Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-23

  Cheng, Ken ^a   Newcombe, Nora S ^b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244442335     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196346     Document Type: Review

References (133)

1. AGUIRRE, G. K., & D'ESPOSITO, M. (1999). Topographical disorientation: A synthesis and taxonomy. Brain, 122, 1613-1628.
2. AGUIRRE, G. K., DETRE, J. A., ALSOP, D. C., & D'ESPOSITO, M. (1996). The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 823-829.
3. ANDERSON, M. I., HAYMAN, R., CHAKRABORTY, S., & JEFFERY, K. J. (2003). The representation of spatial context. In K. J. Jeffery (Ed.), The neurobiology of spatial behaviour (pp. 274-294). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. BARRASH, J., DAMASIO, H., ADOLPHS, R., & TRANEL, D. (2000). The neuroanatomical correlates of route learning impairment. Neuropsychologia, 38, 820-836.
5. BENHAMOU, S., & POUCET, B. (1998). Landmark use by navigating rats (Rattus norvegicus): Contrasting geometric and featural information. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 317-322.
6. BIEGLER, R. (2000). Possible uses of path integration in animal navigation. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 257-277.
7. BIEGLER, R., & MORRIS, R. G. M. (1999). Blocking in the spatial domain with arrays of discrete landmarks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 334-351.
8. BOHBOT, V. D., KALINA, M., STEPANKOVA, K., SPACKOVA, N., PETRIDES, M., & NADEL, L. (1998). Spatial memory deficits in patients with lesions to the right hippocampus and to the right parahippocampal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 36, 1217-1238.
9. BURGESS, N., & O'KEEFE, J. (2003). Neural representations in human spatial memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 517-519.
10. CARTWRIGHT, B. A., & COLLETT, T. S. (1983). Landmark learning in bees. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 151, 521-543.
11. CHENG, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149-178.
12. CHENG, K. (1988). Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 162, 815-826.
13. CHENG, K. (1989). The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 366-375.
14. CHENG, K. (1994). The determination of direction in landmark-based spatial search in pigeons: A further test of the vector sum model. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 291-301.
15. CHENG, K. (1998). Distances and directions are computed separately by honeybees in landmark-based search. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 455-468.
16. CHENG, K. (2000). How honeybees find a place: Lessons from a simple mind. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 1-15.
17. CHENG, K., & GALLISTEL, C. R. (1984). Testing the geometric power of a spatial representation. In H. L. Roitblat, H. S. Terrace, & T. G. Bever (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 409-423). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. CHENG, K., & SPETCH, M. L. (1998). Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. In S. Healy (Ed.), Spatial representation in animals (pp. 1-17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. CHENG, K., SPETCH, M. L., & MICELI, P. (1996). Averaging temporal duration and spatial position. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 175-182.
20. COLLETT, T. S., & COLLETT, M. (2000). Path integration in insects. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 757-762.
21. COLLETT, T. S., & COLLETT, M. (2002). Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 542-552.
22. DFNNISTON, J. C., MILLER, R. R., & MATUTE, H. (1996). Biological significance as determinant of cue competition. Psychological Science. 7, 325-331
23. DIEZ-CHAMIZO, V., STERIO, D., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1985). Blocking and overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues: A test of the independence of locale and guidance learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 235-253.
24. DYER, F. C., & GOULD, J. L. (1983). Honey bee navigation. American Scientist, 71, 587-597.
25. EGERTON, S. J., CALLAGHAN, V., & CHERNETT, P. (2000). A biologically inspired mapping model for autonomous mobile robots. In M. Mohammadian (Ed.), New frontiers in computational intelligence and its applications (pp. 293-302). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
26. EKSTROM, A. D., KAHANA, M. J., CAPLAN, J. B., FIELDS, T. A., ISHAM, E. A., NEWMAN, E. L., & FRIED, L. (2003). Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation. Nature, 425, 184-187.
27. EPSTEIN, R., DE YOE, E. A., PRESS, D. Z., ROSEN, A. C., & KANWISHER, N. (2001). Neuropsychological evidence for a topographical learning mechanism in parahippocampal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 481-508.
28. EPSTEIN, R., GRAHAM, K. S., & DOWNING, P. E. (2003). Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron, 37, 865-876.
