Role of gamma-band synchronization in priming of form discrimination for multiobject displays

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 610-617

  Lu, Hongjing ^a   Morrison, Robert G ^b,d   Hummel, John E ^c   Holyoak, Keith J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Xunesis ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^d Xunesis   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding; Kanizsa type figure discrimination; Neural synchrony; Relation coding; Visual priming

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33746891858     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.610     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alf, E. F., & Grossberg, J. M. (1979). The geometric mean: Confidence limits and significance tests. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 419-421.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint in-variance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
5. Dusey, T. A., & Loftus, G. R. (1994). Sensory and cognitive components of visual information processing. Psychological Review, 101, 446-469.
6. Csibra. G., Davis, G., Spratling, M. W., & Johnson, M. H. (2000, November 24). Gamma oscillations and object processing in the infant brain. Science, 290, 1582-1585.
7. Dorfman, D. D., & Alf. E. (1969). Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals - Rating-method data. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 487-496.
8. Eckhorn, R., Bauer, R., Jordan, W., Brish, M., Kruse, W. Munk, M., & Reitboeck, H. J. (1988). Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? Multiple electrode and correlation analysis in the cat. Biological Cybernetics, 60, 121-130.
9. Elliott, M. A., Herrmann, C. S., Mecklinger, A., & Müller, H. J. (2000). The loci of oscillatory visual-object priming: A combined electroen-cephalographic and reaction-time study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38, 225-241.
10. Elliott, M. A., & Müller, H. J. (1998). Synchronous information presented in 4-Hz flicker enhances visual feature binding. Psychological Science, 9, 277-283.
11. Elliott, M. A., & Müller, H. J. (2000). Evidence for 40-Hz oscillatory short-term visual memory revealed by human reaction-time measurements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 703-718.
12. Elliott, M. A., & Müller, H. J. (2001). Effects of synchrony on mechanisms of perceptual organization. Visual Cognition, 8, 655-677.
13. Green, C. B., & Hummel, J. E. (2004). Relational perception and cognition: Implications for cognitive architecture and the perceptual-cognitive interface. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 201-223). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Haig, A. R., Gordon, E., Wright, J. J., Meares, R. A., & Bahramali, H. (2000). Synchronous cortical gamma-band activity in task-relevant cognition. NeuroKeport, 11, 669-675.
15. Hummel, J. E. (1999). Binding problem. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 85-86). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Hummel, J. E. (2001). Complementary solutions to the binding problem in vision: Implications for shape perception and object recognition. Visual Cognition, 8, 489-517.
17. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
18. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Indirect analogical mapping. In Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 516-521). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
20. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological. Review, 110, 220-264.
21. Hummel, J. E., & Stankiewicz, B. J. (1996). An architecture for rapid, hierarchical structural description. In T. Inui & J. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 93-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Hummel, J. E., & Stankiewicz, B. J. (1998). Two roles for attention in shape perception: A structural description model of visual scrutiny. Visual Cognition, 5, 49-79.
23. Ihara, A., Hirata, M., Sakihara, K., Izumi, H., Takahashi, Y., Kono, K., et al. (2003). Gamma-band desynchronization in language areas reflects syntactic process of words. Neuroscience Letters, 339, 135-138.
24. Keele, S. W., Cohen, A., Ivry, R., Liotti, M., & Yee, P. (1988). Test of a temporal theory of attentional binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 444-452.
25. König, P., & Engel, A. K. (1995). Correlated firing in sensory-motor systems. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 511-519.
26. Krishnan, G. P., Skosnik, P. D., Vohs, J. L., Busey, T. A., & O'Donnell, B. F. (2005). Relationship between steady-state and induced gamma activity to motion. NeuroReport, 16, 625-630.
27. Lee, K. H., Williams, L. M., Breakspear, M., & Gordon, E. (2003). Synchronous gamma activity: A review and contribution to an integrative neuroscience model of schizophrenia. Brain Research Review, 41, 57-78.
28. Lee, S.-H., & Blake, R. (1999, May 14). Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science, 284, 1165-1167.
29. Lisman, J. (1998, July 9). Neuroscience: What makes the brain's tickers lock. Nature, 394, 132-133.
30. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997, November 20). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
31. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
32. Rodriguez, E., George, N., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., Renault, B., & Varela, F. J. (1999, February 4). Perception's shadow: Long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature, 397, 430-433.
33. Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. J. (1992). Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 97-106.
34. Singer, W. (2004). Synchrony, oscillations and relational codes. In L. M. Chalupa & J. S. Werner (Eds.), The visual neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 1665-1681). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
35. Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 555-586.
36. Stankiewicz, B. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2002). The role of attention in scale-and translation-invariant object recognition. Visual Cognition, 9, 719-739.
37. Stankiewicz, B. J., Hummel, J. E., & Cooper, E. E. (1998). The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: Evidence for a dual representation of object shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 732-744.
38. Tarr, M. J., Williams, P., Hayward, W. G., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 275-277.
39. Thoma, V., Hummel, J. E., & Davidoff, J. (2004). Evidence for holistic representations of ignored images and analytic representations of attended images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 257-267.
40. Usher, M., & Donnelly, N. (1998, July 9). Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation processes in perception. Nature, 394, 179-182.
41. von der Malsburg, C. (1994). The correlation theory of brain function. In E. Domany, J. L. van Hemmen, & K. Schulten (Eds.), Models of neural networks II (pp. 95-119). Berlin: Springer.
42. von der Malsburg, C. (1995). Binding in models of perception and brain function. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 520-526.