After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition?

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 425-427

  Hayward, William G ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

OBJECT REPRESENTATIONS;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RETINA IMAGE; SHORT SURVEY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0141756308     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.004     Document Type: Short Survey

References (24)

1. Foster D.H., Gilson S.J. Recognizing novel three-dimensional objects by summing signals from parts and views. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 269:2002;1939-1947.
2. Biederman I., Cooper E.E. Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 23:1991;393-419.
3. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P.C. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19:1993;1162-1182.
4. Biederman I., Bar M. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Res. 39:1999;2885-2899.
5. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 21:1989;233-282.
6. Tarr M.J. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2:1995;55-82.
7. Bülthoff H.H., Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89:1992;60-64.
8. Jolicoeur P. Identification of misoriented objects: a dual-systems theory. Mind Lang. 5:1990;387-410.
9. Tarr M.J., Bülthoff H.H. Is human object recognition better described by geon-structural-descriptions or by multiple-views? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21:1995;1494-1505.
10. Biederman I., Gerhardstein P.C. Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21:1995;1506-1514.
11. Hayward W.G., Tarr M.J. Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23:1997;1511-1521.
12. Stankiewicz B.J. Empirical evidence for independent dimensions in the visual representation of three-dimensional shape. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28:2002;913-932.
13. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. When does human object recognition use a viewer-centered frame of reference? Psychol. Sci. 1:1990;253-256.
14. Farah M.J. Is an object an object an object? Cognitive and neuropsychological investigations of domain-specificity in visual object recognition. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1:1992;164-169.
15. Hummel J.E., Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol. Rev. 99:1992;480-517.
16. Hummel J.E., Stankiewicz B.J. Two roles for attention in shape perception: a structural description model of visual scrutiny. Vis. Cogn. 5:1998;49-79.
17. Wilson K.D., Farah M.J. When does the visual system use viewpoint-invariant representations during recognition? Cogn. Brain Res. 16:2003;399-415.
18. Winston P.H. Learning structural descriptions from examples. Winston P.H. The Psychology of Computer Vision. 1975;157-209 McGraw-Hill.
19. Marr D., Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 200:1978;269-294.
20. Biederman I. Recognition-By-Components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;115-147.
21. Ullman S., Basri R. Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13:1991;992-1005.
22. Poggio T., Edelman S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature. 343:1990;263-266.
23. Edelman S., Weinshall D. A self-organizing multiple-view representation of 3D objects. Biol. Cybern. 64:1991;209-219.
24. Perrett D.I., et al. Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition. 67:1998;111-145.