The assessment cycle: a model for learning through peer assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 301-315

  Reinholz, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

formative assessment; peer assessment; peer evaluation; peer learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955175297     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. V.Aleven,, A.Ogan, O.Popescu, C.Torrey, and K.Koedinger. 2004. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Tutorial Dialogue System for Self-explanation.” In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, edited by J.C. Lester, R.M.Vicari, and F.Paraguaçu, Vol. 3220, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 443–454. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_42.
2. H.L.Andrade, 2010. “Students as the Definitive Source of Formative Assessment: Academic Self-assessment and the Self-regulation of Learning.” NERA Conference Proceedings 2010. Paper 25. Rocky Hill, CT.
3. H.L.Andrade,, and A.Valtcheva. 2009. “Promoting Learning and Achievement through Self-Assessment.” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 12–19.
4. P.Black,, C.Harrison, and C.Lee. 2003. Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
5. P.Black,, and D.Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
6. P.Black,, and D.Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
7. M.Boekaerts,, and L.Corno. 2005. “Self-regulation in the Classroom: A Perspective on Assessment and Intervention.” Applied Psychology 54 (2): 199–231.10.1111/apps.2005.54.issue-2
8. R.Butler, 1988. “Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: The Effects of Task-involving and Ego-involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 58 (1): 1–14.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
9. D.L.Butler,, and P.H.Winne. 1995. “Feedback and Self-regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–281.10.3102/00346543065003245
10. M.T.H.Chi,, N.De Leeuw, M.H.Chiu, and C.LaVancher. 1994. “Eliciting Self-explanations Improves Understanding.” Cognitive Science 18 (3): 439–477. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(94)90016-7.
11. P.Cobb,, J.Confrey, A.DiSessa, R.Lehrer, and L.Schauble. 2003. “Design Experiments in Educational Research.” Educational Researcher 32 (1): 9–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001009.
12. F.Dochy,, M.Segers, and D.Sluijsmans. 1999. “The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education 24 (3): 331–350. doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935.
13. J.Dunlosky,, and A.Lipko. 2007. “Metacomprehension: A Brief History and How to Improve Its Accuracy.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 16 (4): 228–232.10.1111/cdir.2007.16.issue-4
14. D.Dunning,, C.Heath, and J.M.Suls. 2004. “Flawed Self-assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5 (3): 69–106. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x.
15. N.Falchikov, 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. New York: Routledge.
16. N.Falchikov,, and J.Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3): 287–322.10.3102/00346543070003287
17. H.Featherstone,, S.Crespo, L.M.Jilk, J.A.Oslund, A.N.Parks, and M.B.Wood. 2011. Smarter Together! Collaboration and Equity in the Elementary Math Classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
18. J.Hattie,, and H.Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
19. D.Kahneman, 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
20. A.Y.Kolb,, and D.A.Kolb. 2012. “Experiential Learning Theory.” In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, edited by N.M.Seel, 1215–1219. Dordrecht: Springer.
21. I.Kollar,, and F.Fischer. 2010. “Peer Assessment as Collaborative Learning: A Cognitive Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 344–348.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005
22. T.Lombrozo, 2006. “The Structure and Function of Explanations.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (10): 464–470. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004.
23. H.Min, 2006. “The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (2): 118–141.10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
24. C.M.Mueller,, and C.S.Dweck. 1998. “Praise for Intelligence Can Undermine Children's Motivation and Performance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1): 33–52.10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
25. D.J.Nicol,, and D.Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self‐regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
26. E.Panadero,, and M.Romero. 2014. “To Rubric or Not to Rubric? The Effects of Self-assessment on Self-regulation, Performance and Self-efficacy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 21 (2): 133–148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872.
27. E.Panadero,, and J.Alonso-Tapia. 2013. “Self-assessment: Theoretical and Practical Connotations. When It Happens, How is It Acquired and What to Do to Develop It in Our Students.” Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 11 (2): 551–576.10.14204/ejrep
28. C.Patton, 2012. “‘Some Kind of Weird, Evil Experiment’: Student Perceptions of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (6): 719–731.
29. N.J.Pelaez, 2002. “Problem-based Writing with Peer Review Improves Academic Performance in Physiology.” Advances in Physiology Education 26 (3): 174–184.
30. M.Pulman, 2009. “Seeing Yourself as Others See You: Developing Personal Attributes in the Group Rehearsal.” British Journal of Music Education 26 (2): 117–135.10.1017/S0265051709008390
31. D.L.Reinholz, 2013. “PAR for the Course: Developing Mathematical Authority.” Paper Presented at the Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Denver, CO, February 21–23.
32. D.L.Reinholz, Forthcoming. “Peer-assisted Reflection: A Design-based Intervention for Improving Success in Calculus.” Manuscript under review.
33. TM.” The American Biology Teacher 63 (7): 474–480.
34. R.D.Roscoe,, and M.T.H.Chi. 2007. “Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-building and Knowledge-telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions.” Review of Educational Research 77 (4): 534–574.10.3102/0034654307309920
35. D.R.Sadler, 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
36. P.M.Sadler,, and E.Good. 2006. “The Impact of Self- and Peer-grading on Student Learning.” Educational Assessment 11 (1): 1–31.10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
37. A.H.Schoenfeld, 1985. Mathematical Problem Solving. New York: Academy Press.
38. A.H.Schoenfeld, 1987. “What’s All the Fuss about Metacognition?” In Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, edited by A.H. Schoenfeld, 189–215. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. A.H.Schoenfeld, 1991. “What’s All the Fuss about Problem Solving.” ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education 91 (1): 4–8.
40. V.J.Shute, 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795.
41. H.Smith,, A.Cooper, and L.Lancaster. 2002. “Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 39 (1): 71–81.10.1080/13558000110102904
42. L.A.J.Stefani, 1998. “Assessment in Partnership with Learners.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23 (4): 339–350.
43. M.Swan, 2006. Collaborative Learning in Mathematics: A Challenge to Our Beliefs and Practices. London: National Institute for Adult and Continuing Education (NIACE) for the National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy (NRDC).
44. K.J.Topping, 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276.10.3102/00346543068003249
45. K.J.Topping, 2003. “Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility.” Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, edited by M.Segers, F. Dochy, and E.Cascallar, Vol. 1, Innovation and Change in Professional Education, 55–87. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4.10.1007/0-306-48125-1
46. K.J.Topping, 2009. “Peer Assessment.” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 20–27.10.1080/00405840802577569
47. University of California. 2012. “Calibrated Peer Review: Web-based Writing and Peer Review.” http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu/Overview.aspx.
48. M.J.Wilson,, M.M.Diao, and L.Huang. 2015. “‘I’m Not Here to Learn How to Mark Someone Else’s Stuff’: An Investigation of an Online Peer-to-Peer Review Workshop Tool.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (1): 15–32. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.881980.
49. R.M.F.Wong,, M.J.Lawson, and J.Keeves. 2002. “The Effects of Self-explanation Training on Students’ Problem Solving in High-school Mathematics.” Learning and Instruction 12 (2): 233–262.10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00027-5
50. R.Yucel,, F.L.Bird, J.Young, and T.Blanksby. 2014. “The Road to Self-assessment: Exemplar Marking before Peer Review Develops First-year Students’ Capacity to Judge the Quality of a Scientific Report.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (8): 971–986. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.880400.
51. B.J.Zimmerman, 2002. “Becoming a Self-regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41 (2): 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.