Analogy and Relational Reasoning

The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Holyoak, Keith J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Analogy; Causal models; Cognitive development; Frontal cortex; Induction; Inference; Iq; Mapping; Metaphor; Neuroimaging; Relational priming; Retrieval; Role based relational reasoning; Schemas; Symbolic connectionism; System 1; System 2

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066392099     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0013     Document Type: Chapter

References (179)

1. Allen, K., Ibara, S., Seymour, A., Cordova, N., & Botvinick, M. (2010). Abstract structural representations of goal-directed behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1518-1524.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Asaad, W. F., Rainer, G., & Miller, E. K. (1998). Neural activity in the primate prefrontal cortex during associative learning. Neuron, 21, 1399-1407.
4. Barnett, S. M., & Koslowski, B. (2002). Solving novel, ill-defined problems: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 237-267.
5. Bartha, P. (2010). By parallel reasoning: The construction and evaluation of analogical arguments. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bassok, M., Chase, V. M, & Martin, S. A. (1998). Adding apples and oranges: Alignment of semantic and formal knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 99-134.
7. Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 153-166.
8. Bassok, M., & Olseth, K. L. (1995). Object-based representations: Transfer between cases of continuous and discrete models of change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1522-1538.
9. Bassok, M., Pedigo, S. F., & Oskarsson, A. T. (2008). Priming addition facts with semantic relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 343-352.
10. Bassok, M., Wu, L. L., & Olseth, K. L. (1995). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer. Memory and Cognition, 23, 354-367.
11. Bernardo, A. B. I. (2001). Principle explanation and strategic schema abstraction in problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 29, 627-633.
12. Beveridge, M., & Parkins, E. (1987). Visual representation in analogical problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 15, 230-237.
13. Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14. Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2000). Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goal. Memory and Cognition, 29, 730-735.
15. Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2001). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory and Cognition, 28, 108-124.
16. Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2002). Representational change and analogy: How analogical inferences alter target representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 672-685.
17. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
18. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2005). The science of false memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Brown, A. L., Kane, M. J., & Echols, C. H. (1986). Young children's mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure. Cognitive Development, 1, 103-121.
20. Brown, A. L., Kane, M. J., & Long, C. (1989). Analogical transfer in young children: Analogies as tools for communication and exposition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 275-293.
21. Bunge, S. A., Wendelken, C., Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Analogical reasoning and prefrontal cortex: Evidence for separable retrieval and integration mechanisms. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 239-249.
22. Carbonell, J. G. (1983). Learning by analogy: Formulating and generalizing plans from past experience. In R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, & T. M. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (pp. 137-161). Palo Alto, CA: Tioga.
23. Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404-431.
24. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
25. Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
26. Chen, Z. (1996). Children's analogical problem solving: The effects of superficial, structural, and procedural similarity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 410-431.
27. Chen, Z., & Daehler, M. W. (1989). Positive and negative transfer in analogical problem solving by 6-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 4, 327-344.
28. Chen, Z., Sanchez, R. P., & Campbell, T. (1997). From beyond to within their grasp: The rudiments of analogical problem solving in 10- and 13-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33, 790-801.
29. Cho, S., Holyoak, K. J., & Cannon, T. (2007). Analogical reasoning in working memory: Resources shared among relational integration, interference resolution, and maintenance. Memory and Cognition, 35, 1445-1455.
30. Cho, S., Moody, T. D., Fernandino, L., Mumford, J. A., Poldrack, R. A., Cannon, T. D.,... Holyoak, K. J. (2010). Common and dissociable prefrontal loci associated with component mechanisms of analogical reasoning. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 524-533.
31. Christoff, K., Prabhakaran, V., Dorfman, J., Zhao, Z., Kroger, J. K., Holyoak, K. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. NeuroImage, 14, 1136-1149.
32. Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132.
33. Cromer, J. A., Machon, M., & Miller, E. K. (2011). Rapid association learning in the primate prefrontal cortex in the absence of behavioral reversals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1823-1828.
34. Dawson, M., Soulières, I., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Mottron, L. (2007). The level and nature of autistic intelligence. Psychological Science, 18, 657-662.
