Nonnutritive sweeteners are not supernormal stimuli

International Journal of Obesity

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 254-259

  Antenucci, R G ^a   Hayes, J E ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACESULFAME; AGAVE NECTAR; ASPARTAME; MAPLE SYRUP; NONNUTRITIVE SWEETENER; NUTRITIVE SWEETENER; REBAUDIOSIDE A; SUCRALOSE; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ARTICLE; BITTER TASTE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SENSATION; SWEETNESS; TASTE; PENNSYLVANIA; PHYSIOLOGY; TASTE ACUITY;

ACER; AGAVE;

HUMANS; NON-NUTRITIVE SWEETENERS; NUTRITIVE SWEETENERS; PENNSYLVANIA; TASTE; TASTE PERCEPTION; TASTE THRESHOLD;

EID: 84922664757     PISSN: 03070565     EISSN: 14765497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2014.109     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Beauchamp GK, Mennella JA. Flavor perception in human infants: development and functional significance. Digestion 2011; 83: 1-6.
2. National Research Council (US). Food Protection Committee. The safety of artificial sweeteners for use in foods, a report: Washington, 1955.
3. Mattes RD, Popkin BM. Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89: 1-14.
4. Sylvetsky AC, Welsh JA, Brown RJ, Vos MB. Low-calorie sweetener consumption is increasing in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 96: 640-646.
5. Swithers SE. Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2013; 24: 431-441.
6. Zhao L, Tepper BJ. Perception and acceptance of selected high-intensity sweeteners and blends in model soft drinks by propylthiouracil (PROP) non-tasters and super-tasters. Food Qual Prefer 2007; 18: 531-540.
7. Hutchinson SA, Ho GS, Ho CT. Stability and degradation of the high-intensity sweeteners: Aspartame, alitame, and sucralose. Food Rev Int 1999; 15: 249-261.
8. Shankar P, Ahuja S, Sriram K. Non-nutritive sweeteners: Review and update. Nutrition 2013; 29: 1293-1299.
9. Pereira MA, Odegaard AO. Artificially Sweetened Beverages - Do They Influence Cardiometabolic Risk? Curr Atheroscler Rep 2013; 15: 1-6.
10. Tinbergen N, Perdeck AC. On the stimulus situation releasing the begging response in the newly hatched herring gull chick (Larus argentatus argentatus Pont.). Behaviour 1950; 1-39.
11. Ludwig DS. Artificially sweetened beverages: cause for concern. JAMA 2009; 302: 2477-2478.
12. Bloomgarden ZT. Nonnutritive sweeteners, fructose, and other aspects of diet. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: e46-e51.
13. Alpert B, Farris P. The Sugar Detox: Lose Weight, Feel Great, and Look Years Younger. Da Capo Press: Boston, MA, 2013.
14. McNeil Nutritionals LLC. Splenda Products FAQs 2013, http://www.splenda.com/faq/no-calorie-sweetener.
15. Paulus K, Braun M. Sweetening Capacity and Taste Profile of Sweeteners. Ernahrungs-Umschau 1988; 35: 384.
16. DuBois GE, Walters DE, Schiffman SS, Warwick ZS, Booth BJ, Pecore SD et al. Concentration-Response Relationships of Sweeteners. In: Sweeteners vol. 450. American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1991, pp 261-276.
17. Vigues S, Dotson C, Munger S. The receptor basis of sweet taste in mammals. In: Chemosensory Systems in Mammals, Fishes, and Insects. Springer, 2009, pp 20-23.
18. Cadena RS, Bolini HMA. Ideal and relative sweetness of high intensity sweeteners in mango nectar. Int J Food Sci Technol 2012; 47: 991-996.
19. Souza VR, Pereira PA, Pinheiro ACM, Bolini H, Borges SV, Queiroz F. Analysis of various sweeteners in low-sugar mixed fruit jam: equivalent sweetness, time-intensity analysis and acceptance test. Int J Food Sci Technol 2013; 48: 1541-1548.
20. Moskowitz HR. The sweetness and pleasantness of sugars. Am J Psychol 1971; 387-405.
21. Snyder DJ, Prescott J, Bartoshuk LM. Modern psychophysics and the assessment of human oral sensation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 63: 221-241.
22. Snyder D, Fast K. Valid comparisons of suprathreshold sensations. J Conscious Stud 2004; 11: 7-8.
23. Sartor F, Donaldson LF, Markland DA, Loveday H, Jackson MJ, Kubis HP. Taste perception and implicit attitude toward sweet index and soft drink supplementation. Appetite 2011; 57: 237-246.
24. Thai PK, Tan EC, Tan WL, Tey TH, Kaur H, Say YH. Sweetness intensity perception and pleasantness ratings of sucrose, aspartame solutions and cola among multi-ethnic Malaysian subjects. Food Qual Prefer 2011; 22: 281-289.
25. Green BG, Lim J, Osterhoff F, Blacher K, Nachtigal D. Taste mixture interactions: suppression, additivity, and the predominance of sweetness. Physiol Behav 2010; 101: 731-737.
26. Hayes JE, Allen AL, Bennett SM. Direct comparison of the generalized Visual Analog Scale (gVAS) and general Labeled Magnitude Scale (gLMS). Food Qual Prefer 2013; 28: 36-44.
