-
1
-
-
27944469338
-
-
Assessment Reform Group. 2002. “Assessment for Learning:10 Principles.” http://cdn.aaia.org.uk/content/uploads/2010/06/Assessment-for-Learning-10-principles.pdf.
-
(2002)
Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles
-
-
-
2
-
-
0004075459
-
-
Sydney: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia
-
D.Boud, 1986. Implementing Student Self-assessment. Sydney:Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.
-
(1986)
Implementing Student Self-assessment
-
-
Boud, D.1
-
4
-
-
3042835441
-
Using Classroom Communication Systems to Support Interaction and Discussion in Large Class Settings
-
J.Boyle, and D.Nicol. 2003. “Using Classroom Communication Systems to Support Interaction and Discussion in Large Class Settings.” Association for Learning Technology Journal 11 (3):43–57. doi:10.3402/rlt.v11i3.11284.
-
(2003)
Association for Learning Technology Journal
, vol.11
, Issue.3
, pp. 43-57
-
-
Boyle, J.1
Nicol, D.2
-
5
-
-
0003304689
-
Towards Autonomous Assessment: Using Self-assessment and Peer Assessment
-
Brown S., Glasner A., (eds), Buckingham: Open University Press
-
A.Brew, 1999. “Towards Autonomous Assessment:Using Self-assessment and Peer Assessment.” In Assessment Matters in Higher Education:Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches, edited by S.Brown and A.Glasner, 159–171. Buckingham:Open University Press.
-
(1999)
Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches
, pp. 159-171
-
-
Brew, A.1
-
9
-
-
0346728653
-
The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review
-
F.Dochy, M.Segers, and D.Sluijsmans. 1999. “The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education:A Review.” Studies in Higher Education 24 (3):331–350. doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935.
-
(1999)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.24
, Issue.3
, pp. 331-350
-
-
Dochy, F.1
Segers, M.2
Sluijsmans, D.3
-
10
-
-
84990963059
-
-
University of Essex
-
Education Enhancement Unit. n.d., “Peer and Self Assessment in Student Work.” University of Essex. http://admin.exeter.ac.uk/academic/tls/tqa/Part%205/5Dpeerassess1.pdf.
-
Peer and Self Assessment in Student Work
-
-
-
11
-
-
77955764789
-
Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments
-
N.Falchikov, 1986. “Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 11 (2):146–166. doi:10.1080/0260293860110206.
-
(1986)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.11
, Issue.2
, pp. 146-166
-
-
Falchikov, N.1
-
12
-
-
21844500642
-
Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment
-
N.Falchikov, 1995. “Peer Feedback Marking:Developing Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Training International 32 (2):175–187. doi:10.1080/1355800950320212.
-
(1995)
Innovations in Education and Training International
, vol.32
, Issue.2
, pp. 175-187
-
-
Falchikov, N.1
-
14
-
-
0034562333
-
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
-
N.Falchikov, and J.Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education:A Meta-analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3):287–322. doi:10.3102/00346543070003287.
-
(2000)
Review of Educational Research
, vol.70
, Issue.3
, pp. 287-322
-
-
Falchikov, N.1
Goldfinch, J.2
-
15
-
-
84857659974
-
Computer-assisted and Peer Assessment: A Combined Approach to Assessing First Year Laboratory Practical Classes for Large Numbers of Students
-
G.Ferguson, E.Sheader, and R.Grady. 2008. “Computer-assisted and Peer Assessment:A Combined Approach to Assessing First Year Laboratory Practical Classes for Large Numbers of Students.” Bioscience Education E-Journal 11:11–14. doi:10.3108/beej.11.4.
-
(2008)
Bioscience Education E-Journal
, vol.11
, pp. 11-14
-
-
Ferguson, G.1
Sheader, E.2
Grady, R.3
-
16
-
-
0001523593
-
Implementation and Evaluation of Peer Marking in Higher Education
-
S.Fry, 1990. “Implementation and Evaluation of Peer Marking in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 15 (3):177–189. doi:10.1080/0260293900150301.
