Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA)

Food Research International

Volumn 121, Issue , 2019, Pages 39-47

  Tan, Vicki Wei Kee ^a   Wee, May Sui Mei ^a   Tomic, Oliver ^b   Forde, Ciaran G ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (Singapore)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Sucrose reduction; Sugar; Sweeteners; Temporal check all that apply; Temporal profile; Time intensity

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; DEXTROSE; FOOD ADDITIVES; FRUCTOSE; MIXTURES; PEPTIDES; POLYOLS; SUGAR (SUCROSE); SUGARS;

CONSUMER AWARENESS; DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY; FRUIT EXTRACTS; QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES; SWEETENERS; TEMPORAL CHECK-ALL-THAT-APPLY; TEMPORAL PROFILE; TIME INTENSITIES;

SUGAR SUBSTITUTES;

CARBOHYDRATE; SUGAR ALCOHOL; SWEETENING AGENT;

ADULT; CHEMISTRY; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TASTE; TIME FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; SUGAR ALCOHOLS; SUGARS; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85062891065     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: 18737145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.019     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allen, A.L., McGeary, J.E., Hayes, J.E., Rebaudioside a and Rebaudioside D bitterness do not Covary with Acesulfame-K bitterness or polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31. Chemosensory Perception 6:3 (2013), 109–117.
2. Antenucci, R.G., Hayes, J.E., Nonnutritive sweeteners are not supernormal stimuli. International Journal of Obesity, 39(2), 2015, 254.
3. Ares, G., Castura, J.C., Antúnez, L., Vidal, L., Giménez, A., Coste, B., Jaeger, S.R., Comparison of two TCATA variants for dynamic sensory characterization of food products. Food Quality and Preference 54 (2016), 160–172.
4. Ayya, N., Lawless, H.T., Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of high-intensity sweeteners and sweetener mixtures. Chemical Senses 17:3 (1992), 245–259.
5. Azevedo, B.M., Schmidt, F.L., Bolini, H.M., High-intensity sweeteners in espresso coffee: Ideal and equivalent sweetness and time–intensity analysis. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 50:6 (2015), 1374–1381.
6. Bayarri, S., Rivas, I., Izquierdo, L., Costell, E., Influence of texture on the temporal perception of sweetness of gelled systems. Food Research International 40:7 (2007), 900–908.
7. Bobowski, N., Reed, D.R., Mennella, J.A., Variation in the TAS2R31 bitter taste receptor gene relates to liking for the nonnutritive sweetener Acesulfame-K among children and adults. Scientific Reports, 6, 2016.
8. Castura, J.C., tempR: Temporal Sensory Analysis, R package version 0.9.9.15. 2018 https://cran.r-project.org/package=tempR.
9. Castura, J.C., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Ares, G., Temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA): A novel dynamic method for characterizing products. Food Quality and Preference 47 (2016), 79–90, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.017.
10. Clemens, R.A., Jones, J.M., Kern, M., Lee, S.Y., Mayhew, E.J., Slavin, J.L., Zivanovic, S., Functionality of sugars in foods and health. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 15:3 (2016), 433–470.
11. Di Monaco, R., Miele, N., Volpe, S., Picone, D., Cavella, S., Temporal sweetness profile of MNEI and comparison with commercial sweeteners. Journal of Sensory Studies 29:6 (2014), 385–394.
12. DuBois, G.E., Molecular mechanism of sweetness sensation. Physiology & Behavior 164 (2016), 453–463.
13. DuBois, G.E., Lee, J.F., A simple technique for the evaluation of temporal taste properties. Chemical Senses 7:3–4 (1983), 237–247.
14. DuBois, G.E., Prakash, I., Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology 3 (2012), 353–380.
15. Duizer, L., Bloom, K., Findlay, C., Dual-attribute time-intensity sensory evaluation: A new method for temporal measurement of sensory perceptions. Food Quality and Preference 8:4 (1997), 261–269.
16. Froloff, N., Lloret, E., Martinez, J.-M., Faurion, A., Cross-adaptation and molecular modeling study of receptor mechanisms common to four taste stimuli in humans. Chemical Senses 23:2 (1998), 197–206.
