A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment

Higher Education Research and Development

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 453-467

  Adachi, Chie ^a   Tai, Joanna ^a   Dawson, Phillip ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

assessment design; empirical research; framework; Peer assessment; practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034850669     PISSN: 07294360     EISSN: 14698366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1405913     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adachi, C., Tai, J., & Dawson, P., (2016). Enabler or inhibitor? Educational technology in self and peer assessment. Paper presented at the Proceeding of Ascilite 2016 Show Me The Learning, Adelaide, Australia.
2. Adachi, C., Tai, J. H.-M., & Dawson, P., (2017). Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 3, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1339775
3. Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E., (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the assessment design decisions framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 545–556. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217
4. Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D., (2016). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 672–682. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12439
5. Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. S.-K., (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D., (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
7. Boud, D., & Molloy, E., (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
8. Boud, D., & Soler, R., (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
9. Boud, D., & Tyree, A., (1980). Self and peer assessment in professional education: A preliminary study in law. Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, New Series, 15, 65–74.
10. Carless, D., (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 79–89. doi: 10.1080/02602930801895786
11. Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., & Lam, J., (2011). Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 395–407. doi: 10.1080/03075071003642449
12. Carnell, B., (2015). Aiming for autonomy: Formative peer assessment in a final-year undergraduate course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 1269–1283. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1077196
13. Dawson, P., (2014). Beyond a definition: Toward a framework for designing and specifying mentoring models. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 137–145. doi: 10.3102/0013189X14528751
14. Dawson, P., (2015). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42, 347–360. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
15. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D., (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. doi: 10.1080/03075079912331379935
16. Eid, M. I., & Al-Jabri, I. M., (2016). Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students. Computers & Education, 99, 14–27. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.007
17. Falchikov, N., (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Programmed Learning, 32(2), 175–187.
18. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J., (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. doi: 10.3102/00346543070003287
19. Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G., (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 135–176. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954
20. Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P., (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 137–155. doi: 10.1080/02602930903221444
21. Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S., (2010). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 143–162. doi: 10.1080/01411920902894070
22. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G., (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students’ views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53–70. doi: 10.1080/07294360123776
23. Joughin, G., (2009). Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education: A critical review. In G. Joughin (Ed.), Assessment, learning and judgement in higher education (pp. 13–27). Dordrecht: Springer.
24. Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., … Klemmer, S. R., (2015). Peer and self assessment in massive online classes. In H., Plattner, C., Meinel, & L., Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 131–168). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
25. Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K., (2015). Peer assessment in the digital age: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 254–264.
26. Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D., (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290. doi: 10.1080/13562510600680582
27. Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A., (2014). Facts are more important than novelty: Replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43, 304–316. doi: 10.3102/0013189X14545513
28. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C., (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
29. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W., (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. In D., Laveault & L., Allal (Ed.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenges of implementation (pp. 311–326). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
30. Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W., (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(4), 195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
31. Reinholz, D., (2016). The assessment cycle: A model for learning through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 301–315. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982
32. Russell, A. A., (2004). Calibrated peer review–A writing and critical-thinking instructional tool. In M. Druger, E. D. Siebert, & L. W. Crow (Eds.), Teaching tips: Innovations in undergraduate science instruction (pp. 54–55). Arlington, VA: NSTA press.
33. Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., Leeman, J., & Crandell, J. L., (2012). Mapping the mixed methods–Mixed research synthesis terrain. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 317–331. doi: 10.1177/1558689811427913
34. Snowball, J. D., & Mostert, M., (2013). Dancing with the devil: Formative peer assessment and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 646–659. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2012.705262
35. Spencer, D., Riddle, M., & Knewstubb, B., (2012). Curriculum mapping to embed graduate capabilities. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(2), 217–231. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2011.554387
36. Tai, J. H.-M., Canny, B. J., Haines, T. P., & Molloy, E. K., (2016). The role of peer-assisted learning in building evaluative judgement: Opportunities in clinical medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(3), 659–676. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0
37. Topping, K., (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. doi: 10.3102/00346543068003249
38. Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A., (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(03), 341–356. doi: 10.1080/03075070600680836
39. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C.-C., (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27–44. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
40. Wilson, M. J., Diao, M. M., & Huang, L., (2015). ‘I’m not here to learn how to mark someone else’s stuff’: An investigation of an online peer-to-peer review workshop tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 15–32. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.881980