29. EPSTEIN, R., HARRIS, A., STANLEY, D., & KANWISHER, N. (1999). The parahippocampal place area: Recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron, 23, 115-125.
30. EPSTEIN, R., & KANWISHER, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
31. ETIENNE, A. S., BERLIE, J., GEORGAKOPOULOS, J., & MAURER, R. (1998). Role of dead reckoning in navigation. In S. Healy (Ed.), Spatial representation in animals (pp. 54-68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. FODOR, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. FODOR, J. A. (2001). The mind doesn't work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. FRY, S. N., & WEHNER, R. (2002). Honeybees store landmarks in an egocentric frame of reference. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 187, 1009-1016.
35. GAGLIARDO, A., IOALÉ, P., & BINGMAN, V. P. (1999). Homing in pigeons: The role of the hippocampal formation in the representation of landmarks used for navigation. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 311-315.
36. GALLISTEL, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. GALLISTEL, C. R. (2000). The replacement of general-purpose learning models with adaptively specialized learning modules. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1179-1191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. GALLISTEL, C. R. (2003a). Conditioning from an information processing perspective. Behavioural Processes, 62, 89-101.
39. GALLISTEL, C. R. (2003b). The principle of adaptive specialization as it applies to learning and memory. In R. H. Kluwe, G. Lüer, & F. Rösler (Eds.), Principles of learning and memory (pp. 250-280). Berlin: Birkhäuser Verlag.
40. GALLISTEL, C. R., & GIBBON, J. (2000). Time, rate and conditioning. Psychological Review, 107, 289-344.
41. GALLISTEL, C. R., & GIBBON, J. (2002). The symbolic foundations of conditioned behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. GARRAD-COLE, F., LEW, A. R., BREMNER, J. G., & WHITAKER, C. J. (2001). Use of cue configuration geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 317-320.
43. GEPSHTEIN, S., & BANKS, M. S. (2003). Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Current Biology, 13, 483-488.
44. GOUTEUX, S., & SPELKE, E. S. (2001). Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space. Cognition, 81, 119-148.
45. GOUTEUX, S., THINUS-BLANC, C., & VAUCLAIR, J. (2001). Rhesus monkeys use geometric and nongeometric information during a reorientation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 505-519.
46. GOUTEUX, S., VAUCLAIR, J., & THINUS-BLANC, C. (2001). Reorientation in a small-scale environment by 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 16, 853-869.
47. GRAY, E. R., SPETCH, M. L., KELLY, D. M., & NGUYEN, A. (2004). Search ing in the center: Pigeons encode relative distances from the walls of an enclosure. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 113-117.
48. GRÖN, G., WUNDERLICH, A. P., SPITZER, M., TOMCZAK, R., & RIEPE, M. W. (2000). Brain activation during human navigation: Gender-different neural networks as a substrate of performance. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 404-408.
49. HABIB, M., & SIRIGU, A. (1987). Pure topographical disorientation: A definition and anatomical basis. Cortex, 23, 73-85.
50. HARTLEY, T., MAGUIRE, E. A., SPIERS, H. J., & BURGESS, N. (2003). The well-worn route and the path less travelled: Distinct neural bases of route following and way finding in humans. Neuron, 37, 877-888.
51. HARTLEY, T., TRINKLER, I., & BURGESS, N. (2004). Geometric determinants of human spatial memory. Cognition, 94, 39-75.
52. HAYWARD, A., MCGREGOR, A., GOOD, M. A., & PEARCE, J. M. (2003). Absence of overshadowing and blocking between landmarks and geometric cues provided by the shape of a test arena. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 114-126.
53. HERMER, L., & SPELKE, E. (1994). A geometric process for spatial representation in young children. Nature, 370, 57-59.
54. HERMER, L., & SPELKE, E. (1996). Modularity and development: The case of spatial reorientation. Cognition, 61, 195-232.
55. HERMER-VAZQUEZ, L., MOFFET, A., & MUNKHOLM, P. (2001). Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: The case of two spatial memory tasks. Cognition, 79, 263-299.
56. HERMER-VAZQUEZ, L., SPELKE, E., & KATSNELSON, A. (1999). Source of flexibility in human cognition: Dual task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3-36.