17. Fujimaru, T., Park, J.H., Lim, J., Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners. Journal of Food Science 77:9 (2012), S323–S328.
18. Green, B.G., Lim, J., Osterhoff, F., Blacher, K., Nachtigal, D., Taste mixture interactions: Suppression, additivity, and the predominance of sweetness. Physiology & Behavior 101:5 (2010), 731–737.
19. Grembecka, M., Sugar alcohols—Their role in the modern world of sweeteners: A review. European Food Research and Technology 241:1 (2015), 1–14.
20. Gwak, M.-J., Chung, S.-J., Kim, Y.J., Lim, C.S., Relative sweetness and sensory characteristics of bulk and intense sweeteners. Food Science and Biotechnology 21:3 (2012), 889–894.
21. Hanger, L., Lotz, A., Lepeniotis, S., Descriptive profiles of selected high intensity sweeteners (HIS), HIS blends, and sucrose. Journal of Food Science 61:2 (1996), 456–459.
22. Hayashi, N., Iida, T., Yamada, T., Okuma, K., Takehara, I., Yamamoto, T., Tokuda, M., Study on the postprandial blood glucose suppression effect of D-psicose in borderline diabetes and the safety of long-term ingestion by normal human subjects. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 74:3 (2010), 510–519.
23. Holub, I., Gostner, A., Theis, S., Nosek, L., Kudlich, T., Melcher, R., Scheppach, W., Novel findings on the metabolic effects of the low glycaemic carbohydrate isomaltulose (Palatinose™). British Journal of Nutrition 103:12 (2010), 1730–1737.
24. Iida, T., Kishimoto, Y., Yoshikawa, Y., Hayashi, N., Okuma, K., Tohi, M., Izumori, K., Acute D-psicose administration decreases the glycemic responses to an oral maltodextrin tolerance test in normal adults. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 54:6 (2008), 511–514.
25. ISO, Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms. 1988, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
26. Ketelsen, S., Keay, C., Wiet, S., Time-intensity parameters of selected carbohydrate and high potency sweeteners. Journal of Food Science 58:6 (1993), 1418–1421.
27. Kim, M.-J., Yoo, S.-H., Jung, S., Park, M.-K., Hong, J.-H., Relative sweetness, sweetness quality, and temporal profile of xylooligosaccharides and luo han guo (Siraitia grosvenorii) extract. Food Science and Biotechnology 24:3 (2015), 965–973.
28. King, B.M., Arents, P., Duineveld, C., A comparison of aspartame and sucrose with respect to carryover effects in yogurt. Food Quality and Preference 14:1 (2003), 75–81.
29. Kuhn, C., Bufe, B., Winnig, M., Hofmann, T., Frank, O., Behrens, M., Meyerhof, W., Bitter taste receptors for saccharin and acesulfame K. Journal of Neuroscience 24:45 (2004), 10260–10265.
30. Lawless, H.T., Theoretical note: Tests of synergy in sweetener mixtures. Chemical Senses 23:4 (1998), 447–451.
31. Lawless, H.T., Heymann, H., Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices. 2010, Science 1 Business Media, New York, NY: Springer.
32. Lawless, H.T., Skinner, E.Z., The duration and perceived intensity of sucrose taste. Perception & Psychophysics 25:3 (1979), 180–184.
33. Lê, K.-A., Robin, F., Roger, O., Sugar replacers: From technological challenges to consequences on health. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 19:4 (2016), 310–315.
34. Lee, W. III, Pangborn, M., Time-intensity: The temporal aspects of sensory perception. Food Technology (USA). 40:11 (1986), 71–78.
35. Livesey, G., Tolerance of low-digestible carbohydrates: A general view. British Journal of Nutrition 85:S1 (2001), S7–S16.
36. Marks, L.E., The role of attention in chemosensation. Food Quality and Preference 14:2 (2003), 147–155.
37. McMahon, K.M., Culver, C., Castura, J.C., Ross, C.F., Perception of carbonation in sparkling wines using descriptive analysis (DA) and temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA). Food Quality and Preference 59 (2017), 14–26.
38. Meyners, M., Castura, J.C., The analysis of temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA) data. Food Quality and Preference 67 (2018), 67–76, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.003.
39. Moskowitz, H.R., Ratio scales of sugar sweetness. Perception & Psychophysics 7:5 (1970), 315–320, 10.3758/bf03210175.
40. Naim, M., Nir, S., Spielman, A., Noble, A., Peri, I., Rodin, S., Samuelov-Zubare, M., Hypothesis of receptor-dependent and receptor-independent mechanisms for bitter and sweet taste transduction: Implications for slow taste onset and lingering aftertaste. Paper presented at the ACS symposium series, 2002.