-
(1990)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.15
, Issue.3
, pp. 177-189
-
-
Fry, S.1
-
17
-
-
84917176308
-
How Assessment Frames Student Learning
-
Bryan C., Clegg K., (eds), London: Routledge
-
G.Gibbs, 2006. “How Assessment Frames Student Learning.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C.Bryan and K.Clegg, 23–36. London:Routledge.
-
(2006)
Innovative Assessment in Higher Education
, pp. 23-36
-
-
Gibbs, G.1
-
18
-
-
84990957771
-
-
Paper Presented at the Ninth Australasian Computing Education Conference, Victoria, Australia: February
-
J.Hamer, C.Kell and F.Spence. 2007. “Peer Assessment using Aropä.” Paper Presented at the Ninth Australasian Computing Education Conference, Victoria, Australia, February.
-
(2007)
Peer Assessment using Aropä
-
-
Hamer, J.1
Kell, C.2
Spence, F.3
-
19
-
-
0002689016
-
Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students’ views
-
S.Hanrahan, and G.Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment:The Students’ views.” Higher Education Research and Development 20 (1):53–70. doi:10.1080/07294360123776.
-
(2001)
Higher Education Research and Development
, vol.20
, Issue.1
, pp. 53-70
-
-
Hanrahan, S.1
Isaacs, G.2
-
22
-
-
84990896142
-
The Supervision of Undergraduate Research Students: Expectations of Student and Supervisor
-
S.Jamieson, and C.Gray. 2006. “The Supervision of Undergraduate Research Students:Expectations of Student and Supervisor.” Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 1 (1):37–59. http://www.pestlhe.org.uk/index.php/pestlhe/article/view/9/18.
-
(2006)
Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
, vol.1
, Issue.1
, pp. 37-59
-
-
Jamieson, S.1
Gray, C.2
-
24
-
-
84874917919
-
Peer-assessment as a Process for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Learning in Design Disciplines
-
A.Karandinou, 2012. “Peer-assessment as a Process for Enhancing Critical Thinking and Learning in Design Disciplines.” CEBE Transactions 9 (1):53–67. doi:10.11120/tran.2012.09010053.
-
(2012)
CEBE Transactions
, vol.9
, Issue.1
, pp. 53-67
-
-
Karandinou, A.1
-
27
-
-
84860179144
-
Supporting Diverse Students: Developing Learner Autonomy via Assessment
-
Bryan C., Clegg K., (eds), London: Routledge
-
L.McDowell, K.Sambell, and A.Sambell. 2006. “Supporting Diverse Students:Developing Learner Autonomy via Assessment.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C.Bryan and K.Clegg, 158–168. London:Routledge.
-
(2006)
Innovative Assessment in Higher Education
, pp. 158-168
-
-
McDowell, L.1
Sambell, K.2
Sambell, A.3
-
28
-
-
22544435100
-
Alternative Forms of Formative and Summative Assessment
-
Houston J., Whigham D., (eds), Bristol: University of Bristol
-
N.Miller, 2011. “Alternative Forms of Formative and Summative Assessment.” In The Handbook for Economics Lecturers, edited by J.Houston and D.Whigham. Bristol:University of Bristol. http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/assessment/.
-
(2011)
The Handbook for Economics Lecturers
-
-
Miller, N.1
-
29
-
-
84990962985
-
-
Proceedings of the 2005 13th International Symposium Improving Students Learning, London, UK: Oxford: Alden Press
-
J.Mills, C.Glover, and V.Stevens. 2006. “Using Assessment within Course Structures to Drive Student Engagement with the Learning Process.” In Proceedings of the 2005 13th International Symposium Improving Students Learning, London, UK, September 5–7, 358–367. Oxford:Alden Press.
-
(2006)
Using Assessment within Course Structures to Drive Student Engagement with the Learning Process
, pp. 358-367
-
-
Mills, J.1
Glover, C.2
Stevens, V.3
-
30
-
-
33748957131
-
Peer Assessment: Report of a project Involving Group Presentations and Assessment by Peers
-
Brown S., (ed), Birmingham, AL: Staff Education Development Association
-
C.Mindham, 1998. “Peer Assessment:Report of a project Involving Group Presentations and Assessment by Peers.” In Peer Assessment in Practice, edited by S.Brown, 45–66. Birmingham, AL:Staff Education Development Association.
