The role of attention in chemosensation

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 147-155

  Marks, Lawrence E ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Chemosensory; Flavor; Olfaction; Taste

Indexed keywords

CITRIC ACID; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUCROSE;

ARTICLE; CHEMOSENSITIVITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FLAVOR; HUMAN; NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMETRY; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SENSE ORGAN; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SWEETNESS; TASTE DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 0037349883     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00076-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dai, H., Scharf, B., & Buus, S. (1991). Effective attenuation of signals in noise under focused attention. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2839-2842.
2. Frank, R. A., & Byram, J. (1988). Taste-smell interactions are tastant and odorant dependent. Chemical Senses, 13, 445-455.
3. Frank, R. A., van de Klaauw, N. J., & Schifferstein, H. N. (1993). Both perceptual and conceptual factors influence taste-odor and taste-taste interactions. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 343-354.
4. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
5. Greenberg, G. Z., & Larkin, W. D. (1968). Frequency-response characteristics of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: the probe-signal technique. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1513-1523.
6. Jinks, A., & Laing, D. G. (1999). A limit in the processing of components in odour mixtures. Perception, 28, 395-404.
7. Kinnamon, S. C., & Cummings, T. A. (1992). Chemosensory transduction mechanisms in taste. Annual Review of Physiology, 54, 715-731.
8. Kuznicki, J. T., Hayward, M., & Schultz, J. (1983). Perceptual processing of taste quality. Chemical Senses, 7, 273-292.
9. Kuznicki, J. T., & Turner, L. S. (1986). Reaction time in the perceptual processing of taste quality. Chemical Senses, 11, 183-201.
10. Laing, D. G., & Glemarec, A. (1992). Selective attention and the perceptual analysis of odor mixtures. Physiology and Behavior, 52, 1047-1053.
11. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattention blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Marks, L. E., & Wheeler, E. (1998). Attention and the detectability of weak taste stimuli. Chemical Senses, 19, 23-29.
13. Pashler, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Patterson, R. D. (1974). Auditory filter shape. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 802-809.
15. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
16. Rabin, M. D., & Cain, W. S. (1989). Attention and learning in the perception of odor mixtures. In D. G. Laing, W. S. Cain, R. W. McBride, & B. W. Ache (Eds.), Perception of complex smells and tastes (pp. 173-188). New York: Academic Press.
17. Rankin, K. M., & Marks, L. E. (2000). Chemosensory context effects: role of perceived similarity and neural commonality. Chemical Senses, 25, 747-759.
18. Rushton, W. A. H. (1972). Review lecture. Pigments and signals in color vision. Journal of Physiology, 220, 1-31 P.
19. Scharf, B., Quigley, S., Aoki, C., Peachey, N., & Reeves, A. (1991). Focused auditory attention and frequency selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 215-223.
20. Spence, C., Kettenmann, B., Kobal, G., & McGlone, F. P. (2000). Selective attention to the chemosensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1265-1271.
21. Wundt, W. (1908). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie (Principles of physiological psychology)-1911. Leipzig: Engelmann.