57. HUTTENLOCHER, J., HEDGES, L. V., & VEVEA, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgement? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 220-241.
58. HUTTENLOCHER, J., NEWCOMBE, N., & SANDBERG, E. H. (1994). The coding of spatial location in young children. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 115-148.
59. HUTTENLOCHER, J., & VASILYEVA, M. (2003). How toddlers represent enclosed spaces. Cognitive Science, 27, 749-766.
60. ISGOR, C., & SENGELAUB, D. R. (1998). Prenatal gonadal steroids affect adult spatial behavior, CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cell morphology in rats. Hormones & Behavior, 34, 183-198.
61. JACOBS, L. F. (2003). The evolution of the cognitive map. Brain, Behavior, & Evolution, 62, 128-139.
62. JACOBS, L. F., & SCHENK, F. (2003). Unpacking the cognitive map: The parallel map theory of hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 110, 285-315.
63. JEFFERY, K. J. (ED.) (2003). The neurobiology of spatial behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. JEFFERY, K. J., & ANDERSON, M. I. (2003). Dissociation of the geometric and contextual influences on place cells. Hippocampus, 13, 868-872.
65. JOHNSRUDE, I. S., OWEN, A. M., CRANE, J., MILNER, B., & EVANS, A. C. (1999). A cognitive activation study of memory for spatial relationships. Neuropsychologia, 37, 829-841.
66. JONES, J. E., ANTONIADIS, E., SHETTLEWORTH, S. J., & KAMIL, A. C. (2002). A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 350-356.
67. KAMIL, A. C., & CHENG, K. (2001). Way-finding and landmarks: The multiple-bearings hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 204, 103-113.
68. KAMIL, A. C., & JONES, J. E. (1997). The seed storing corvid Clark's nutcracker learns geometric relationships among landmarks. Nature, 390, 276-279.
69. KAMIL, A. C., & JONES, J. E. (2000). Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 439-453.
70. KELLY, D. M., & SPETCH, M. L. (2001). Pigeons encode relative geometry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 417-422.
71. KELLY, D. M., & SPETCH, M. L. (2004). Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: I. Do adults encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 82-94.
72. KELLY, D. M., SPETCH, M. L., & HETH, C. D. (1998). Pigeons' encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 259-269.
73. KESSELS, R. P. C., DE HAAN, E. H. F., KAPPELLE, L. J., & POSTMA, A. (2001). Varieties of human spatial memory: A meta-analysis on the effects of hippocampal lesions. Brain Research Reviews, 35, 295-303.
74. KING, J. A., BURGESS, N., HARTLEY, T., VARGHA-KHADEM, F., & O'KEEFE, J. (2002). Human hippocampus and viewpoint dependence in spatial memory. Hippocampus, 12, 811-820.
75. LEARMONTH, A. E., NADEL, L., & NEWCOMBE, N. S. (2002). Children's use of landmarks: Implications for modularity theory. Psychological Science, 13, 337-341.
76. LEARMONTH, A. E., NEWCOMBE, N. S., & HUTTENLOCHER, J. (2001). Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 225-244.
77. LEVER, C., WILLS, T., CACUCCI, F., BURGESS, N., & O'KEEFE, J. (2002). Long-term plasticity in hippocampal place-cell representation of environmental geometry. Nature, 416, 90-94.
78. LUZZI, S., PUCCI, E., DI BELLA, P., & PICCIRILLI, M. (2000). Topographical disorientation consequent to amnesia of spatial location in a patient with right parahippocampal damage. Cortex, 36, 427-434.
79. MAGUIRE, E. A., BURGESS, N., DONNETT, J. G., FRACKOWIAK, R. S. J., FRITH, C. D., & O'KEEFE, J. (1998). Knowing where and getting there: A human navigation network. Science, 280, 921-924.
80. MAGUIRE, E. A., BURGESS, N., & O'KEEFE, J. (1999). Human spatial navigation: Cognitive maps, sexual dimorphism, and neural substrates. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 171-177.
81. MAGUIRE, E. A., FRACKOWIAK, R. S. J., & FRITH, C. D. (1997). Recalling routes around London: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 7103-7110.
