Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: Coordinate transformations in object recognition

Psychological Science

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 214-221

  Graf, Markus ^a,d   Kaping, D ^a,b,c   Bulthoff H H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^c GERMAN PRIMATE CENTER   (Germany)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEMANTICS; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEMANTICS;

EID: 15944420579     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00806.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Belongie, S., Malik, J., & Puzicha, J. (2002). Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 509-522.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Bülthoff, H.H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
4. Deneve, S., & Pouget, A. (2003). Basis functions for object-centered representations. Neuron, 37, 347-359.
5. Edelman, S. (1998). Representation is representation of similarities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 449-498.
6. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M.J. (1997). Orientation priming of novel shapes in the context of viewpoint-dependent recognition. Perception, 26, 51-73.
7. Graf, M. (2002). Form, space and object: Geometrical transformations in object recognition and categorization. Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.
8. Graf, M. (2004). Coordinate transformations in object recognition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. Hinton, G.E. (1981). A parallel computation that assigns canonical object-based frames of reference. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. II, pp. 683-685). Los Altos, CA: Kaufman.
10. Hummel, J.E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
11. Hummel, J.E., & Stankiewicz, B.J. (1998). Two roles of attention in shape perception: A structural description model of visual scrutiny. Visual Cognition, 5, 49-79.
12. Humphreys, G.W., & Forde, E.M.E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
13. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
14. Jolicoeur, P. (1990). Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 351-364.
15. Jolicoeur, P. (1992). Orientation congruency effects in visual search. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 280-305.
16. Jolicoeur, P., Corballis, M.C., & Lawson, R. (1998). The influence of perceived rotary motion on the recognition of rotated objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 140-146.
17. Jolicoeur, P., & Humphrey, G.K. (1998). Perception of rotated two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects and visual shapes. In V. Walsh & J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Perceptual constancy: Why things look as they do (pp. 69-123). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Large, M.-E., McMullen, P.A., & Hamm, J.P. (2003). The role of axes of elongation and symmetry in rotated object naming. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1-19.
19. Larsen, A., & Bundesen, C. (1978). Size scaling in visual pattern recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 1-20.
20. Lawson, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245.
21. Lawson, R. (2004). Recognizing a plane-misoriented view of a familiar object is not influenced by the ease of specifying the main axis of elongation of that object. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 234-248.
22. Lawson, R., & Jolicoeur, P. (1998). The effects of plane rotation on the recognition of brief masked pictures of familiar objects. Memory & Cognition, 26, 791-803.
23. Milner, A.D., & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
24. Palmer, S.E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Pashler, H. (1990). Coordinate frame for symmetry detection and object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 150-163.
26. Perrett, D.I., Oram, W.M., & Ashbridge, E. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalization of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition, 67, 111-145.
27. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2002). Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 162-168.
28. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
29. Salinas, E., & Abbott, L.F. (1995). Transfer of coded information from sensory to motor networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 6461-6474.
30. Salinas, E., & Abbott, L.F. (1997). Invariant visual responses from attentional gain fields. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 3267-3272.
31. Salinas, E., & Abbott, L.F. (2001). Coordinate transformations in the visual system: How to generate gain fields and what to compute with them. In M.A.L. Nicolelis (Ed.), Progress in brain research: Vol. 130. Advances in neural population coding (pp. 175-190). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
32. Salinas, E., & Sejnowski, T.J. (2001). Gain modulation in the central nervous system: Where behavior, neurophysiology, and computation meet. The Neuroscientist, 7, 430-440.
33. Snodgrass, J.G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
34. Tarr, M.J. (2003). Visual object recognition: Can a single mechanism suffice? In M.A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes (pp. 177-211). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
35. Tarr, M.J., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1998). Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. In M.J. Tarr & H.H. Bülthoff (Eds.), Object recognition in man, monkey, and machine (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Tarr, M.J., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? Cognition, 67, 71-109.
37. Ullman, S. (1996). High-level vision: Object recognition and visual cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Zipser, D., & Andersen, R.A. (1988). A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature, 331, 679-684.