Conceptual integration networks

Cognitive Science

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 133-187

  Fauconnier, Gilles ^a,b   Turner, Mark ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032037689     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Barsalou, L. (1996). Perceptual symbol systems. University of Chicago, ms.
2. Burns, B. (1995). Fluid concepts and creative analogy: A review. AI Magazine, 16(3), 81-83.
3. Coulson, S. (1995). Analogic and metaphoric mapping in blended spaces. Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 9(1), 2-12.
4. Coulson, S. (1997). Semantic leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending. UCSD Ph.D. dissertation.
5. Cutrer, M. (1994). Time and tense in narratives and everyday language. UCSD Ph.D. dissertation.
6. Dinsmore, J. (1991). Partitioned representations. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press. [Originally published (1985) Cambridge: MIT Press.]
8. Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Fauconnier, G. (1990). Domains and connections. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1).
10. Fauconnier, G. & Sweetser, E. (1996). Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1994). Conceptual projection and middle spaces. UCSD: Department of Cognitive Science Technical Report 9401. [Available from http://cogsci.ucsd.edu and from http:// www.wam.umd.edu/~mturn]
12. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, Ed. Adele Goldberg. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information [distributed by Cambridge University Press].
13. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (in preparation). Making Sense.
14. Fillmore, C. & Kay, P. n.d. ms. On grammatical constructions. University of California at Berkeley.
15. Fong, H. (1988). The stony idiom of the brain: A study in the syntax and semantics of metaphors. UCSD Ph.D. dissertation.
16. Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1994). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205.
17. Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., Markman, A., Ferguson, R. (1997). Analogy just looks like high level perception: Why a domain-general approach to analogical mapping is right. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence.
18. Freeman, M. (1997). Grounded spaces: Deictic-self anaphors in the poetry of Emily Dickinson. Language and Literature, 6(1), 7-28.
19. French, R. M. (1995). The subtlety of sameness. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
21. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Glucksberg, S. & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3-18.
23. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.
24. Goldberg, A. (1994). Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Goodman, N. (1947). The problem of counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Philosophy, 44.
26. Grush, R. (1995). Cognition and emulation. UCSD Ph.D. dissertation.
27. Hofstadter, D. (1985). Analogies and roles in human and machine thinking. Metamagical Themas. Chap. 24. New York: Bantam Books.
28. Hofstadter, D. (1995a). Fluid concepts and creative analogies. New York: Basic Books.
29. Hofstadter, D. (1995b). A review of mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. AI Magazine, 16(3), 75-80.
30. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. (1986). Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
31. Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
32. Holyoak, K. J. & Thagard, P. (1994). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass.
33. Hummel, J. & Holyoak, K. (1996). LISA: A computational model of analogical inference and schema induction. In G. Cottrell (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. Indurkhya, B. (1992). Metaphor and cognition: An interactionist approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
37. Kahneman, D. (1995). Varieties of counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, N.J.
38. Keane, M. T., Ledgeway, T. & Duff, S. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18, 387-438.
39. Kline, M. (1980). Mathematics. The loss of certainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. NY: Macmillan.
41. Kunda, Z., Miller, D. T. & Clare, T. (1990). Combining social concepts: The role of causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 14, 551-577.
42. Lakoff, G.(1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Case study 1, Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 380-415.
43. Lakoff, G. (1989). The invariance hypothesis: Do metaphors preserve cognitive topology? Paper delivered at the 1989 Duisburg Cognitive Linguistics Conference and available from the Linguistic Agency at the University of Duisburg.
44. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, Second edition, Cambridge: University Press Cambridge; 202-251.
45. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. (in preparation). Embodied Cognitive Foundations for a Mind-Based Mathematics.
47. Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Langacker, R. (1987/1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol.I., II, Stanford University Press.
49. Langacker, R. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1-38.
50. Lewis, D. (1972). We, the navigators. The ancient art of landfinding in the Pacific. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.
51. Mandelblit, N. & Zachar, O. (in press). The notion of unit and its development in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science.
52. Mandelblit, N. (1997). Grammatical blending: Creative and schematic aspects in sentence processing and translation. UCSD Ph.D. dissertation.
53. Mitchell, M. (1993). Analogy-making as perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
54. Moser, D. & Hofstadter, D. (undated ms.) Errors: A royal road to the mind. Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition. Indiana University.
55. Nunberg, G. (1978). The pragmatics of reference. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
56. Oakley, T. (1995). Presence: The conceptual basis of rhetorical effect. University of Maryland Ph.D. dissertation.
57. Ortony, A. (1979a). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review 86, 161-180.
58. Ortony, A. (1979b). The role of similarity in similes and metaphors. In A. Ortony, editor, Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 186-201.
59. Robert, A. (in press) Blending in the interpretation of mathematical proofs. In: Koenig, J-P. Discourse and Cognition: Bridging the gap. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) [distributed by Cambridge University Press].
60. Schwartz, D. L. & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fall-back. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-497.
61. Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: the mind-as-body metaphor in semantic structure and semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Sweetser, E. (1997). Mental spaces and cognitive linguistics: a cognitively realistic approach to compositionality. Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 1997.
63. Talmy, L. (1977). Rubber-sheet cognition in language. Proceedings of the 13th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.
64. Talmy, L. (1978). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In: J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language: Syntax. Vol. 4, Stanford University Press.
65. Tetlock, P. & Belkin, A. (1996). Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. In P. E. Tetlock & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics: Logical, methodological, and psychological perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3-38.
66. Turner, M. (1987). Death is the mother of beauty: Mind, metaphor, criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. Turner, M. (1991). Reading minds: The study of english in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
68. Turner, M. (1996a). Conceptual blending and counterfactual argument in the social and behavioral sciences. In P. Tetlock & A. Belkin (Eds.), Counterfactual thought experiments in world politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
69. Turner, M. (1996b). The literary mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
70. Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Journal of Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(3), 183-204.
71. Turner, M. & Fauconnier, G. (in press). Conceptual integration in counterfactuals. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), CDiscourse and Cognition: Bridging the gap. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information [distributed by Cambridge University Press].
72. Van Hoek, K. (1997). Anaphora and conceptual structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
73. Veale, T. (1996). Pastiche: A metaphor-centred computational model of conceptual blending, with special reference to cinematic borrowing. Manuscript.
74. Zbikowski, L. (1997). Conceptual blending and song. Manuscript, University of Chicago.
75. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1989). Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language, 65, 695-727.