82. MAGUIRE, E. A., FRITH, C. D., BURGESS, N., DONNETT, J. G., & O'KEEFE, J. (1998). Knowing where things are: Parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 61-76.
83. MARGULES, J., & GALLISTEL, C. R. (1988). Heading in the rat: Determination by environmental shape. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 404-410.
84. MARR, D. (1982). Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. MELLET, E., BRISCOGNE, S., TZOURIO-MAZOYER, N., GHAEM, O., PETIT, L., ZAGO, L., ETARD, O., BERTHOZ, A., MAZOYER, B., & DENIS, M. (2000). Neural correlates of topographic mental exploration: The impact of route versus survey perspective learning. NeuroImage, 12, 588-600.
86. MILLER, R. R., & MATUTE, H. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 370-386.
87. MOFFAT, S. D., HAMPSON, E., & HATZIPANTELIS, M. (1998). Navigation in a "virtual" maze: Sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 19, 73-88.
88. NEWCOMBE, N. S. (2002). The nativist-empiricist controversy in the context of recent research on spatial and quantitative development. Psychological Science, 13, 395-401.
89. NEWCOMBE, N. S. (in press). Evidence for and against a geometric module: The roles of language and action. In J. Rieser, J. Lockman, & C. Nelson (Eds.), Action as an organizer of learning and development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. NEWCOMBE, N. S., & HUTTENLOCHER, J. (2000). Making space: The development of spatial representation and reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. O'KEEFE, J., & BURGESS, N. (1996). Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature, 381, 425-428.
92. O'KEEFE, J., BURGESS, N., DONNETT, J. G., JEFFERY, K. J., & MAGUIRE, E. A. (1999). Place cells, navigational accuracy, and the human hippocampus. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 153-164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. O' KEEFE, J., & NADEL, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
94. PEARCE, J. M., WARD-ROBINSON, J., GOOD, M., FUSSELL, C., & AYDIN, A. (2001). Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 329-344.
95. PINE, D. S., GRUN, J., MAGUIRE, E. A., BURGESS, N., ZARAHN, E., KODA, V., FYER, A., SZESZKO, P. R., & BILDER, R. M. (2002). Neurodevelopmental aspects of spatial navigation: A virtual reality fMRI study. NeuroImage, 15, 396-406.
96. POUCET, B., LENCK-SANTINI, P.-P., & SAVE, E. (2003). Drawing parallels between the behavioural and neural properties of navigation. In K. J. Jeffery (Ed.), The neurobiology of spatial behaviour (pp. 187-198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97. QUINE, W. V., & ULLIAN, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
98. ROBERTS, A. D. L., & PEARCE, J. M. (1999). Blocking in the Morris swimming pool. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25,225-235.
99. RODRIGO, T., CHAMIZO, V. D., MCLAREN, I. P. L., & MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1997). Blocking in the spatial domain. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 110-118.
100. SANDSTROM, N. J., KAUFMAN, J., & HUETTEL, S. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 351-360.
101. SHELTON, A. L., & GABRIELI, J. D. E. (2002). Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives. Journal of Neuro science, 22, 2711-2717.
102. SHETTLEWORTH, S. J. (1998). Cognition, evolution, and behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
103. SOVRANO, V. A., BISAZZA, A., & VALLORTIGARA, G. (2002). Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: Encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition, 85, B51-B59.
104. SOVRANO, V. A., BISAZZA, A., & VALLORTIGARA, G. (2003). Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: Conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 199-210.
105. SPETCH, M. L. (1995). Overshadowing in landmark learning: Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 166-181.
106. SPETCH, M. L., CHENG, K., & MACDONALD, S. E. (1996). Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 110, 55-68.
107. SPETCH, M. L., CHENG, K., MACDONALD, S. E., LINKENHOKER, B. A., KELLY, D. M.. & DOERKSON, S. R. (1997). Use of landmark configuration in pigeons and humans: II. Generality across search tasks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 14-24.
108. SPETCH. M. L., & EDWARDS, C. A. (1988). Pigeons', Columba livia, use of global and local cues for spatial memory. Animal Behaviour, 36, 293-296.
