A comparison of psychophysical dose-response behaviour across 16 sweeteners

Nutrients

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2018, Pages

  Wee, May ^a   Tan, Vicki ^a   Forde, Ciarán ^a,b  

^a AGENCY FOR SCIENCE   (Singapore)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Psychophysical dose response; Sugar reduction; Sweeteners; Sweetness growth rate; Sweetness potency

Indexed keywords

FRUCTOSE; MALTITOL; PALATINOSE; POLYOL; PSICOSE; SUCRALOSE; SWEETENING AGENT; XYLITOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BODY MASS; DISEASE ASSESSMENT; DOSE RESPONSE; EC50; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICAL SCALING; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SWEETNESS; TEMPERATURE; TRAINING; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85056129469     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20726643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/nu10111632     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Drewnowski, A.; Mennella, J.A.; Johnson, S.L.; Bellisle, F. Sweetness and Food Preference–3. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 1142S–1148S. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Malik, V.S.; Popkin, B.M.; Bray, G.A.; Després, J.-P.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 2477–2483. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Malik, V.S.; Schulze, M.B.; Hu, F.B. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: A systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 84, 274–288. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Gibson, S.; Ashwell, M.; Arthur, J.; Bagley, L.; Lennox, A.; Rogers, P.J.; Stanner, S. What can the food and drink industry do to help achieve the 5% free sugars goal? Perspect. Public Health 2017, 137, 237–247. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Phua, R. In HPB Aims to Cut Singaporeans’ Sugar Intake by a Quarter. Available online: https://www. channelnewsasia.com/news/health/hpb-aims-to-cut-singaporeans-sugar-intake-by-a-quarter-9931662 (accessed on 3 August 2018).
6. Raben, A.; Richelsen, B. Artificial sweeteners: A place in the field of functional foods? Focus on obesity and related metabolic disorders. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2012, 15, 597–604. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Rogers, P.; Hogenkamp, P.; De Graaf, C.; Higgs, S.; Lluch, A.; Ness, A.; Penfold, C.; Perry, R.; Putz, P.; Yeomans, M. Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies. Int. J. Obes. 2016, 40, 381–394. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. Glendinning, J.I. Oral post-oral actions of low-calorie sweeteners: A tale of contradictions and controversies. Obesity 2018, 26, S9–S17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Lease, H.; Hendrie, G.A.; Poelman, A.A.; Delahunty, C.; Cox, D.N. A sensory-diet database: A tool to characterise the sensory qualities of diets. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 49, 20–32. [CrossRef]
10. Van Langeveld, A.W.; Gibbons, S.; Koelliker, Y.; Civille, G.V.; de Vries, J.H.; de Graaf, C.; Mars, M. The relationship between taste and nutrient content in commercially available foods from the United States. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 57, 1–7. [CrossRef]
11. Sylvetsky, A.C.; Rother, K.I. Trends in the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners. Physiol. Behav. 2016, 164, 446–450. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Hayashi, N.; Iida, T.; Yamada, T.; Okuma, K.; Takehara, I.; Yamamoto, T.; Yamada, K.; Tokuda, M. Study on the postprandial blood glucose suppression effect of D-psicose in borderline diabetes and the safety of long-term ingestion by normal human subjects. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 510–519. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Holub, I.; Gostner, A.; Theis, S.; Nosek, L.; Kudlich, T.; Melcher, R.; Scheppach, W. Novel findings on the metabolic effects of the low glycaemic carbohydrate isomaltulose (Palatinose™). Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 103, 1730–1737. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Iida, T.; Kishimoto, Y.; Yoshikawa, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Okuma, K.; Tohi, M.; Yagi, K.; Matsuo, T.; Izumori, K. Acute D-psicose administration decreases the glycemic responses to an oral maltodextrin tolerance test in normal adults. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 2008, 54, 511–514. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Grembecka, M. Sugar alcohols—Their role in the modern world of sweeteners: A review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 241, 1–14. [CrossRef]
16. Livesey, G. Tolerance of low-digestible carbohydrates: A general view. Br. J. Nutr. 2001, 85, S7–S16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Zumbe, A.; Lee, A.; Storey, D. Polyols in confectionery: The route to sugar-free, reduced sugar and reduced calorie confectionery. Br. J. Nutr. 2001, 85, S31–S45. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Moskowitz, H.R. Ratio scales of sugar sweetness. Percept. Psychophys. 1970, 7, 315–320. [CrossRef]
19. Wiet, S.G.; Beyts, P.K. Sensory characteristics of sucralose and other high intensity sweeteners. J. Food Sci. 1992, 57, 1014–1019. [CrossRef]
20. Cardello, H.; Da Silva, M.; Damasio, M. Measurement of the relative sweetness of stevia extract, aspartame and cyclamate/saccharin blend as compared to sucrose at different concentrations. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1999, 54, 119–129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. DuBois, G.E.; Walters, D.E.; Schiffman, S.S.; Warwick, Z.S.; Booth, B.J.; Pecore, S.D.; Gibes, K.; Carr, B.T.; Brands, L.M. Concentration-response relationships of sweeteners: A systematic study. ACS Symp. Ser. 1991, 450, 261–276.
