Auditory presentation leads to better analogical retrieval than written presentation

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1101-1106

  Markman, Arthur B ^a   Taylor, Eric ^b   Gentner, Dedre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149142392     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193098     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BLANCHETTE, I., & DUNBAR, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 108-124.
2. BLANCHETTE, I., & DUNBAR, K. (2001). Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals. Memory & Cognition, 29, 730-735.
3. CARROLL, M., & KORUKINA, S. (1999). The effect of text coherence and modality on metamemory judgements. Memory, 7, 309-322.
4. CATRAMBONE, R. (2002). The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 318-334.
5. CATRAMBONE, R., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
6. CLARK, H. H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. CLEMENT, C. A., & GENTNER, D. (1991). Systematicky as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132.
8. CLEMENT, C. A., MAWBY, R., & GILES, D. E. (1994). The effects of manifest relational similarity on analog retrieval. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 396-420.
9. COHEN, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 213-220.
10. CONWAY, M. A., & GATHERCOLE, S. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 341-361.
11. DUNBAR, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. FALKENHAINER, B., FORBUS, K. D., & GENTNER, D. (1989).The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.
13. FORBUS, K. D., GENTNER, D., & LAW, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205.
14. GENTNER, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
15. GENTNER, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199-241). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. GENTNER, D., BOWDLE, B., WOLFF, P., & BORONAT, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind (pp. 199-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. GENTNER, D., LOEWENSTEIN, J., & THOMPSON, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393-408.
18. GENTNER, D., RATTERMANN, M. J., & FORBUS, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575.
19. GICK, M. L., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
20. GICK, M. L., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
21. HAMMOND, K. J., SEIFERT, C. M., & GRAY, K. C. (1991). Functionality in analogical transfer: A hard match is good to find. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 111-152.
22. HOLYOAK, K. J., & KOH, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332-340.
23. HORTON, W. S., & GERRIG, R. J. (2005). The impact of memory demands upon audience design during language production. Cognition, 96, 127-142.
24. HUMMEL, J. E., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
25. JAKIMIK, J., & GLENBERG, A. (1990). Verbal learning meets psycholinguistics: Modality effects in the comprehension of anaphora. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 582-590.
26. LOEWENSTEIN, J., THOMPSON, L., & GENTNER, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 586-597.
27. NOVICK, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 510-520.
28. POLYA, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. RAYNER, K., & CLIFTON, C. (2002). Language processing. In H. Pashler & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Stevens'Handbook of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 261-316). New York: Wiley.
30. ROSS, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 629-639.
31. ROSS, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 456-468.
32. SCHANK, R. C. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
33. SCHUMACHER, R., & GENTNER, D. (1987, May). Similarity-based remindings: The effects of similarity and interitem difference. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
34. TOHILL, J. M., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (2000). The impact of anxiety on analogical reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 6, 27-40.
35. WALTZ, J. A., LAU, A., GREWAL, S. K., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1205-1212.
36. WHARTON, C. M., HOLYOAK, K. J., DOWNING, P. E., LANGE, T. E., WICKENS, T. D., & MELZ, E. R. (1994). Below the surface: Analogical similarity and retrieval competition in reminding. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 64-101.
37. WHARTON, C. M., HOLYOAK, K. J., & LANGE, T. E. (1996). Remote analogical reminding. Memory & Cognition, 24, 629-643.