35. Day, S. B., & Gentner, D. (2007). Nonintentional analogical inference in text comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 35, 39-49.
36. Day, S. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2011). Analogical transfer from a simulated physical system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 551-567.
37. Diamond, A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. In D. T. Stuss & R. T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 466-503). New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Diamond, A. (2006). The early development of executive function. In E. Bialystok & F. I. M. Craok (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 70-95). New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Doumas, L. A. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115, 1-43.
40. Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Kolodny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A.,... Emslie, H. (2000). A neural basis for general intelligence. Science, 289, 457-460.
41. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58 (Whole No. 270).
42. Estes, Z. (2003). Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 304-319.
43. Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2006). Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 89-101.
44. Evans, T. G. (1968). A program for the solution of geometric-analogy intelligence test questions. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 271-353). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.
46. Fauconnier, G. (2001). Conceptual blending and analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 255-285). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133-187.
48. Feldman, V., & Kokinov, B. (2009). Anxiety restricts the analogical search in an analogy generation task. In B. Kokinov, K. J. Holyoak, & D. Gentner (Eds.), New frontiers in analogy research: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy (pp. 117-126). Sofia, Bulgaria: New Bulgarian University Press.
49. Fisher, K. J., Bassok, M., & Osterhout, L. (2010). When two plus two does not equal four: Event-related potential responses to incongruous arithmetic word problems. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1571-1576). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
50. Gattis, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 231-239.
51. Gentner, D. (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In D. S. Miall (Eds.), Metaphor: Problems and perspectives (pp. 106-132). Brighton, England: Harvester Press.
52. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
53. Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 34, 752-775.
54. Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109-128). New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. Gentner, D, Falkenhainer, B., & Skorstad, J. (1988). Viewing metaphor as analogy. In D. H. Helman (Eds.), Analogical reasoning: Perspectives of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy (pp. 171-177). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
56. Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 99-129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Forbus, K. D. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science, 33, 1343-1382.
58. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5, 152-158.
59. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56.
60. Gentner, D., & Namy, L. L. (2006). Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 297-301.
61. Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on thought and language: Interrelations in development (pp. 225-277). London: Cambridge University Press.
62. Gentner, D., Rattermann, M., & Forbus, K. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575.
63. Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
64. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
65. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
66. Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 21, 85-98.
67. Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3-18.
68. Glucksberg, S., McClone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50-67.
69. Goode, M. R., Dahl, D. W., & Moreau, C. P. (2010). The effect of experiential analogies on consumer perception and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 274-286.
70. Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Goswami, U. (2001). Analogical reasoning in children. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 437-470). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Goswami, U., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35, 69-95.
73. Green, A. E., Fugelsang, J. A., Kraemer, D. J., Shamosh, N. A., & Dunbar, K. N. (2006). Frontopolar cortex mediates abstract integration in analogy. Brain Research, 1096, 125-137.
74. Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J., Fugelsang, A. J., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2010). Connecting long distance: Semantic distance in analogical reasoning modulates frontopolar cortex activity. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 70-76.
75. Halford, G. S. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. Halford, G. S., & Wilson, W. H. (1980). A category theory approach to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 356-411.
77. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803-831.
78. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H. & Phillips, S. (2010). Relational knowledge: The foundation of higher cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 497-505.
79. Hesse, M. (1966). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
80. Hofstadter, D. R., & Mitchell, M. (1994). The copycat project: A model of mental fluidity and analogy-making. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Analogical connections. Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory (Vol. 2, pp. 31-112). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
81. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. Holyoak, K. J. (1982). An analogical framework for literary interpretation. Poetics, 11, 105-126.
83. Holyoak, K. J. (1985). The pragmatics of analogical transfer. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, (Vol. 19, pp. 59-87). New York: Academic Press.
84. Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N., & Billman, D. O. (1984). Development of analogical problem-solving skill. Child Development, 55, 2042-2055.
85. Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory and Cognition, 15, 332-340.
86. Holyoak, K. J., Lee, H. S., & Lu, H. (2010). Analogical and category-based inference: A theoretical integration with Bayesian causal models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 702-727.