22. Bartoshuk, L.M.; Duffy, V.B.; Green, B.G.; Hoffman, H.J.; Ko, C.W.; Lucchina, L.A.; Marks, L.E.; Snyder, D.J.; Weiffenbach, J.M. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: The gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiol. Behav. 2004, 82, 109–114. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Antenucci, R.G.; Hayes, J.E. Nonnutritive sweeteners are not supernormal stimuli. Int. J. Obes. 2015, 39, 254–259. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Fujimaru, T.; Park, J.H.; Lim, J. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, S323–S328. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Low, J.; McBride, R.; Lacy, K.; Keast, R. Psychophysical evaluation of sweetness functions across multiple sweeteners. Chem. Senses 2017, 42, 111–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. International Organization for Standardization. Sensory Analysis: General Guidance for The Design of Test Nutrients Rooms; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1988.
27. Kim, M.-J.; Yoo, S.-H.; Jung, S.; Park, M.-K.; Hong, J.-H. Relative sweetness, sweetness quality, and temporal profile of xylooligosaccharides and luo han guo (Siraitia grosvenorii) extract. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 24, 965–973. [CrossRef]
28. Portmann, M.O.; Birch, G. Sweet taste and solution properties of _, _-trehalose. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1995, 69, 275–281. [CrossRef]
29. Green, B.G.; Dalton, P.; Cowart, B.; Shaffer, G.; Rankin, K.; Higgins, J. Evaluating the ‘Labeled Magnitude Scale’ for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem. Senses 1996, 21, 323–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Hayes, J.E.; Allen, A.L.; Bennett, S.M. Direct comparison of the generalized visual analog scale (gVAS) and general labeled magnitude scale (gLMS). Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 36–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. Delwiche, J.F.; Buletic, Z.; Breslin, P.A. Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals. Physiol. Behav. 2001, 74, 329–337. [CrossRef]
32. Li, X.; Staszewski, L.; Xu, H.; Durick, K.; Zoller, M.; Adler, E. Human receptors for sweet and umami taste. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4692–4696. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Xu, H.; Staszewski, L.; Tang, H.; Adler, E.; Zoller, M.; Li, X. Different functional roles of T1R subunits in the heteromeric taste receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 14258–14263. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Ventura, E.E.; Davis, J.N.; Goran, M.I. Sugar content of popular sweetened beverages based on objective laboratory analysis: Focus on fructose content. Obesity 2011, 19, 868–874. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Frijters, J.E.; de Graaf, C. The equiratio taste mixture model successfully predicts the sensory response to the sweetness intensity of complex mixtures of sugars and sugar alcohols. Perception 1987, 16, 615–628. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Graaf, C.D.; Frijters, J.E. Sweetness intensity of a binary sugar mixture lies between intensities of its components, when each is tasted alone and at the same total molarity as the mixture. Chem. Senses 1987, 12, 113–129. [CrossRef]
37. Lawless, H.T. Laboratory Exercises for Sensory Evaluation, 1st ed.; Springer: Manhattan, NY, USA, 2012.
38. Moskowitz, H.R. The sweetness and pleasantness of sugars. Am. J. Psychol. 1971, 84, 387–405. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Yamaguchi, S.; Yoshikawa, T.; Ikeda, S.; Ninomiya, T. Studies on the taste of some sweet substances: Part I. Measurement of the relative sweetness part II. Interrelationships among them. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1970, 34, 181–197. [CrossRef]
40. Schiffman, S.S.; Booth, B.J.; Losee, M.L.; Pecore, S.D.; Warwick, Z.S. Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration. Brain Res. Bull. 1995, 36, 505–513. [CrossRef]
41. Prescott, J.; Ripandelli, N.; Wakeling, I. Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium tasters and super-tasters. Chem. Senses 2001, 26, 993–1003. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Lawless, H.T.; Horne, J.; Spiers,W. Contrast and range effects for category, magnitude and labeled magnitude scales in judgements of sweetness intensity. Chem. Senses 2000, 25, 85–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. DuBois, G.E. Molecular mechanism of sweetness sensation. Physiol. Behav. 2016, 164, 453–463. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Świa̧der, K.; Waszkiewicz‐Robak, B.; Świderski, F.; Kostyra, E. Sensory properties of some synthetic highintensity sweeteners in water solutions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 2030–2038
45. Tunaley, A.; Thomson, D.; McEwan, J. Determination of equi‐sweet concentrations of nine sweeteners using a relative rating technique. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1987, 22, 627–635.
46. Reyes, M.; Castura, J.; Hayes, J. Characterizing dynamic sensory properties of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners with temporal check-all-that-apply. J. Sens. Stud. 2017, 32. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Clemens, R.A.; Jones, J.M.; Kern, M.; Lee, S.Y.; Mayhew, E.J.; Slavin, J.L.; Zivanovic, S. Functionality of sugars in foods and health. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2016, 15, 433–470. [CrossRef]
48. Cadena, R.S.; Bolini, H.M.A. Ideal and relative sweetness of high intensity sweeteners in mango nectar. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 991–996. [CrossRef]
49. Miele, N.A.; Cabisidan, E.K.; Plaza, A.G.; Masi, P.; Cavella, S.; Di Monaco, R. Carbohydrate sweetener reduction in beverages through the use of high potency sweeteners: Trends and new perspectives from a sensory point of view. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 64, 87–93. [CrossRef]