27. Kamerud JK, Delwiche JF. Individual differences in perceived bitterness predict liking of sweeteners. Chem Senses 2007; 32: 803-810.
28. Murray JM, Delahunty CM, Baxter IA. Descriptive sensory analysis: past, present and future. Food Res Int 2001; 34: 461-471.
29. Hootman RC (ed). Manual on descriptive analysis testing for sensory evaluation. ASTM: Philadelphia, PA, 1992.
30. Green BG, Shaffer GS, Gilmore MM. Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chem Senses 1993; 18: 683-702.
31. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Fast K, Green BG, Prutkin J, Snyder DJ. Labeled scales (eg, category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Qual Prefer 2003; 14: 125-138.
32. Riera CE, Vogel H, Simon SA, le Coutre J. Artificial sweeteners and salts producing a metallic taste sensation activate TRPV1 receptors. Am J Physiol 2007; 293: R626-R634.
33. Allen AL, McGeary JE, Knopik VS, Hayes JE. Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31. Chem Senses 2013; 38: 379-389.
34. Frank RA, Ducheny K, Mize SJS. Strawberry Odor, but Not Red Color, Enhances the Sweetness of Sucrose Solutions. Chem. Senses 1989; 14: 371-377.
35. Schifferstein HN, Verlegh PW. The role of congruency and pleasantness in odor-induced taste enhancement. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1996; 94: 87-105.
36. Bartoshuk LM, Klee HJ. Better Fruits and Vegetables through Sensory Analysis. Curr Biol 2013; 23: R374-R378.
37. Taga A, Kodama S. Analysis of Reducing Carbohydrates and Fructosyl Saccharides in Maple Syrup and Maple Sugar by CE. Chromatographia 2012; 75: 1009-1016.
38. Willems JL, Low NH. Major carbohydrate, polyol, and oligosaccharide profiles of agave syrup. Application of this data to authenticity analysis. J Agric Food Chem 2012; 60: 8745-8754.
39. Lawless HT. Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1979; 93: 538.
40. Frijters JER. Critical Analysis of Odor Unit Number and Its Use. Chem Sens Flav 1978; 3: 227-233.
41. Hayes JE. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Sweetness. Chemosens Percept 2008; 1: 48-57.
42. Lichtenstein P. The relative sweetness of sugars: sucrose and dextrose. J Exp Psychol 1948; 38: 578.
43. Allen AL, McGeary JE, Hayes JE, Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside D. Bitterness do not Covary with Acesulfame-K Bitterness or Polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31. Chemosens Percept 2013; 6: 109-117.
44. Schiffman SS, Booth BJ, Losee ML, Pecore SD, Warwick ZS. Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration. Brain Res Bull 1995; 36: 505-513.
45. Hellfritsch C, Brockhoff A, Stähler F, Meyerhof W, Hofmann T. Human psychometric and taste receptor responses to steviol glycosides. J Agric Food Chem 2012; 60: 6782-6793.
46. Schiffman SS, Booth BJ, Losee ML, Pecore SD, Warwick ZS. Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration. Brain Res Bull 1995; 36: 505-513.
47. Larson-Powers N, Pangborn RM. Paired Comparison and Time-Intensity Measurements of Sensory Properties of Beverages and Gelatins Containing Sucrose or Synthetic Sweeteners. J Food Sci 1978; 43: 41-46.
48. Mazur RH. Discovery of aspartame. Aspartame: Physiology and biochemistry 1984; 3-9.
49. Fujimaru T, Park JH, Lim J. Sensory Characteristics and Relative Sweetness of Tagatose and Other Sweeteners. J Food Sci 2012; 77: S323-S328.
50. Stone H, Oliver SM. Measurement of the relative sweetness of selected sweeteners and sweetener mixtures. J Food Sci 1969; 34: 215-222.
51. McBride RL. Category scales of sweetness are consistent with sweetness-matching data. Percept Psychophys 1983; 34: 175-179.
52. MacLeod S. A construction and attempted validation of sensory sweetness scales. J Exp Psychol 1952; 44: 316.
53. Fry JC, Yurttas N, Biermann KL, Lindley MG, Goulson MJ. The Sweetness Concentration-Response of R,R-Monatin, a Naturally Occurring High-Potency Sweetener. J Food Sci 2012; 77: S362-S364.
54. Fitch C, Keim KS. Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112: 739-758.
55. Schiffman SS. Rationale for Further Medical and Health Research on High-Potency Sweeteners. Chem Senses 2012; 37: 671-679.
56. Dotson CD, Vigues S, Steinle NI, T1R Munger SD. and T2R receptors: the modulation of incretin hormones and potential targets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2010; 11: 447.
57. Fowler SP, Williams K, Resendez RG, Hunt KJ, Hazuda HP, Stern MP. Fueling the obesity epidemic? Artificially sweetened beverage use and long-term weight gain. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 1894-1900.
58. Peters JC, Wyatt HR, Foster GD, Pan Z, Wojtanowski AC, Vander Veur SS et al. The effects of water and non-nutritive sweetened beverages on weight loss during a 12-week weight loss treatment program. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014; 22: 1415-1421.