-
(1998)
Peer Assessment in Practice
, pp. 45-66
-
-
Mindham, C.1
-
32
-
-
33645227268
-
Formative Assessment and Self‐regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice
-
D.Nicol, and D.Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self‐regulated Learning:A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2):199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
-
(2006)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.31
, Issue.2
, pp. 199-218
-
-
Nicol, D.1
Macfarlane-Dick, D.2
-
33
-
-
84990959867
-
Can Students Assess Themselves and their Peers? – A Five Year Study
-
A.Nortcliffe, 2012. “Can Students Assess Themselves and their Peers? – A Five Year Study.” Student Engagement and Experience Journal 1 (2):1–17. doi:10.7190/seej.v1i2.29.
-
(2012)
Student Engagement and Experience Journal
, vol.1
, Issue.2
, pp. 1-17
-
-
Nortcliffe, A.1
-
34
-
-
79952304131
-
Self- and Peer-assessment: Guidance on Practice in the Biosciences
-
Leeds: Higher Education Academy Centre for Biosciences
-
P.Orsmond, 2004. “Self- and Peer-assessment:Guidance on Practice in the Biosciences.” Teaching Biosciences:Enhancing Learning Series, edited by S.Maw, J.Wilson and H.Sears. Leeds:Higher Education Academy Centre for Biosciences.
-
(2004)
Teaching Biosciences: Enhancing Learning Series
-
-
Orsmond, P.1
Maw, S.2
Wilson, J.3
Sears, H.4
-
35
-
-
0036588154
-
Research Training and Supervision Development
-
M.Pearson, and A.Brew. 2002. “Research Training and Supervision Development.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (2):135–150. doi:10.1080/03075070220119986.
-
(2002)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.27
, Issue.2
, pp. 135-150
-
-
Pearson, M.1
Brew, A.2
-
36
-
-
55049097489
-
Improving Performance Through Enhancing Student Understanding of Criteria and Feedback
-
Bryan C., Clegg K., (eds), London: Routledge
-
M.Price, and B.O’Donovan. 2006. “Improving Performance Through Enhancing Student Understanding of Criteria and Feedback.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C.Bryan and K.Clegg, 100–109. London:Routledge.
-
(2006)
Innovative Assessment in Higher Education
, pp. 100-109
-
-
Price, M.1
O’Donovan, B.2
-
38
-
-
0032285568
-
Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities
-
K.Topping, 1998. “Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68:249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.
-
(1998)
Review of Educational Research
, vol.68
, pp. 249-276
-
-
Topping, K.1
-
39
-
-
84872418720
-
The Architecture of Peer Assessment: Do Academically Successful Students Make Good Teammates in Design Assignments?
-
R.Tucker, 2013. “The Architecture of Peer Assessment:Do Academically Successful Students Make Good Teammates in Design Assignments?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (1):74–84. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.604122.
-
(2013)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.38
, Issue.1
, pp. 74-84
-
-
Tucker, R.1
-
41
-
-
84868305808
-
Peer Assessment as a Method of Improving Student Engagement
-
D.Weaver, and A.Esposto. 2012. “Peer Assessment as a Method of Improving Student Engagement.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (7):805–816. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.576309.
-
(2012)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.37
, Issue.7
, pp. 805-816
-
-
Weaver, D.1
Esposto, A.2
-
42
-
-
47649111924
-
Students Assessing Student: Case Studies on Peer Assessment
-
C.P.Wheater, C Philip, A.M.LanganA. Mark, and P.Dunleavy. 2005. “Students Assessing Student:Case Studies on Peer Assessment.” Planet 15:13–15. doi:10.11120/plan.2005.00150013.
-
(2005)
Planet
, vol.15
, pp. 13-15
-
-
Wheater, C.P.1
Langan, A.M.2
Dunleavy, P.3
|