Sugar replacers: From technological challenges to consequences on health

Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 310-315

  Lê, Kim Anne ^a   Robin, Frédéric ^a   Roger, Olivier ^a  

^a NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Functionality in food product; Metabolic health; Nutritional properties; Sugar replacers; Sweeteners

Indexed keywords

OLIGOSACCHARIDE; SUGAR; SUGAR ALCOHOL; SWEETENING AGENT; NONNUTRITIVE SWEETENER; NUTRITIVE SWEETENER;

DIETARY FIBER; FLAVOR; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; REVIEW; SWEETNESS; DIET THERAPY; DISORDERS OF CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD PREFERENCE; OBESITY; TASTE; THERAPEUTIC USE; TRENDS;

DIETARY FIBER; FOOD PREFERENCES; FOOD TECHNOLOGY; GLUCOSE METABOLISM DISORDERS; HUMANS; NON-NUTRITIVE SWEETENERS; NUTRITIVE SWEETENERS; OVERWEIGHT; TASTE;

EID: 84966699022     PISSN: 13631950     EISSN: 14736519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000288     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. WHO, Sugars intake for adults and children-Guideline. 2015.
2. SACN. Carbohydrates and Health. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutriastion; 2015.
3. Excellent and exhaustive systematic review on the health effect of sugars, complex carbohydrates, and fibres.
4. Philippe RN, De Mey M, Anderson J, Ajikumar PK. Biotechnological production of natural zero-calorie sweeteners. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2014; 26:155-161.
5. ANSES, Evaluation des benefices et des risques nutritionnels des edulcor-∗ ants intenses. Agence Nationale de Securite Sanitaire Alimentation, Environnement, Travail; Edition Scientifique, 2015. Very good systematic review on the health effects of HIS; report in French.
6. Rogers PJ, Hogenkamp PS, de Graaf C, et al. Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies. Int J Obes (Lond) 2016; 40:381-394.
7. Li J, Cai T, Mannava N, et al. Sweetener enhancers and methods for using the same 2015.
8. Grembecka M. Sugar alcohols-their role in the modern world of sweeteners: a review. Eur Food Res Technol 2015; 241:1-14.
9. Respondek F, Hilpipre C, Chauveau P, et al. Digestive tolerance and post-prandial glycaemic and insulinaemic responses after consumption of dairy desserts containing maltitol and fructo-oligosaccharides in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; 68:575-580.
10. Nagata Y, Kanasaki A, Tamaru S, Tanaka K. D-psicose, an epimer of D-fructose, favorably alters lipid metabolism in Sprague-Dawley rats. J Agric Food Chem 2015; 63:3168-3176.
11. Itoh K, Mizuno S, Hama S, et al. Beneficial effects of supplementation of the rare sugar 'D-allulose' against hepatic steatosis and severe obesity in Lep(ob)/Lep(ob) mice. J Food Sci 2015; 80:H1619-H1626.
12. Campbell MD, Walker M, Trenell MI, et al. A low-glycemic index meal and bedtime snack prevents postprandial hyperglycemia and associated rises in inflammatory markers, providing protection from early but not late nocturnal hypoglycemia following evening exercise in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014; 37:1845-1853.
13. Keyhani-Nejad F, Irmler M, Isken F, et al. Nutritional strategy to prevent fatty liver and insulin resistance independent of obesity by reducing glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide responses in mice. Diabetologia 2015; 58:374-383.
14. InterAct C. Dietary fibre and incidence of type 2 diabetes in eight European countries: the EPIC-InterAct Study and a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetologia 2015; 58:1394-1408.
15. Hofman DL, Van Buul VJ, Brouns FJ. Nutrition, health, and regulatory aspects of digestible maltodextrins. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2015. (in press).