Spatial cognition: Evidence from visual neglect

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 125-133

  Halligan, Peter W ^a   Fink, Gereon R ^b,c   Marshall, John C ^d   Vallar, Giuseppe ^e  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d RADCLIFFE INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL IMAGING; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

COORDINATE SYSTEMS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HUMAN; IMAGERY; MEMORY; MENTAL DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SENSORY SYSTEM; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SPATIAL UNILATERAL NEGLECT; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION;

EID: 0037333604     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00032-9     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Vallar G. Spatial hemineglect in humans. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2:1998;87-97.
2. Karnath H.O., et al. The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect. 2002;Oxford University Press.
3. Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C. Graphic neglect-more than the sum of the parts. Neuroimage. 14:2001;S91-S97.
4. Stone S.P., et al. Unilateral neglect: a common but heterogeneous syndrome. Neurology. 50:1998;1902-1905.
5. Robertson I.H., Halligan P.W. Spatial Neglect: A Clinical Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. 1999;Erlbaum.
6. Kanwisher N., Wojciulik E. Visual attention: insights from brain imaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1:2000;91-100.
7. Driver J., Vuilleumier P. Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition. 79:2001;39-88.
8. Vuilleumier P. Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinction. Neuropsychologia. 38:2000;693-700.
9. Shulman M.B., et al. Triangular backgrounds shift the bias of line bisection performance in hemispatial neglect. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 72:2002;68-72.
10. Daini R., et al. Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length. Exp. Brain Res. 144:2002;224-237.
11. Beschin N., et al. Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 63:1997;483-489.
12. Behrmann M., Geng J.J. What is 'left' when all is said and done/spatial coding and hemispatial neglect. Karnath H.O., et al. The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect. 2002;85-100 Oxford University Press.
13. Umilta C. Mechanisms of attention. Rapp B. Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2000;135-158 Psychology Press.
14. Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C. When two is one: a case study of spatial parsing in visual neglect. Perception. 22:1993;309-312.
15. Caramazza A., Hillis A.E. Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature. 346:1990;267-269.
16. Bartolomeo P. The relationship between visual perception and visual mental imagery; a reappraisal of the neuropsychological evidence. Cortex. 38:2002;357-378.
17. Kosslyn S.M. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. 1994;MIT Press.
18. Previc F.W. The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychol. Bull. 124:1998;123-164.
19. Rizzolatti G., et al. Spatial neglect: neurophysiological bases, cortical circuits and theories. Boller F., Grafman J., et al. Handbook of Neuropsychology. 2000;503-537 Elsevier.
20. Cocchina G., et al. The fluff test: a simple task to assess body representational neglect. Neuropsychol. Rehab. 11:2001;17-31.
21. Guariglia C., Antonucci G. Personal and extrapersonal space: a case of neglect dissociation. Neuropsychologia. 30:1992;1001-1009.
22. Halligan P.W., Marshall J.C. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature. 350:1991;498-500.
23. Berti A., Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:2000;415-420.
24. Vuilleumier P., et al. Near and far visual space in unilateral neglect. Ann. Neurol. 43:1998;406-410.
25. Barrett A.M., et al. Attentional grasp in far extrapersonal space after thalamic infarction. Neuropsychologia. 38:2000;778-784.
26. Pizzamiglio L., et al. Visual neglect for far and near extra-personal space in humans. Cortex. 25:1989;471-477.
27. Pitzalis S., et al. Influence of the radial and vertical dimensions on lateral neglect. Exp. Brain Res. 136:2001;281-294.
28. Iriki A., et al. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport. 7:1996;2325-2330.
29. Berti A., et al. Coding of far and near space in neglect patients. Neuroimage. 14:2001;S98-S102.
30. Ackroyd K., et al. Widening the sphere of influence: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase. 8:2002;1-12.
31. Vallar G. The methodological foundations of human neuropsychology: studies in brain-damaged patients. Boller F., Grafman J. Handbook of Neuropsychology. 2000;305-344 Elsevier.
32. Vallar G., Perani D. The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia. 24:1986;609-622.
33. Leibovitch F.S., et al. Brain-behavior correlations in hemispatial neglect using CT and SPECT: the Sunnybrook Stroke Study. Neurology. 50:1998;901-908.
34. Perenin M.-T. Optic ataxia and unilateral neglect: clinical evidence for dissociable spatial functions in posterior parietal cortex. Their P., Karnath H.O. Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space. 1997;209-308 Springer-Verlag.
35. Karnath H.O., et al. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature. 411:2001;950-953.
36. Marshall J.C., et al. Spatial awareness: a function of the posterior parietal lobe? Cortex. 38:2002;253-257.
37. Perani D., et al. Left and right hemisphere contribution to recovery from neglect after right hemisphere damage-an [18F]FDG pet study of two cases. Neuropsychologia. 31:1993;115-125.
