisition and integration of route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighborhood. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 10:1990;3-25.
21. Held R., Bossom J. Neonatal deprivation and adult rearrangement: Complementary techniques for analyzing plastic sensory-motor coordinations. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 54:1961;33-37.
22. Held R., Freedman S.J. Plasticity in human sensory-motor control. Science. 142:1963;455-462.
23. Held R., Hein A.V. Adaptation of disarranged hand-eye coordination contingent upon re-afferent stimulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 8:1958;87-90.
24. Huttenlocher J., Presson C.C. Mental rotation and the perspective problem. Cognitive Psychology. 4:1973;277-299.
25. Huttenlocher J., Presson C.C. The coding and transformation of spatial information. Cognitive Psychology. 11:1979;375-394.
26. Israel I., Bronstein A.M., Kanayama R., Faldon M., Gresty M.A. Visual and vestibular factors influencing vestibular 'navigation'. Experimental Brain Research. 112:1996;411-419.
27. Kelso J.A. Planning and efferent components in the coding of movement. Journal of Motor Behavior. 9:1977;33-47.
28. Kirchner W.H., Braun U. Dancing honey bees indicate the location of food sources using path integration rather than cognitive maps. Animal Behaviour. 48:1994;1437-1441.
29. Kourtzi Z., Shiffrar M. One-shot view invariance in a moving world. Psychological Science. 8:1997;461-466.
30. Larish J.F., Andersen G.J. Active control in interrupted dynamic spatial orientation: the detection of orientation change. Perception and Psychophysics. 57:1995;533-545.
31. Loomis J.M., Klatzky R.L., Golledge R.G., Cicinelli J.G., Pellegrino J.W., Fry P.A. Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 122:1993;73-91.
32. Nakatani, C., Pollatsek, A., Johnson, S., (1996). Mental rotation of scenes. Poster presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Chicago, IL.
33. Peruch P., Vercher J.L., Gauthier G.M. Acquisition of spatial knowledge through visual exploration of simulated environments. Ecological Psychology. 7:1995;1-20.
34. Poag C.K., Cohen R., Weatherford D.L. Spatial representations of young children: the role of self- versus adult-directed movement and viewing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 35:1983;172-179.
35. Poggio T., Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize 3D objects. Nature. 343:1990;263-266.
36. Presson C.C. Strategies in spatial reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 8:1982;243-251.
37. Rieser J.J., Garing A.E., Young M.F. Imagery, action, and young children's spatial orientation: it's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind. Child Development. 65:1994;1262-1278.
38. Rock I., Wheeler D., Tudor L. Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? Cognitive Psychology. 21:1989;185-210.
39. Ronacher B., Wehner R. Desert ants Cataglyphis fortis use self-induced optic flow to measure distances traveled. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory Neural and Behavioral Physiology. 177:1995;21-27.
40. Shelton A.L., McNamara T.P. Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 4:1997;102-106.
41. Shepard, R.N., Cooper, L.A., 1982. Mental images and Their Transformations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Shepard R.N., Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science. 171:1971;701-703.
43. Simons D.J., Wang R.F. Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science. 9:1998;315-320.
44. Simons, D.J., 1996a. In sight, out of mind: when object representations fail. Psychological Science 7, 301-305.
45. Simons, D.J., 1996b. Accurate visual detection of layout changes requires a stable observer position. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 37(3), s519.
46. Spelke E.S., Kestenbaum R., Simons D.J., Wein D. Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 13:1995;113-142.
47. Srinivasan M.V., Zhang S.W., Lehrer M., Collett T.S. Honeybee navigation en route to the goal: visual flight control and odometry. Journal of Experimental Biology. 199:1996;237-244.
48. Tarr M.J. Rotating objects to recognize them: a case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2:1995;55-82.
49. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology. 21:1989;233-282.
50. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H., Zabinski M., Blanz V. To what extent do unique parts influence recognition across changes in viewpoint? Psychological Science. 8:1997;282-289.
51. Thinus-Blanc C., Durup M., Poucet B. The spatial parameters encoded by hamsters during exploration a further study. Behavioural Processes. 26:1992;43-57.
52. Ullman S., Basri R. Recognition by linear-combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 13:1991;992-1006.
53. Vetter T., Poggio T. Symmetric 3D objects are an easy case for 2D object recognition. Spatial Vision. 8:1994;443-453.
54. Vetter T., Hurlbert A., Poggio T. View-based models of 3D object recognition: invariance to imaging transformations. Cerebral Cortex. 5:1995;261-269.
55. Wang R.F. Imagination, action and spatial representations. Proceedings and Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association. 69:1998;91.
56. Wang R.F., Simons D.J. Layout change detection is differentially affected by display rotations and observer movements. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 38:1997;s1009.
57. Wehner R., Srinivasan M.V. Searching behavior of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). Journal of Comparative Physiology. 142:1981;315-318.
58. Wraga, M., Creem, S.H., Proffitt, D.R., submitted. Updating scenes after imagined object- and viewer-rotations.
59. Xu F., Carey S. Infants' metaphysics: the case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology. 30:1996;111-153.