109. SPETCH, M. L., RUST, T. B., KAMIL, A. C., & JONES, J. E. (2003). Searching by rules: Pigeons' (Columba livia) landmark-based search according to constant bearing or constant distance. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 125-132.
110. SPIERS, H. J., BURGESS, N., HARTLEY, T., VARGHA-KHADEM, F., & O'KEEFE, J. (2001). Bilateral hippocampal pathology impairs topographical and episodic memory but not visual pattern matching. Hippocampus, 11, 715-725.
111. SPIERS, H. J., BURGESS, N., MAGUIRE, E. A., BAXENDALE, S., HARTLEY, T., THOMPSON, P. J., & O'KEEFE, J. (2001). Unilateral temporal lobectomy patients show lateralized topographical and episodic memory deficits in a virtual town. Brain, 124, 2476-2489.
112. TEES, R. C., BUHRMANN, K., & HANLEY, J. (1990). The effect of early experience on water maze spatial learning and memory in rats. Developmental Psychobiology, 23, 427-439.
113. TOMMASI, L., GAGLIARDO, A., ANDREW, R. J., & VALLORTIGARA, G. (2003). Separate processing mechanisms for encoding geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1695-1702.
114. TOMMASI, L., & POLLI, C. (2004). Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Animal Cognition, 7, 53-59.
115. TOMMASI, L., & VALLORTIGARA, G. (2000). Searching for the center: Spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 477-486.
116. TOMMASI, L., & VALLORTIGARA, G. (2001). Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the avian brain. Behavioral Neuroscience, 115, 602-613.
117. TOMMASI, L., VALLORTIGARA, G., & ZANFORLIN, M. (1997). Young chicks learn to localize the center of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 180, 567-572.
118. VALLORTIGARA, G., PAGNI, P., & SOVRANO, V. A. (2004). Separate geometric and non-geometric modules for spatial reorientation: Evidence from a lopsided animal brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 390-400.
119. VALLORTIGARA, G., ZANFORLIN, M., & PASTI, G. (1990). Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: A test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 248-254.
120. VON FRISCH, K., & LINDAUER, M. (1954). Himmel und Erde in Konkurrenz bei der Orientierung der Bienen [Sky and earth in competition in the orientation of bees]. Naturwissenschaften, 41, 245-253.
121. WALL, P. L., BOTLY, L. C. P., BLACK, C. K., & SHETTLEWORTH, S. J. (2004). The geometric module in the rat: Independence of shape and feature learning in a food finding task. Learning & Behavior, 32, 289-298.
122. WANG, R. F., HERMER, L., & SPELKE, E. S. (1999). Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: A comparison with rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 113, 475-485.
123. WANG, R. F., & SPELKE, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 11, 215-250.
124. WANG, R. F., & SPELKE, E. S. (2002). Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 376-382.
125. WANG, R. F., & SPELKE, E. S. (2003). Comparative approaches to human navigation. In K. J. Jeffery (Ed.), The neurobiology of spatial behaviour (pp. 119-143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
126. WEHNER, R. (1992). Arthropods. In F. Papi (Ed.), Animal homing (pp. 45-144). London: Chapman & Hall.
127. WEHNER, R. (1994). The polarization-vision project: Championing organismic biology. Fortschritte der Zoologie, 39, 103-143.
128. WEHNER, R., MICHEL, B., & ANTONSEN, P. (1996). Visual navigation in insects: Coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 129-140.
129. WEHNER, R., & SRINIVASAN, M. V. (2003). Path integration in insects. In K. J. Jeffery (Ed.), The neurobiology of spatial behaviour (pp. 9-30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
130. WEHNER, R., & WEHNER, S. (1990). Insect navigation: Use of maps or Ariadne's thread? Ethology, Ecology, & Evolution, 2, 27-48.
131. WILLIAMS, C. L., BARNETT, A. M., & MECK, W. H. (1990). Organizational effects of early gonadal secretions on sexual differentiation in spatial memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 84-97.
132. WILTSCHKO, W., & BALDA, R. P. (1989). Sun compass orientation in seed-caching scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 164, 717-722.
133. YEAP, W. K., & JEFFERIES, M. E. (1999). Computing a representation of the local environment. Artificial Intelligence, 107, 265-301.