87. Holyoak, K. J., Novick, L. R., & Melz, E. R. (1994). Component processes in analogical transfer: Mapping, pattern completion, and adaptation. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory. Vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 113-180). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
88. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
89. Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
90. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
91. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review, 110, 220-263.
92. Hunt, E. B. (1974). Quote the raven? Nevermore! In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition (pp. 129-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
93. Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
94. Keane, M. T. (1987). On retrieving analogues when solving problems. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 29-41.
95. Keane, M. T. (1997). What makes an analogy difficult The effects of order and causal structure on analogical mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 946-967.
96. Keane, M. T., & Brayshaw, M. (1988). The incremental analogical machine: A computational model of analogy. In D. Sleeman (Ed.), European working session on learning (pp. 53-62). London: Pitman.
97. Keysar, B. (1989). On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 375-385.
98. Khong, Y. F. (1992). Analogies at war: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam decisions of 1965. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
99. Knowlton, B. J., & Holyoak, K. J. (2009). Prefrontal substrate of human relational reasoning. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (4th ed., pp. 1005-1017). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
100. Kokinov, B. N., & Petrov, A. A. (2001). Integration of memory and reasoning in analogy-making: The AMBR model. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 59-124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
101. Kolodner, J. L. (1983). Reconstructive memory: A computer model. Cognitive Science, 7, 281-328.
102. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
103. Kotovsky, L., & Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67, 2797-2822.
104. Kotovsky, K., & Simon, H. A. (1990). What makes some problems really hard? Explorations in the problem space of difficulty. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 143-183.
105. Krawczyk, D. C., Morrison, R. G., Viskontas, I., Holyoak, K. J., Chow, T. W., Mendez, M. F.,... Knowlton, B. J. (2008). Distraction during relational reasoning: The role of prefrontal cortex in interference control. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2020-2032.
106. Kroger, J. K., Saab, F. W., Fales, C. L., Bookheimer, S. Y., Cohen, M. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: A parametric study of relational complexity. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 477-485.
107. Kubose, T. T., Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2002). The role of textual coherence in incremental analogical mapping. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 407-435.
108. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
109. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
110. Lassaline, M. E. (1996). Structural alignment in induction and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 754-770.
111. Lee, H. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (2008). The role of causal models in analogical inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1111-1122.
112. Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2001). Spatial mapping in preschoolers: Close comparisons facilitate far mappings. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2, 189-219.
113. Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2005). Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 315-353.
114. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 586-597.
115. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (2003). Analogical learning in negotiation teams: Comparing cases promotes learning and transfer. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2, 119-127.
116. Lu, H., Morrison, R. G., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Role of gamma-band synchronization in priming of form discrimination for multiobject displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 610-617.
117. Lu, H., Yuille, A. L., Liljeholm, M., Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2008). Bayesian generic priors for causal learning. Psychological Review, 115, 955-982.
118. Markman, A. B. (1997). Constraints on analogical inference. Cognitive Science, 21, 373-418.
119. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 431-467.
120. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1996). Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons. Memory and Cognition, 24, 235-249.
121. Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1997). The effects of alignability on memory. Psychological Science, 8, 363-367.
122. Markman, A. B., & Loewenstein, J. (2010). Structural comparison and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 126-137.
123. Markman, A. B., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Similarity and alignment in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 117-130.
124. Markman, A. B., Taylor, E., & Gentner, D. (2007). Auditory presentation leads to better analogical retrieval than written presentation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1101-1106.
125. Markman, A. B., & Stilwell, C. H. (2001) Role-governed categories. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13, 329-358.
126. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
127. Medin, D. L., & Ross, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem-solving, and induction. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 179-195). New York: Cambridge University Press.
128. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
129. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-281). New York: McGraw-Hill.
130. Monti, M. M., Parsons, L. M. & Osherson, D. N. (2009). The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 12554-12559.
131. Morrison, R. G., Doumas, L. A. A., & Richland, L. E. (2011). A computational account of children's analogical reasoning: Balancing inhibitory control in working memory and relational representation. Developmental Science, 14, 516-529.
132. Morrison, R. G., Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., Chow, T. W., Miller, B. L., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). A neurocomputational model of analogical reasoning and its breakdown in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 260-271.
