Resistance is futile: The unwitting insertion of analogical inferences in memory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 696-702

  Perrott, David A ^a,b   Genter, Dedre ^a   Bodenhausen, Galen V ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TrialGraphix   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31044439637     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196760     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BLANCHETTE, I., & DUNBAR, K. (1999). Memory for analogies and analogical inferences. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 73-77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BLANCHETTE, I., & DUNBAR, K. (2002). Representational change and analogy: How analogical inferences alter representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 672-685.
3. CAREY, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. CLEMENT, C., & GENTNER, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132.
5. DAY, S. B., & GENTNER, D. (in press). Nonintentional analogical inference in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition.
6. DITTO, P., & LOPEZ, D. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 568-584.
7. DUNBAR, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. DUNNING, D. (2001). On the motives underlying social cognition. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 348-374). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9. GENTNER, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
10. GENTNER, D., & MARKMAN, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56.
11. GENTNER, D., RATTERMANN, M. J., & FORBUS, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575.
12. HEREK, G. (ED.) (1998). Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. HOLYOAK, K., & THAGARD, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. KUNDA, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
15. LOEWENSTEIN, J., THOMPSON, L., & GENTNER, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 586-597.
16. LORD, C., Ross, L., & LEPPER, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
17. MORENO, K., & BODENHAUSEN, G. (2001). Intergroup affect and social judgment: Feelings as inadmissible information. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 21-29.
18. Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics [Online] (2001). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available at http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/pdf/t285.pdf.
19. SPELLMAN, B., & HOLYOAK, K. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 307-346.
20. THAGARD, P., & SHELLEY, C. (2001). Emotional analogies and analogical inference. In D Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 335-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.