38. Pizzamiglio L., et al. Recovery of neglect after right hemispheric damage: H2(15)O positron emission tomographic activation study. Arch. Neurol. 55:1998;561-568.
39. Vallar G. Extrapersonal visual unilateral spatial neglect and its neuroanatomy. Neuroimage. 14:2001;S52-S58.
40. Na D.L., et al. Motor perseverative behavior on a line cancellation task. Neurology. 52:1999;1569-1576.
41. Daini R., et al. Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length. Exp. Brain Res. 144:2002;224-237.
42. Vallar G., et al. Anatomical correlates of visual and tactile extinction in humans: a clinical CT scan study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 57:1994;464-470.
43. Fierro B., et al. Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects. Neuroreport. 11:2000;1519-1521.
44. Fierro B., et al. Timing of right parietal and frontal cortex activity in visuospatial perception: a TMS study in normal individuals. Neuroreport. 12:2001;2605-2607.
45. Hilgetag C.C., et al. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 4:2001;953-957.
46. Oliveri M., et al. rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect. Neurology. 57:2001;1338-1340.
47. Kinsbourne M. Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. Robertson I.H., Marshall J.C. Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. 1993;63-86 Erlbaum.
48. Fink G.R., et al. Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains. Brain. 120:1997;2013-2028.
49. Buchel C., Friston K. Assessing interactions among neuronal systems using functional neuroimaging. Neural Netw. 13:2000;871-882.
50. Corbetta M., et al. Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 3:2000;292-297.
51. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:2002;201-215.
52. Posner M.I., et al. Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. J. Neurosci. 4:1984;1863-1874.
53. Fink G.R., et al. 'Where' depends on 'what': a differential functional anatomy for position discrimination in one- versus two-dimensions. Neuropsychologia. 38:2000;1741-1748.
54. Fink G.R., et al. Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain. 120:1997;1779-1791.
55. Paivio A. Comparisons of mental clocks. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 4:1978;61-71.
56. Trojano L., et al. Coordinate and categorical judgements in spatial imagery: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;1666-1674.
57. Formisano E., et al. Tracking the mind's image in the brain: I. Time-resolved fMRI during visuospatial mental imagery. Neuron. 35:2002;185-194.
58. Behrmann M. Gazzaniga M.S. The New Cognitive Neurosciences. Vol. 2:2000;651-666.
59. Vallar G., et al. A fronto-parietal system for computing the egocentric spatial frame of reference in humans. Exp. Brain Res. 124:1999;281-286.
60. Ress D., et al. Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task. Nat. Neurosci. 3:2000;940-945.
61. Corbetta M., et al. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J. Neurosci. 11:1991;2383-2402.
62. Driver J., Mattingley J.B. Parietal neglect and visual awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 1:1998;17-22.
63. Marois R., et al. Neural correlates of the attentional blink. Neuron. 28:2000;299-308.
64. Fink G.R., et al. Neural consequences of competing stimuli in both visual hemifields: a physiological basis for visual extinction. Ann. Neurol. 47:2000;440-446.
65. Kastner S., et al. Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science. 282:1998;108-111.
66. Thaiss L., De Bleser R. Visual agnosia: a case of reduced attentional 'spotlight'? Cortex. 28:1992;601-621.
67. Rusconi M.L., et al. Is the intact side really intact? Perseverative responses in patients with unilateral neglect: a productive manifestation. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;594-604.
68. Vallar, G., et al. Neglect syndromes: the role of parietal cortex. In The Parietal Lobe (Spencer, D., ed.), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (in press).
69. Heilman K.M., et al. Localization of lesions in neglect and related disorders. Kertesz A., et al. Localization and Neuroimaging in Neuropsychology. 1994;495-524 Academic Press.
70. Vallar G. The anatomical basis of spatial hemineglect in humans. Robertson I.H., Marshall J.C. Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. 1993;27-59 Erlbaum.
71. Driver J., et al. Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry perception in visual neglect. Nature. 360:1992;73-75.
72. Marshall J.C., Halligan P.W. The Yin and the Yang of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study. Neuropsychologia. 32:1994;1037-1057.
73. Ishiai S., et al. Mechanisms of unilateral spatial neglect in copying a single object. Neuropsychologia. 34:1996;965-971.
74. Behrmann M., Tipper S.P. Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25:1999;83-101.
75. Driver J., Halligan P.W. Can visual neglect operate in object-centred co-ordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8:1991;475-496.
76. Ota H., et al. Dissociation of body-centered and stimulus-centered representations in unilateral neglect. Neurology. 57:2001;2064-2069.
77. Walker R. Spatial and object-based neglect. Neurocase. 1:1995;371-384.
78. Weiss P.H., et al. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain. 123:2000;2531-2541.
79. Fink G.R., et al. Task instructions influence the cognitive strategies involved in line bisection judgements: evidence from modulated neural mechanisms revealed by fMRI. Neuropsychologia. 40:2002;119-130.
80. Seki K., et al. Unassociated responses to two related task demands: a negative factor for improvement of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 37:1999;75-82.