133. Morsanyi, K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2010). Analogical reasoning ability in autistic and typically-developing children. Developmental Science, 13, 578-587.
134. Mulholland, T. M., Pellegrino, J. W., & Glaser, R. (1980). Components of geometric analogy solution. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 252-284.
135. Namy, L. L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow's ears: Young children's use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 5-15 10.
136. Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510-520.
137. Novick, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398-415.
138. Pask, C. (2003). Mathematics and the science of analogies. American Journal of Physics, 71, 526-534.
139. Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 109-178.
140. Perrott, D. A., Gentner, D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2005). Resistance is futile: The unwitting insertion of analogical inferences in memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 696-702.
141. Raven, J. C. (1938). Progressive matrices: A perceptual test of intelligence, individual form. London: Lewis.
142. Reed, S. K. (1987). A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 124-139.
143. Reitman, W. (1965). Cognition and thought. New York: Wiley.
144. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249-271.
145. Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist.
146. Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Cognitive supports for analogy in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316, 1128-1129.
147. Robin, N., & Holyoak, K. J. (1995). Relational complexity and the functions of prefrontal cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 987-997). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
148. Ross, B. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 629-639.
149. Ross, B. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 456-468.
150. Ross, B. H., & Kennedy, P. T. (1990). Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 42-55.
151. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
152. Schunn, C. D., & Dunbar, K. (1996). Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 24, 271-284.
153. Schustack, M. W., & Anderson, J. R. (1979). Effects of analogy to prior knowledge on memory for new information. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 565-583.
154. Seifert, C. M., McKoon, G., Abelson, R. P., & Ratcliff, R. (1986). Memory connections between thematically similar episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 220-231.
155. Smith, E. E., Langston, C., & Nisbett, R. E. (1992). The case for rules in reasoning. Cognitive Science, 16, 1-40.
156. Snow, R. E., Kyllonen, C. P., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of ability and learning correlations. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 47-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
157. Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. London: MacMillan.
158. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: Macmillan.
159. Spearman, C. (1946). Theory of a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 36, 117-131.
160. Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). If Saddam is Hitler then who is George Bush? Analogical mapping between systems of social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 913-933.
161. Spellman, B. A., & Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 307-346.
162. Spellman, B. A., Holyoak, K. J., & Morrison, R. G. (2001). Analogical priming via semantic relations. Memory and Cognition, 29, 383-393.
163. Spencer, R. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Context-dependent effects on analogical transfer. Memory and Cognition, 14, 442-449.
164. Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353-378.
165. Taylor, E. G., & Hummel, J. E. (2009). Finding similarity in a model of relational reasoning. Cognitive Systems Research, 10, 229-239.
166. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
167. Thagard, P., & Shelley, C. (2001). Emotional analogies and analogical inference. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 335-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
168. Tohill, J. M., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The impact of anxiety on analogical reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 6, 27-40.
169. Tunteler, E., & Resing, W. C. M. (2002). Spontaneous analogical transfer in 4-year-olds: A microgenetic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 149-166.
170. Viskontas, I. V., Morrison, R. G., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition and analogical reasoning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19, 581-591.
171. Waldmann, M. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 222-236.
172. Waltz, J. A., Knowlton, B. J., Holyoak, K. J., Boone, K. B., Mishkin, F. S., de Menezes Santos, M.,... Miller, B. L. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119-125.
173. Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1205-1212.
174. Wendelken, C., Nakahbenko, D., Donohue, S. E., Carter, C. S., & S. A. Bunge, S. A. (2008). "Brain is to thought as stomach is to?" Investigating the role of rostrolateral prefrontal cortex in relational reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 682-693.
175. Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., Downing, P. E., Lange, T. E., Wickens, T. D., & Melz, E. R. (1994). Below the surface: Analogical similarity and retrieval competition in reminding. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 64-101.
176. Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., & Lange, T. E. (1996). Remote analogical reminding. Memory and Cognition, 24, 629-643.
177. Wharton, C. M., & Lange, T.E. (1994). Analogical transfer through comprehension and priming. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 934-939). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
178. Winston, P. H. (1980). Learning and reasoning by analogy. Communications of the ACM, 23, 689-703.
179. Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2000). Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 529-541.