41. Ott, D., Edwards, C., Palmer, S., Perceived taste intensity and duration of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in water using time-intensity (T-I) evaluations. Journal of Food Science 56:2 (1991), 535–542.
42. Palazzo, A., Bolini, H.M.A., Multiple time-intensity analysis: Sweetness, bitterness, chocolate flavor and melting rate of chocolate with sucralose, rebaudioside and neotame. Journal of Sensory Studies 29:1 (2014), 21–32.
43. Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., Köster, E., Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference 20:6 (2009), 450–455.
44. Portmann, M.-O., Kilcast, D., Descriptive profiles of synergistic mixtures of bulk and intense sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 9:4 (1998), 221–229.
45. R core team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2018, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria https://www.R-project.org/.
46. Reinbach, H.C., Giacalone, D., Ribeiro, L.M., Bredie, W.L., Frøst, M.B., Comparison of three sensory profiling methods based on consumer perception: CATA, CATA with intensity and napping®. Food Quality and Preference 32 (2014), 160–166.
47. Reis, R.C., Minim, V.P., Bolini, H.M., Dias, B.R., Minim, L.A., Ceresino, E.B., Sweetness equivalence of different sweeteners in strawberry-flavored yogurt. Journal of Food Quality 34:3 (2011), 163–170.
48. Reyes, M., Castura, J., Hayes, J., Characterizing dynamic sensory properties of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners with temporal check-all-that-apply. Journal of Sensory Studies, 32(3), 2017.
49. Rocha, I.F.d.O., Bolini, H.M.A., Passion fruit juice with different sweeteners: Sensory profile by descriptive analysis and acceptance. Food Science & Nutrition 3:2 (2015), 129–139.
50. Running, C.A., Hayes, J.E., Sip and spit or sip and swallow: Choice of method differentially alters taste intensity estimates across stimuli. Physiology & Behavior 181 (2017), 95–99.
51. Schiffman, S.S., Booth, B.J., Losee, M.L., Pecore, S.D., Warwick, Z.S., Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration. Brain Research Bulletin 36:5 (1995), 505–513.
52. Schiffman, S.S., Pecore, S.D., Booth, B.J., Losee, M.L., Carr, B.T., Sattely-Miller, E., Warwick, Z.S., Adaptation of sweeteners in water and in tannic acid solutions. Physiology & Behavior 55:3 (1994), 547–559.
53. Schiffman, S.S., Sattely-Miller, E.A., Bishay, I.E., Time to maximum sweetness intensity of binary and ternary blends of sweeteners. Food Quality and Preference 18:2 (2007), 405–415.
54. Swartz, M., Sensory screening of synthetic sweeteners using time-intensity evaluations. Journal of Food Science 45:3 (1980), 577–581.
55. Sylvetsky, A.C., Rother, K.I., Trends in the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners. Physiology & Behavior 164 (2016), 446–450.
56. Temple, E.C., Laing, D.G., Hutchinson, I., Jinks, A.L., Temporal perception of sweetness by adults and children using computerized time—Intensity measures. Chemical Senses 27:8 (2002), 729–737.
57. Tunaley, A., Thomson, D., McEwan, J., Determination of equi-sweet concentrations of nine sweeteners using a relative rating technique. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 22:6 (1987), 627–635.
58. Ventura, E.E., Davis, J.N., Goran, M.I., Sugar content of popular sweetened beverages based on objective laboratory analysis: Focus on fructose content. Obesity 19:4 (2011), 868–874.
59. von Rymon Lipinski, G.-W., The new intense sweetener acesulfame K. Food Chemistry 16:3–4 (1985), 259–269.
60. Wee, M., Tan, V., Forde, C., A comparison of psychophysical dose-response behaviour across 16 sweeteners. Nutrients, 10(11), 2018, 1632.
61. Wiet, S.G., Beyts, P.K., Sensory characteristics of sucralose and other high intensity sweeteners. Journal of Food Science 57:4 (1992), 1014–1019.
62. Yoshida, M.-a., A microcomputer (PC 9801/MS mouse) system to record and analyze time-intensity curves of sweetness. Chemical Senses 11:1 (1986), 105–118.
63. Zumbe, A., Lee, A., Storey, D., Polyols in confectionery: The route to sugar-free, reduced sugar and reduced calorie confectionery. British Journal of Nutrition 85:S1 (2001), S31–S45.